Different everyday. Functioning of Venice as a city without cars
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 16 No. 4 (2017)
-
Contemporary German architecture in the context of selected philosophical literature
Aleksander Serafin005-013
-
Contemporary architecture of high-rise buildings in Doha – the capital of Qatar
Jerzy Szołomicki, Hanna Golasz-Szołomicka015-033
-
Value creation in industrial heritage management. Evidence from the City of Paper (Fabriano, Italy)
Mara Cerquetti035-047
-
The value of museum communication: the cases of the Paper and Watermark Museum in Fabriano and the Ascoli Piceno Papal Paper Mill Museum in Ascoli Piceno
Patrizia Dragoni049-058
-
In pursuit of the heritage and place synergy: the environmental impact of Panemunė Castle as a heritage property and entirety of values. A study.
Vaida Ščiglienė, Vaida Almonaitytė-Navickienė, Kristina Daubarytė, Ieva Kuizinienė, Angelė Čepėnaitė059-092
-
Value assessment of Zamość from the perspective of 25 years on UNESCO World Heritage List
Joanna Jurczyk, Bogusław Szmygin093-112
-
Social investigations as a measuring instrument of construction industry in the areas of Polish districts with prefabricated buildings
Anna Ostańska113-126
-
Different everyday. Functioning of Venice as a city without cars
Hubert Trammer127-139
-
Neovernacular architecture – genesis. From Erdmannsdorf to Pension „Maryja”
Jacek Knothe141-158
-
Contemporary wooden architecture in search of free form
Michał Golański159-168
-
From scandal to style
Jacek Knothe169-180
-
Selected problems of protecting and managing historical ruins in Poland
Anna Fortuna-Marek, Bogusław Szmygin181-194
-
Structures of masonry walls in buildings of permanent ruin – causes of damage and methods of repairs
Bartosz Szostak195-207
-
Degradation processes and the methods of securing wall crests
Maciej Trochonowicz; Bogusław Szmygin209-233
Archives
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2020-04-23 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2020-01-24 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2019-11-20 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2019-09-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2019-10-10 15
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2019-10-10 21
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2019-10-14 14
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2019-10-14 15
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2019-10-14 12
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2019-10-15 20
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2019-10-17 19
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2019-10-15 13
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2019-10-16 14
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2019-10-09 28
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2020-04-07 19
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2020-04-15 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2020-04-20 15
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2020-04-25 14
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Shaping of the space generally follows the standards which are created in search for fulfilling the human needs. Unfortunately the means often became more important than the goals. In order to provide mobility and at the same time protection from the oppressiveness of transportation the huge space is lost for the transportation roads which are alienated from their surrounding and for the buffer spaces. There are different solutions. The spectacular example of their use is Venice – the city big part of which is inaccesibble for cars. It means it is free from oppressiveness connected with the presence of cars, but also it does not use the possibilities given by using cars for different needs. The function reserved in majority of the world for cars in Venice is provided by different kinds of boats. It is worth to pay attention on different everyday situations from the part of Venice which is free of cars. They are substituted not only by water transit but also by the pedestrian transit. The small scale of the streets and squares of Venice also has an important meaning for the everyday of the city. Venice faces a serious problem of the loss of its inhabitants which are pushed out of the city by the tourists. Also the functions which serve the inhabitants are pushed out by the functions for tourists. However the problems of the city should not discredit the management of the traffic in the city. The problems are the site effect of success of Venice as a tourist destination which follows the unique quality of the place. The examples of the solutions which base on the rejection of the domination of the car in the space of the city one can find also in other places, where the rejection of the hegemony of the cars does not have such a total scale as in Venice. Such examples can be found also in Poland. Different space relations cause different relations between different users, as well as different relations between spending time in the city and passing it through.
Keywords:
References
[2] Gehl J. Życie między budynkami. Użytkowanie przestrzeni publicznych, Wydawnictwo RAM, Kraków, 2009.
[3] Gehl J. Miasta dla ludzi, Wydawnictwo RAM, Kraków, 2014.
[4] Kusch C.F., Gelhaar A. Architectural Guide. Venice. Buildings and Projects After 1950, DOM publishers, Berlin, 2014.
[5] https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tronchetto - dostęp dnia 15 września 2016 roku
[6] AFP, Venetians hold rally to fight city’s exodus, http://www.thelocal.it/20161113/venetians-rally-to-fight-citys-exodus - dostęp dnia 3 grudnia 2016 roku
[7] Miraglia A., Callegaro N., Niero L., Galasso M. Annuario del Turismo 2014, Comune di Venezia CPM Editoria per le comunicazione, Wenecja, 2015.
[8] Ostrowski W. Wprowadzenie do historii budowy miast. Ludzie i środowisko, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa, 1996.
[9] Kubecka M., Zimny B. Kierowca syty i pieszy cały, Magazyn Miasta 14 (2016) 133.
Article Details
Abstract views: 334
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
