Earned value method as a tool for project control
Agata Czarnigowska
Department of Construction Management; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-3521
Abstract
Earned Value is a well-known project management tool that uses information on cost, schedule and work performance to establish the current status of the project. By means of a few simple rates, it allows the manager to extrapolate current trends to predict their likely final effect. The method is based on a simpli-fied model of a project, but proved to be useful in practice of cost control. It is being developed to account better for schedule and time aspects. The paper outlines the basic principles of the method and its recent extension, the Earned Schedule method, and, with help of a few examples, investigates into assumptions that affect their diagnostic and predictive accuracy.
Keywords:
Earned Value, project controlReferences
Burke R., Project Management. Planning and Control Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, 2006.
Google Scholar
Dałkowski B.T., W trosce o publiczne pieniądze. zarządzanie projektami metodą Earned value, Materiały III Konferencji Project Management, www.spmp.org.pl/ files/3dalkowski1.pdf.
Google Scholar
Christensen D.S., Using performance indices to evaluate the estimate at completion, Journal of Cost Analysis and Management, 1994 (Spring):17-24.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08823871.1994.10462282
Google Scholar
Ruskin A. M., Two issues concerning the use of Earned Value Measurements, Engineering Management Journal, 2004: 16(3) s. 26-30.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2004.11415254
Google Scholar
Evensmo J., Karlsen J.T., Earned Value Based Forecasts – Some Pitfalls, 2006 AACE International Transactions.
Google Scholar
Cass D.J., Earned Value Programs for US Dept. of Energy Projects, Cost Engineering Vol 42 No 2 2000, s. 24-43.
Google Scholar
Vandevoorde S., Vanhoucke M., A comparison of different project duration forecasting methods using earned value metrics, International Journal of Project Management, 2006: 24, s. 289-302.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.10.004
Google Scholar
Corovic R., Why EVM Is Not Good for Schedule Performance Analyses (and how it could be…), The Measurable News, Winter 2006-2007, www.earnedschedule.com/papers.
Google Scholar
Lipke W., Henderson K., Earned Schedule - an emerging enhancement to EVM, www. pmicos.org/topics/EVMDEC07.pdf.
Google Scholar
Henderson K., Earned Schedule A Breakthrough, Extension to Earned Value Management, Proceedings of PMI Global Congress Asia Pacific, January 2007 www.earnedschedule. com/papers.
Google Scholar
Van De Velde R., Time Is Up: Assessing Schedule Performance with Earned Value, PM World Today - October 2007 (Vol. IX, Issue X). www.earnedschedule.com/papers.
Google Scholar
Christensen D., Templin C., EAC evaluation methods: do they still work?, Acquisition Review Quarterly 9 (2002) s. 105-116.
Google Scholar
DOD (1997), Earned Value Management Implementation Guide, Washington: United States of America Department of Defense.
Google Scholar
AS 4817-2006, Project performance measurement using Earned Value.
Google Scholar
Authors
Agata CzarnigowskaDepartment of Construction Management; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3715-3521
Statistics
Abstract views: 385PDF downloads: 219
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
