The Impact of Ecological Footprint, Energy Consumption, and Economic Stability on Happiness: Evidence from BRICS-T Countries
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to analyze the impact of ecological footprint, fossil fuel energy consumption, renewable energy consumption and economic stability on happiness in BRICS-T countries for the years between 2015-2022 with the help of methods that take into account cross-section dependence and also can be used for heterogeneous panels. In this context, Dynamic SUR and AMG estimators are used to determine whether there is a long-run relationship among the variables. As a results of the analysis, there is a difference for individual and panel results. The individual results show that the variables considered in the analysis are statistically significant and there are differences among countries. Also, panel results indicate that factors that increase environmental pollution, such as an increase in ecological footprint and fossil fuel energy consumption negatively affect happiness, while reducing environmental pollution like a rise in renewable energy consumption, and improvement in economic conditions, like an increase in economic stability increases happiness.
Keywords:
References
1. AKSOY F., BAYRAM ARLI N., 2019, Evaluation of sustainable happiness with Sustainable Development Goals: Structural equation model approach, Sustainable Development 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1985.
2. APERGIS N., MAJEED M. T., 2021, Greenhouse gas emissions and cross-national happiness: A global perspective, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 14(8), 1289-1300, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01019-5.
3. BASSO L., VIOLA E., 2022, Are the BRICS engaged in the low carbon transition?, CEBRI Journal 1(4), 123-151.
4. BONASIA M., SIMONE E. D., D’UVA M., NAPOLITANO O., 2022, Environmental protection and happiness: A long-run relationship in Europe, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 93, 106704.
5. ALDIERI L., BRUNO B., VINCI C. P., 2019, Does environmental innovation make us happy? An empirical investigation, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 67, 166-172.
6. BAI J., NG S., 2004, A panic attack on unit roots and cointegration, Econometrica 72(4), 1127-1177, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.x.
7. BAI J., NG, S., 2010, Panel unit root tests with cross-section dependence: A further investigation, Econometric The-ory 26(4), 1088-1114, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466609990478.
8. CAT (Climate Action Tracker), 2025a, Russian Federation: Policies and action, https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/russian-federation/policies-action/ (05.03.2025).
9. CAT (Climate Action Tracker), 2025b, India: Net zero targets, https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/india/net-zero-tar-gets/#:~:text=Target%20year%20%E2%80%93%20India%20aims%20to,key%20sectors%20of%20the%20economy (05.03.2025).
10. CAT (Climate Action Tracker), 2025c, Turkey: Net zero targets, https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/turkey/net-zero-targets/ (05.03.2025).
11. CCPI (Climate Change Performance Index), 2025, South Africa, https://ccpi.org/country/zaf/ (05.03.2025).
12. CLIMATE TRANSPARENCY, 2022a, Russia. Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 climate action, https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CT2022-Russia-web.pdf.
13. CLIMATE TRANSPARENCY, 2022b, India. Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 climate action, https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CT2022-India-Web.pdf.
14. CLIMATE TRANSPARENCY, 2022c, China. Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 climate action, https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CT2022-China-Web.pdf.
15. CLIMATE TRANSPARENCY, 2022d, South Africa. Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 climate action, https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CT2022-South-Africa-Web.pdf.
16. CLIMATE TRANSPARENCY, 2022e, Turkey. Climate Transparency Report: Comparing G20 climate action, https://www.climate-transparency.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/CT2022-Turkey-Web.pdf.
17. CRS, 2023, India: Climate change issues, CRS.
18. DE MORAIS, I. L. L., DE LIMA A. A., SANTOS I. N. L. D, MENESES C., DA SILVA R. F., LOPES R., RA-MOS S. L. F., DE AGUIAR A. V., WREGE M. S., LOPES M. T. G., 2024, Climate change impact on the distribu-tion of forest species in the Brazilian Amazon, Sustainability 16, 3458, https://doi.org/10.3390/ su16083458.
19. DONATH L., OPREA I., 2020, The inclusive finance factor of happiness, Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law 18, 139-149.
20. DOWNIE C., WILLIAMS M., 2018, After the Paris Agreement: What role for the BRICS in global climate governance?, Global Policy, https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12550
21. EBERHARDT M., BOND S., 2009, Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: A novel estimator, MPRA Paper, No. 17692, University Library of Munich, Germany.
22. EFEOĞLU R., AZGÜN S., 2021, Demokrasi ve mutluluk: BRIC ve MIST ülkeleri üzerine bir araştırma, Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 11(1), 333-349.
23. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 2022, Brazil’s climate change policies: State of play ahead of COP27, European Parliamentary Research Service.
24. FEITOSA T. B., FERNANDES M. M., SANTOS C. A. G., DA SILVA R. M., GARCIA J. R., FILHO R. N. D. A., FERNANDES M. R. D. M., DA CUNHA E. R., 2023, Assessing economic and ecological impacts of carbon stock and land use changes in Brazil’s Amazon Forest: A 2050 projection, Sustainable Production and Consumption 41, 64-74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2023.07.009.
25. GENGENBACH C., URBAIN J-P., WESTERLUND J., 2016, Error correction testing in panels with common stochastic trends, Journal of Applied Econometrics 31(6), 982-1004.
26. GERASIMCHUK I., KÜHNE K., ROTH J., GEDDES A., OHARENKO Y., BRIDLE R., GARG V., 2019, Be-yond fossil fuels: Fiscal transition in BRICS. Report, The International Institute for Sustainable Development.
27. GIANSYAH R. W., SAMBODO H., BINARDJO G., SUHARNO S., 2023, Happiness index in ASEAN-9 2015-2021: Macroeconomic and demographic perspectives, Economics Development Analysis Journal 12(4), 537-547.
28. GLOBAL FOOTPRINT NETWORK, 2024, Ecological Footprint, https://www.footprintnetwork.org (10.07.2024).
29. GUILHOT L., 2022, An analysis of China’s energy policy from 1981 to 2020: Transitioning towards to a diversified and low-carbon energy system, Energy Policy 162, 112806, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112806.
30. IEA, 2021, Turkey 2021: Energy policy review, International Energy Agency.
31. IEA, 2025a, Energy system of Russia, https://www.iea.org/countries/russia (03.03.2025).
32. IEA, 2025b, Energy system of China, https://www.iea.org/countries/china (03.03.2025).
33. IEA, 2025c, China: World energy investment 2024, https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024/china (03.03.2025).
34. INVEST, 2025, https://www.invest.gov.tr/en/sectors/pages/energy.aspx (03.03.2025).
35. INVEST IN BRASIL, 2025, https://investinbrasil.com.br/content/portaldoinvestidor/us/home/why-brazil.html (03.03.2025).
36. INVEST IN INDIA, 2025, https://www.investindia.gov.in/sector/renewable-energy (03.03.2025).
37. IRENA, 2024, Energy profile: South Africa, Irena.
38. JIN Z., ZENG S., CAO C., MA H., SUN D., 2020, Impacts of pollution abatement projects on happiness: An ex-ploratory study in China, Journal of Cleaner Production 274, 122869, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122869.
39. KANAUJIYA K. S., MAURYA N. K., 2022, Does development lead to happiness?, IASSI Quarterly: Contributions to Indian Social Science 41(4), 498-515.
40. KAPÇAK S., 2023, Gelişmekte olan ülkelerde mutluluk ve ekonomik büyümenin ekolojik ayak izi üzerindeki etkisi, Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi 10(2), 136-146.
41. KARAÇOR Z., MİRZA E., 2018, Sustainable development and life satisfaction relationship: A cross country study, International Journal of Innovative Science, Engineering & Technology 5(11), 52-61.
42. KHARE V., JAIN A., BHUIYAN M. A., 2023, Perspective of renewable energy in the BRICS country, e-Prime – Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy 5, 100250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2023.100250.
43. KHASANAH L., SURYANTO, 2023, The impact of air pollution on the happiness index of ASEAN communities, 8th International Conference on Climate Change, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1165, 012044.
44. KLEY S., DOVBISHCHUK T., 2021, How a lack of green in the residential environment lowers the life satisfaction of city dwellers and increases their willingness to relocate, Sustainability 13(7), 3984, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073984.
45. LELE F. F., 2013, Happiness and the environment: Finding out a relationship, Master’s Dissertation in Environmental Economics and Management.
46. LI B., LU Y., 2009, Happiness and development: The effect of mental well-being on economic growth, The 2009 Conference on Improving the Human Destiny, Lingnan University, Hong Kong, 11-12 June 2009.
47. LIU Y., LI R.-L., SONG Y., ZHANG Z.-J., 2019, The role of environmental tax in alleviating the impact of environmental pollution on residents’ happiness in China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(22), 4574, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16224574.
48. MAJEED M. T., MUMTAZ S., 2017, Happiness and environmental degradation: A global analysis, Pakistan Jour-nal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 11(3), 753-772.
49. MARK N. C., OGAKI M., SUL D., 2005, Dynamic seemingly unrelated cointegrating regressions, Review of Eco-nomic Studies 72(3), 797-820, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2005.00352.x.
50. MFA, 2025, https://www.mfa.gov.tr/bm-iklim-degisikligi-cerceve-sozlesmesi.tr.mfa (05.03.2025).
51. NGUYEN D. H., KHOMINICH I. P., 2023, The measurement of green economic quality in the BRICS countries: Should they prioritize financing for environmental protection, economic growth, or social goals?, Russian Journal of Economics 9(2), 183-200, https://doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.9.101612.
52. NOUBISSI DOMGUIA E., POUMIE B., 2019, National happiness and environment quality in Africa, MPRA Paper No. 96580.
53. O’BRIEN C., 2005, Planning for sustainable happiness: Harmonizing our internal and external landscapes, Rethink-ing Development: 2nd International Conference on Gross National Happiness, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada.
54. OSTROWSKA A., KOTLINSKI K., MARKOWSKI L., 2024, Does renewable energy matter for economic growth and happiness?, Energies 17(11), 2619.
55. ÖKSÜZ M., 2023, Seçilmiş OECD ülkelerinde sosyal harcamaların toplumun mutluluk düzeyi üzerindeki etkisi, Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimlerde Yenilikçi Yaklaşımlar Dergisi 7(1), 27-45.
56. PATHAK L., SHAH K., 2019, Renewable energy resources, policies and gaps in BRICS countries and the global impact, Frontiers in Energy 13, 506-521, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-018-0601-z.
57. PENG Y.-F., TANG J.-H., FU Y., FAN I., HOR M.-K., CHAN T.-C., 2016, Analyzing personal happiness from global survey and weather data: A geospatial approach, PLOS ONE 11(4), e0153638, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153638.
58. PESARAN M. H., 2007, A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence, Journal of Applied Econometrics 22(2), 265-312, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951.
59. PESARAN M. H., YAMAGATA T., 2008, Testing slope homogeneity in large panels, Journal of Econometrics 142(1), 50-93, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010.
60. PROSKURYAKOVA L., 2022, Russia’s renewable energy sector: Policy recommendations, BSR policy briefing series.
61. QU H., SUPHACHALASAI S., THUBE S., WALKER S., 2023, South Africa carbon pricing and climate mitigation policy, IMF Selected Issues paper, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.
62. REESE S., WESTERLUND J., 2016, Panicca: Panic on cross‐section averages, Journal of Applied Econometrics 31(6), 961-981.
63. REHDANZ K., MADDISON D., 2005, Climate and happiness, Ecological Economics 52(1), 111-125, https;//10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.015.
64. SAMOUR A., ADEBAYO T. S., AGYEKUM E. B., KHAN B., KAMEL S., 2023, Insights from BRICS‑T econ-omies on the impact of human capital and renewable electricity consumption on environmental quality, Scientific Re-ports 13, 5245, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32134-1.
65. SARGAN J. D., BHARGAVA A., 1983, Testing residuals from least squares regression for being generated by the Gaussian random walk, Econometrica 51(1), 153-174, https://doi.org/10.2307/1912252.
66. SEYDİOĞULLARI H. S., 2013, Sürdürülebilir kalkınma için yenilenebilir enerji, Planlama 23(1), 19-25.
67. SILVA J., KEULENAER F. DE, JOHNSTONE N., 2012, Environmental quality and life satisfaction: Evidence based on micro-data, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 44, OECD Publishing.
68. STRANGE T., BAYLEY A., 2008, Sustainable development: Linking economy, society, environment, OECD.
69. TOIGO C. H., MATTOS E. J., 2021, Happier and greener? The relationship between subjective well-being and environmental performance, International Journal of Social Economics 48(12), 1697-1717.
70. TURAL DİKMEN A., BEDİR KARA S., 2024, Yükselen piyasa ekonomilerinde CO2 emisyonu, yenilenebilir enerji tüketimi ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 19(2), 415-433.
71. UNEP, 2024, Emissions gap report 2023, https://www.unep.org/interactives/emissions-gap-report/2023/#section-1 (26.07.2024).
72. UNITED NATIONS, 2025, The 17 Sustainable development goals, https://sdgs.un.org (27.02.2025).
73. WANG Y., ARSHED N., GHULAM SHABEER M., MUNIR M., REHMAN H. U., KHAN Y. A., 2023, Does globalization and ecological footprint in OECD lead to national happiness, PLOS ONE 18(10), e0288630.
74. WELSCH H., 2006, Environment and happiness: Valuation of air pollution using life satisfaction data, Ecological Economics 58(4), 801-813, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.006.
75. WORLD BANK, 2024, https://data.worldbank.org (10.07.2024).
76. WORLD HAPPINESS REPORT, 2020, Sustainability makes people happier, research finds, https://worldhappiness.report/news/sustainability-makes-people-happier-research-finds (27.02.2025).
77. WORLD HAPPINESS REPORT, 2024, Happiness index, WHP.
78. WWF, 2021, 10 soruda Türkiye ve Paris iklim anlaşması, World Wildlife Found.
79. YAĞIŞ O., 2024, Ekonomik büyüme ve sanayileşmenin ekolojik ayak izine etkileri: Asimetrik nedensellik analizi, International Journal of Social Inquiry 17(1), 87-104.
80. YAN L., TAO T., ULLAH S., 2023, Internet financial services, environmental technology, and happiness: Implications for sustainable development, PLOS ONE 18(11), e0287673.
81. YILDIRIM O., NURİ F. İ., 2018, Yenilenebilir enerji ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma ilişkisi, Journal of International Banking, Economy and Management Studies 1(1), 105-143.
82. YUNANI A., DALLE J., MIAR, MAULIDA S., 2020, Can life quality dimensions alter ecological footprint for sus-tainability of ASEAN countries? Role of per capita income, happiness and human development, Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues 10, 242-252.
83. ZHENG Y., YANG R. Y., 2019, Environmental regulation, public participation and happiness: Empirical research based on Chinese general social survey of 2015, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17(4), 9317-9332, http://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1704_93179332.
84. ZIDANSEK A., 2007, Sustainable development and happiness in nations, Energy 32, 891-897, 10.1016/j.energy.2006.09.016.
Article Details
Abstract views: 17