Development and analysis of power grid failure scenarios using ontology, power flow model, and knowledge graph
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026)
-
Efficient CNN-based classification of white blood cells: a comparative study of model performance
Achraf Benba, Sara Sandabad5-9
-
Automated skin cancer diagnosis using deep learning: a systematic review of state-of-the-art architectures, techniques and performance evaluation
Subaidabeevi Shafeena, Ramayyan Sumathy Vinod Kumar, Sikamony Sumathi Kumar, David Shahi10-20
-
Enhancing driver safety with ECG-based emotion recognition using BiLSTM networks
Raga Madhuri Chandra, Satya Sumanth Vanapalli, Giri Venkata Sai Tej Neelaiahgari21-28
-
An automated system for calibration table calculation of cylindrical horizontal tanks
Denis Proskurenko, Mykhailo Bezuglyi29-34
-
Control of water–diesel emulsion stability using turbidity measurements
Oleksandr Zabolotnyi, Andrii Khodieiev, Nicolay Koshevoy, Roman Trishch35-41
-
Improving the induction motor starting mode under a voltage drop conditions
Oleksandr Vovk, Serhii Halko, Andrii Sabo, Oleksandr Miroshnyk, Taras Shchur42-47
-
Modelling of dynamic modes in a DC motor for electric vehicle
Viktor Lyshuk, Anatolii Tkachuk, Sergiy Moroz, Mykola Yevsiuk, Mykola Khvyshchun, Stanislav Prystupa, Valentyn Zablotskyi48-55
-
Development and analysis of power grid failure scenarios using ontology, power flow model, and knowledge graph
Oleksandr Khomenko, Vyacheslav Senchenko, Oleksandr Koval, Iryna Husyeva56-61
-
Kinetics of grain material drying in installations with intermittent energy supply by microwave and infrared radiation
Roman Kalinichenko, Valentyna Bandura, Borys Kotov, Yurii Pantsyr, Ihor Garasymchuk, Serhii Stepanenko62-66
-
Smartphone shell temperature controller automatic tuning method
Danylo Zinchenko, Yurii Mariiash67-71
-
Using FPGA for modelling and generating chaotic processes
Oleksandr Osadchuk, Iaroslav Osadchuk, Valentyn Skoshchuk72-77
-
Simulation and electronic design of a chaotic 5d artificial neural network
Michael Kopp, Inna Samuilik78-83
-
Intelligent DL-SCH/PDSCH processing chain in 5G with adaptive HARQ mechanism
Juliy Boiko, Ilya Pyatin84-93
-
Exploring generative models for remote sensing: a comprehensive review
Gottapu Santosh Kumar, Gurugubelli Jagadeesh, Swarajya Madhuri Rayavarapu94-98
-
Ensemble noise-aided bit flipping decoding of low-density parity-check codes
Mykola Shtompel, Oleksandr Shefer99-103
-
Knowledge sharing in Independent Deep Q-Network
Viacheslav Bochok, Nataliia Fedorova104-108
-
Detection of humans in drone images using deep learning techniques
Sobhana Mummaneni, Naga Deepika Ginjupalli, Pragathi Dodda, Novaline Jacob, Sanjay Raj Emmanuel Katari109-115
-
Comparative analysis of DeepSORT, ByteTrack and StrongSORT algorithms for multi-object tracking in UAV-based video surveillance
Andrii Safonyk, Viktor Podvyshennyi, Oleksandr Naumchuk116-120
-
Highly efficient approaches to processing complex visual data in decision support systems
Oleksandr Poplavskyi, Sergii Pavlov, Oksana Bezsmernta, Iryna Gerasymova, Bakhyt Yeraliyeva121-125
-
Anti-aliasing method for second-order curves on a hexagonal raster
Oleksandr Melnyk, Tetiana Prysiazhniuk126-129
-
Method for assessing the risk of user compromise based on individual security profile
Svitlana Lehominova, Mykhailo Zaporozhchenko, Tetiana Kapeliushna, Yuriy Shchavinsky, Tetiana Muzhanova130-137
-
Positional coding method in differential wave space
Volodymyr Barannik, Anatolii Berchanov, Valeriy Barannik, Dmytro Uzlov, Mykola Dihtiar, Mykhailo Osovytskyi, Andrii Sushko, Yurii Babenko138-146
-
Web platform with Checkbox support: aspects of fiscal accounting, reporting, and interaction with tax authorities
Yuliia Povstiana, Lyudmila Samchuk, Ivan Kachula147-154
-
Comparative analysis of web development frameworks in PHP: Codeigniter, Cakephp and Yii
Karol Rak, Mariusz Dzieńkowski155-161
-
Crop price forecasting using a Temporal Fusion Transformer for Krishna district of Andhra Pradesh
Dedeepya Manikonda, Ashutosh Satapathy, Keerthi Padamata, Jaswanthi Machcha, J. Chandrakanta Badajena162-170
-
Model of packet transmission of text data using SDR in the GNU Radio Companion environment
Nurbol Kaliaskarov, Kyrmyzy Taissariyeva, Nurlykhan Raulyev, Akezhan Sabibolda171-176
-
Modelling of a pull-flow production system with dynamic buffer stock control
Saad Elbaraka, Salah-eddine Mokhlis, Adil Barra, Hicham Fouraiji, Mohamed Rhouzali, Najat Messaoudi177-182
Archives
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2026-03-30 27
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2025-12-20 27
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2025-09-30 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2025-06-27 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2025-03-31 26
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2024-12-21 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2024-09-30 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2024-06-30 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2024-03-31 23
-
Vol. 13 No. 4
2023-12-20 24
-
Vol. 13 No. 3
2023-09-30 25
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-06-30 14
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2023-03-31 12
-
Vol. 12 No. 4
2022-12-30 16
-
Vol. 12 No. 3
2022-09-30 15
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2022-06-30 16
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2022-03-31 9
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Power grids are complex systems that play an important role in many processes and are essential for the functioning of key services to society. Component failure can lead to cascading effects, equipment damage, and potential blackouts. In this paper, an ontology is used to formalize knowledge about the subject area, draw new conclusions, and build failure scenarios. The software simulates the operation of the power grid based on power flow, combining computer simulation of power grid failure scenarios, a semantic model of the subject area, and builds a knowledge graph, which is analysed using centrality metrics and used to draw conclusions about the scenarios of grid failure development. The ontology and knowledge graph can be supplemented with new knowledge and used for further analysis using other models or approaches, as the data is easily interpreted and described using the concepts of the subject area.
Keywords:
References
[1] Afolabi, O., Ali, W., Cofie, P., Fuller, J., Obiomon, P., & Kolawole, E. (2015). Analysis of the load flow problem in power system planning studies. Energy and Power Engineering, 7, 509–523. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2015.710048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2015.710048
[2] Anghel, M., Werley, K. A., & Motter, A. E. (2006). Stochastic model for power grid dynamics. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.physics/0609217
[3] Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. (2022). The status of Ukraine’s power system as of 15 June 2022. https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/robota-energosistemi-ukrayini-stanom-na-15-chervnya-2022-roku
[4] Cuadra, L., Salcedo-Sanz, S., Del Ser, J., Jiménez-Fernández, S., & Geem, Z. W. (2015). A critical review of robustness in power grids using complex networks concepts. Energies, 8(9), 9211–9265. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8099211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en8099211
[5] De Rosa, F., Maunero, N., Nicoletti, L., Prinetto, P., & Trussoni, M. (2022). Ontology for cybersecurity governance of ICT systems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3260/paper4.pdf
[6] Eldosouky, A., Saad, W., & Mandayam, N. (2021). Resilient critical infrastructure: Bayesian network analysis and contract-based optimization. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1709.00303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107243
[7] Ge, M., Rossi, B., Chren, S., & Blanco, J. M. (2024). Petri nets for smart grids: The story so far. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.05462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3605098.3635989
[8] Hagberg, A., Schult, D., & Swart, P. (n.d.). NetworkX. https://networkx.org
[9] Henriques, J., Caldeira, F., Cruz, T., & Simões, P. (2018). On the use of ontology data for protecting critical infrastructures. Journal of Information Warfare, 17(4).
[10] Hines, P., Balasubramaniam, K., & Sanchez, E. C. (2009). Cascading failures in power grids. IEEE Potentials, 28(5), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2009.933498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MPOT.2009.933498
[11] Hines, P., Cotilla-Sanchez, E., & Blumsack, S. (2010). Do topological models provide good information about electricity infrastructure vulnerability? https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3489887 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3489887
[12] Horrocks, I. et al. (2004). SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). https://www.w3.org/submissions/SWRL
[13] Korkali, M., Veneman, J. G., Tivnan, B. F., & Hines, P. D. H. (2014). Reducing cascading failure risk by increasing infrastructure network interdependency. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1410.6836
[14] Nan, C., Sansavini, G., Kröger, W., & Heinimann, H. R. (2014). A quantitative method for assessing the resilience of infrastructure systems. In Proceedings of the 12th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference (PSAM12), 10, 359–370, Honolulu, HI, United States.
[15] Neo4j, Inc. (n.d.). Neo4j. https://neo4j.com
[16] Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford University.
[17] Oehlers, M., & Fabian, B. (2021). Graph metrics for network robustness – A survey. Mathematics, 9(8), 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9080895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math9080895
[18] Poulin, C., & Kane, M. B. (2021). Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 216, 107926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107926
[19] Python Software Foundation. (n.d.). Python. https://www.python.org
[20] Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., & Kelly, T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 21(6), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.969131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/37.969131
[21] Roman, D., Sukhobok, D., Nikolov, N., Elvesæter, B., & Pultier, A. (2019). The InfraRisk ontology: Enabling semantic interoperability for critical infrastructures at risk from natural hazards. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/249984754.pdf
[22] SanPen. (n.d.). GridCal. GitHub. https://github.com/SanPen/GridCal
[23] Song, J., Cotilla-Sanchez, E., Ghanavati, G., & Hines, P. D. H. (2014). Dynamic modeling of cascading failure in power systems. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.3990
[24] Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research. (n.d.). Protégé. https://protege.stanford.edu
[25] Tofani, A. et al. (2010). Using ontologies for the federated simulation of critical infrastructures. Procedia Computer Science, 1(1), 2301–2309. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050910002590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.04.258
[26] Toscano, B., Fernandes, A. D., & Mira da Silva, M. (2022). A domain ontology on cascading effects in critical infrastructures based on a systematic literature review. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 18(1), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2022.120679 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2022.120679
[27] Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2021). Law of Ukraine “On Critical Infrastructure”, 1882-IX, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1882-20#Text
[28] West Health. (n.d.). Pyvis. GitHub. https://github.com/WestHealth/pyvis
[29] Xie, B., Tian, X., Kong, L., & Chen, W. (2021). The vulnerability of the power grid structure: A system analysis based on complex network theory. Sensors, 21(21), 7097. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217097
Article Details
Abstract views: 7

