CLASSIFICATION OF EEG SIGNAL BY METHODS OF MACHINE LEARNING
Amina ALYAMANI
amina.alyamani@yahoo.comOmar Al-Mukhtar University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Science, West Shiha, Dernah (Libya)
Oleh YASNIY
* Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Faculty of Computer Information Systems and Software Engineering, Department of Mathematical Methods in Engineering, Ruska 56, 46001, Ternopil (Ukraine)
Abstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal of two healthy subjects that was available from literature, was studied using the methods of machine learning, namely, decision trees (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), K-nearest neighbours (kNN), and support vector machines (SVM). Since the data were imbalanced, the appropriate balancing was performed by Kmeans clustering algorithm. The original and balanced data were classified by means of the mentioned above 4 methods. It was found, that SVM showed the best result for the both datasets in terms of accuracy. MLP and kNN produce the comparable results which are almost the same. DT accuracies are the lowest for the given dataset, with 83.82% for the original data and 61.48% for the balanced data.
Keywords:
machine learning, EEG signal, classification, data balancing, feature extractionReferences
Altman, N. S. (1992). An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician, 46(3), 175–185.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879
Google Scholar
Amin, H. U., Mumtaz, W., Subhani, A. R., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). Classification of EEG Signals Based on Pattern Recognition Approach. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11(103), 1–12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00103
Google Scholar
Bryant, R. A., & Sindicich, N. (2007). Hypnosis and Thought Suppression – More Data: A Brief Communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56(1), 37–46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701672995
Google Scholar
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. N. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
Google Scholar
Dvey-Aharon, Z., Fogelson, N., Peled, A, & Intrator, N. (2015). Schizophrenia Detection and Classification by Advanced Analysis of EEG Recordings Using a Single Electrode Approach. PLoS ONE, 10(4), 1–12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123033
Google Scholar
Haykin, S. (Ed.). (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines (3rd Edition). New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006). Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786), 504–507.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127647
Google Scholar
Lawhern, V., Hairston, W. D., McDowell, K., Westerfield, M., & Robbins, K. (2012). Detection and classification of subject-generated artifacts in EEG signals using autoregressive models. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 208(2), 181–189.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.017
Google Scholar
Li, J., Struzik, Z., Zhang, L., & Cichocki, A. (2015). Feature learning from incomplete EEG with denoising autoencoder. Neurocomputing, 165, 23–31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.08.092
Google Scholar
MacQueen, J. B. (1967). Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability – Volume 1: Statistics, 281–297.
Google Scholar
Parvinnia, E., Sabeti, M., Zolghadri Jahromi, M., & Boostani, R. (2014). Classification of EEG Signals using Adaptive Weighted Distance Nearest Neighbor Algorithm. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 1–6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.01.001
Google Scholar
Podgorelec, V. (2012). Analyzing EEG signals with machine learning for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease. Elektronika i Elektrotechnika, 18(8), 61–64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.18.8.2627
Google Scholar
Provençal, S. C., Bond, S., Rizkallah, E., & El-Baalbaki, G. (2018). Hypnosis for burn wound care pain and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns, 44(8), 1870–1881.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.04.017
Google Scholar
Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251
Google Scholar
Real, R. G. L., & Kübler, A. (2014). Auditory oddball paradigm during hypnosis. Institute of Psychology, University of Würzburg.
Google Scholar
Sanei, S., & Chambers, J. A. (Eds.). (2007). EEG Signal processing. Great Britain, Chippenham, John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470511923
Google Scholar
Satapathy, S. K., Jagadev, A. K., & Dehuri, S. (2017). Weighted majority voting based ensemble of classifiers using different machine learning techniques for classification of EEG signal to detect epileptic seizure. Informatica, 41(1), 99–110.
Google Scholar
Sun, L., Jin, B., Yang, B., Tong, J., Liu, C., & Xiong, H. (2019). Unsupervised EEG Feature Extraction Based on Echo State Network. Information Sciences, 475, 1–17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.09.057
Google Scholar
Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(A), 59–74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002
Google Scholar
Thilakvathi, B., Shenbaga, Devi, S., Bhanu, K., & Malaippan, M. (2017). EEG signal complexity analysis for schizophrenia during rest and mental activity. Biomedical Research, 28(1): 1–9.
Google Scholar
Wood, C., & Bioy, A. (2008). Hypnosis and Pain in Children. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 35(4), 437–446.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.009
Google Scholar
Authors
Amina ALYAMANIamina.alyamani@yahoo.com
Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Science, West Shiha, Dernah Libya
Authors
Oleh YASNIY* Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Faculty of Computer Information Systems and Software Engineering, Department of Mathematical Methods in Engineering, Ruska 56, 46001, Ternopil Ukraine
Statistics
Abstract views: 243PDF downloads: 30
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Applied Computer Science are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Nataliya SHABLIY, Serhii LUPENKO, Nadiia LUTSYK, Oleh YASNIY, Olha MALYSHEVSKA, KEYSTROKE DYNAMICS ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING METHODS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 4 (2021)
Similar Articles
- Workineh TESEMA, INEFFICIENCY OF DATA MINING ALGORITHMS AND ITS ARCHITECTURE: WITH EMPHASIS TO THE SHORTCOMING OF DATA MINING ALGORITHMS ON THE OUTPUT OF THE RESEARCHES , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 15 No. 3 (2019)
- Nataliya SHABLIY, Serhii LUPENKO, Nadiia LUTSYK, Oleh YASNIY, Olha MALYSHEVSKA, KEYSTROKE DYNAMICS ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING METHODS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 4 (2021)
- Anitha Rani PALAKAYALA, Kuppusamy P, A QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACH USING MACHINE LEARNING AND NON-MOTOR SYMPTOMS FOR PARKINSON’S DISEASE CLASSIFICATION. A HIERARCHICAL STUDY , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 20 No. 3 (2024)
- Nawazish NAVEED, Hayan T. MADHLOOM, Mohd Shahid HUSAIN, BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS USING WRAPPER-BASED FEATURE SELECTION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 3 (2021)
- Miguel Angel BELLO RIVERA, Carlos Alberto REYES GARCÍA, Tania Cristal TALAVERA ROJAS, Perfecto Malaquías QUINTERO FLORES, Rodolfo Eleazar PÉREZ LOAIZA, AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION OF DYSPHONIAS USING MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 19 No. 4 (2023)
- Sri INDRA MAIYANTI, Anita DESIANI, Syafrina LAMIN, P PUSPITAHATI, Muhammad ARHAMI, Nuni GOFAR, Destika CAHYANA, ROTATION-GAMMA CORRECTION AUGMENTATION ON CNN-DENSE BLOCK FOR SOIL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 19 No. 3 (2023)
- Jerzy JÓZWIK, Magdalena ZAWADA-MICHAŁOWSKA, Monika KULISZ, Paweł TOMIŁO, Marcin BARSZCZ, Paweł PIEŚKO, Michał LELEŃ, Kamil CYBUL, MODELING THE OPTIMAL MEASUREMENT TIME WITH A PROBE ON THE MACHINE TOOL USING MACHINE LEARNING METHODS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024)
- Leszek JASKIERNY, REVIEW OF THE DATA MODELING STANDARDS AND DATA MODEL TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUES , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 14 No. 4 (2018)
- Robert KARPIŃSKI, Przemysław KRAKOWSKI, Józef JONAK, Anna MACHROWSKA, Marcin MACIEJEWSKI, COMPARISON OF SELECTED CLASSIFICATION METHODS BASED ON MACHINE LEARNING AS A DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR KNEE JOINT CARTILAGE DAMAGE BASED ON GENERATED VIBROACOUSTIC PROCESSES , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 19 No. 4 (2023)
- Dilek AYDOGAN-KILIC, Deniz Kenan KILIC, Izabela Ewa NIELSEN, EXAMINATION OF SUMMARIZED MEDICAL RECORDS FOR ICD CODE CLASSIFICATION VIA BERT , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
