A Three-dimensional Aproach in Education for Sustainable Future
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 12 No. 1 (2017)
-
The Effect of Environmental Innovation on Employment Level: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Industries
Wei Yu, Huifang Yu7-14
-
Climatic Migrations – Consequences of Upsetting Environmental Balance and a of Flaws in Human Protection by International Law
Piotr Krajewski15-20
-
General Social Survey and Sustainable Development. Methodological and Empirical Aspects
Paweł Rydzewski21-29
-
Tackling Sustainability from a Systemic Perspective: A Contextualized Approach
Horatiu Dragomirescu, Lino Bianco41-54
-
Social Responsibility, Internal Governance and Manufacturing Growth
Yuhong Cao, Jianxin You, Yongjiang Shi, Wei Hu41-54
-
Prosumption as a Factor of Sustainable Development
Michał Czuba55-61
-
A Three-dimensional Aproach in Education for Sustainable Future
Živilė Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Viktorija Žilinskaitė-Vytienė, Ilona Valantinaitė63-69
-
Sustainable Development of a City: Systemic Approach
Lidia Mierzejewska71-78
-
Rationalisation of Investment Decisions in the Sustainable Management of Urban Development – is a New Paradigm Needed?
Anna Wojewnik-Filipkowska79-90
-
Effect of Drilling for Shale Gas on the Quality of Atmospheric Air
Jan Macuda, Marek Bogacki, Jakub Siemek91-100
-
Model-Driven Engineering and Creative Arts Approach to Designing Climate Change Response System for Rural Africa: A Case Study of Adum-Aiona Community in Nigeria
Emmanuel Okewu, Sanjay Misra, Jonathan Okewu101-116
-
Sustainable Development in the Context of the Integral Approach of the Human Person Guido Gatti
Jakub Bartoszewski, Bartłomiej Skowroński, Peter Papšo117-121
-
Influence of RES Integrated Systems on Energy Supply Improvement and Risks
Vladimir Ivanovich Velkin, Sergei Evgenevich Shcheklein123-129
-
Issues of Sustainable Development in the Light of a GIS-based Assessment of the Geochemical State of the Aquatic Environment
Katarzyna Rozpondek, Rafał Rozpondek131-137
-
Ecological Compensation Standard for Non-point Pollution from Farmland
Yin Zhang, Yujia Ji, Yuchen Zhou, Hua Sun139-146
-
Sustainable Landfilling as Final Step of Municipal Waste Management System
Marcin K. Widomski, Piotr Gleń, Grzegorz Łagód147-155
Archives
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2019-07-01 20
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2019-01-02 20
-
Vol. 13 No. 2
2023-10-15 22
-
Vol. 13 No. 1
2018-01-02 23
-
Vol. 12 No. 2
2017-07-03 18
-
Vol. 12 No. 1
2017-01-02 16
-
Vol. 11 No. 2
2016-07-01 17
-
Vol. 11 No. 1
2016-01-04 20
-
Vol. 10 No. 2
2015-07-01 17
-
Vol. 10 No. 1
2015-01-05 16
Main Article Content
Authors
zivile.sedereviciute-paciauskiene@vgtu.lt
viktorija.ziliskaite-vytiene@vgtu.lt
Abstract
The concept of sustainable development is used in a growing number of new contexts (ever-modernising technologies, developing science, environmental protection, politics) and levels (global, regional, national, institutional, personal). The concept differs depending on an area in which it is used. Business, technologies and politics use typical, already existing approaches to sustainable development. The projection/transposition of sustainable development paradigm into the sphere of education, science, technologies, economy, environmental protection and politics acquire the specifics of a sphere, namely structure and terminology, and has different elements. A wide field of human activity and different levels of the implementation of the concept of sustainable development make the analysis of this development and its implementation in the education sector more difficult. Both scientific and practical educational discourse need common parameters, common dimensions which unify the different areas of sustainable development and allow educators to accurately convey a full picture of this development. In this article, we will highlight educational approach towards a sustainability paradigm by analysing the common dimensions of sustainable development. We will talk about the levels of the implementation of sustainable development by concentrating on education at a personal level. Having applied the triangle of the dimensions of sustainable development (Place, Permanence, Persons), created by L. Seghezzo, to explain and analyse the concept of quality of life, in the article, we will present a three dimensional model of education for sustainable development.
Keywords:
References
ADKINS B., FOTH M., SUMMERVILLE J., HIGGS P., 2007, Ecologies of innovation – Symbolic aspects of cross-organizational linkages in the design sector in an Australian inner-city area, in: American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 50, no 7, p. 922-934.
COHEN-ROSENTHAL E., 2004, Making sense out of industrial ecology: a framework for analysis and action, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 12, no 8-10, p. 1111-1123.
COTTLE S., 2004, Producing nature(s): on the changing production ecology of natural history TV, in: Media Culture & Society, vol. 26, no 1, p. 81-101.
Darnaus vystymosi darbotvarkė iki 2030 metų, 2015, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld (22.06.2016).
DIENER E., SUH E., 1997, Measuring quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators, in: Social Indicators Research, vol. 40, p. 189-216.
FLORIDA R., 2002, The Rise of Creative Class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, communitiy and everyday life, Basic, New York.
FROMM E., 1976, To Have or to Be? The nature of the psyche, Harper & Row, New York.
HUCLE J., 2012, Towards a greater realism in learning for sustainability, in: Learning for Sustainability, p. 35-48, http://john.huckle.org.uk/download/2958/LfSChapterOne2012.pdf (10.07.2016).
HUGHES M., 2006, Affect, Meaning and Quality of Life, in: Social Forces, vol. 85, no. 2, p. 611-629.
KAČERAUSKAS T., 2016, Discourses of Ecology and the Sketches of Creative Ecology in the Context of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol.11, no.1, p. 31-39.
KOHLBERG L., 1984, The Psychology of Moral Development. Nature and Validity of Moral Stages, Harper and Row, San Francisco.
MASLAW A.H., 1954. Motivation and personality, Harper & Bros., New York, in: Seghezzo, 2009.
O‘CONNOR J., 1998, Natural Causes. Essays in Ecological Marxism, Guilford, New York.
PACE P., 2010, Education for sustainable development: current fad or renewed commitment to action? In: Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 315-323.
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2009, How many dimensions does sustainable development have?, in: Sustainable Development, vol. 16 no 2, p. 81-90.
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2011, Sustainable Development as a Civilizational Revolution. Multidimensional Approach to the Challenges of the 21st century, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, A Balkema Book, Boca Raton, Londyn, Nowy Jork, Leiden.
SEGHEZZO L., 2009, The five dimensions of sustainability, in: Enironmental Politics, vol.18, no. 4, p. 539-556.
SPRINGETT D., 2016, Education and the Problems of Sustainable Development, in: Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 11, no 1, p. 7-14.
Study Protocol for the World Health Organization Project to Develop a Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL) (1993). Quality of Life Research, vol. 2, no. 2, p. 153-159, http://www.jstor.org/stable/4034396 (21.08.2016).
The World Summit on Sustainable Development. People, planet, prosperity, 2002, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/wssd/documents/wssd_brochure.pdf (21.08.2016).
WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987, Our Common Future (Brundtland Report), Oxford University Press, New York.
ZOLLER U., 2015, Research-Based Transformative Science/ STEM/ STES/ STESEP Education for Sustainability Thinking. From: Teaching to ‘Know‘ to Learning to ‘Think‘, in: Sustainability, vol 7, no. 4, p. 4474-4491.
Article Details
Abstract views: 87
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
