The Spectrum of Sustainability: Why Environmental Sustainability Matters Most
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025)
-
The Spectrum of Sustainability: Why Environmental Sustainability Matters Most
Subhasmita Maharana1-10
-
Navigating the Risks of Generative AI: A Comparative Analysis of International Regulatory Approaches
Huang Xinbo, Liu Guo11-20
-
Towards an Islamic Ecotheology: Indonesian Muslim Organizations in Climate Mitigation and Adaptation Efforts
M. Lutfi Mustofa, M. Fauzan Zenrif, Ahmad Barizi21-31
-
Are Women's Socioeconomic Rights at Risk from Extreme Weather?
Jia Wei, Xiao-Yang Wang, Hua-Tang Yin, Chun-Ping Chang32-50
-
Clustering of European Сountries by Strategies of Digitalization of their Business Environment
Marharyta Chepeliuk, Elena Nirean, Yevheniia Voroniuk51-70
-
Demographic Security and Sustainable Development of Ukraine in the Conditions of Active Migration of the Population
Zinaida Smutchak, Ramin Tsinaridze, Tetiana Burlaienko, Oksana Dubinina71-85
-
Sustainable Urbanization Strategies: Mitigating Urban Heat Islands through Synergy between Economic Choices, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Environmental Interventions
Muhammad Khalid Anser, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Khalid M. Al-Aiban, Khalid Zaman, Mohamed Haffar86-100
-
Sustainable and Resilient International Agricultural Trade: Global Uncertainty and Regional Reactions
Yuliia Zavadska, Alla Shlapak, Olha Yatsenko, Oleksandr Iatsenko, Mariia Mykhailova, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi101-113
-
From Waste to Wealth: Leveraging Upcycling to Drive Sustainable E-Waste Management
Fatma Ince114-123
-
Rural Communities Access to Clean Cooking Fuels, Energy and Technologies: Socioeconomic Implications and Progress Toward Sustainable Development
Haitong Jiang, Kingsley Imandojemu, Mohamad Shaharudin bin Samsurijan, Omowumi Omodunni Idowu, Qinyuan Xu124-140
-
The Role of the Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Policies in the Transformation and Upgrading of the Manufacturing Sector: A Pathway to Green, Low-Carbon, and Sustainable Growth
Hongbing Shen141-155
-
Carbon Footprints, Social Inclusion, and Inequality: Multidimensional Pathways to Sustainable Development Goals
Haihua Zhao, Chuks Kingsley Okogor, Gabriel Osabohien156-177
-
Investigating the Determinants of Ecological, Carbon Footprints and Natural Resources: Evidence from Asia countries
Qiang Wang, Symphorien Zogbassè, Kemi Funlayo Akeju, Oluwayemisi Kajijat Adeleke178-194
-
The Impact of Ecological Footprint, Energy Consumption, and Economic Stability on Happiness: Evidence from BRICS-T Countries
Seher Suluk, Yusuf Ekrem AKBAŞ195-212
-
The The Impact of the Experience Economy on the Sustainable Development Strategy of Companies in the European Union and Great Britain
Olesia Iastremska, Maryna Martynenko, Yevgeniy Goryuk, Hanna Demchenko, Mykyta Budreiko213-222
-
The Effects of Circular Economy, Green Finance, and ICT Developments on Resource Productivity aimed Ecological Sustainability: Evidence from OECD Countries Using a CS-ARDL Approach
Shaomeng Shi, Asad Nisar223-244
-
Mechanisms of Management Adaptation to Sustainable Development Standards under the Condition of Global Changes
Olha Komelina, Svitlana Korobka, Hanna Kondratieva, Oleh Lazor, Oksana Lazor245-254
-
Spatio-temporal Distribution of Influencing Factors of Agricultural Sustainable Development in China
Lei Qian, Dehong Sun Sun, Hui Wang Wang254-269
-
Dynamic Common Correlated Effects of Green Innovation Funding and Green Trade on Environmental Quality in OECD Countries
Ke Xiao, Gang Wang, Hongling Yi, Asad Nisar270-283
-
Chanakya’s Concept of ‘Lokasangraha’ (Welfare of the People) in Global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Puja Mishra, Ashutosh Mishra284-293
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-09-16 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 23
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2021-01-04 24
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
subhasmitamaharana951@gmail.com
Abstract
Sustainability has emerged as a guiding principle in addressing the complex challenges of modern development. It encompasses a wide spectrum, including environmental, economic, and social dimensions, all of which are interconnected and essential for long-term global well-being. This paper explores the various types of sustainability, with a primary focus on environmental sustainability as the foundational pillar of sustainable development. Environmental sustainability ensures the preservation of natural ecosystems, biodiversity, and resources that support all life on Earth. Without maintaining ecological balance, economic growth and social equity become unsustainable. The paper argues that among the various forms of sustainability, environmental sustainability is the most critical, as it provides the natural foundation upon which human progress and societal well-being rest. By emphasizing the need for a shift in values and practices, this study underlines how prioritizing environmental sustainability can lead to a more resilient and equitable future.
Keywords:
References
1. AGYEMAN J., BULLARD R.D., EVANS B., 2002, Exploring the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity, Space and Polity 6(1): 77–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13562570220137907
2. BARRY J., 1999, Rethinking Green Politics: Nature, Virtue and Progress, Sage, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279311
3. BERKES F., 2012, Sacred Ecology, 3rd ed., Routledge, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203123843
4. CEBALLOS G., EHRLICH P.R., BARNOSKY A.D., GARCÍA A., PRINGLE R.M., PALMER T.M., 2015, Acceler-ated modern human–induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction, Science Advances 1(5): e1400253, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1400253
5. COLANTONIO A., 2009, Social sustainability: Linking research to policy and practice, Oxford Institute for Sustainable Development, https://www.brookes.ac.uk/schools/be/oisd/sustainable_communities.html
6. COLLINS L., 2021, The Ecological Constitution: Reframing Environmental Law, Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429277320
7. COSTANZA R., D’ARGE R., DE GROOT R., FARBER S., GRASSO M., HANNON B., LIMBURG K., NAEEM S., O’NEILL R.V., PARUELO J., RASKIN R.G., SUTTON P., VAN DEN BELT M., 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature 387(6630): 253–260, https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
8. DAILY G.C., EHRLICH P.R., 1992, Population, sustainability, and Earth’s carrying capacity, BioScience 42(10): 761–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1311995
9. DALY H., 1996, Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development, Beacon Press, Boston.
10. DEVALL B., SESSIONS G., 1985, Deep Ecology: Living as if Nature Mattered, Peregrine Smith Books, Salt Lake City.
11. DÍAZ S., SETTELE J., BRONDÍZIO E.S., NGO H.T., AGARD J., ARNETH A., BALVANERA P., BRAUMAN K.A., BUTCHART S.H.M., CHAN K.M.A., GARIBALDI L.A., ICHII K., LIU J., SUBRAMANIAN S.M., MIDGLEY G.F., MILOSLAVICH P., MOLNÁR Z., OBURA D., PFAFF A., POLASKY S., PURVIS A., RAZ-ZAQUE J., REYERS B., ROY CHOWDHURY R., SHIN Y.J., VISSEREN-HAMAKERS I.J., WILLIS K.J., ZAYAS C.N., 2019, Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change, Science 366(6471): eaax3100, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100
12. ECO-BUSINESS, 2023, New economic paradigm needed in India to achieve SDGs, Eco-Business, https://www.eco-business.com/opinion/new-economic-paradigm-needed-in-india-to-achieve-sdgs/.
13. ELKINGTON J., 1997, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, Capstone Publishing, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.3310080106
14. FOLKE C., BIGGS R., NORSTRÖM A., REYERS B., ROCKSTRÖM J., 2016, Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science, Ecology and Society 21(3): 41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08748-210341
15. FOLKE C., CARPENTER S.R., WALKER B., SCHEFFER M., CHAPIN T., ROCKSTRÖM J., 2011, Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability, Ecology and Society 15(4): 20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03610-150420
16. FOSTER J.B., 2009, The Ecological Revolution: Making Peace with the Planet, Monthly Review Press, New York.
17. GARDINER S.M., 2011, A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change, Oxford University Press, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195379440.001.0001
18. GIBSON R.B., 2006, Beyond the pillars: Sustainability assessment as a framework for effective integration of social, economic and ecological considerations in significant decision-making, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 8(3): 259–280, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002510 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333206002517
19. IPCC, 2023, Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr
20. IPCC, 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
21. JACKSON T., 2009, Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet, Earthscan, London. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849774338
22. KALLIS G., 2011, In defence of degrowth, Ecological Economics 70(5): 873–880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.007
23. KATES R.W., PARRIS T.M., LEISEROWITZ A.A., 2005, What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 47(3): 8–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444
24. LATOUCHE S., 2009, Farewell to Growth, Polity Press, Cambridge.
25. MADSEN P., 2023, Deep ecology, Encyclopaedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/topic/deep-ecology.
26. MAHA UPANISHAD, n.d., Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasudhaiva_Kutumbakam.
27. MEADOWS D.H., MEADOWS D.L., RANDERS J., BEHRENS W.W., 1972, The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1349/ddlp.1
28. MEADOWS D.H., MEADOWS D.L., RANDERS J., 2004, Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
29. MERBATU D., 1998, Sustainability and sustainable development: Historical and conceptual review, Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18(6), 493–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(98)00019-5
30. MYERS N., 2009, Environmental Refugees: A Growing Phenomenon of the 21st Century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364(1532), 2113–2123.
31. NAESS A., 1973, The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary, Inquiry 16(1–4): 95–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00201747308601682
32. NAESS A., 1984, A Defence of the Deep Ecology Movement, Environmental Ethics 6(3), 265–270, https://www.pdcnet.org/enviroethics/content/enviroethics_1984_0006_0003_0265_0270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19846330
33. NAESS A., 1986, The Deep Ecological Movement: Some Philosophical Aspects, Philosophical Inquiry 8(1–2), 10–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philinquiry198681/22
34. NAESS A., 1989, Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525599
35. NORTON B.G., 2005, Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226595221.001.0001
36. PAECH N., 2025,Niko Paech, Wikipedia,.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niko_Paech.
37. PURSER R.E., PARK C. and MONTUORI A., 1995, Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm?, Academy of Management Review 20(4), 1053–1089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258965
38. RAWORTH K., 2017, Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist, Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction.
39. REDCLIFT M., 2005, Sustainable development (1987–2005): An oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13(4), pp.212–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.281
40. ROCKSTRÖM J. et al., 2009, Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity, Ecology and Society 14(2), 32.
41. ROCKSTRÖM J., STEFFEN W., NOONE K., PERSSON Å., CHAPIN F.S., LAMBIN E.F., LENTON T.M., SCHEFFER M., FOLKE C., SCHELLNHUBER H.J., NYKVIST B., DE WIT C.A., HUGHES T., VAN DER LEEUW S., RODHE H., SÖRLIN S., SNYDER P.K., COSTANZA R., SVEDIN U., FALKENMARK M., KARLBERG L., CORELL R.W., FABRY V.J., HANSEN J., WALKER B., LIVERMAN D., RICHARDSON K., CRUTZEN P., FO-LEY J.A., 2009, A safe operating space for humanity, Nature 461(7263): 472–475, https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
42. ROCKSTRÖM J., SUKHDEV P., 2016, How food connects all the SDGs, Stockholm Resilience Centre, https://www.stockholmresilience.org.
43. SALA O.E., CHAPIN F.S., ARMESTO J.J., BERLOW E., BLOOMFIELD J., DIRZO R., HUBER-SANWALD E., HuENNEKE L.F., JACKSON R.B., KINZIG A., LEEMANS R., LODGE D.M., MOONEY H.A., OESTERHELD, M., POFF N.L., SYKES M.T., WALKER B.H., WALKER M., WALL D.H., 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100, Science 287(5459), 1770–1774, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
44. SOINI K. and BIRKELAND I., 2014, Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability, Geoforum 51, 213–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.12.001
45. SPASH C.L., 2012. New foundations for ecological economics, Ecological Economics 77, 36–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.004
46. SRIVASTAV S., RAFATY R., 2023, Political Strategies to Overcome Climate Policy Obstructionism, arXiv, https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14960.
47. STEFFEN W. et al., 2015, Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet, Science 347(6223), 1259855.
48. STEFFEN W., BROADGATE W., DEUTSCH L., GAFFNEY O., LUDWIG C., 2018. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration, The Anthropocene Review 5(1), 81–98, https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785
49. STEFFEN W., RICHARDSON K., ROCKSTROM J., CORNELL S.E., FETZER I., BENNETT E.M., BIGGS R., CARPENTER S.R., de VRIES W., de WITT C.A., FOLKE C., GERTEN D., HEINKE J., MACE G.M., PERSSON L.M., RAMANATHAN V., REYERS B., SORLIN S., 2015, Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet, Science 347(6223), 1259855, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
50. UNEP, 2021, Making Peace with Nature: A scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies, United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi.
51. VALLANCE S., PERKNS H.C., DIXON J.E., 2011. What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts, Geoforum 42(3), 342–348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
52. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development), 1987, Our common future, Oxford University Press, New York.
53. WIKIPEDIA, 2025, Ecological overshoot, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_overshoot
54. WIKIPEDIA, 2025, Environmental governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental_governance
55. WWF, 2022, Living Planet Report 2022: Building a Nature-Positive Society, WWF International, Gland.
Article Details
Abstract views: 480

