Sustainable and Resilient International Agricultural Trade: Global Uncertainty and Regional Reactions
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025)
-
The Spectrum of Sustainability: Why Environmental Sustainability Matters Most
Subhasmita Maharana1-10
-
Navigating the Risks of Generative AI: A Comparative Analysis of International Regulatory Approaches
Huang Xinbo, Liu Guo11-20
-
Towards an Islamic Ecotheology: Indonesian Muslim Organizations in Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Efforts
M. Lutfi Mustofa, M. Fauzan Zenrif, Ahmad Barizi21-31
-
Are Women's Socioeconomic Rights at Risk from Extreme Weather?
Jia Wei, Xiao-Yang Wang, Hua-Tang Yin, Chun-Ping Chang32-50
-
Clustering of European Сountries by Strategies of Digitalization of their Business Environment
Marharyta Chepeliuk, Elena Nirean, Yevheniia Voroniuk51-70
-
Demographic Security and Sustainable Development of Ukraine in the Conditions of Active Migration of the Population
Zinaida Smutchak, Ramin Tsinaridze, Tetiana Burlaienko, Oksana Dubinina71-85
-
Sustainable Urbanization Strategies: Mitigating Urban Heat Islands through Synergy between Economic Choices, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Environmental Interventions
Muhammad Khalid Anser, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Khalid M. Al-Aiban, Khalid Zaman, Mohamed Haffar86-100
-
Sustainable and Resilient International Agricultural Trade: Global Uncertainty and Regional Reactions
Yuliia Zavadska, Alla Shlapak, Olha Yatsenko, Oleksandr Iatsenko, Mariia Mykhailova, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi101-113
-
From Waste to Wealth: Leveraging Upcycling to Drive Sustainable E-Waste Management
Fatma Ince114-123
-
Rural Communities Access to Clean Cooking Fuels, Energy and Technologies: Socioeconomic Implications and Progress Toward Sustainable Development
Haitong Jiang, Kingsley Imandojemu, Mohamad Shaharudin bin Samsurijan, Omowumi Omodunni Idowu, Qinyuan Xu124-140
-
The Role of the Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Policies in the Transformation and Upgrading of the Manufacturing Sector: A Pathway to Green, Low-Carbon, and Sustainable Growth
Hongbing Shen141-155
-
Carbon Footprints, Social Inclusion, and Inequality: Multidimensional Pathways to Sustainable Development Goals
Haihua Zhao, Chuks Kingsley Okogor, Gabriel Osabohien156-177
-
Investigating the Determinants of Ecological, Carbon Footprints and Natural Resources: Evidence from Asia countries
Qiang Wang, Symphorien Zogbassè, Kemi Funlayo Akeju, Oluwayemisi Kajijat Adeleke178-194
-
The Impact of Ecological Footprint, Energy Consumption, and Economic Stability on Happiness: Evidence from BRICS-T Countries
Seher Suluk, Yusuf Ekrem AKBAŞ195-212
-
The The Impact of the Experience Economy on the Sustainable Development Strategy of Companies in the European Union and Great Britain
Olesia Iastremska, Maryna Martynenko, Yevgeniy Goryuk, Hanna Demchenko, Mykyta Budreiko213-222
-
The Effects of Circular Economy, Green Finance, and ICT Developments on Resource Productivity aimed Ecological Sustainability: Evidence from OECD Countries Using a CS-ARDL Approach
Shaomeng Shi, Asad Nisar223-244
-
Mechanisms of Management Adaptation to Sustainable Development Standards under the Condition of Global Changes
Olha Komelina, Svitlana Korobka, Hanna Kondratieva, Oleh Lazor, Oksana Lazor245-254
-
Spatio-temporal Distribution of Influencing Factors of Agricultural Sustainable Development in China
Lei Qian, Dehong Sun Sun, Hui Wang Wang254-269
-
Dynamic Common Correlated Effects of Green Innovation Funding and Green Trade on Environmental Quality in OECD Countries
Ke Xiao, Gang Wang, Hongling Yi, Asad Nisar270-283
-
Chanakya’s Concept of ‘Lokasangraha’ (Welfare of the People) in Global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Puja Mishra, Ashutosh Mishra284-293
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The research presents a complex analysis of modern tendencies in agricultural sector development focusing on the interaction between sustainable and resilient development concepts and international trade. The linear regression analysis established a statistically significant dependence between production volume, input costs, and export volumes. The influence of several factors on the agricultural sector's efficiency has been confirmed, making the results significant for forming development strategies and management solutions in agriculture. As a complying carrying out the clustering analysis, a group of countries whose approaches to agricultural sector development most fully comply with sustainability principles and whose efficiency of trade activity of agricultural products tends to rise constantly, has been distinguished. It has been highlighted that the European Union is an example of one of the most efficient combinations of economic and trade relationships and sustainable development. Major determinants of economic development in the industry have been distinguished within the context of agricultural production and trade transformation. Fundamental pillars of its transformation, in particular, the concept of bioeconomy and innovative technology implementation, have been defined. It has been highlighted that the effectiveness of bioeconomic policy substantially depends on regional peculiarities and the readiness of a country to adjust these strategies to its economic context. Using the integration of statistical methods and theoretical models, strategies of sustainable and resilient development in the agricultural sector under global economic and ecological challenges have been formed considering future generations' need to use the planet's resources efficiently
Keywords:
References
1. BAZALUK O., YATSENKO O.; ZAKHARCHUK O., OVACHARENKO A., KHRYSTENKO O., NITSENKO V., 2020, Dynamic Development of the Global Organic Food Market and Opportunities for Ukraine, Sustainability 12(17), 6963, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176963.
2. BLAND R., GANSEAN V., HONG E., KALANIK J.,2023, Trends driving automation on the farm, McKinsey & Com-pany, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/trends-driving-automation-on-the-farm.
3. CHAPLIN H., DAVIDOVA S., GORTON, M., 2004, Agricultural adjustment and the diversification of farm households and corporate farms in Central Europe, Journal of rural studies 20(1), 61-77, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00043-3.
4. DALY H.E., 1996, Beyond Growth. The Economics of Sustainable Development, Boston, https://books.google.com.ua/books?id=AgVoBAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=uk&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false.
5. DALY H.E., 2008, Ecological Economics and Sustainable Development. Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing, https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/ecological-economics-and-sustainable-development-selected-essays-of-herman-daly-9781847209887.html.
6. DATANOVIA 2020, K-Means Clustering in R: Algorithm and Practical Examples, https://www.datanovia.com/en/lessons/k-means-clustering-in-r-algorith-and-practical-examples/.
7. EIB, 2020, Agriculture, bioeconomy and rural development: overview, https://www.eib.org/attachments/thematic/agriculture_bioeconomy_and_rural_development_overview_2021_en.pdf.
8. EKINS P., 2000, Economic growth and environmental sustainability: the prospects for green growth, Routledge, https://books.google.com.ua/books/about/Economic_Growth_and_Environmental_Sustai.html?id=uoS4AAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y.
9. EKINS P., 2007, The living economy: a New Economics in the Making, Routledge, https://api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.9781134955688_A24765189/preview-9781134955688_A24765189.pdf.
10. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2021, European Green Deal, https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en.
11. European Commission, 2033, Value of EU trade deals surpasses €2 trillion - 2023 Implementation & Enforcement Report, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_5742.
12. European Investment Bank. Agriculture and bioeconomy – Unlocking production potential in a sustainable and resource-efficient way, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2867/611457.
13. FAO, 2023, Bioeconomy for sustainable food and agriculture: a global opportunity, United Nations, https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/17c04076-d998-4fe4-ba88-85c773dbd293.
14. FAO, 2023, Beyond the Price Tag: How Consumers are Changing the Game in 2022 and What Your Brands Need to Do to Keep Up in 2023, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/beyond-price-tag-how-consumers-changing-game-2022-what-your/
15. FAO, 2023, Faostat, https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/.
16. GARCIA M., 2012, The European Union and Latin America: ‘Transformative power Europe’ versus the realities of economic interests, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28(4), 621–640, https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2011.647762.
17. KOSTOV P, DAVIDOVA S., 2021, Common Policy but Different Outcomes: Structural Change in Family Farms of Central and East European Countries after Their Accession to the EU, Agriculture 11(11), 1074, https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v11y2021i11p1074-d669246.html.
18. MACQUEEN J., 1967, Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations, Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1, 281–97, http://projecteuclid.org:443/euclid.bsmsp/1200512992.
19. MATTHEWS A., 2012, The Impact of WTO Agricultural Trade Rules on Food Security and Development: An Examination of Proposed Additional Flexibilities for Developing Countries, Research Handbook on the WTO Agriculture Agreement, eds. McMahon J.A., Melaku G.D., Edward Elgar Publishing,https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/13302_4.html.
20. MATTHEWS A., 2012, Trade Agreements, WTO Rules, And Food Security: New Rules of Trade? San Diego, California 143183, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iat12m/143183.html.
21. MYKHALOVA, M., YATSENKO O., ZAVADSKA, Y.; AFANASIEVA O., HAAS R., 2023, The War in Ukraine and Its Impact on Global Agricultural Trade, Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment 74(2), 91–105. https://intapi.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/boku-2023-0008.
22. OSAULENKO O.; YATSENKO O.; REZNIKOVA N.; RUSAK D.; NItSENKO V., 2020, The productive capacity of countries through the prism of sustainable development goals: challenges to international economic security and to competitiveness, Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice 2(33), 492-499, https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i33.207214.
23. POLETTI A., 2012, The European Union and Multilateral Trade Governance: The Politics of the Doha Round, Routledge, London, https://www.routledge.com/The-European-Union-and-Multilateral-Trade-Governance-The-Politics-of-the-Doha-Round/Poletti/p/book/9781138802377.
24. SACHS J.D., 2005, Challenges of Sustainable Development Under Globalization, International Journal of Development Issues 4(2), 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1108/eb045851.
25. SACHS J.D., 2006, The end of poverty: Economic possibilities for our time, The Penguin Press, New York, http://www.economia.unam.mx/cedrus/pdf/jeffrey_sachs_the_end_of_poverty_economic_possibilities_for_our_time__2006.pdf.
26. STIGLITZ J.E., 2002, Globalization and Its Discontents, Norton, New York.
27. STIGLITZ J.E., 2012, The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future, https://business.columbia.edu/sites/default/files-efs/imce-uploads/Joseph_Stiglitz/Price%20of%20Inequality%20for%20Sustainable%20Humanity.pdf.
28. TANANAIKO T., YATSENKO O., OSYPOVA O., NITSENKO V., BALAEZENTIS T., STREIMIKIENE D., 2023, Economic Rationale for Manifestations of Asymmetry in the Global Trading System, Sustainability 15, 5316, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065316.
29. UC, 2018, UC Business Analytics R Programming Guide, https://uc-r.github.io/.
30. VALERI E., 2009, The European Union Free Trade Agreements: Implications for Developing Countries, https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/work-document/the-european-union-free-trade-agreements-implications-for-developing-countries-wp/.
31. WALDL D., 2024, Mykhailova, M.; Haas R. Entry points of the Russo-Ukrainian war into the EU's food supply chain and potential impacts, International Journal on Food System Dynamics 15(5), 453-466,
https://doi.org/10.18461/ijfsd.v15i5.M1.
32. YUNUS A., 2019, K Means Clustering Using R, https://rpubs.com/abdul_yunus/Kmeans_Clustering.
Article Details
Abstract views: 402

