Sensory garden in the school area

Margot Dudkiewicz

margotdudkiewicz@o2.pl
Department of Landscape Architecture Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-6192

Patryk Krupiński


Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)

Magdalena Stefanek


Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)

Marcin Iwanek


Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-1101

Abstract

School gardens play a huge role in learning about nature by children and young people. Lessons conducted in the open air surrounded by greenery develop the natural interests of students who can observe individual stages of plant development and change of seasons. In school gardens, classes in biological and chemical subjects, art, music, Polish and English can be conducted. The study presents a study of a selected case – a concept of land development at the Primary School in Stasin (Lubelskie Voivodeship) changing the current school environment into a sensory garden. The new project will meet the diverse needs of children, allow them to develop properly mental and physical, and allow teachers to conduct creative classes. The project created zones of the senses, dividing them into the zone of sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste. In addition, a representative zone in front of the building, an educational, sport and recreation zone were distinguished. Consistency of the whole assumption is provided by attractive plantings and unified small architecture.

Supporting Agencies

środki własne Katedry Architektury Krajobrazu UP w Lublinie /, The study was performed by the research yourself received from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for Department of Landscape Architecture at the University of Life Sciences in Lublin

Keywords:

school garden, sensory garden, child, Stasin Konopnica commune

Bańka A. 2002. Społeczna psychologia środowiskowa. WN Scholar, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Choi Y. A., Son K. C. 2000. Development and effect of horticultural therapy program for children. Horticultural therapy for disabled person and children. Korean Horticultural Therapie Association, Seo – Won Books, Seul, Korea.
  Google Scholar

Dąbski M., Dudkiewicz M. 2010. Przystosowanie ogrodu dla niewidomego użytkownika na przykładzie ogrodów sensorycznych w Bolestraszycach, Bucharzewie i Powsinie. Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych PAN oddz. w Lublinie 6: 7−17.
  Google Scholar

Dudkiewicz M., Pudelska K., Parzymies M., Durlak W. 2018. Rola hortiterapii i bukieciarstwa w leczeniu dzieci i dorosłych. Kosmos 4:813−821.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36921/kos.2018_2418   Google Scholar

Etherington N. 2015. Gadrening of children with Autism spectrum Disorders and Special Educational Needs, Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
  Google Scholar

Frątczak E., Frątczak J. 1991. Kącik przyrody w wychowaniu przedszkolnym, Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne, Warszawa.
  Google Scholar

Gehl J. 2013. Życie między budynkami. Użytkowanie przestrzeni publicznych. Wydawnictwo RAM, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Klichowska A. 2013. Architektura i funkcje ogrodu przedszkolnego w opiniach nauczycieli. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mic­kiewicza w Poznaniu, Poznań.
  Google Scholar

Majdecki L. 2008. Historia ogrodów. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa
  Google Scholar

Nowak J. 2003. Rośliny ozdobne – możliwości rozwoju produkcji i oddziaływania na jakość życia. Folia Hortic. Suppl. 1: 29−31.
  Google Scholar

Pawłowska K. 2008. Ogród sensoryczny. Politechnika Krakowska, Instytut Architektury Krajobrazu, Kraków.
  Google Scholar

Połucha I., Kruba M. 2012. Możliwości edukacji w przestrzeni ogrodowej. Olsztyn.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.2508   Google Scholar

Relf P.D. 1981. Therapy and rehabilitation through horticulture. Chronica Horticulturae 21(1): 1−2.
  Google Scholar

Relf P.D. 1992. Human issue in horticulture. Hort Technology 2(2): 159−171.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.2.2.159   Google Scholar

Sobczyńska K. 2014. Zieleń jako element współczesnego miasta i jej rola w przestrzeniach publicznych Poznania, Poznań.
  Google Scholar

Waliczek T. M., Zajiczek J.M. 1999. Kindergarden: Using computer technology to discover the benefits of children’s gardening, Towards a new millenium in people – plant relationships. Univ.Technol., Sydney, Australia.
  Google Scholar

Wilson E. O. 1993. Biophilia and the conservative ethic. The biophilia hypothesis, Washington D.C., Island Press, USA.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2020-03-31

Cited by

Dudkiewicz, M., Krupiński, P., Stefanek, M., & Iwanek, M. (2020). Sensory garden in the school area. Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki I Studiów Krajobrazowych, 16(1), 87–93. https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.713

Authors

Margot Dudkiewicz 
margotdudkiewicz@o2.pl
Department of Landscape Architecture Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-6192

Authors

Patryk Krupiński 

Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland

Authors

Magdalena Stefanek 

Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland

Authors

Marcin Iwanek 

Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, University of Life Sciences in Lublin Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-1101

Statistics

Abstract views: 318
PDF downloads: 286