Monuments of modernism as a defined resource of architectural heritage in the context of post-war facilities protection

Maciej Czarnecki


Faculty of Architecture, Warsaw University of Technology (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-3593

Abstract

Modern movement in architecture of the twentieth century image diverse in terms of trends and tendencies and also consistent in terms of characteristics and evaluation criteria. So assumption is aimed at:
– Separation of the main directions of modernism with an emphasis on diversity of forms and spatial systems;
– Demonstrate common features ideological, artistic, stylish – allow for a holistic treatment of Modernism as a movement with the characteristics of the architectural style.
These assumptions should be regarded as crucial to the prospects for the protection of post-war modernist architecture. Many pre-war buildings listed in the register of monuments and in the municipal records for. Numerous studies over the interwar modernism facilitate assessment of the value, to determine the characteristics and restoration of this architecture.
Most of the realization of being an example of post-war modernism is not protected, functioning in the collective consciousness as objects too contemporary to treat them as historical monuments. Their ideological characteristics, formal, functional and technological – are not often used in so far classification and valuation of objects recommended for protection.
The article is an attempt to summarize the objects typical of selected trends of the inter-war period realizations depicting post-war trends of modern architecture in order to show that modernism was a movement that should be treated holistically as stylistically consistent, time-limited period of twentieth century architecture.


Keywords:

architecture, modernism, heritage, monuments, preservation

Bieniecki Z., Potrzeba i drogi ochrony obiektów architektury najnowszej, „Ochrona Zabytków”, R. XXII, 1969 nr 2.
  Google Scholar

Lewicki J., O początkach klasyfikacji zabytków. O wadach i zaletach polskich systemów wartościowania zabytków, [w:] B. Szmygin (red.), Ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego. Klasyfikacja i kategoryzacja w systemie ochrony zabytków, Warszawa 2016.
  Google Scholar

Schulz S., Schulz C. G., Das Hansaviertel. Ikone der Moderne, Berlin 2008.
  Google Scholar

The Olivetti Showroom, (red.) Dal Co Francesco, Dina Lucia Borromeo, 2011.
  Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 23 lipca 2003 r. o ochronie zabytków i opiece nad zabytkami.
  Google Scholar

Witwicki M. T., Kryteria oceny wartości zabytkowej obiektów architektury jako podstawa wpisu do rejestru zabytków, „Ochrona Zabytków”, R. LX, 2007 nr 1.
  Google Scholar

http://docomomo-us.org/programs/awards (dostęp: 9.03.2017).
  Google Scholar

http://flwright.org/ (dostęp: 9.03.2017).
  Google Scholar

http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/445 (dostęp: 10.03.2017).
  Google Scholar

http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/5249/ (dostęp: 9.03.2017).
  Google Scholar


Published
2017-03-21

Cited by

Czarnecki, M. (2017). Monuments of modernism as a defined resource of architectural heritage in the context of post-war facilities protection. Protection of Cultural Heritage, (3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.24358/ODK_2017_03_13

Authors

Maciej Czarnecki 

Faculty of Architecture, Warsaw University of Technology Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7992-3593

dr inż. architekt, adiunkt na Wydziale Architektury Politechniki Warszawskiej. Kieruje
Pracownią Architektury i Sztuki Współczesnej działającą w ramach Zakładu Dziedzictwa
Architektonicznego i Sztuki na WAPW. Badania z zakresu polskiej architektury powojennej, ze
szczególnym uwzględnieniem realizacji po 1956 r. Zainteresowania zawodowe: architektura XX
wieku, problemy ochrony powojennego modernizmu, architektura najnowsza.



Statistics

Abstract views: 242
PDF downloads: 243