The importance of the space in the process of merging the city
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017)
-
Synergy in non-ideal „ideal city” – the attempts to integrate Zamość
Jan Wrana5-17
-
Synergy as a criterion for evaluation of projects revitalization of city centers
Adam Derlatka019-028
-
Recovering visual contacts in the historic cityscape
Yuliia Frolova29-35
-
The use of public utility facility entered into the register of monuments to fulfill the contemporary occupancy function
Mieczysław Brzozowski, Katarzyna Święcicka-Brzozowska037-058
-
Variable theater space and synergy
Piotr Obracaj059-068
-
Sacrum versus Synergy
Jurij Kryworuczko, Bogusław Podhalański069-080
-
„Seal in the building” – the integration element
Piotr Gleń, Bartosz Szostak081-088
-
Transformation of old-town’s districts after 1989/1990 in Poland and Germany
Piotr Fiuk099-108
-
Śródka District in Poznan – physical and mental borders within the city
Teresa Bardzińska-Bonenberg089-098
-
Synergy of contemporary architecture and materials science
Petro Rychkov, Nataliya Lushnikova109-118
-
From the ground floor of the city
Wacław Seruga119-138
-
Light in architecture and urban planning – the underestimated element bonding the city
Małgorzata Bartnicka139-152
-
Space Syntax in communication structure of Lublin’s district – Kośminek
Wojciech Kocki, Bartłomiej Kwiatkowski153-164
-
City as a human-friendly organism
Aleksandra Prokopska, Anna Martyka165-174
-
The importance of the space in the process of merging the city
Aleksandra Hereć, Michał Pieczka, Olga Skoczylas175-182
-
On the synergy of urban plan
Zbigniew Zuziak183-198
-
Synergy in architectural design and urban planning
Krzysztof Lenartowicz199-212
-
Synergy in economics, as an element of urban creation in China
Dariusz Gaweł213-222
-
Synergistic completeness of contemporary villa architecture in urban space
Monika Gała-Walczowska223-232
-
Synergy in the seaside resort architecture – Sopot case study
Krystyna Pokrzywnicka233-244
Archives
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2020-04-23 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2020-01-24 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2019-11-20 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2019-09-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2019-10-10 15
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2019-10-10 21
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2019-10-14 14
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2019-10-14 15
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2019-10-14 12
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2019-10-15 20
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2019-10-17 19
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2019-10-15 13
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2019-10-16 14
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2019-10-09 28
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2020-04-07 19
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2020-04-15 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2020-04-20 15
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2020-04-25 14
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
An integral part of the process of uniting the city is to notice importance of common places as fields of concentration of interpersonal acting. The need for gathering places is the result of human nature and determines space perception. The urban habitat is perceived by citizens mainly through the form and nature of the common areas. First of all common spaces showcase the settlements, neighborhoods, cities and create a sense of bond - attachment with the place. The quality of urban interiors affects the formation of social ties and thereby the attractiveness of the urban environment. Improper adjustment of public spaces disintegrates urban structure. In effect makes it difficult or even impossible to identify with the place. The confrontation of the reality with the need for change often stimulates local community to action, which change space in collaboration with the architect (as in the Stockholm district Tensta - Piazza Taxingeplan). Actions bonding urban structure can take various forms but most commonly lead to formation a space oriented to users, encouraging residents to integration.
Keywords:
References
2. Alexander C., Język wzorców. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 2008.
3. Montgomery C., Miasto szczęśliwe. Kraków, Wydawnictwo Wysoki Zamek, 2015.
4. Alexander C., Język wzorców, Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 2008.
5. Gehl J. Mannesker til Fods. Architekten nr 20,1968.
6. Lakeman M. The intersection of planning and community health. The American Journal of Public Health, 2004.
7. Jałowiecki B., Szczepański M. Miasto i przestrzeń w perspektywie socjologicznej. Katowice, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar, 2006.
8. Montgomery C. Miasto szczęśliwe. Kraków, Wydawnictwo Wysoki Zamek, 2015.
9. Baranowski A. Projektowanie zrównoważone w architekturze. Politechnika Gdańska, Gdańsk 1998.
10. Lydon M., Gracia A. Tactical Urbanism, Island Press,Washington 2015.
11. www.ecosistemaurbano.com/portfolio/parkeing/
12. www.recetasurbanas.net
13. Świeżewska K. Mikrointerwencje jako alternatywne narzędzia rewitalizacji współczesnych miast. Urbanistyka, Warszawa 2011.
14. Bohm A. O budowie i synergii wnętrz urbanistycznych. Politechnika Krakowska im. Tadeusza Kościuszki, Kraków 1981.
15. Wrana J. Rola i znaczenia architektury w procesie scalania struktury przestrzennej miasta na przykładzie Lublina. Politechnika Lubelska, Lublin 2011.
16. Wywiad z M. Brataniec i U. Forczek-Brataniec w serwisie internetowym Sztuka-architektury, http://www.sztuka-architektury.pl/
17. Pawłowska K. Idea swojskości w urbanistyce i architekturze miejskiej. Politechnika Krakowska, Kraków 1996.
18. Hall E. Ukryty wymiar. PIW, Warszawa 1976.
Article Details
Abstract views: 218
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
