Simplified analytical method for the robustness assessment of precast reinforced concrete structural systems

Viktar Tur

v.tur@pb.edu.pl
Department of Building Structures; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences; Bialystok University of Technology; (Belarus)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6046-1974

Andrei Tur


Department of Building Structures; Faculty of Civil Engineering; Brest State Technical University; (Belarus)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-9044

Aliaksandr Lizahub


Department of Building Structures; Faculty of Civil Engineering; Brest State Technical University; (Belarus)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8896-0246

Abstract

The article presents the simplified implementation of alternative load path method based on the energy balance approach. This method should be used to check the global resistance of a damaged structural system after the occurrence of an accidental event. Basic assumptions of simplified analytical models for modelling resistance of horizontal ties in a damaged structural system, taking into account the membrane (chain) effects, were presented. An approach to modelling the dynamic resistance of a damaged structural system based on the energy balance method is described. Calculated dependencies for checking the robustness of a prefabricated multi-storey building with hollow-core slabs after the loss of the central column are proposed and considered using an example. On the considered example, a comparison of the required tie sections area with the dynamic resistance designed using the energy balance method (EBM) and according to the current standards, and a statistical assessment of the reliability of the load-bearing capacity models are carried out. In the end, a brief algorithm for the simplified calculation of the dynamic resistance of a damaged structural system is proposed.


Keywords:

robustness, dynamic resistance, ties, energy balance method, membrane effect

Adam J.M., Parisi F., Sagaseta J.,Lu X., “Research and practice on progressive collapse and robustness of building structures in the 21st century”, Engineering Structures, vol. 173, (2018), pp. 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.082   Google Scholar

Tohidi M., Effect of floor-to-floor joint design on the robustness of precast concrete cross wall buildings. PhD dissertation, University of Birmingham, UK, 2015.
  Google Scholar

El-Tawil S., Li H. and Kunnath S., “Computational simulation of gravity-induced progressive collapse of steel-frame buildings: Current trends and future research needs”, Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 140, no. 8, (2014), A2513001. https://doi.org 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000897
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000897   Google Scholar

Byfield M., Mudalige W., Morison C. and Stoddart E., “A review of progressive collapse research and regulations”, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, vol. 167, no. 8, (2014), pp. 447–456.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.12.00023   Google Scholar

Fang Z.X. and Fan H.T., “Redundancy of structural systems in the context of structural safety”, Procedia engineering, vol. 14, (2011), pp. 2172–2178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.273
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.273   Google Scholar

Folić R., “Structural Robustness of monolithic and precast RC building”, in First Scientific-applied Conference with International Participation Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Structures-Theory and Practice, Sofia, 2015.
  Google Scholar

fib Bulletin 43. Structural connections for precast concrete buildings. Guide to good practice, 2008. https://doi.org 10.35789/fib.BULL.0043
  Google Scholar

SP 5.03.01-2020. Concrete and reinforced concrete structures. Minsk, Belarus, 2020. (In Russian)
  Google Scholar

SN 2.01.01-2019. Basis of structural design. Minsk, Belarus, 2020. (In Russian)
  Google Scholar

EN 1991-1-7. Eurocode 1 - Actions on structures - Part 1-7: General actions - Accidental actions, 2006.
  Google Scholar

BS 8110-1. The structural use of concrete in building – Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction, 1997.
  Google Scholar

Department of Defense (DoD) Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC-04-023-03). Design Building to Resist Progressive Collapse. Washington, D.C., 2005
  Google Scholar

MC2010. fib Model Code for Concrete Structures, International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib), 2010.
  Google Scholar

ISO 2394:2015. General principles on reliability of structures. International Standard, 2015.
  Google Scholar

Qian K. and Li B., “Research advances in design of structures to resist progressive collapse”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, vol. 29, no. 5, (2015), B4014007. https://doi.org10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000698
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000698   Google Scholar

Tur A. and Tur V., “Reliability Approaches to Modelling of the Nonlinear Pseudo-Static Response of RC-structural Systems in Accidental Design Situations”, Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, vol. 22, no. 1, (2018), pp. 76–87.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.22.1.20194   Google Scholar

Herraiz B., Vogel T. and Russell J., “Energy-based method for sudden column failure scenarios: theoretical, numerical and experimental analysis”, in IABSE Workshop Helsinki 2015: Safety, Robustness and Condition Assessment of Structures. Report, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering IABSE, 2015, pp. 70-77. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010389549
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2749/222137815815622672   Google Scholar

Izzuddin B.A., Vlassis A.G., Elghazouli A.Y. and Nethercot D.A., “Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss – Part I: Simplified assessment framework”, Engineering structures, vol. 30, no. 5, (2008), pp. 1308–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.011   Google Scholar

Vlassis A.G., Izzuddin B.A., Elghazouli A.Y. and Nethercot D.A., “Progressive collapse of multi-storey buildings due to sudden column loss – Part II: Application”, Engineering Structure, vol. 30, no. 5, (2008), pp. 1424-1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.08.011   Google Scholar

ASCE. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2013.
  Google Scholar

Tur V., Tur A., Lizahub A. and Derechennik S., “Accidental actions values and combinations for key-elements checking”, in E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 212, EDP Sciences, 2020. https://doi.org 10.1051/e3sconf/202021202019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021202019   Google Scholar

Van Coile R., Hopkin D., Elhami Khorasani N., Lange D. and Gernay T., “Permanent and live load model for probabilistic structural fire analysis: a review”, in 3rd International Conference on Structural Safety under Fire and Blast Loading, Brunel University, London, 2019, 2nd – 4th September 2019.
  Google Scholar

Ding L., Van Coile R., Botte W. and Caspeele R., “Quantification of model uncertainties of the energy-based method for dynamic column removal scenarios”, Engineering Structures, vol. 237, (2021), pp. 112057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112057
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112057   Google Scholar

fib Bulletin 72. Bond and anchorage of embedded reinforcement: Background to the fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010. Technical report. fib-Fédération internationale du béton, 2014. https://doi.org 10.35789/fib.BULL.0072
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783433604090   Google Scholar

Tur A.V., Petsold T.M., Tsimbarevich T.A., “Experimental research of the robustness of disk of overlapping from the hollow core slabs with removing the carrier element”, Bulletin of the Brest State Technical University, vol. 1, (2018), pp. 104–109.
  Google Scholar

Droogné, D., Caspeele, R., Taerwe, L., and Herraiz, B., “Parametric study and reliability-based evaluation of alternate load path design in reinforced concrete slabs”, In 39th IABSE Symposium-Engineering the Future, (2017), pp. 1106-1113. IABSE.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2749/vancouver.2017.1106   Google Scholar


Published
2021-12-29

Cited by

Tur, V., Tur, A. and Lizahub, A. (2021) “Simplified analytical method for the robustness assessment of precast reinforced concrete structural systems”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 20(4), pp. 093–114. doi: 10.35784/bud-arch.2774.

Authors

Viktar Tur 
v.tur@pb.edu.pl
Department of Building Structures; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences; Bialystok University of Technology; Belarus
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6046-1974

Authors

Andrei Tur 

Department of Building Structures; Faculty of Civil Engineering; Brest State Technical University; Belarus
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9744-9044

Authors

Aliaksandr Lizahub 

Department of Building Structures; Faculty of Civil Engineering; Brest State Technical University; Belarus
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8896-0246

Statistics

Abstract views: 245
PDF downloads: 176 PDF downloads: 14 PDF downloads: 18


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.

Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.