Tools for modeling and simulating business processes - a comparative analysis
Radosław Lipski
radoslaw.lipski@pollub.edu.plLublin University of Technology (Poland)
Dominik Lipski
(Poland)
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to compare selected tools for modeling and simulating business processes. The comparative study concerned Bizagi, Adonis, Bonita Studio and Visual Paradigm tools. The analysis has the aim to identify the best tool according to the criteria. The article explains the concepts related to business processes and analyzes the existing literature. Research scenarios containing evaluation criteria will be created for the analysis. The conducted research indicated that the best tool among the considered: Bizagi, Adonis, Bonita Studio, Visual Paradigm is Bizagi.
Keywords:
business process, process modeling, process simulationReferences
Symulacja procesów biznesowych - opis, https://kissflow.com/workflow/bpm/business-process-simulation , [23.09.2021].
Google Scholar
Modelowanie procesów biznesowych – zastosowanie oraz opis technik, https://kissflow.com/bpm/business-process-modeling/, [23.09.2021].
Google Scholar
N. Damij, P. Boškosk, M. Bohanec, B. M. Boshkoska, Ranking of Business Process simulation software Tools with DEX/qq hierarchical Decision Model, PLOS ONE, (2016), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148391.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148391
Google Scholar
R. Laue, C. Müller, The business process simulation standard (BPSim): chances and limits, Germany, (2016), 413-418, http://dx.doi.org/10.7148/2016-0413.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7148/2016-0413
Google Scholar
I. Chomiak-Orsa, A. Kołtonowska, Modelowanie procesów biznesowych z wykorzystaniem sieci Petriego i BPMN - Próba oceny metod, Informatyka Ekonomiczna, Wrocław, (2018), 9-18, http://dx.doi.org/10.15611/ie.2018.2.01.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15611/ie.2018.2.01
Google Scholar
R. C. Papademetriou, D. A. Karras, Towards a Thorough Evaluation Framework of Software. Tools Suitable for Small and Medium Size Enterprises. Focusing on Modelling and Simulating Business Processes, Rodos, (2017), 161-182, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57222-2_8.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57222-2_8
Google Scholar
J. L. Pereira, A. P. Freitas, Simulation of BPMN Process Models: Current BPM. Tools Capabilities, International Journal for Quality Research 13(4), Portugal, (2016), 783-796, http://dx.doi.org/10.24874/IJQR13.04-02.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR13.04-02
Google Scholar
R. Koncevičs, L. Peņicina, A. Gaidukovs, Comparative Analysis of Business Process Modelling Tools for Compliance Management Support, Latvia, (2017), 22-27, https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2017-0003.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/acss-2017-0003
Google Scholar
A. Freitas, P. Pereira, J. L. Mota, Process Simulation Support in BPM Tools: The Case of BPMN, Proceedings of 2100 Projects Association Joint Conferences, (2015).
Google Scholar
Bizagi - opis narzędzia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bizagi, [26.09.2021].
Google Scholar
Bonita Studio - opis narzędzia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonita/BPM, [26.09.2021].
Google Scholar
Adonis - opis narzędzia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADONIS/(software), [26.09.2021].
Google Scholar
Visual Paradigm - opis narzędzia, https://www.visual-paradigm.com/aboutus/, [26.09.2021].
Google Scholar
Authors
Dominik LipskiPoland
Statistics
Abstract views: 361PDF downloads: 252
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.