COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF LMS-DERIVED ALGORITHMS APPLIED ON ECG SIGNALS CONTAMINATED WITH MOTION ARTIFACT DURING PHYSICAL ACTIVITIES
Jarelh Galdos
National University of San Agustín of Arequipa (Peru)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6591-1866
Nikolai Lopez
nlopezcol@unsa.edu.peNational University of San Agustín of Arequipa (Peru)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-0717
Angie Medina
National University of San Agustín of Arequipa (Peru)
Jorge Huarca
National University of San Agustín of Arequipa (Peru)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-5122
Jorge Rendulich
National University of San Agustín of Arequipa (Peru)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-547X
Erasmo Sulla
National University of San Agustín of Arequipa (Peru)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1223-1223
Abstract
The acquisition of ECG signals offers physicians and specialists a very important tool in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases. However, very often these signals are affected by noise from various sources, including noise generated by movement during physical activity. This type of noise is known as Motion Artifact (MA) which changes the waveform of the signal, leading to erroneous readings. The elimination of this noise is performed by different filtering techniques, where the adaptive filtering using the LMS (least mean squares) algorithm stands out. The objective of this article is to determine which algorithms best deal with motion artifacts, taking into account the use of instruments or wearable equipment, in different conditions of physical activity. A comparison between different algorithms derived from LMS (NLMS, PNLMS and IPNLM) used in adaptive filtering is carried out using indicators such as: Pearson's Correlation Coefficient, Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) and Mean Squared Error (MSE) as metrics to evaluate them. For this purpose, the mHealth database was used, which contains ECG signals taken during moderate to medium intensity physical activities. The results show that filtering by IPNLMS as well as PNLMS offers an improvement both visually and in terms of SNR, Pearson, and MSE indicators.
Keywords:
ECG signal, Motion Artifact, LMS algorithm, NLMS, PNLMS, IPNLMS, Wearable DevicesReferences
An, X., & Stylios, G. K. (2020). Comparison of motion artefact reduction methods and the implementation of adaptive motion artefact reduction in wearable electrocardiogram monitoring. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051468
Google Scholar
Banos, O., Garcia, R., Holgado-terriza, J. A., Damas, M., Pomares, H., Rojas, I., Saez, A., & Villalonga, C. (2014). mHealthDroid: a novel framework for agile development of mobile health applications. 91–98.
Google Scholar
Banos, O., Villalonga, C., Garcia, R., Saez, A., Damas, M., Holgado-Terriza, J. A., Lee, S., Pomares, H., & Rojas, I. (2015). Design, implementation and validation of a novel open framework for agile development of mobile health applications. BioMedical Engineering Online, 14(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-14-S2-S6
Google Scholar
Burns, A., Greene, B. R., McGrath, M. J., O’Shea, T. J., Kuris, B., Ayer, S. M., Stroiescu, F., & Cionca, V. (2010). SHIMMERTM - A wireless sensor platform for noninvasive biomedical research. IEEE Sensors Journal, 10(9), 1527–1534. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2010.2045498
Google Scholar
Cömert, A., & Hyttinen, J. (2015). A motion artifact generation and assessment system for the rapid testing of surface biopotential electrodes. Physiological Measurement, 36(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/36/1/1
Google Scholar
Duttweiler, D. L. (2000). Proportionate normalized least-mean-squares adaptation in echo cancelers. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 8(5), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1109/89.861368
Google Scholar
Ebrahimzadeh, E., Pooyan, M., Jahani, S., Bijar, A., & Setaredan, S. K. (2015). ECG signals noise removal: Selection and optimization of the best adaptive filtering algorithm based on various algorithms comparison. Biomedical Engineering - Applications, Basis and Communications, 27(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4015/S1016237215500386
Google Scholar
Friesen, G. M., Jannett, T. C., Yates, S. L., Quint, S. R., & Nagle, H. T. (1990). A Comparison of the Noise Sensitivity. IEEE. Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 37(January).
Google Scholar
Ghaleb, F. A., Kamat, M. B., Salleh, M., Rohani, M. F., & Razak, S. A. (2018). Two-stage motion artefact reduction algorithm for electrocardiogram using weighted adaptive noise cancelling and recursive Hampel filter. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 13, Issue 11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207176
Google Scholar
Ghaleb, F. A., Kamat, M., Salleh, M., Rohani, M. F., & Hadji, S. E. (2018). Motion artifact reduction algorithm using sequential adaptive noise filters and estimation methods for mobile ECG. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 5, 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59427-9_13
Google Scholar
Han, D., Bashar, S. K., Lázaro, J., Mohagheghian, F., Peitzsch, A., Nishita, N., Ding, E., Dickson, E. L., Dimezza, D., Scott, J., Whitcomb, C., Fitzgibbons, T. P., McManus, D. D., & Chon, K. H. (2022). A Real-Time PPG Peak Detection Method for Accurate Determination of Heart Rate during Sinus Rhythm and Cardiac Arrhythmia. Biosensors, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12020082
Google Scholar
Huang, B., & Kinsner, W. (2002). ECG frame classification using dynamic time warping. Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2, 1105–1110. https://doi.org/10.1109/ccece.2002.1013101
Google Scholar
Huang, M., Chen, D., & Xiong, F. (2019). An effective adaptive filter to reduce motion artifacts from ECG signals using accelerometer. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326172.3326214
Google Scholar
Jung, H.-K., & Jeong, D.-U. (2013). Development of wearable ECG measurement system using EMD for motion artifact removal.
Google Scholar
Kim, H., Kim, S., Van Helleputte, N., Berset, T., Geng, D., Romero, I., Penders, J., Van Hoof, C., & Yazicioglu, R. F. (2012). Motion artifact removal using cascade adaptive filtering for ambulatory ECG monitoring system. 2012 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference: Intelligent Biomedical Electronics and Systems for Better Life and Better Environment, BioCAS 2012 - Conference Publications, July 2014, 160–163. https://doi.org/10.1109/BioCAS.2012.6418472
Google Scholar
Lee, J. W., & Yun, K. S. (2017). ECG monitoring garment using conductive carbon paste for reduced motion artifacts. Polymers, 9(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9090439
Google Scholar
Levkov, C., Mihov, G., Ivanov, R., Daskalov, I., Christov, I., & Dotsinsky, I. (2005). Removal of power-line interference from the ECG: A review of the subtraction procedure. BioMedical Engineering Online, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-4-50
Google Scholar
Lilienthal, J., & Dargie, W. (2021). Comparison of Reference Sensor Types and Position for Motion Artifact Removal in ECG. European Signal Processing Conference, 2021-Augus, 1296–1300. https://doi.org/10.23919/EUSIPCO54536.2021.9616221
Google Scholar
Liu, Y., & Pecht, M. G. (2011). Reduction of motion artifacts in electrocardiogram monitoring using an optical sensor. Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology, 45(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205-45.2.155
Google Scholar
Mandala, S., Fuadah, Y. N., Arzaki, M., & Pambudi, F. E. (2017). Performance analysis of wavelet-based denoising techniques for ECG signal. 2017 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology, ICoIC7 2017, 0(c). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2017.8074701
Google Scholar
Medina, A., Lopez, N., Galdos, J., Supo, E., Rendulich, J., & Sulla, E. (2022). Continuous Blood Pressure Estimation in Wearable Devices Using Photoplethysmography: A Review. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 12(10), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae1022_12
Google Scholar
Meyer, C. R., & Keiser, H. N. (1977). Electrocardiogram baseline noise estimation and removal using cubic splines and state-space computation techniques. Computers and Biomedical Research, 10(5), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4809(77)90021-0
Google Scholar
Milanesi, M., Martini, N., Vanello, N., Positano, V., Santarelli, M. F., & Landini, L. (2008). Independent component analysis applied to the removal of motion artifacts from electrocardiographic signals. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 46(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0293-8
Google Scholar
Raya, M. A. D., & Sison, L. G. (2002). Adaptive noise cancelling of motion artifact in stress ECG signals using accelerometer. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings, 2, 1756–1757. https://doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2002.1106637
Google Scholar
Seok, D., Lee, S., Kim, M., Cho, J., & Kim, C. (2021). Motion Artifact Removal Techniques for Wearable EEG and PPG Sensor Systems. Frontiers in Electronics, 2(May), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/felec.2021.685513
Google Scholar
Slock, D. T. M. (1993). On the Convergence Behavior of the LMS and the Normalized LMS Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 41(9), 2811–2825. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.236504
Google Scholar
Sörnmo, L., & Laguna, P. (2005). Bioelectrical Signal Processing in Cardiac and Neurological Applications (1st ed.). Elsevier Inc.
Google Scholar
Sultana, N., Kamatham, Y., & Kinnara, B. (2015). Performance analysis of adaptive filtering algorithms for denoising of ECG signals. 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, ICACCI 2015, 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2015.7275624
Google Scholar
Tejaswi, V., Surendar, A., & Srikanta, N. (2020). Simulink implementation of RLS algorithm for resilient artefacts removal in ECG signal. International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms, 16(3–4), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAIP.2020.107529
Google Scholar
Thakor, N. V., & Zhu, Y. S. (1991). Applications of Adaptive Filtering to ECG Analysis: Noise Cancellation and Arrhythmia Detection. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 38(8), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.83591
Google Scholar
Tuzcu, V., & Nas, S. (2005). Dynamic time warping as a novel tool in pattern recognition of ECG changes in heart rhythm disturbances. Conference Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1, 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.2005.1571142
Google Scholar
Van Alsté, J. A., & Schilder, T. S. (1985). Removal of Base-Line Wander and Power-Line Interference from the ECG by an Efficient FIR Filter with a Reduced Number of Taps. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-32(12), 1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.1985.325514
Google Scholar
Widrow, B., Williams, C. S., Glover, J. R., McCool, J. M., Hearn, R. H., Zeidler, J. R., Kaunitz, J., Dong, E., & Goodlin, R. C. (1975). Adaptive Noise Cancelling: Principles and Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(12), 1692–1716. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1975.10036
Google Scholar
Wittenmark, B. (2014). Adaptive filter theory. Simon Haykin. In Automatica (Vol. 29, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(93)90162-M
Google Scholar
Xiong, F., Chen, D., Chen, Z., & Dai, S. (2019). Cancellation of motion artifacts in ambulatory ECG signals using TD-LMS adaptive filtering techniques. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 58, 606–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2018.12.030
Google Scholar
Xiong, F., Chen, D., & Huang, M. (2020). A wavelet adaptive cancellation algorithm based on multi‐inertial sensors for the reduction of motion artifacts in ambulatory ECGs. Sensors (Switzerland), 20(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/s20040970
Google Scholar
Xu, P., Tao, X., & Wang, S. (2011). Measurement of wearable electrode and skin mechanical interaction using displacement and pressure sensors. Proceedings - 2011 4th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, BMEI 2011, 2, 1131–1134. https://doi.org/10.1109/BMEI.2011.6098433
Google Scholar
Yadav, S., Saha, S. K., Kar, R., & Mandal, D. (2021). Optimized adaptive noise canceller for denoising cardiovascular signal using SOS algorithm. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 69(March), 102830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102830
Google Scholar
Yoon, S. W., Min, S. D., Yun, Y. H., Lee, S., & Lee, M. (2008). Adaptive motion artifacts reduction using 3-axis accelerometer in E-textile ECG measurement system. Journal of Medical Systems, 32(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-007-9112-x
Google Scholar
Authors
Jarelh GaldosNational University of San Agustín of Arequipa Peru
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6591-1866
Authors
Nikolai Lopeznlopezcol@unsa.edu.pe
National University of San Agustín of Arequipa Peru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-0717
Authors
Angie MedinaNational University of San Agustín of Arequipa Peru
Authors
Jorge HuarcaNational University of San Agustín of Arequipa Peru
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6300-5122
Authors
Jorge RendulichNational University of San Agustín of Arequipa Peru
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1302-547X
Authors
Erasmo SullaNational University of San Agustín of Arequipa Peru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1223-1223
Statistics
Abstract views: 104PDF downloads: 47
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Applied Computer Science are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Similar Articles
- Thanh-Nghia NGUYEN, Thanh-Hai NGUYEN, Ba-Viet NGO, R PEAK DETERMINATION USING A WDFR ALGORITHM AND ADAPTIVE THRESHOLD , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 18 No. 3 (2022)
- Evans BAIDOO, FIREWORKS ALGORITHM FOR UNCONSTRAINED FUNCTION OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 13 No. 1 (2017)
- Noor SABAH, Ekhlas HAMEED, Muayed S AL-HUSEINY, OPTIMAL SLIDING MODE CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON WHALE OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHM FOR LOWER LIMB REHABILITATION ROBOT , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 3 (2021)
- Marcin MACIEJEWSKI, Barbara MACIEJEWSKA, Robert KARPIŃSKI, Przemysław KRAKOWSKI, ELECTROCARDIOGRAM GENERATION SOFTWARE FOR TESTING OF PARAMETER EXTRACTION ALGORITHMS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 16 No. 4 (2020)
- Alexandru Marius OBRETIN, Andreea Alina CORNEA, FILTERING STRATEGIES FOR SMARTPHONE EMITTED DIGITAL SIGNALS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024)
- Zaid ALSAYGH, Zohair AL-AMEEN, CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT OF SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY IMAGES USING A NONCOMPLEX MULTIPHASE ALGORITHM , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 18 No. 2 (2022)
- Kuppan Chetty RAMANATHAN, Manju MOHAN, Joshuva AROCKIA DHANRAJ, BACKWARD MOTION PLANNING AND CONTROL OF MULTIPLE MOBILE ROBOTS MOVING IN TIGHTLY COUPLED FORMATIONS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 3 (2021)
- Hamid JAN, Amjad ALI, OPTIMIZATION OF FINGERPRINT SIZE FOR REGISTRATION , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 15 No. 2 (2019)
- Piotr Miś, Przemysław Szulim, ANALYSIS OF THE POSSIBILITY OF USING MARKERS EMITTING PULSATING LIGHT IN THE TASK OF LOCALIZATION , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 1 (2021)
- Amina ALYAMANI, Oleh YASNIY, CLASSIFICATION OF EEG SIGNAL BY METHODS OF MACHINE LEARNING , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 16 No. 4 (2020)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
