Sensory garden in the school area
Margot Dudkiewicz
margotdudkiewicz@o2.plDepartment of Landscape Architecture Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-6192
Patryk Krupiński
Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)
Magdalena Stefanek
Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)
Marcin Iwanek
Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-1101
Abstract
School gardens play a huge role in learning about nature by children and young people. Lessons conducted in the open air surrounded by greenery develop the natural interests of students who can observe individual stages of plant development and change of seasons. In school gardens, classes in biological and chemical subjects, art, music, Polish and English can be conducted. The study presents a study of a selected case – a concept of land development at the Primary School in Stasin (Lubelskie Voivodeship) changing the current school environment into a sensory garden. The new project will meet the diverse needs of children, allow them to develop properly mental and physical, and allow teachers to conduct creative classes. The project created zones of the senses, dividing them into the zone of sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste. In addition, a representative zone in front of the building, an educational, sport and recreation zone were distinguished. Consistency of the whole assumption is provided by attractive plantings and unified small architecture.
Supporting Agencies
Keywords:
school garden, sensory garden, child, Stasin Konopnica communeReferences
Bańka A. 2002. Społeczna psychologia środowiskowa. WN Scholar, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Choi Y. A., Son K. C. 2000. Development and effect of horticultural therapy program for children. Horticultural therapy for disabled person and children. Korean Horticultural Therapie Association, Seo – Won Books, Seul, Korea.
Google Scholar
Dąbski M., Dudkiewicz M. 2010. Przystosowanie ogrodu dla niewidomego użytkownika na przykładzie ogrodów sensorycznych w Bolestraszycach, Bucharzewie i Powsinie. Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych PAN oddz. w Lublinie 6: 7−17.
Google Scholar
Dudkiewicz M., Pudelska K., Parzymies M., Durlak W. 2018. Rola hortiterapii i bukieciarstwa w leczeniu dzieci i dorosłych. Kosmos 4:813−821.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36921/kos.2018_2418
Google Scholar
Etherington N. 2015. Gadrening of children with Autism spectrum Disorders and Special Educational Needs, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
Google Scholar
Frątczak E., Frątczak J. 1991. Kącik przyrody w wychowaniu przedszkolnym, Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa.
Google Scholar
Gehl J. 2013. Życie między budynkami. Użytkowanie przestrzeni publicznych. Wydawnictwo RAM, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Klichowska A. 2013. Architektura i funkcje ogrodu przedszkolnego w opiniach nauczycieli. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Majdecki L. 2008. Historia ogrodów. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa
Google Scholar
Nowak J. 2003. Rośliny ozdobne – możliwości rozwoju produkcji i oddziaływania na jakość życia. Folia Hortic. Suppl. 1: 29−31.
Google Scholar
Pawłowska K. 2008. Ogród sensoryczny. Politechnika Krakowska, Instytut Architektury Krajobrazu, Kraków.
Google Scholar
Połucha I., Kruba M. 2012. Możliwości edukacji w przestrzeni ogrodowej. Olsztyn.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.2508
Google Scholar
Relf P.D. 1981. Therapy and rehabilitation through horticulture. Chronica Horticulturae 21(1): 1−2.
Google Scholar
Relf P.D. 1992. Human issue in horticulture. Hort Technology 2(2): 159−171.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.2.2.159
Google Scholar
Sobczyńska K. 2014. Zieleń jako element współczesnego miasta i jej rola w przestrzeniach publicznych Poznania, Poznań.
Google Scholar
Waliczek T. M., Zajiczek J.M. 1999. Kindergarden: Using computer technology to discover the benefits of children’s gardening, Towards a new millenium in people – plant relationships. Univ.Technol., Sydney, Australia.
Google Scholar
Wilson E. O. 1993. Biophilia and the conservative ethic. The biophilia hypothesis, Washington D.C., Island Press, USA.
Google Scholar
Authors
Margot Dudkiewiczmargotdudkiewicz@o2.pl
Department of Landscape Architecture Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-6192
Authors
Patryk KrupińskiDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland
Authors
Magdalena StefanekDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland
Authors
Marcin IwanekDepartment of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-1101
Statistics
Abstract views: 322PDF downloads: 289
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
