From Antagonism to Peace with Nature: Paradigm Shifts in the Human–Nature Relationship
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 21 No. 1 (2026)
-
Global Resilience in the Face of Aggression: An Analysis of Sanctions Pressure on Russia's Economy
Olena Honcharenko, Olha Diachenko1-15
-
The Impact of National Interests on Cooperation in Global Environmental Policy
Mohamed Debbah, Sofiane Rimouche16-29
-
Environmental and Social Sustainability Pathways in the Development of Energy Storage Technologies: Global Scenario Analysis
Pawel Rydzewski30-41
-
Electricity Network Capacity Needs for Industrial Decarbonization in China: Pathways to Net-Zero under Grid Constraints
Mohammed Touitou42-60
-
Importance of Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 4 in Relation to overall Sustainable Development
Magdaléna Drastichová, Jiří Fišer61-78
-
From Antagonism to Peace with Nature: Paradigm Shifts in the Human–Nature Relationship
Ryszard F. Sadowski79-88
-
Threshold Role of Democracy in the Nexus of Sustainable Development and Fiscal Stance
Emin Efecan Aktaş89-110
-
Managing Sustainable Digital Marketing: Financial Implications, Security and Ethical Challenges
Ganna Likhonosova, Iryna Shevchenko, Valentyna Hatylo111-128
-
SDG-2: Food and Nutrition Security in BRICS Countries: Do GVC Participation and Carbon Footprints Matter?
SDG2- Food and nutrition Security, Carbon footprints and GVC ParticipationLiu Dan129-159 -
Eco-Taxation and Financial Development: Catalyst for Green Innovation and Environmental Sustainability in the EU
Seyi Saint Akadiri, Sani Abubakar, Fadhila Hamza160-172
-
Energy Transition, Environmental Sustainability and Healthcare Costs in Emerging Sub-Saharan Economies: Evidence from the Pre- and During-COVID-19 Periods – Implications for SDG 3, SDG 7 and SDG 13
Changhong Xu, Changhua Xu173-204
-
Carbon Intensity, Renewable Energy Consumption and SDG8 – Decent Work and Economic Growth in MINT Countries
Weiwei Zhang, Erfu Zhang205-228
-
Environmental Sustainability, Institutions, and Inclusive Growth in MINT Countries: Pathways to Achieving SDG 13- Climate Action
Mengya Wei, Aminat Olayinka Olohunlana, Musa Abdu, Evans Osabuohien229-246
-
Enduring Wisdom: Traditional Sustainable Livelihood Practices of Indian Tribes
Shivendra Shandilya, Dr. Rouchi Chaudhary247-255
-
Research on Sustainable Development Strategies for Folk Culture in Rural China: Based on the Experiencing Perspective
Huangdong Ma, Fenghua Lu, Jiqun Deng256-263
-
Public Governance of Smart Grid Implementation in Urban Energy Infrastructure
Nataliia Protsiuk, Hanna Komarnytska, Maksym Khozhylo, Olesya Lobyk, Tetiana Iankovets264-278
-
Carbon Emission, Human Capital and Adoption of Green Energy Technology in Sub- Saharan Africa
Qingli Li, Lihan Gu279-294
-
Sustainable Development Commitments in the Kenya–EU Economic Partnership Agreement
Mateusz Prorok295-304
-
Realizing Sustainability: An Analysis of Agroforestry Policy Coherence in Indonesia in the Forestry, Agriculture, and Environment Sectors
Eno Suwarno, Indra Gumay Febryano, Fazriyas, Saefudin305-316
-
Can Tourism be Sustainable? An International Perspective
Rupsha Chakraborty, Dipannita Chand317-325
-
Prospects for Development of the Global Automotive Industry in Context of Digitalization and Achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals
Serhii Kozlovskyi, Illya Khadzhynov, Vladyslav Bolhov, Inna Akhnovska, Vladislav Kabachii, Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, Oleksandr Kozlovskyi326-341
Archives
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2026-01-12 21
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
This article explores both historical and contemporary understandings of the human–nature relationship, tracing the evolution of paradigms from perceptions of nature as an adversary, through its instrumental treatment as a resource, to contemporary efforts aimed at establishing a partnership model. It examines key turning points in this evolution, including the Scientific and Industrial Revolutions, the ecological awakening of the twentieth century, and the emergence of new philosophical currents such as deep ecology, ecofeminism, posthumanism, sustainable development, and environmental justice. Particular attention is given to Michael Meyer-Abich’s concept of peace with nature, which proposes an ethical and political framework for coexistence between humanity and the natural world as the foundation of a new civilization. The article argues that only a transformation in how we conceptualize the environment – one that incorporates philosophical, religious, educational, institutional, and social dimensions – can offer an adequate response to the global environmental crisis. Peace with nature emerges here not merely as an ethical choice, but as a fundamental condition for the survival of humankind.
Keywords:
References
1. ABRAM D., 2017, The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world, Vintage Books, New York.
2. ARISTOTLE, 1941, Politics, The Basic Works of Aristotle, ed. McKeon R., Random House, New York: 1127–1316.
3. AUGUSTINE, 2003, The City of God, Penguin Books, London.
4. BACON F., 1620, Novum Organum, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. BESONG E., 2025, Beyond Binary Opposition Thinking in Environmentalism: Using Chris Okezie Ijiomah’s Harmoni-ous Monism to Integrate Anthropocentric and Ecocentric Worldviews, Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, July, https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5860
6. BISONG P., 2024, Tackling Environmental Problems from the Root: An Ibuanyidanda Perspective, Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 22(3): 17–28, https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5820
7. BOŁOZ W., 2020, Axiological Principles of Integrated Protection of Human and Natural Environments, Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 18(5): 119–124, https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.5.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2020.18.5.10
8. BRAIDOTTI R., 2013, The Posthuman, Polity Press, Cambridge.
9. CARSON R., 1962, Silent Spring, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
10. CHEW S.C., 2007, The Recurring Dark Ages: Ecological Stress, Climate Changes, and System Transformation, AltaMi-ra Press, Lanham.
11. COMMONER B., 1971, The Closing Circle: Nature, Man, and Technology, Knopf, New York.
12. DESCARTES R., 1637, Discourse on the Method, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. DESCOLA P., 2013, Beyond Nature and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226145006.001.0001
14. DIAMOND J., 1997, Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies, W.W. Norton, New York.
15. EDOR E.J., USHIE A.I., OGELENYA G., 2025, A Critical Analysis of Ogungbemi’s Ethics of Nature-Relatedness and Tangwa’s Ecobio-Communitarianism, Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, May, https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5849
16. ELIADE M., 1959, The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion, Harcourt, New York.
17. GEORGESCU-ROEGEN N., 1971, The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674281653
18. GLACKEN C.J., 1967, Traces on the Rhodian Shore, University of California Press, Berkeley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520343054
19. GÖRG C., 2003, Regulation der Naturverhältnisse, Prokla 33(3): 323–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32387/prokla.v33i133.654
20. GUDYNAS E., 2011, Buen Vivir: Today's Tomorrow, Development 54(4): 441–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2011.86
21. HARAWAY D.J., 2016, Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Duke University Press, Durham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw25q
22. HARTMANN K., 2005, Ökologische Verantwortung im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik & Umweltrecht 28(4): 491–503.
23. HOBBES T., 1998, Leviathan, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. HUGHES J.D., 2001, An Environmental History of the World: Humankind’s Changing Role in the Community of Life, Routledge, London.
25. JACKSON T., 2009, Prosperity Without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet, Earthscan, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774338
26. JONAS H., 1984, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chi-cago Press, Chicago. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226850337.001.0001
27. KEELEY L.H., 1996, War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
28. KYEI-NUAMAH D., PENG Z., 2024, Ubuntu philosophy for ecological education and environmental policy formulation, Journal of Philosophy of Education 58(4): 540–561, https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhae034
29. LATOUR B., 2004, Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
30. LATOUR B., 2017, Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime, Polity Press, Cambridge.
31. LEOPOLD A., 1949, A Sand County Almanac, Oxford University Press, New York.
32. ŁEPKO Z., 2017, Anthropocentrism of Encyclical Laudato Si’, Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 15(1): 5–13, https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2017.1.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2017.1.01
33. ŁEPKO Z., 2022, Die Anthropologischen Aspekte Der Umweltkriese, Seminare. Poszukiwania Naukowe 35(2): 61–70, https://doi.org/10.21852/sem.2014.2.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21852/sem.2014.2.05
34. MCNEILL J.R., 2000, Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World, W.W. Norton, New York.
35. MERCHANT C., 1980, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution, Harper & Row, San Fran-cisco.
36. MEYER-ABICH K.M., 1979, Toward a Practical Philosophy of Nature, Environmental Ethics 1(4): 293–308, https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19791423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19791423
37. MEYER-ABICH K.M., 1986, Peace with Nature, or Plants as Indicators to the Loss of Humanity, Experientia 42(2): 115–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01952427
38. MEYER-ABICH K.M., 1990, Frieden mit der Natur: Grundlagen einer Umweltethik, C.H. Beck, München.
39. MEYER-ABICH K.M., 1993, Revolution for Nature: From the Environment to the Connatural World, The White Horse Press, Cambridge.
40. MILTON J., 2007, Paradise Lost, ed. A. Fowler, Longman, London.
41. NAESS A., 1973, The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement, Inquiry 16(1–4): 95–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682
42. NASR S.H., 1976, Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man, Unwin Paperbacks, London.
43. NIXON R., 2011, Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061194
44. OPPERMANN S., 2016, From posthumanism to posthuman ecocriticim, Relations. Beyond Anthropocentrism 4(1): 23–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/rela-2016-001-oppe
45. ÖZTÜRK Y.M., 2020, An Overview of Ecofeminism: Women, Nature and Hierarchies, Journal of Academic Social Sci-ence Studies 13(81): 705–714, https://doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.45458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.45458
46. PETRIKIN J.S., 1995, Environmental Justice, Greenhaven Press, San Diego.
47. PHILLIPS D., 2015, Posthumanism, environmental history, and narratives of collapse, Interdisciplinary Studies in Litera-ture and Environment 22(1): 63–79, https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isv004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isv004
48. PLUMWOOD V., 1993, Feminism and the Mastery of Nature, Routledge, London.
49. PŁAŠIENKOVÁ Z., SMOLKOVÁ E., 2024, In Defence of Environmental Anthropocentrism, Studia Ecologiae et Bio-ethicae 22(3): 5–15, https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5816. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.5816
50. PONTING C., 2007, A New Green History of the World: The Environment and the Collapse of Great Civilizations, Pen-guin, London.
51. PRISM SUSTAINABILITY DIRECTORY, 2025, Ecological Paradigm Shift, https://prism.sustainability-directory.com/term/ecological-paradigm-shift/ (26.07.2025).
52. REDCLIFT M., 2005, Sustainable Development (1987–2005): An Oxymoron Comes of Age, Sustainable Development 13(4): 212–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.281
53. ROCKSTRÖM J., STEFFEN W., NOONE K., PERSSON Å., CHAPIN F.S., LAMBIN E.F., LENTON T.M., SCHEFFER M., FOLKE C., SCHELLNHUBER H.J., NYKVIST B., DE WIT C.A., HUGHES T., VAN DER LEEUW S., RODHE H., SÖRLIN S., SNYDER P.K., COSTANZA R., SVEDIN U., FALKENMARK M., KARLBERG L., CORELL R.W., FABRY V.J., HANSEN J., WALKER B., LIVERMAN D., RICHARDSON K., CRUTZEN P., FO-LEY J.A., 2009, A Safe Operating Space for Humanity, Nature 461(7263): 472–475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
54. ROSE D.B., 1996, Nourishing Terrains: Australian Aboriginal Views of Landscape and Wilderness, Australian Heritage Commission, Canberra.
55. SADOWSKI R., 2016, The Concept of Eco-Justice in Encyclical Laudato Si’, Roczniki Teologiczne 63(3): 151–166, https://doi.org/10.18290/rt.2016.63.3-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18290/rt.2016.63.3-12
56. SADOWSKI R., 2025, The Role of Christianity in Ecological Awakening: Foundations for Christians’ Sustainable Behav-ior Toward Nature, Problemy Ekorozwoju 20(1): 15–24, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6835
57. SADOWSKI R., AYVAZ Z., 2023, Biblical and Quranic Argumentation for Sustainable Behaviors Toward Nature, Prob-lemy Ekorozwoju 18(1): 152–163, https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2023.1.15
58. SAROKIN D., SCHULKIN J., 1994, Environmental Justice: Co-evolution of Environmental Concerns and Social Justice, Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, Philadelphia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901305
59. SCHLOSBERG D., 2007, Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature, Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001
60. SMOLKOVÁ E., 2021, On the Formation of Environmental Normative Criteria: Bioethics As a Dead End, Studia Ecolo-giae et Bioethicae 19(3): 5–15, https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2021.19.3.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/seb.2021.19.3.01
61. STEFFEN W., CRUTZEN P.J., MCNEILL J.R., 2007, The Anthropocene: Are Humans Now Overwhelming the Great Forces of Nature, AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36(8): 614–621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2
62. SUTTON M.Q., ANDERSON E.N., 2004, Introduction to Cultural Ecology, AltaMira Press, New York.
63. THE QUR’AN, 2024, trans. M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
64. TUAN Y.-F., 1971, Environmental Attitudes, Science Studies 1(2): 215–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277100100206
65. TUAN Y.-F., 1974, Discrepancies between Environmental Attitude and Behaviour: Examples from Europe and China, in: SPRING D., SPRING E. (eds.), Ecology and Religion in History, Harper Torchbooks, New York–Evanston–San Fran-cisco–London: 91–113.
66. WARREN K.J., ERKAL N., 1997, Ecofeminism: Women, Culture, Nature, Indiana University Press, Bloomington. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/1569.0
67. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
68. WHITE L. Jr., 1967, The Historical Roots of Our Ecologic Crisis, Science 155(3767): 1203–1207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3767.1203
69. WITOSZEK N., BRENNAN A. (eds.), 1999, Philosophical Dialogues: Arne Naess and the Progress of Ecophilosophy, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781461640769
70. WORSTER D., 1994, Nature’s Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Article Details
Abstract views: 4

