Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
Open-plan office research has paid considerable attention to physical comfort, interaction, and collaboration. Far less is known about how spatial configuration affects privacy in specific cultural settings. This study addresses that question through a case study of an Algerian company in Oran, where a layout developed by a foreign partner was later altered by local management. The research used a quantitative correlational design. A Building-In-Use (BIU)-based questionnaire was completed by 109 employees across 14 offices, and the same spaces were analysed using the space syntax measures of integration, control, entropy, and choice. Spearman's coefficients showed negative associations between privacy satisfaction and integration, control, and choice, but a positive association with entropy (r = 0.722, p < 0.001). A descriptive comparison of one office in its original and modified forms found a lower maximum integration value and a slightly higher maximum entropy value after modification. In this case, more differentiated layouts with less exposure were associated with better perceived privacy. Our contribution integrates a sociocultural perspective on user privacy into the space syntax analysis of Algerian open-plan offices. The results remain specific to one company, and the concentration of users within the same offices limits both generalisation and causal claims.
[1] Sundstrom E., Herbert R., Brown D., Privacy and communication in an open-plan office: A case study, Environment and Behavior 14(3) (1982) 379‑392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916582143007
[2] Oldham G.R., Rotchford N.L., Relationships between office characteristics and employee reactions: A study of the physical environment, Administrative Science Quarterly 28(14) (1983) 542-556,. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393008
[3] Sundstrom E.D., Burt R.E., Kamp D., Privacy at work: Architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance, Academy of Management Journal 23(1) (1980) 101-117. https://doi.org/10.5465/255498
[4] Sundstrom E., Sundstrom M.G., Work Places: The Psychology of the Physical Environment in Offices and Factories. New York, Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[5] Rashid A.M., Zimring C., On Psychosocial Constructs and Office Settings: A Review of the Empirical Literature, In: Proceedings of the Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA) 35 Conference Vancouver Vancouver; 2005.
[6] Kim J., de Dear R., Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices, Journal of Environmental Psychology 36 (2013) 18-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.007
[7] Allen T.J., Fustfeld A.R., Research Laboratory Architecture and the Structuring of Communications, R&D Management 2(15) (1975) 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1975.tb01230.x
[8] Becker F.D., Work Space: Creating Environments in Organizations. New York, Praeger Publishers Inc, 1981.
[9] Pfeffer J., Organizations and Organization Theory. Cambridge MA: Ballinger; 1982.
[10] Hillier B., Space Is the Machine. A Configurational Theory of Architecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
[11] Fischer G.N., Vischer J.C., L'évaluation des environnements de travail: la méthode diagnostique. Bruxelles, De Boeck Université, 1998, 260.
[12] Duffy F., Design and facilities management in a time of change. Facilities 18 (2000) 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770010349592
[13] Sailer K., Penn A., Towards an architectural theory of space and organisations: cognitive, affective and conative relations in workplaces, In: 2nd Workshop on Architecture and Social Architecture, 2010 May 26-27, Brussels, Belgium. Brussels, EIASM, 2010.
[14] Price I., Lean Assets: New Language for New Workplaces. California Management Review 49(12) (2007) 102-18. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166385
[15] Rashid M, Wineman J., Zimring C., Space, Behavior,and environmental perception in open-plan offices: a prospective study. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36(13) (2009) 432-449,. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33034
[16] Seksaf M.E., Impact de la conception des fenêtres en milieu aride sur la perception et le comportement des usagers des espaces de bureau vis-à-vis de l’éclairage: étude exploratoire, cas de la ville de Biskra [mémoire de magister]. Biskra, Université Mohamed Khider, 2006.
[17] Belakehal A, Tabet Aoul K., Bennadji A., Natural versus artificial lighting use in an office building under clear sunny skies, In: Proceedings of the 33rd Passive and Low Energy Architecture International Conference (PLEA. 2017), Edinburg, UK, 2017, NCEUB vol. 2, 3143-3150.
[18] Mezerdi T, Balakehal A., Benndji A., Evaluation of the luminous and thermal comfort in a’transparent’office space with single and double-glazing under a sunny clear sky, Journal of Applied Engineering Science and Technology 3(12) (2018) 97-103. https://doi.org/10.69717/jaest.v3.i2.70
[19] Benammar A., Anouche K., LesgaaH., Cherif Y.H., Open-plan office post-occupancy evaluation: inquiring Algerian gender specificity, Facilities 12(136) (2018) 546-570. https://doi.org/10.1108/f-08-2017-0086
[20] Mustafa F.A., Hassan A.S., Baper S.Y., Using space syntax analysis in detecting privacy: a comparative study of traditional and modern house layouts in Erbil city, Iraq, Asian Social Science 6(8) (2010) 157-166. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n8p157
[21] Alalouch C., Aspinall P., Spatial attributes of hospital multi-bed wards and preferences for privacy, Facilities 25(9-10) (2007) 345-362. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770710772450
[22] Hong Y.K., Yoo U.S., Workspace visibility graph analysis (VGA) for concentration privacy and group relations in the open-plan office environment, Architectural Research 12(1) (2010) 9-14. https://doi.org/10.5659/AIKAR.2010.12.1.9
[23] Sailer K., Koutsolampros P., Pachilova R., Differential perceptions of teamwork, focused work and perceived productivity as an effect of desk characteristics within a workplace layout, PLoS One 16(4) (2021) e0250058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250058
[24] Güler G.Y., Demirkan H., Evaluating the relationship between visual privacy and work-process interactions in open-plan offices: a space syntax approach, Archnet-IJAR International Journal of Architectural Research 20(1) (2026) 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-03-2024-0123
[25] Baharetha S., Alhoutary I., Hassanain M.A., Ali M., Ezz M.S., Evaluating workplace performance through post-occupancy evaluation: a case study of open-plan office buildings in Saudi Arabia, Frontiers in Built Environment 12 (2026) 1726776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2026.1726776
[26] Fischer G.N., Vischer J., L’évaluation des environnements de travail: la méthode diagnostique. Bruxelles, Montréal, De Boeck Université, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 1997, 260.
[27] Duffy F., Design and facilities management in a time of change, Facilities 18(10/11/12) (2000) 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770010349592
[28] Kupritz V.W., The effects of physical design on routine work activities, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 20(2) (2003) 110–121.
[29] Sundstrom E., Herbert R.K., Brown D.W., Privacy and communication in an open-plan office: a case study, Environment and Behavior 14(3) (1982) 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916582143007
[30] Bodin Danielsson C, Bodin L. Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environ Behav. 2008;40(5):636-668. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507307459.
[31] Veitch J.A., Charles K.E., Farley K.M.J., Newsham G.R., A model of satisfaction with open-plan office conditions: COPE field findings, Journal of Environmental Psychology 27(3) (2007) 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.002
[32] Gath-Morad M., Egli S., Grübel J., Steemers K., Hölscher C., Aguilar L., Designing affective workplace environments: The impact of typology, contour, ceiling and partition height on cognitive and aesthetic appraisal, Building and Environment 265 (2024) 111928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111928
[33] Altman I., Privacy regulation: culturally universal or culturally specific?, Journal of Social Issues 33(3) (1977) 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01883.x
[34] Sundstrom E., Burt R.E., Kamp D., Privacy at work: architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance, Academy of Management Journal 23(1) (1980) 101–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/255498
[35] Hall E.T., The hidden dimension. Garden City (NY), Doubleday, 1966.
[36] Leino-Kilpi H., Välimäki M., Dassen T., Gasull M., Lemonidou C., Scott A., Arndt M., Privacy: a review of the literature, International Journal of Nursing Studies 38(6) (2001) 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00111-5
[37] Burgoon J.K., Privacy and communication, Communication Yearbook 6(1) (1982) 206–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1982.11678499
[38] Ding S., Users' privacy preferences in open plan offices, Facilities 26(9–10) (2008) 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632770810885751
[39] Vischer J.C., Building-in-use assessment: foundation of workspace psychology, Preiser W., Hardy A., Schramm U. (eds) Building Performance Evaluation, Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56862-1_10
[40] Vischer J.C., Environmental quality in offices. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1989, 250.
[41] Bae S., Martin C.S., The impact of measurable findings from pre- and post-occupancy evaluations of indoor environmental quality in the primary workspace, Buildings 13(10) (2023) 2486. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102486
[42] Hanson J., Hillier B., The architecture of community: some new proposals on the social consequences of architectural and planning decisions, Architecture & Behaviour 3(3) (1987) 251–273.
[43] Peponis J., Wineman J., Spatial structure of environment and behawior, In: Bechtel R.B., Churchman A., (eds.) Handbook of environmental psychology, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 2002, 271-291.
[44] Nourian P., Rezvani S., Sariyildiz S., Designing with space syntax: a configurative approach to architectural layout, proposing a computational methodology, In: Stouffs R., Sariyildiz S., (eds.) Computation and performance, Delft, Delft University of Technology, 2013, 357-365. https://doi.org/10.52842/conf.ecaade.2013.1.357
[45] Stokols D., On the distinction between density and crowding: some implications for future research, Psychological Review 79(3) (1972) 275–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0032706
[46] Sommer R., Personal space: the behavioral basis of design. Englewood Cliffs (NJ), Prentice-Hall, 1969, 177.
[47] Kim J., de Dear R., Workspace satisfaction: the privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices, Journal of Environmental Psychology 36 (2013) 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.007
[48] Sundstrom E., De Meuse K.P., Futrell D., Work teams: applications and effectiveness, American Psychologist 45(2) (1990) 120–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120
[49] Brand J.L., Smith T.J., Effects of reducing enclosure on perceptions of occupancy quality, job satisfaction, and job performance in open-plan offices, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 49(8) (2005) 582–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504900806
[50] Lee S.Y., Brand J.L., Effects of control over office workspace on perceptions of the work environment and work outcomes, Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(3) (2005) 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.001
[51] Rashid M., Wineman J., Zimring C., Space, behavior, and environmental perception in open-plan offices: a prospective study, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36(3) (2009) 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33034
[52] Altamimi S., Iranmanesh A., Denerel S.B., Exploring the spatial dimensions of social sustainability in the workplace through the lens of interior architects in Jordan, Buildings 13(6) (2023) 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13061448

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
