Multicriteria optimisation of information protection system configuration based on the NSGA-II algorithm
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 16 No. 2 (2026)
-
Performance evaluation of optimized deep learning model with Multilayered Max-Norm Regularization (MMNR) technique for brain tumour classification in MRI multi-modal images
Mulackal Chandran Binish, Vinu Thomas5-14
-
Stroke detection from brain CT-images and its volume visualization
Rithu James, Appukuttan Harsha, Liza Annie Joseph15-21
-
Adaptive filtering for noise reduction in photoplethysmography signals
Hicham Loumissi, Adil Barra, Najat Messaoudi, Othmane El Badlaoui, Bahloul Bensassi, Hicham Medromi22-25
-
Evaluation of informational diagnostic criteria and severity biomarkers using a discrimination model in patients with COVID-19
Gryhoriy Gradil, Oleg Avrunin, Kateryna Yurko, Natalia Shushlyapina, Yuliia Kalashnyk-Vakulenko, Mariia Shostatska, Aigul Iskakova26-31
-
Signal amplifiers in optical communication systems
Nurzhigit Smailov, Nurlybek Turar, Akezhan Sabibolda32-36
-
Analysis of underwater communication systems based on hybrid Li-Fi technology
Nurzhigit Smailov, Aizhan Urazgaliyeva, Akezhan Sabibolda37-43
-
Applying Box-Behnken design to research voice control automatic lighting systems
Oleksandr Burban, Mykola Polishchuk, Anatolii Tkachuk, Serhii Kostiuchko, Liliia Polishchuk, Valentyna Tkachuk44-49
-
Paddy fields detection on Sentinel-2 satellite images using EfficientDet model
Suvarna Vani Koneru, Kamal Epuri, Bhuvanesh Kakumanu, Ram Dinesh Aduri50-55
-
Models for assessing accuracy and reliability of fibre-optic gyroscope-based navigation systems
Maral Abulkhanova, Nurzhigit Smailov, Yerlan Tashtay, Gulbakhar Yussupova, Anar Khabay, Beibarys Sekenov, Akezhan Sabibolda56-60
-
Aggregation of multimodal log and metric streams for neuro-fuzzy anomaly detection in computer systems
Andrii Mishchenko, Oleksii Shushura, Alona Kolomiiets, Andrii Donets, Olena Kosaruk61-67
-
Static forensic analysis of file carving on SSDs uses NIST and ACPO method
Khoirul Anam Dahlan, Anton Yudhana, Herman Yuliansyah68-75
-
Fuzzy logic-based security risk assessment in wireless sensor networks of Industrial IoT
Olena Semenova, Natalia Kryvinska, Olha Voitsekhovska, Andrii Dzhus, Volodymyr Martyniuk76-83
-
Multicriteria optimisation of information protection system configuration based on the NSGA-II algorithm
Valeryi Lakhno, Myroslav Lakhno, Alona Desiatko, Bohdan Bebeshko84-90
-
Method of structural-block coding of tuple transformant video images
Volodymyr Barannik, Dmytro Uzlov, Yevhenii Yelisieiev, Valeriy Barannik, Nina Petrukha, Mykhailo Babenko, Dmitry Barannik, Vladyslav Kostromytskyi, Oleh Kompaniiets, Artem Bychenko91-101
-
Analysis of the increase in model forecasting accuracy after data normalization
Vladyslav Pylypenko, Vladyslava Skidan, Antonina Volivach102-106
-
Optimizing parameters for 4D hyperchaotic system using Walrus Optimizer Algorithm
Karam Adel Abed, Omar Saber Qasim, Saad Fawzi Al-Azzawi107-112
-
Iron coagulation optimization during water treatment using artificial intelligence tools
Andrii Safonyk, Ivan Tarhonii, Oleksandr Naumchuk, Vladyslav Danchenkov, Roman Zaichuk113-117
-
Optimisation of the generating capacity of droop-based DGs integrated into an isolated AC microgrid using metaheuristic algorithms to minimise power losses
Tuan-Ho Le, Tham X. Nguyen, Robert Lis, Muhammad Jamshed Abbass118-125
-
Chemical composition, structural and electrical properties of CdZnTeSe thick polycrystalline films
Yaroslav Znamenshchykov, Oleksii Lisovenko, Mykola Khvyshchun, Anatoliy Opanasyuk126-130
-
Substantiation of a new method for separation of bulk materials on a vibro-friction separator
Mykola Bakum, Serhii Kharchenko, Anatolii Mykhailov, Mykola Krekot, Taras Shchur, Oleg Dzhidzhora131-138
-
Software-based performance evaluation and forecasting of web applications using machine learning models
Liubov Oleshchenko139-144
-
Comparative analysis of Java unit and integration testing tools: JUnit, TestNG and Spock
Dawid Grabek, Jan Gryta, Mariusz Dzieńkowski145-151
-
Application of UML in the development process of computer games
Lyudmila Samchuk, Yuliia Povstiana, Yaroslav Tymoshchuk152-155
-
Design of digital cooking assistant system with modern voice generative AI model
Robert Banasiak, Zdzisława Rowińska, Wojciech Szczucki, Dawid Jantosz, Łukasz Rembowski156-161
-
Deep learning architectures for multiclass clothing recognition as the semantic core of automated virtual try-on systems
Roman Chekhmestruk, Olena Voitsekhovska, Svitlana Kyrylashchuk162-172
-
Knowledge model "Tags about batches and containers" of the ERP system "PlasmIS" with the possibility of self-improvement using local llm models
Oleh Bisikalo, Valerii Starzhynskyi, Tetiana Molodetska, Nelia Burlaka173-178
-
Paradigms of information technology impact on economic education
Artem Yurchenko, Inna Kharchenko, Volodymyr Shamonia, Vladyslav Bespalyi, Serhii Bohoslavskyi, Olena Semenikhina179-186
Archives
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2026-06-30 27
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2026-03-30 27
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2025-12-20 27
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2025-09-30 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2025-06-27 24
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2025-03-31 26
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2024-12-21 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2024-09-30 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2024-06-30 24
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2024-03-31 23
-
Vol. 13 No. 4
2023-12-20 24
-
Vol. 13 No. 3
2023-09-30 25
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-06-30 14
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2023-03-31 12
-
Vol. 12 No. 4
2022-12-30 16
-
Vol. 12 No. 3
2022-09-30 15
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2022-06-30 16
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2022-03-31 9
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The article addresses the problem of multi-criteria optimisation of configuration parameters for an information protection system (IPS) within an enterprise or company. The problem lies in the difficulty of allocating a company’s limited resources among the various components of the information security system (ISS) when there are conflicting requirements regarding security and performance. To address this challenge, it is proposed to integrate an analytical risk assessment model with the NSGA-II evolutionary algorithm. This results in the formation of a 3D Pareto front, which will enable the decision-maker to select a security configuration based on a visual analysis of five dimensions: reliability, performance, scalability, cost and compliance. This will eliminate the subjectivity inherent in methods that rely on a priori weighting coefficients. During the computational experiments, the influence of algorithm parameters on the formation of the solution set was examined, and Pareto fronts were visualised using the Plotly library. The trade-offs between the considered criteria were analysed. The results obtained confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed approach for selecting the optimal configuration of the protection system.
Keywords:
References
[1] Abraham, S., & Nair, S. (2018). Comparative analysis and patch optimization using the cyber security analytics framework. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 15(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548512917705743
[2] Al-Jarrah, O., & Arafat, A. (2014). Network Intrusion Detection System using attack behavior classification. 2014 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Systems (ICICS), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IACS.2014.6841978
[3] Al-Kasasbeh, B. (2022). Model of the information security protection subsystem operation and method of optimization of its composition. Egyptian Informatics Journal, 23(3), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eij.2022.05.003
[4] Boranbayev, A., Boranbayev, S., Nurusheva, A., & Yersakhanov, K. (2018). The Modern State and the Further Development Prospects of Information Security in the Republic of Kazakhstan. In S. Latifi (Ed.), Information Technology – New Generations (Vol. 738, pp. 33–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77028-4_6
[5] Carcary, M., Doherty, E., & Conway, G. (2019). A framework for managing cybersecurity effectiveness in the digital context. In T. Cruz, & P. Simoes (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, ECCWS 2019 (Vol. 2019, pp. 78-86). (European Conference on Information Warfare and Security, Vol. 2019-July). Curran Associates Inc.
[6] Dreis, Y., Korchenko, O., Brzhevska, Z., Kriuchkova, L., & Nesterova, O. (2024). Model to formation data base of internal parameters for assessing the status of the state secret protection. 3654, 277–289. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3654/paper23.pdf
[7] Dreis, Y., Korchenko, O., Sokolov, V., & Skladannyi, P. (2024). Model to formation data base of secondary parameters for assessing status of the state secret protection. 3800, 1–11. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3800/paper1.pdf
[8] Ehis, A. T. (2023). Optimization of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Infrastructures, and Events Correlation/Regression Analysis for Optimal Cyber Security Posture. Archives of Advanced Engineering Science, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewAAES32021068
[9] Ekelhart, A., Kiesling, E., Grill, B., Strauss, C., & Stummer, C. (2015). Integrating attacker behavior in IT security analysis: A discrete-event simulation approach. Information Technology and Management, 16(3), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-015-0232-6
[10] Enayaty-Ahangar, F., Albert, L. A., & DuBois, E. (2021). A survey of optimization models and methods for cyberinfrastructure security. IISE Transactions, 53(2), 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/24725854.2020.1781306
[11] Hardy, S., Crete-Nishihata, M., Kleemola, K., Senft, A., Sonne, B., Wiseman, G., Gill, P., & Deibert, R. J. (2014). Targeted Threat Index: Characterizing and quantifying politically-motivated targeted malware (K. Fu, Ed.). USENIX Association.
[12] Jiang, Y., Jeusfeld, M. A., Ding, J., & Sandahl, E. (2023). Model-Based Cybersecurity Analysis: Extending Enterprise Modeling to Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65(6), 643–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00811-0
[13] Kiesling, E., Ekelhart, A., Grill, B., Strauss, C., & Stummer, C. (2016). Selecting security control portfolios: A multi-objective simulation-optimization approach. EURO Journal on Decision Processes, 4(1–2), 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40070-016-0055-7
[14] Ma, H., Zhang, Y., Sun, S., Liu, T., & Shan, Y. (2023). A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(12), 15217–15270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10526-z
[15] Muminov, K., & Rustamova, M. (2024). Solving modern cybersecurity issues, a practical and experimental approach. Engineering Problems and Innovations, 2(4), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.70037/epai.2.4.18-26
[16] Okimoto, T., Ikegai, N., Inoue, K., Okada, H., Ribeiro, T., & Maruyama, H. (2013). Cyber security problem based on Multi-Objective Distributed Constraint Optimization technique. 2013 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop (DSN-W), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/DSNW.2013.6615540
[17] Palko, D., Babenko, T., Bigdan, A., Kiktev, N., Hutsol, T., Kuboń, M., Hnatiienko, H., Tabor, S., Gorbovy, O., & Borusiewicz, A. (2023). Cyber Security Risk Modeling in Distributed Information Systems. Applied Sciences, 13(4), 2393. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042393
[18] Park, J. Y., & Huh, E. N. (2020). A Cost-Optimization Scheme Using Security Vulnerability Measurement for Efficient Security Enhancement. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 16(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.3745/JIPS.02.0128
[19] Serra, E., Jajodia, S., Pugliese, A., Rullo, A., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2015). Pareto-Optimal Adversarial Defense of Enterprise Systems. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 17(3), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699907
[20] Shelupanov, A., Evsyutin, O., Konev, A., Kostyuchenko, E., Kruchinin, D., & Nikiforov, D. (2019). Information Security Methods—Modern Research Directions. Symmetry, 11(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11020150
[21] Shukla, M., Sarmah, S. P., & Tiwari, M. K. (2023). A multi-objective framework for the identification and optimisation of factors affecting cybersecurity in the Industry 4.0 supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 61(15), 5266–5281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2100840
[22] Shulha, O., Yanenkova, I., Kuzub, M., Muda, I., & Nazarenko, V. (2022). Banking Information Resource Cybersecurity System Modeling. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(2), 80. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020080
[23] Tagarev, N. (2019). A Critical Look at the Metrics for Measuring the Effectiveness of a Cybersecurity System. In Proceedings of International Conference on Application of Information and Communication Technology and Statistics in Economy and Education (ICAICTSEE) (pp. 183-191).
[24] Verma, S., Pant, M., & Snasel, V. (2021). A Comprehensive Review on NSGA-II for Multi-Objective Combinatorial Optimization Problems. IEEE Access, 9, 57757–57791. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070634
[25] Wang, L., Jajodia, S., Singhal, A., Cheng, P., & Noel, S. (2014). k-Zero Day Safety: A Network Security Metric for Measuring the Risk of Unknown Vulnerabilities. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 11(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDSC.2013.24
[26] Yan, D. (2020). A Systems Thinking for Cybersecurity Modeling (Version 1). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2001.05734
[27] Yin, L., Sun, Y., Wang, Z., Guo, Y., Li, F., & Fang, B. (2018). Security Measurement for Unknown Threats Based on Attack Preferences. Security and Communication Networks, 2018, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7412627
Article Details
Abstract views: 26

