PaaS platform comparison based on users feedback
Mateusz Saputa
mateusz.saputa@pollub.edu.plLublin University of Technology (Poland)
Konrad Prządka
(Poland)
Jakub Smołka
(Poland)
Abstract
This article presents a description of the opinion study about SalesForce and ServiceNow platforms. These are modern PaaS (Platform as a Service) environments that are gaining more and more popularity. Their main common feature is the use of cloud technology in creating and maintaining internet applications. The scope of the study included such platform properties as: applicability, interface assessment, as well as the required level of knowledge of code development. For the purpose of comparing the platforms on each of them, the respondents were asked to create an identical business form. It covers different types of fields and how to validate them. The research group received full access to the test platforms. Training was conducted to introduce the respondents to a given system. The prerequisite for completing the survey was that they created a form based on a template on each of the platforms. The answers to the questions were in the form of a point scale, where the minimum value was 1 and the highest value was 5. Based on the results obtained, it was found that the SalesForce platform is a better choice, gaining more points compared to ServiceNow by about 15%.
Keywords:
salesforce, servicenow, platform serviceReferences
F. Paraiso, N. Haderer, P. Merle, R. Rouvoy, L. Seinturier, A federated multi-cloud PaaS infrastructure, IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing (2012) 392-399.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2012.79
Google Scholar
M. Sellami, S. Yangui, M. Mohamed, S. Tata, PaaS-independent provisioning and management of applications in the cloud, IEEE 6th International Conference on Cloud Computing (2013) 693-700.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2013.105
Google Scholar
J. Hermann, A. David, A. Wagner, M. Ruskowski, Considering interdependencies for a dynamic generation of process chains for production as a service, Procedia Manufacturing 51 (2020) 1454-1461.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.202
Google Scholar
F. Zalila, S. Challita, P. Merle, Model-driven cloud resource management with OCCIware, Future Generation Computer Systems 99 (2019) 260-277.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.04.015
Google Scholar
P. Trakadas, et.al., Hybrid clouds for data-intensive, 5G-enabled IoT applications: An overview, key issues and relevant architecture, Sensors 19(16) (2019) 16.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19163591
Google Scholar
W. Huang, J. Li, Using Agent Solutions and Visualization Techniques to Manage Cloud-based Education System, 18th IEEE International Conference on Dependable (2020) 375-379.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC-PICom-CBDCom-CyberSciTech49142.2020.00073
Google Scholar
C. Krintz, et.al., Cloud platform support for API governance, 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (2014) 615-618.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2E.2014.90
Google Scholar
C. Teixeira, et.al., The building blocks of a PaaS, Journal of Network and Systems Management 22(1) (2014) 75-99.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10922-012-9260-2
Google Scholar
Authors
Konrad PrządkaPoland
Authors
Jakub SmołkaPoland
Statistics
Abstract views: 84PDF downloads: 77
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
