Architecture of the administrative centre of Kharkiv, the capital – laboratory for the creation of the New Man: from concept to implementation

Kateryna Didenko

yekaterina.didenko@gmail.com
Faculty of Architecture; Vilnius Gediminas Technical University; (Lithuania)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2567-686X

Olena Gella


Department of Architecture Design; O.M. Beketov Kharkiv National University of Municipal Economy; (Ukraine)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5659-6411

Abstract

The interest in addressing social and political problems through architecture entered the professional discourse of Ukrainian architects in the 1920s. The creation of a new Soviet man became one of the central ideas of the early Soviet state. As a result of the planned transformation of social and family life, there was an active search for new typologies and concepts in both residential and public architecture. The creation of "social condensers," as a means of spatially materializing the idea of shaping a new Soviet man through architecture, became one of the most significant leitmotifs in the formation of architectural and urban planning ensembles in the capital city of Kharkiv, Kharkiv is known not only as a site for creating world renowned modernist complexes, but also as a venue for implementing social experiments. This article explores an example of such a "social condenser" through the ensemble of the Dzerzhynskyj Square (now Svobody Square) district, featuring its unique residential block-combines, as well as architectural concepts that were not realized in their originally conceived form.


Keywords:

metropolitan Kharkiv, administrative centre, residential block-combines, social condenser, new Soviet man

[1] Alyoshyn V., “Development of the idea of socialist settlement in urban planning of Ukraine in 1920s - beginning of 1930s”. PhD dissertation. Kyiv, 1985.
  Google Scholar

[2] Smolenska S., Nägelke H.-D., “Architect Hans Poelzig: a project for Ukraine”, Budownictwo i Architektura, vol. 22(3), (2023), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.4241
  Google Scholar

[3] Cherkasova K., “Ideas and implementation of the plan for the socialist reconstruction of Kharkiv in 1933-1935. Soviet Urban Planning in the 1920s and 1930s”, in New research and materials, Y. L. Kosenkova ed., Moscow: Librokom Book House, 2010, pp. 129-155.
  Google Scholar

[4] Didenko K., “Social and residential programs in the architecture of the capital city of Kharkiv: a monograph”. Publishing House «European Scientific Platform», 2023. https://doi.org/10.36074/Didenko-monograph
  Google Scholar

[5] Bouryak A., Kreiser I., “Method and style in the architecture of Kharkiv in the 20s and 30s.”, Traditions and Innovations in Higher Architectural and Art Education, vol. 4-5, (1999), 128-129.
  Google Scholar

[6] Gella O., Kachemtseva L., “Influence of utopian ideas on urban planning practice in Kharkiv in the 1920-30s”, Scientific Bulletin of Construction, vol. 93(3), (2018), 41-49.
  Google Scholar

[7] Gella O., Kachemtseva L. “All-Ukrainian construction society “Construction Industry” in 1926-1931”, in Proceedings - 74th Scientific and Technical Conference of Kharkiv National University of Construction and Architecture. Kharkiv: KNUBA, 2019, 10-11, 598.
  Google Scholar

[8] Deryabina O. “Avant-garde concepts of forming in the architecture of Kharkiv clubs”, PhD dissertation, Kharkiv, 2013.
  Google Scholar

[9] Khoroian N., “Kharkiv school of architecture in the period of formation and development: the end of the nineteenth - the first third of the twentieth century”. PhD dissertation, Kharkiv, 2015.
  Google Scholar

[10] Shvydenko O., “The value and preservation of architectural monuments of 1910-1940s, inscribed on the World Heritage List”, Scientific Bulletin of Construction, vol. 2, (2014), 10-14.
  Google Scholar

[11] Chabanyuk O., Fonseca M., “Stigmergic behaviour and nodal places in residential areas: case of post-socialist city Kharkiv in Ukraine”, Budownictwo i Architektura, vol.18(1), (2019), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.24358/Bud-Arch_19_181_04
  Google Scholar

[12] Ginzburg A., “On the establishment of the research institute of urban construction in Kharkiv”, Ekonomika Ukrainy, vol. 4, (1936), 178-187.
  Google Scholar

[13] Georgievskyj H., “Housing construction in Ukraine in 1929-30”, Ekonomika Ukrayiny, vol. 2, (1930), 80-90.
  Google Scholar

[14] Polotskyj O., “New life – new man. Report at the debate at the October Depot in Kharkiv. Krasnyi shlyakh, vol. 5-6, (1930), 186-195.
  Google Scholar

[15] Kondrashenko F. “The project of the administrative center and the scheme of development of the residential sector around Dzerzhinskyj Square in Kharkiv”, New Generation, vol. 12, (1929), 68-74.
  Google Scholar

[16] L'Architecture d'aujourd'hui. “Architecture et urbanisme en u.r.s.s. a l'occasion du voyage d'etudes et des reunions d'architectes organises en u.r.s.s. et en pologne”, vol. 8, (1932), 49-96.
  Google Scholar

[17] Sazonov B., Methodological and socio-theoretical problems of designing public service systems. PhD dissertation, 1978.
  Google Scholar

[18] Popper K., The open society and its enemies: New One Volume Edition, NED-New Edition, Princeton University Press, 1994.
  Google Scholar

[19] Toffler F., Powershift: knowledge, wealth and violence at the edge of the 21st century. Bantam Books, 1990.
  Google Scholar

[20] Berger P. L., Luckmann T., The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. USA, Penguin Group, 1991.
  Google Scholar

[21] Hayek F. A pernicious arrogance. Mistakes of socialism. University of Chicago Press, 1992.
  Google Scholar

[22] Murawskyj M., “Introduction: crystallising the social condenser”, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 22(3), (2017), 372-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1322815
  Google Scholar

[23] Hatherley O., “Actually existing social condensers: on the mundanity of Soviet Modernism”, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 22(3), (2017), 512-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1309447
  Google Scholar

[24] Rendell J., “Conclusion: the social condenser – a thing in itself?”, The Journal of Architecture, vol. 22(3), (2017), 578-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1323996
  Google Scholar

[25] Martinez Millana E., “The panopticon prison as a “social condenser”: The study of the project for De Koepel prison by Rem Koolhaas/OMA (1979–1988)”, Frontiers of Architectural Research, vol. 11(1), (2022), 31-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.08.004
  Google Scholar

[26] Ginzburg M., “Target setting in modern architecture”, Contemporary architecture, vol. 1, (1927), 4-10.
  Google Scholar

[27] Ginzburg M., “Constructivism as a method of laboratory and pedagogical work”, Contemporary architecture, vol. 6, (1927), 160-166.
  Google Scholar

[28] Ginzburg M., Constructivism in architecture. 1928. Available: https://tehne.com/assets/i/upload/library/sa-1928-05-010-1400.jpg [Accessed: 09 Feb 2024]
  Google Scholar

[29] Ginzburg M., “Problems of typization of housing in the RSFSR”, Contemporary architecture, vol. 1, (1929), 4-6.
  Google Scholar

[30] Didenko C., Bouryak A., Antonenko N., “Residential housing in Kharkov (Ukraine) 1920-1935”, ZARCH Journal of interdisciplinary studies in architecture and Urbanism, vol. 5, (2016), 68-85.
  Google Scholar

[31] Lovel D., “Socialism, Utopianism and the “Utopian socialists”, History of European Ideas, vol. 14(2), (1992), 185-201.
  Google Scholar

[32] Goltzman А., Zelenko N., Krupska N. et al., “Cities of socialism and the socialist reconstruction of everyday life”, Worker of Education, 1930. p.162.
  Google Scholar

[33] Wolfenzon G., “Planning of workers' dwellings”, City and Village, (1927), p. 145.
  Google Scholar

[34] SAKhR – State Archives of Kharkiv Region, f. 1777, inv.2, case 192. Slovo.
  Google Scholar

[35] Chervony Shlyakh, 1930, vol. 7-8, p. 192.
  Google Scholar

[36] Didenko K. “Residential building SLOVO (1927-1930)”, Architectural Bulletin of KNUBA, vol. 14-15, (2018), 262-274. https://repositary.knuba.edu.ua/handle/987654321/3422
  Google Scholar

[37] Didenko K. and Gella О., “Residential complexes built behind the State Industry Building in the structure of the capital’s administrative centre of Kharkiv in the 1920s and 1930s”, Municipal economy of cities, vol.180(6), (2023), 51-60. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-6-180-51-60
  Google Scholar

[38] Vsesvit, no.2, 1934, p.15.
  Google Scholar

[39] SAKhR – State Archive of Kharkiv Region, f.1777, inv. 2, case 178. Red Industrialist.
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2024-12-16

Cited by

Didenko, K. and Gella, O. (2024) “Architecture of the administrative centre of Kharkiv, the capital – laboratory for the creation of the New Man: from concept to implementation”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 23(4), pp. 005–023. doi: 10.35784/bud-arch.5886.

Authors

Kateryna Didenko 
yekaterina.didenko@gmail.com
Faculty of Architecture; Vilnius Gediminas Technical University; Lithuania
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2567-686X

Authors

Olena Gella 

Department of Architecture Design; O.M. Beketov Kharkiv National University of Municipal Economy; Ukraine
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5659-6411

Statistics

Abstract views: 15
PDF downloads: 18


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.

Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.