Publikowanie artykułów jest możliwe po podpisaniu zgody na przeniesienie licencji na czasopismo.
The problem of urban redevelopment of post-industrial King’s Cross central area in London
Renata Jóźwik
renata.jozwik@gmail.comThe Department of Landscape Design and Conservation; Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; University of Life Science in Lublin; (Polska)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7625-0151
Abstrakt
The paper presents the strategy of redevelopment of the post-industrial King’s Cross area in London – one of the biggest European investments in the last years (the surface of approx. 67 acres), which could be considered the perfect case study for similar works.
The author described in details the investment process, as well as the principles and effects of functional and spatial changes that have led to creation of the new system of open space, adaptation of selected post-industrial buildings for new functions (also the buildings proclaimed as a monument) and also fostering a new urban dimension to the wastelands. Detailed architectural issues are presented on the example of 3 squares: Granary Square, Pancras Square and King’s Cross Square. Field research was realized from 2011 to 2016.
Słowa kluczowe:
urban design, redevelopment, King’s Cross in London, renovation, urban areaBibliografia
[1] Hollander J.B., Kirkwood N.G., Gold J.L. Principles of Brownfields regeneration. Island Press, 2010.
[2] Tallow A. Urban regeneration in the UK. Routledge 2013.
[3] Thompson Z. Urban constellation: spaces of cultural regeneration in post-industrial Britain (theory, technology and society). Routledge, London 2015.
[4] Roberts P., Sykes H., Granger R. Urban Regeneration. SAGE 2017.
[5] Brenner D. King’s Cross railway lands: A „good argument” for change? Development Planning Unit UCL, London 2014.
[6] Bishop P., Williams L. Planning, politics and city making. A case study of King’s Cross. RIBA Publishing, 2016.
[7] Strategic Guidance for London Planning Authorities. Government Office for London (GOL), London 1996.
[8] Summers Ch. Cleaning up King’s Cross, BBC news online. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2550709.stm, access: 1.12.2017.
[9] Principles for a human city. Argent St George, London 2001.
[10] King’s Cross Central, Allies & Morrison. http://www.alliesandmorrison.com/project/kings-cross-central, access: 1.12.2017.
[11] Judgement of the Court of Appeal: King’s Cross Railway Lands Group v London Borough of Camden, Court of Appeal – Administrative Court, May 25, 2007, [2007] EWHC 1515. https://high-court-justice.vlex.co.uk/vid/-52630692, access: 1.12.2017.
[2] Tallow A. Urban regeneration in the UK. Routledge 2013.
[3] Thompson Z. Urban constellation: spaces of cultural regeneration in post-industrial Britain (theory, technology and society). Routledge, London 2015.
[4] Roberts P., Sykes H., Granger R. Urban Regeneration. SAGE 2017.
[5] Brenner D. King’s Cross railway lands: A „good argument” for change? Development Planning Unit UCL, London 2014.
[6] Bishop P., Williams L. Planning, politics and city making. A case study of King’s Cross. RIBA Publishing, 2016.
[7] Strategic Guidance for London Planning Authorities. Government Office for London (GOL), London 1996.
[8] Summers Ch. Cleaning up King’s Cross, BBC news online. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/2550709.stm, access: 1.12.2017.
[9] Principles for a human city. Argent St George, London 2001.
[10] King’s Cross Central, Allies & Morrison. http://www.alliesandmorrison.com/project/kings-cross-central, access: 1.12.2017.
[11] Judgement of the Court of Appeal: King’s Cross Railway Lands Group v London Borough of Camden, Court of Appeal – Administrative Court, May 25, 2007, [2007] EWHC 1515. https://high-court-justice.vlex.co.uk/vid/-52630692, access: 1.12.2017.
Jóźwik, R. (2018) „The problem of urban redevelopment of post-industrial King’s Cross central area in London”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 17(1), s. 063–069. doi: 10.24358/Bud-Arch_18_171_08.
Autorzy
Renata Jóźwikrenata.jozwik@gmail.com
The Department of Landscape Design and Conservation; Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture; University of Life Science in Lublin; Polska
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7625-0151
Statystyki
Abstract views: 516PDF downloads: 451
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
Budownictwo i Architektura wspiera program otwartej nauki. Czasopismo umożliwia otwarty dostęp (Open Access) do publikacji. Każdy może przeglądać, pobierać i przekazywać artykuły pod warunkiem przestrzegania zasad licencji.
