CLASSIFICATION OF EEG SIGNAL BY METHODS OF MACHINE LEARNING

Amina  ALYAMANI; Oleh  YASNIY

doi:10.23743/acs-2020-29

Open full text

pdf

Published: Dec 30, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23743/acs-2020-29

Issue Vol. 16 No. 4 (2020)

Articles

GRAPH-BASED FOG COMPUTING NETWORK MODEL
Ihor PYSMENNYI, Anatolii PETRENKO, Roman KYSLYI

5-20
JOINT EFFECT OF FORECASTING AND LOT-SIZING METHOD ON COST MINIMIZATION OBJECTIVE OF A MANUFACTURER: A CASE STUDY
Jack OLESEN, Carl-Emil Houmøller PEDERSEN, Markus Germann KNUDSEN, Sandra TOFT, Vladimir NEDBAILO, Johan PRISAK, Izabela Ewa NIELSEN, Subrata SAHA

21-36
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM GENERATION SOFTWARE FOR TESTING OF PARAMETER EXTRACTION ALGORITHMS
Marcin MACIEJEWSKI, Barbara MACIEJEWSKA, Robert KARPIŃSKI, Przemysław KRAKOWSKI

37-47
ARCHITECTURAL PARADIGM OF THE INTERACTIVE INTERFACE MODULE IN THE CLOUD TECHNOLOGY MODEL
Denis RATOV

48-55
CLASSIFICATION OF EEG SIGNAL BY METHODS OF MACHINE LEARNING
Amina ALYAMANI, Oleh YASNIY

56-63
DEVELOPMENT OF AN ONTOLOGY-BASED ADAPTIVE PERSONALIZED E-LEARNING SYSTEM
Olutayo BOYINBODE, Paul OLOTU, Kolawole AKINTOLA

64-84
COMPUTER VISION BASED ON RASPBERRY PI SYSTEM
Mohanad ABDULHAMID, Otieno ODONDI, Muaayed AL-RAWI

85-102
ORDER VIOLATION IN MULTITHREADED APPLICATIONS AND ITS DETECTION IN STATIC CODE ANALYSIS PROCESS
Damian GIEBAS, Rafał WOJSZCZYK

103-117

DOI

https://doi.org/10.23743/acs-2020-29

Authors

Amina ALYAMANI

amina.alyamani@yahoo.com

Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Science, West Shiha, Dernah, Libya

Oleh YASNIY

oleh.yasniy@gmail.com

* Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Faculty of Computer Information Systems and Software Engineering, Department of Mathematical Methods in Engineering, Ruska 56, 46001, Ternopil, Ukraine

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal of two healthy subjects that was available from literature, was studied using the methods of machine learning, namely, decision trees (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), K-nearest neighbours (kNN), and support vector machines (SVM). Since the data were imbalanced, the appropriate balancing was performed by Kmeans clustering algorithm. The original and balanced data were classified by means of the mentioned above 4 methods. It was found, that SVM showed the best result for the both datasets in terms of accuracy. MLP and kNN produce the comparable results which are almost the same. DT accuracies are the lowest for the given dataset, with 83.82% for the original data and 61.48% for the balanced data.

Keywords:

machine learning, EEG signal, classification, data balancing, feature extraction

References

Altman, N. S. (1992). An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician, 46(3), 175–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879

Amin, H. U., Mumtaz, W., Subhani, A. R., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). Classification of EEG Signals Based on Pattern Recognition Approach. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11(103), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00103

Bryant, R. A., & Sindicich, N. (2007). Hypnosis and Thought Suppression – More Data: A Brief Communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56(1), 37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701672995

Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. N. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018

Dvey-Aharon, Z., Fogelson, N., Peled, A, & Intrator, N. (2015). Schizophrenia Detection and Classification by Advanced Analysis of EEG Recordings Using a Single Electrode Approach. PLoS ONE, 10(4), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123033

Haykin, S. (Ed.). (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines (3rd Edition). New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006). Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786), 504–507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127647

Lawhern, V., Hairston, W. D., McDowell, K., Westerfield, M., & Robbins, K. (2012). Detection and classification of subject-generated artifacts in EEG signals using autoregressive models. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 208(2), 181–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.017

Li, J., Struzik, Z., Zhang, L., & Cichocki, A. (2015). Feature learning from incomplete EEG with denoising autoencoder. Neurocomputing, 165, 23–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.08.092

MacQueen, J. B. (1967). Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability – Volume 1: Statistics, 281–297.

Parvinnia, E., Sabeti, M., Zolghadri Jahromi, M., & Boostani, R. (2014). Classification of EEG Signals using Adaptive Weighted Distance Nearest Neighbor Algorithm. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.01.001

Podgorelec, V. (2012). Analyzing EEG signals with machine learning for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease. Elektronika i Elektrotechnika, 18(8), 61–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.18.8.2627

Provençal, S. C., Bond, S., Rizkallah, E., & El-Baalbaki, G. (2018). Hypnosis for burn wound care pain and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns, 44(8), 1870–1881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.04.017

Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251

Real, R. G. L., & Kübler, A. (2014). Auditory oddball paradigm during hypnosis. Institute of Psychology, University of Würzburg.

Sanei, S., & Chambers, J. A. (Eds.). (2007). EEG Signal processing. Great Britain, Chippenham, John Wiley & Sons. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470511923

Satapathy, S. K., Jagadev, A. K., & Dehuri, S. (2017). Weighted majority voting based ensemble of classifiers using different machine learning techniques for classification of EEG signal to detect epileptic seizure. Informatica, 41(1), 99–110.

Sun, L., Jin, B., Yang, B., Tong, J., Liu, C., & Xiong, H. (2019). Unsupervised EEG Feature Extraction Based on Echo State Network. Information Sciences, 475, 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.09.057

Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(A), 59–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002

Thilakvathi, B., Shenbaga, Devi, S., Bhanu, K., & Malaippan, M. (2017). EEG signal complexity analysis for schizophrenia during rest and mental activity. Biomedical Research, 28(1): 1–9.

Wood, C., & Bioy, A. (2008). Hypnosis and Pain in Children. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 35(4), 437–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.009

ALYAMANI, A. ., & YASNIY, O. . (2020). CLASSIFICATION OF EEG SIGNAL BY METHODS OF MACHINE LEARNING. Applied Computer Science, 16(4), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.23743/acs-2020-29

CLASSIFICATION OF EEG SIGNAL BY METHODS OF MACHINE LEARNING

Issue Vol. 16 No. 4 (2020)

Archives

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

License

Article Sidebar

Issue Vol. 16 No. 4 (2020)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License