Realizing Sustainability: An Analysis of Agroforestry Policy Coherence in Indonesia in the Forestry, Agriculture, and Environment Sectors
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026)
-
Global Resilience in the Face of Aggression: An Analysis of Sanctions Pressure on Russia's Economy
Olena Honcharenko, Olha Diachenko1-15
-
The Impact of National Interests on Cooperation in Global Environmental Policy
Mohamed Debbah, Sofiane Rimouche16-29
-
Environmental and Social Sustainability Pathways in the Development of Energy Storage Technologies: Global Scenario Analysis
Pawel Rydzewski30-41
-
Electricity Network Capacity Needs for Industrial Decarbonization in China: Pathways to Net-Zero under Grid Constraints
Mohammed Touitou42-60
-
Importance of Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 4 in Relation to overall Sustainable Development
Magdaléna Drastichová, Jiří Fišer61-78
-
From Antagonism to Peace with Nature: Paradigm Shifts in the Human–Nature Relationship
Ryszard F. Sadowski79-88
-
Threshold Role of Democracy in the Nexus of Sustainable Development and Fiscal Stance
Emin Efecan Aktaş89-110
-
Managing Sustainable Digital Marketing: Financial Implications, Security and Ethical Challenges
Ganna Likhonosova, Iryna Shevchenko, Valentyna Hatylo111-128
-
SDG-2: Food and Nutrition Security in BRICS Countries: Do GVC Participation and Carbon Footprints Matter?
SDG2- Food and nutrition Security, Carbon footprints and GVC ParticipationLiu Dan129-159 -
Eco-Taxation and Financial Development: Catalyst for Green Innovation and Environmental Sustainability in the EU
Seyi Saint Akadiri, Sani Abubakar, Fadhila Hamza160-172
-
Energy Transition, Environmental Sustainability and Healthcare Costs in Emerging Sub-Saharan Economies: Evidence from the Pre- and During-COVID-19 Periods – Implications for SDG 3, SDG 7 and SDG 13
Changhong Xu, Changhua Xu173-204
-
Carbon Intensity, Renewable Energy Consumption and SDG8 – Decent Work and Economic Growth in MINT Countries
Weiwei Zhang, Erfu Zhang205-228
-
Environmental Sustainability, Institutions, and Inclusive Growth in MINT Countries: Pathways to Achieving SDG 13- Climate Action
Mengya Wei, Aminat Olayinka Olohunlana, Musa Abdu, Evans Osabuohien229-246
-
Enduring Wisdom: Traditional Sustainable Livelihood Practices of Indian Tribes
Shivendra Shandilya, Dr. Rouchi Chaudhary247-255
-
Research on Sustainable Development Strategies for Folk Culture in Rural China: Based on the Experiencing Perspective
Huangdong Ma, Fenghua Lu, Jiqun Deng256-263
-
Public Governance of Smart Grid Implementation in Urban Energy Infrastructure
Nataliia Protsiuk, Hanna Komarnytska, Maksym Khozhylo, Olesya Lobyk, Tetiana Iankovets264-278
-
Carbon Emission, Human Capital and Adoption of Green Energy Technology in Sub- Saharan Africa
Qingli Li, Lihan Gu279-294
-
Sustainable Development Commitments in the Kenya–EU Economic Partnership Agreement
Mateusz Prorok295-304
-
Realizing Sustainability: An Analysis of Agroforestry Policy Coherence in Indonesia in the Forestry, Agriculture, and Environment Sectors
Eno Suwarno, Indra Gumay Febryano, Fazriyas, Saefudin305-316
-
Can Tourism be Sustainable? An International Perspective
Rupsha Chakraborty, Dipannita Chand317-325
-
Prospects for Development of the Global Automotive Industry in Context of Digitalization and Achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Illya Khadzhynov, Vladyslav Bolhov, Inna Akhnovska, Vladislav Kabachii, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Kozlovskyi326-341
Archives
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2026-01-12 21
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Indonesia, which has the third most tropical forests in the world, is at the forefront of finding and fighting for a balance between climate change and food security. Agroforestry is a land use practice that has great potential to carry out this nature-based role, but its maximum benefits can be limited by uncoordinated policies in the forestry, agriculture, and environmental sectors. This paper examines policy inconsistencies and suggests structural improvements for sustainable governance. Analyzing nine key regulations (1999-2021) using the Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development (PCSD) framework, content analysis, and coherence matrix, complemented by empirical deforestation trend analysis, reveals significant vertical, horizontal, and internal misalignments. Critical findings include the absence of a clear agroforestry definition in regulations and lack of cooperation between forestry and agricultural sectors, particularly between Forestry Law No. 41/1999 and Agriculture Law No. 22/2019. This authority overlap complicates bureaucracy, obscures law, and perpetuates deforestation, hindering agroforestry's contribution to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 1, 2, 13, and 15. The study contributes to literature by applying a policy coherence approach to agroforestry governance, shifting focus from previously emphasized technical and economic aspects to governance integration, while linking policy incoherence directly to tangible deforestation outcomes. This research has significance not only for Indonesia, but also for other countries facing similar governance challenges, as it offers a methodological framework for policy coherence analysis that can be applied to other contexts. The report emphasizes that regulatory harmonization and inter-ministerial institutional cooperation are essential to enhance agroforestry's contribution to sustainable development. The study proposes the implementation of integrated strategies to strengthen environmental sustainability, food security, and resilience to climate change by ensuring policy alignment and institutional reforms.
Keywords:
References
1. ACHMAD B., SIARUDIN M., WIDIYANTO, A., et al., 2022, Traditional subsistence farming of smallholder agrofor-estry systems in Indonesia: A review, Sustainability, 14(14): 8631, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148631
2. AHMAD Y., SURATMAN M. N., ABD HAMID S. N. F., et al., 2024, Legal and policy framework for agroforestry ecosystem management, Agroforestry for Carbon and Ecosystem Management, Elsevier: 419-428, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95393-1.00003-8.
3. AJIJ K. S., 2024, The impact of land use regulations on sustainable agricultural practices in deforestation hotspots, Law and Economy, 3(12): 51–58, https://doi.org/10.56397/le.2024.12.08. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56397/LE.2024.12.08
4. ALBUQUERQUE M., 2019, Innovations in agriculture: The important role of agroforestry in achieving SDG 13, World Sustainability Series, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26759-9_27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26759-9_27
5. ALVIYA I., SURYANDARI E. Y., 2006, Evaluasi kebijakan pelaksanaan sistem agroforestry di Indonesia, Jurnal Ana-lisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 3(1): 1-13, https://doi.org/10.20886/jakk.2006.3.1.1-13.
6. AMADU F., MILLER D., MCNAMARA P., 2020, Agroforestry as a pathway to agricultural yield impacts in climate-smart agriculture investments: Evidence from southern Malawi, Ecological Economics, 167 106443, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106443
7. AMRI K., NINGRUM S., 2025, Sustainable forestry policy: Indonesia’s adaptation in supporting Sustainable Develop-ment Goals (SDGs), E3S Web of Conferences 611, 03005, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561103005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561103005
8. ANGELSEN A., 2009, Policy options to reduce deforestation, https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BAngelsen090210.pdf.
9. AUSTIN K., SCHWANTES A., GU Y., KASIBHATLA P., 2019, What causes deforestation in Indonesia? Environmental Research Letters, 14(2): 024007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6db. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6db
10. BASUKI I., ADINUGROHO W. C., UTOMO N. A., et al., 2022, Reforestation opportunities in Indonesia: Mitigating climate change and achieving sustainable development goals, Forests, 13(3): 1–15: 447, https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13030447
11. BEHRENDT J., FRÖNDHOFF D., ARDILA A. M. et al., 2018, RUVIVAL Publication Series 3, Institute of Wastewater Management and Water Protection, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:830-88218207.
12. BHOL N., PARIDA S., DASH A., 2024, Agroforestry: A multifunctional landuse system for sustainable agricultural production under climate change scenario, International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 36(11): 361–376, https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i115153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2024/v36i115153
13. BLICHARSKA M., SMITHERS R., KUCHLER M., et al., 2023, The water–energy–food–land–climate nexus: Policy coherence for sustainable resource management in Sweden, Environmental Policy and Governance, 34(2): 207-220, https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2072
14. BRAND A., FURNESS M., KEIJZER N., 2021, Promoting policy coherence within the 2030 Agenda framework: Exter-nalities, trade-offs and politics, Politics and Governance, 9(1): 108–118, https://doi.org/10.17645/PAG.V9I1.3608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i1.3608
15. BROWNE K., DZEBO A., IACOBUTA G., et al., 2023, How does policy coherence shape effectiveness and inequality? Implications for sustainable development and the 2030 Agenda, Sustainable Development, 31(5): 3161-3174, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2598
16. CANDEL J. J. L., BIESBROEK R., 2016, Toward a processual understanding of policy integration, Policy Sciences, 49: 211–231, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
17. CASSON A., OBIDZINSKI K., 2002, From New Order to Regional Autonomy: Shifting Dynamics of ‘Illegal’ Logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia, World Development, 30(12), 2133–2151, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-750x(02)00125-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00125-0
18. CASTLE S., MILLER D., ORDONEZ P., BAYLIS K., HUGHES K., 2021, The impacts of agroforestry interventions on agricultural productivity, ecosystem services, and human well-being in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic re-view, Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17(2): 1-52, e1167, https://doi.org/10.1002/CL2.1167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1167
19. CHENYANG L., CURRIE A., DARRIN H., ROSENBERG N., 2021, Farming with Trees: Reforming U.S. Farm Policy to Expand Agroforestry and Mitigate Climate Change, Ecology Law Quarterly 48(1): 1–48, https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1211439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3717877
20. CHICHINYE A., MLAMBO D., SEBATA A., MABIDI A., 2024, Policy regarding sustainable forest management and resources, Elsevier: 403-417, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-95393-1.00019-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-95393-1.00019-1
21. COSCIEME L., MORTENSEN L. F., DONOHUE I., 2021, Enhance environmental policy coherence to meet the Sus-tainable Development Goals, Journal of Cleaner Production, 296 126502, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126502
22. CRESWELL J. W., 2014, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th) ed., Sage Publications.
23. DATTA P., BEHERA B., RAHUT D., 2024, India's approach to agroforestry as an effective strategy in the context of climate change: An evaluation of 28 state climate change action plans, Agricultural Systems, 214, 103840, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103840
24. DELACOTE P., ROBINSON E. J. Z., ROUSSEL S., 2016, Deforestation, leakage and avoided deforestation policies: A spatial analysis. Resource and Energy Economics, 45: 192-210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.06.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2016.06.006
25. DHANUSH G., NAIK T.V., DAYANANDANAIK S. et al., 2025, The role of agroforestry in carbon sequestration and climate adaptation: A review, International Journal of Research in Agronomy, 8(2): 350–363, https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2025.v8.i2e.2592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2025.v8.i2e.2592
26. DOMBROWSKY I., LENSCHOW A., MEERGANS F. et al., 2022, Effects of policy and functional (in)coherence on coordination – A comparative analysis of cross-sectoral water management problems, Environmental Science & Policy 131: 118–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.01.019
27. DUFFY C., TOTH G. G., HAGAN R. P. O. et al., 2021, Agroforestry contributions to smallholder farmer food security in Indonesia. Agroforestry Systems, 95(6): 1109–1124, https://doi.org/10.1007/S10457-021-00632-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-021-00632-8
28. EBERL J., GORDEEVA E., WEBER N., 2021, The policy coherence framework approach in a multi-level analysis of European, German and Thuringian climate policy with a special focus on land use, land-use change and forestry (LU-LUCF), World, 2(3): 426–442, https://doi.org/10.3390/world2030026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/world2030026
29. GARRITY D. P., AKINNIFESI F. K., AJAYI O. C. et al., 2010, Evergreen agriculture: A robust approach to sustainable food security in Africa, Food Security, 2(3): 169-181, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-010-0074-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-010-0070-7
30. GAVEAU D., LOCATELLI B., SALIM M. et al., 2021, Slowing deforestation in Indonesia follows declining oil palm expansion and lower oil prices, PLoS ONE, 16(3): e0246178, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-143515/v1
31. GUITTON J.-L., 2021, Volet forestier de la loi d’avenir pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et la forêt (loi n° 2014-1170 du 13 octobre 2014): hal-03447622f, https://hal.science/hal-03447622V1/DOCUMENT. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4267/2042/56612
32. GUNAWAN H., SETYAWATI T., ATMOKO T. et al., 2024, A review of forest fragmentation in Indonesia under the DPSIR framework for biodiversity conservation strategies, Global Ecology and Conservation, 51 e02918, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e02918
33. HEIDINGSFELDER J., BECKMANN M., 2020, A governance puzzle to be solved? A systematic literature review of fragmented sustainability governance, Manag Rev Q, 70(3): 355–390, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11301-019-00170-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00170-9
34. HENKE R., ALTOBELLI F., SUDOMO A., et al., 2023, Can Agroforestry Contribute to Food and Livelihood Security for Indonesia’s Smallholders in the Climate Change Era? Agriculture, 13(10): 1896, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101896.
35. HERMAWAN S., KARIM M. F., RETHEL L., 2023, Institutional layering in climate policy: Insights from REDD+ governance in Indonesia, Forest Policy and Economics, 154: 103037, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103037
36. INDRAJAYA Y., YUWATI T., LESTARI S. et al., 2022, Tropical Forest Landscape Restoration in Indonesia: A Review, Land, 11(3): 328, https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030328
37. JIHAD A. N., LESTARI L. D., 2021, An Overview and Future Outlook of Indonesian Agroforestry: a Bibliographic and Literature Review, E3S Web of Conferences, 305: 07002, https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202130507002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130507002
38. JONG H. N., 2025, Februari 7, Surge in legal land clearing pushes up Indonesia deforestation rate in 2024, Mongabay, https://news.mongabay.com/2025/02/surge-in-legal-land-clearing-pushes-up-indonesia-deforestation-rate-in-2024/.
39. KARINDA K., BAHARUDDIN T., 2024, Climate change policy based on global study evolution 1979-2023: An insight and direction for Indonesia, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci,. 1388: 012054, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1388/1/012054
40. KEMENTERIAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN KEHUTANAN [KLHK], 2022, Decree of the Minister of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia Number SK.168/MENLHK/PKTL/PLA.1/2/2022 concerning Indonesia's Forestry and Other Land Use (FOLU) Net Sink 2030 for Climate Change Control, KLHK, Jakarta.
41. KRIPPENDORFF K., 2018, Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th) ed., Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
42. MACKIE J., 2020, Promoting policy coherence: Lessons learned in EU development cooperation, Policy Brief, Septem-ber 2020, https://doi.org/10.55317/casc005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55317/CASC005
43. MAHONEY J., 2000, Path dependence in historical sociology, Theory and Society, 29(4): 507-548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
44. MEENA R. K., KUMARI T., SOLANKI V. K., et al., 2024, Soil, water, and biodiversity conservation through agrofor-estry for crop production, Agroforestry to Combat Global Challenges, eds. Jatav, H.S., Rajput V.D., Minkina, E. D., Van Hullebusch V., Dutta A. (Eds.): 345-362, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7282-1_17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7282-1_17
45. MOELIONO M., PHAM T., BONG I., WONG G., BROCKHAUS M., 2017, Social forestry – why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia, Forest and Society, 1(2): 78-97, https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484
46. MUKHLIS I., RIZALUDIN M., HIDAYAH I., 2022, Understanding socio-economic and environmental impacts of agroforestry on rural communities. Forests, 13(4): 556, https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f13040556
47. NILSSON M., ZAMPARUTTI T., PETERSEN J., et al., 2012, Understanding Policy Coherence: Analytical Framework and Examples of Sector–Environment Policy Interactions in the EU. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6): 395-423, https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1589
48. NOORDWIJK M. VAN., 2020, Agroforestry as nexus of sustainable development goals. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 449(1): 012001, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/449/1/012001
49. NOORDWIJK M. VAN., 2021, Agroforestry-based ecosystem services: Reconciling values of humans and nature in sustainable development, Land, 10(7): 699, https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070699
50. NUGROHO H. Y. S. H., INDRAJAYA Y., ASTANA S. et al., 2023, A chronicle of Indonesia’s forest management: A long step towards environmental sustainability and community welfare, Land, 12(6): 1238, https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061238
51. NURROCHMAT D. R., PRIBADI R., SIREGAR H., JUSTIANTO A., PARK M. S., 2021, Transformation of agro-forest management policy under the dynamic circumstances of a two-decade regional autonomy in Indonesia, Forests, 12(4): 419, https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040419. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f12040419
52. OCTAVIA D., SUHARTI S., DHARMAWAN I. W. E. et al., 2022, Mainstreaming Smart Agroforestry for Social For-estry Implementation to Support Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia: A Review, Sustainability, 14(15): 9313, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159313
53. OECD, 2018, Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development 2018: Towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301061-en. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301061-en
54. PICHANCOURT J., 2024, Navigating the complexities of the forest land sharing vs sparing logging dilemma: analytical insights through the governance theory of social-ecological systems dynamics, PeerJ, 12 e16809, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16809. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16809
55. PLIENINGER T., MUÑOZ-ROJAS J., BUCK L. E., SCHERR S. J., 2020, Agroforestry for sustainable landscape man-agement, Sustainability Science, 15(5): 1255–1266, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-020-00836-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00836-4
56. PITZÉN S., LUKKARINEN J., PRIMMER E., 2023, Coherent at face value: Integration of forest carbon targets in Finn-ish policy strategies, Ambio 52: 1861–1877, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01923-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01923-3
57. PURBA Z. T., 2023, Agrofo,restri: Meningkatkan produktivitas, keberlanjutan, dan pendapatan petani melalui integrasi pertanian dan kehutanan [Conference paper], https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372628597.
58. PURNOMO H., OKARDA B., DERMAWAN A. et al., 2020, Reconciling oil palm economic development and environ-mental conservation in Indonesia: A value chain dynamic approach, Forest Policy and Economics, 111: 102089, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102089
59. PURWANTO E., SANTOSO H., JELSMA I., et al., 2020, Agroforestry as policy option for forest-zone oil palm roduc-tion in Indonesia, Land, 9(12): 531, https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9120531
60. PUTZEL L., JAUNG W., FORREST B. et al., 2019, Fragmentation of Forest Governance in the Asia-Pacific Region: Expert Perceptions from China, Malaysia, Indonesia, Nepal and Vietnam, https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/7297/.
61. RAHAYU S., SAKUNTALADEWI N., SUMIRAT B. et al., 2024, The role of local governments in supporting social forestry implementation in Indonesia: A social network analysis and evidence from Eastern Indonesia, Forest and Society, 8(1): 28524, https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v8i1.28524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v8i1.28524
62. ROY M. K., FORT M. P., KANTER R., MONTAGNINI F., 2025, Agroforestry: A key land use system for sustainable food production and public health, Trees, Forests and People, 20, 100848, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100848
63. RUSTIADI E., VERIASA T. O., 2022, Towards inclusive Indonesian forestry: An overview of a spatial planning and agrarian perspective, Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 28(1): 60–71, https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.28.1.60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.28.1.60
64. SAHIDE M., GIESSEN L., 2015, The fragmented land use administration in Indonesia - analysing bureaucratic responsi-bilities influencing tropical rainforest transformation systems. Land Use Policy, 43: 96–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2014.11.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.11.005
65. SAKTI F., WAHYUDI E., RIFKI E. et al., 2022, Otonomi daerah pembentuk intensi perilaku koruptif kepala daerah di Indonesia, Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 20(1): 1–15, https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v20i1.32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v20i1.32
66. SALLATA M., ALLO M., MUIN N. et al., 2022, Mainstreaming Ecosystem Services from Indonesia’s Remaining Forests, Sustainability, 14(19): 12124, https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912124
67. SANTOS-PAULINO A.U., 2010, UNU Policy Brief Number 5, 2010: Enhancing Development through Policy Coher-ence, Policy Briefs, United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.
68. SARI D., MARGULES C., LIM H. et al., 2021, Evaluating policy coherence: A case study of peatland forests on the Kampar Peninsula landscape, Indonesia, Land Use Policy, 105: 105396, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105396 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105396
69. SCOTT K. N., 2013, Managing Fragmentation Through Governance: International Environmental Law in a Globalized World, Brill Nijhoff: 207–238, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004228818_010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004228818_010
70. SHACKELFORD G. E., STEWARD P., GERMAN R. N., BENTON T. G., 2015, Landscapes: hotspots of conflict between agriculture and nature, http://climate.calcommons.org/sites/default/files/ddi12291.pdf.
71. SHAWOO Z., MALTAIS A., DZEBO A., PICKERING J., 2022, Political drivers of policy coherence for sustainable development: An analytical framework, Environmental Policy and Governance, 33(4): 339–350, https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2039
72. SHEPPARD J. P., RECKZIEGEL R. B., BORRASS L. et al., 2023, Agroforestry: An appropriate and sustainable re-sponse to a changing climate in Southern Africa? Forests, 14(5) 1004, https://doi.org/10.3390/f14051004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f14051004
73. SINGH A. K., DHYANI S. K., 2014, Agroforestry Policy Issues and Challenges, Springer India: 367–372, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1662-9_12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1662-9_12
74. SPRINGGAY E., PAJEL P., 2024, Breaking barriers to agroforestry: FAO’s global capacity needs assessment, FAO, https://doi.org/10.55515/tcdu9996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55515/TCDU9996
75. SUDOMO A., LEKSONO B., TATA H. L. et al., 2023, Can agroforestry contribute to food and livelihood security for Indonesia’s smallholders in the climate change era? Agriculture, 13(10): 1896, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101896
76. TORQUEBIAU E., 2024, The agroforestry-biodiversity-climate change nexus, Tropical Forest Issues, https://doi.org/10.55515/fllz3215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55515/FLLZ3215
77. TRIJANTO M., NURBAEDAH N., 2025, Efektivitas program perhutanan sosial dan reforma agraria di kawasan hutan Kabupaten Blitar, Mizan: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 13(2): 245–255, https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v13i2.6585. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v13i2.6585
78. TROPENBOS INDONESIA & TROPENBOS INTERNATIONAL, 2023, Oktober, Scaling agroforestry in Indonesia: Opportunities, challenges and solution pathways in scaling and mainstreaming agroforestry in Indonesia, Tropenbos In-donesia, https://www.tropenbos-indonesia.org/file.php/2238/scaling%20agroforestry%20in%20indonesia.pdf.
79. ULLAH A., MISHRA A., BAVOROVA M., 2023, Agroforestry adoption decision in green growth initiative programs: Key lessons from the Billion Trees Afforestation Project (BTAP), Environmental Management, 71: 950–964, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01797-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01797-x
80. ULYA N., HARIANJA A., SAYEKTI A. et al., 2023, Coffee agroforestry as an alternative to the implementation of green economy practices in Indonesia: A systematic review. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 8(3): 881–903, https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2023041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2023041
81. VENN R. D., SCHMUTZ U., MIGLIORIN, P., 2023, Transforming food systems towards agroecology – a critical anal-ysis of agroforestry and mixed farming policy in 19 European countries, Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 47(7): 1023–1051, https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2215175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2023.2215175
82. VIJAYKUMAR R., TIWARI P., DANIEL S. et al., 2024, Agroforestry Systems: A Pathway to Resilient and Productive Landscapes. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(12): 177–193, https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i124617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i124617
83. WALLIN I., 2012, Bioenergy from the forest – a source of conflict between forestry and nature conservation? https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/4408/.
84. WENDU K. G., ZERFU D. W., 2023, The role of agroforestry system in reducing farmers' exposure to climate change, Journal of the Selva Andina Biosphere, 11(2): 186–197, https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsab.2023.110200186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsab.2023.110200186
85. WIDIYANTO A., NURROCHMAT D., TRISON S., SUBARUDI 2025, Evaluating the multiple aspects of the new era of social forestry in Indonesia. BIO Web of Conferences 175: 06005, https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202517506005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/202517506005
86. ZINGERLI C., BISANG K., ZIMMERMANN W., 2004, Towards Policy Integration: Experiences with intersectoral coordination in international and national forest policy, http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/ffu/akumwelt/bc2004/download/zingerli_bisang_zimmermann_f.pdf.
87. ZINNGREBE Y., BORASINO E., CHIPUTWA B. et al., 2020, Agroforestry governance for operationalising the land-scape approach: Connecting conservation and farming actors, Sustainability Science, 15(5): 1417–1434, https://doi.org/10.1007/S11625-020-00840-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00840-8
Article Details
Abstract views: 18

