The consequences of the choice of design standards for the use of material on the example of glued laminated roof beam
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Published:
Jun 13, 2011
Issue Vol. 8 No. 1 (2011)
Articles
-
Selection of criteria in pedestrian wind comfort assessment
005-013
-
The influence of boundary condition functions on the quality of the solution and its sensitivity to coefficients of k-ε turbulence models
015-026
-
The consequences of the choice of design standards for the use of material on the example of glued laminated roof beam
027-034
-
The consequences of the choice of design standards for the use of material on the example of reinforced concrete flat ceiling
035-045
-
The numerical research of capacity of nodes in modular scaffolding system
047-065
-
The numerical research of the strength of scaffolding boards
067-081
-
Numerical modelling of vandalistic action on footbridge for pedestrians and bicycles
083-096
-
Application of the TDR measuring technique for in-situ measurements using surface probes
097-106
-
The analysis of heat conductivity coefficient of the aerated concrete building barriers depending on moisture changes
107-116
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The consequence of the membership of Poland in the European Union is the unification of the law, including the adaptation of Polish Building Standards to the European equivalents. Actually the designer is allowed to choose the Standards. It follows the differences in material use and its cost. The paper describes the details of the calculation timber elements, specially glued laminated timber in Eurocodes. The calculations results of double tapered beams made of glued laminated timber obtained by using both standards, analyzes and conclusions are presented in the paper.
Keywords:
Eurocodes, glued laminated timber, double tapered beam
Article Details
Czerski, D. . and Szerafin, J. . (2011) “The consequences of the choice of design standards for the use of material on the example of glued laminated roof beam”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 8(1), pp. 027–034. doi: 10.35784/bud-arch.2256.
