Agrorecreational ecoparks in the quarries territory as a new type of urban production (on the example of Kryvbas)
Taras Rudenko
Department of Buildings Architecture and Urban Planning; Section of Architecture of Buildings and Structures; Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University; Ukraine (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4687-5748
Tetiana Mukha
Department of Buildings Architecture and Urban Planning; Section of Architecture of Buildings and Structures; Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University; Ukraine (Ukraine)
Mariia Rudenko
rudenko.formail@gmail.comDepartment of Buildings Architecture and Urban Planning; Section of Architecture of Buildings and Structures; Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University; Ukraine (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7637-8585
Abstract
The article analyzes the main conditions of formation of agrorecreational ecoparks in the quarries territory, which no longer perform their initial functions. Agrorecreational ecoparks are regarded as a new type of urban development in combination with recreational function for industrial cities. Thus agrorecreational ecoparks are researched as structural elements of both agroproductive and recreational complexes of a country. Depending on types of activity there have been established main functional subzones and their interposition according to the exploitation mode and territory security. The planning structure of an agrorecreational ecopark locates the subzones of scientific use in the middle of a park, in the most accessible places as they are main attraction for visitors. Natural landscape of recreational use subzone adjoins the scientific zone; service centers and utility zones are located along the edges of the park thus creating a buffer area. The main groups of relief forms have been analyzed, which directly affect the planning structure of the researched parks. The main types of agrorecreational ecoparks in terms of relief forms have been identified; dimensional and spatial peculiarities of organization of such territories have been determined. In the context of a complex terrain and intensive soil erosion the major component of agrorecreational ecoterritories is geoplastic relief with drainage network (columbine), which determines precipitations run-off and the water regime of the park in general. The main notions and special features of landscape columbine and geoplastics (terracing) have been analyzed. The major types of agrolandscapes under the conditions of agrorecreational ecoparks formation have been established.
Keywords:
agrorecreational ecopark, relief, geoplastics, landscape columbine, agrolandscape, derelict lands, quarriesReferences
[2] Shulik V.V. Methodological Problems of Regional Recreational Systems Formation (on the example of Poltava region). autoabstract of Architecture PhD thesis 18.00.01, Poltava, 2001.
[3] Pandyak I.G. Village Settlement in Lviv region: Features of Formation, Structure and Tendency of Development. autoabstract of Geography PhD thesis: 11.00.02, Lviv National Ivan Franko University, 2003.
[4] Kazakov V.L. Man-made Landscapes of Kryvbas. Diversity of Landscape Complexes of Ukraine and Ways of Their Rational Use and Conservation: Methodology and Applicable Aspects. Collection of research papers, 41-46, 2000.
[5] Nazan K. Reclamation of Degraded Landscapes due to Opencast Mining – Cankiri. Cankiri Karatekin University, 2012.
[6] Luchenok S.A. Agrotourism. World Experience and Development in Republic of Belarus: monography, Minsk, publishing house BGEU, 2008.
[7] Bogovaya I.O., Fursova L.M. Landscape Art. Moscow, Agpromizdat, 1988.
[8] Alexeyenko V.A. Geochemistry of Landscape and Environment. Moscow, Nedra, 1990.
[9] Vergunov A.P. Architectural Composition of Gardens and Parks. Moscow, Stroyizdat, 1982.
[10] Vergunov A.P. Landscape Design. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1991.
[11] Gunn J., Bailey D. Limestone quarrying and quarry reclamation in Britain. Collection of research papers, 167-172, 1993.
[12] Quan H., Huichao T. The application of restorative ecology to renovation of industrial wasteland. Collection of research papers, 611-614, 2009.
[13] Lavlinskaya I.A. Methodology of Park and Garden Objects Formation (on the example of south Crimea objects). autoabstract of Architecture PhD thesis: 18.00.04 Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture, Simferopol, 2011.
[14] Sokolskaya O.B., Teodoronskii V.S., Vergunov A.P. Landscape Architecture: Specialized Objects: study guide for university students, Moscow: publishing centre “Akademiya”, 2008.
[15] Holzer S. Desert or paradise. Publishing house “Zerno”, 2012.
Authors
Taras RudenkoDepartment of Buildings Architecture and Urban Planning; Section of Architecture of Buildings and Structures; Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University; Ukraine Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4687-5748
Authors
Tetiana MukhaDepartment of Buildings Architecture and Urban Planning; Section of Architecture of Buildings and Structures; Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University; Ukraine Ukraine
Authors
Mariia Rudenkorudenko.formail@gmail.com
Department of Buildings Architecture and Urban Planning; Section of Architecture of Buildings and Structures; Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratyuk University; Ukraine Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7637-8585
Statistics
Abstract views: 258PDF downloads: 169
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.