Determination of the residential renovation range
Robert Bucoń
Department of Construction Methods and Management; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9397-639X
Anna Sobotka
Department of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering and Geotechnics; Faculty of Mining and Geoengineering; AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracow (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4477-8821
Abstract
The article addresses the problem of selecting renovation solution which is a difficult task. It requires the administrator to consider and compare benefits that result from the execution of particular repairs. The priority is to define both the urgency of repair and the financial constraints. Thus, the choice of renovation solution fulfilling these conditions requires a systematic approach. The proposed method allows the decision-maker to assess the state of building, on which basis it is possible to indicate a needed range of renovation – including the information about the level of urgent repairs. During the next stage of calculations, the significance of the selection criteria is defined by means of the fuzzy AHP method. The assessment of these criteria provides the basis for prioritizing and choosing the renovation solutions and is proposed to be conducted by means of TOPSIS method. To illustrate the method, the authors present a numerical example of the proposed approach to selecting renovation solution method applied to a residential building.
Keywords:
renovation solution, operational requirements, building assessment, repair, renovationReferences
Ustawa z dnia 21 sierpnia 1997r. o gospodarce nieruchomościami, Dz.U.10.102.651.
Google Scholar
Jaśkowski P., Bucoń R., Biruk S.: Ocena przydatności użytkowej budynków mieszkalnych z zastosowaniem rozmytego rozszerzenia AHP. Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziałowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach - Modelowanie Preferencji a Ryzyko, Katowice 2012, s. 105-117.
Google Scholar
Owczarek S., Orłowski Z., Szklennik N.: Koncepcja systemowej oceny zużycia budynków. Konferencja Naukowo – Techniczna, „Technologia i zarządzanie w budownictwie”, Karłów 2006, s. 341-346, 2006.
Google Scholar
Bucoń R.: Model decyzyjny wyboru wariantów remontu lub przebudowy budynków mieszkalnych. Praca doktorska, Politechnika Lubelska 2013.
Google Scholar
Urbański P.: Ocena stopnia zużycia technicznego wybranej grupy budynków mieszkalnych za pomocą sztucznych sieci neuronowych. Rozprawa doktorska, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski 2001.
Google Scholar
Nang-Fei Pan.: Fuzzy AHP approach for selecting the suitable bridge construction method; Automation in Construction t. 17, 2008, s. 958-965.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.03.005
Google Scholar
Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Fallahnejad R., Navidi N.:Ranking Efficient Units in DEA by Using TOPSIS Method. Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 5, 2011, no. 17, s. 805-815.
Google Scholar
Authors
Robert BucońDepartment of Construction Methods and Management; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9397-639X
Authors
Anna SobotkaDepartment of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering and Geotechnics; Faculty of Mining and Geoengineering; AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracow Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4477-8821
Statistics
Abstract views: 209PDF downloads: 120
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
