The assessment of usefulness modern IT tools of data analysis Big Data
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Published:
Dec 30, 2017
Issue Vol. 5 (2017)
Articles
-
Performance comparison of different Java versions
Maciasz Mateusz142-147
-
Qualitative analysis of telemetry signals based on data gathered by dedicated mobile application
Damian Wasąg, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik148-154
-
Method of cutting phases of motion while rowing on the ergometer based on three-dimensional motion
Kacper Kowalczyk, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska155-158
-
A comparative analysis of interface quality of mobile access to the services of selected banks
Marcin Kurzyna, Damian Matysiak, Marek Miłosz159-166
-
Performance analysis of Unity3D engine in the context of applications run in web browsers
Przemysław Berdak, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik167-173
-
Comparative analysis of mobile interfaces services to search public transport connections
Filip Skowroński, Marek Miłosz174-178
-
The assessment of usefulness modern IT tools of data analysis Big Data
Rafał Wasiluk, Piotr Muryjas179-186
-
Analysis of the 3D glasses application in a spatial simulation on the basis of the architectural visualization
Mateusz Karol Smaga, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik187-192
-
Analysis of the use of sensors in mobile devices with modified operating systems
Mateusz Dobrowolski, Michał Dobrowolski, Piotr Kopniak193-199
-
Analysis of the impact of refactoring on code quality – comparative analysis of two cases
Mariusz Łukasik, Marek Miłosz200-203
-
Comparison of AngularJS and VueJS frameworks efficiency
Naгar Patrylo, Marek Miłosz204-207
-
Performance comparison of the Xamarin platform and native applications for Android operating system
Ihor Bodia, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik208-212
-
Analysis of Qt libraries usage in selected interprocess communication aplications
Łukasz Janusz Górniak, Maciej Pańczyk213-219
-
Evaluation of the utilization rate of e-services provided by the local administration in Lubelskie Voivodeship
Daniel Ziętek, Elżbieta Miłosz220-226
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Rafał Wasiluk
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Piotr Muryjas
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Abstract
This publication discusses the topic of contemporary IT tools in Big Data data analysis. The research involved the leaders from Gartner 2017, Tableau Desktop, Qlik Sense and Microsoft Power BI programs. The utility rating of these tools has been evaluated according to the selected criteria, among others. The price and type of licenses, types of database connections, and supported operating platforms.
Keywords:
data analysis; Big Data; Tableau Desktop; Qlik Sense; Microsoft Power BI
References
[1] Marz N., Warren J.: Big Data. Najlepsze praktyki budowy skalowalnych systemów obsługi danych w czasie rzeczywistym, Helion, Gliwice, 2016
[2] Howson C., Idoine C., Oestreich T., Richardson J., Sallam R., Tapadinhas J., Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms, Gartner, htps://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-3TYE0CD&ct=170221&st=sb., [02.06.2017]
[3] Rangarajan S., Data Warehouse Design – Inmon versus Kimball, http://tdan.com/data-warehouse-design-inmon-versuskimball/20300 [03.06.2017]
[4] Mudrakola S., Manage your data with these 3 open source etl tools, http://techgenix.com/open-source-etl-tools/ [04.06.2017]
[5] Strona firmy Hortonworks, wykorzystującej Apache Hadoop https://hortonworks.com/products/data-center/hdp/ [21.05.2017]
[6] Siudziński M., Hadoop, czyli przetwarzanie rozproszone w open source, http://itwiz.pl/hadoop-czyli-przetwarzanie-rozproszoneopen-source/ [20.05.2017]
[7] Czajkowski L., A Comparison of SQL and NoSQL to Simplify Your Database Decision, https://blog.couchbase.com/comparison-sql-nosql-simplifydatabase-decision/ [11.06.2017]
[8] Harazin J., Narzędzia Business Intelligence dla managera: QlikView i Qlik Sense, http://www.jcommerce.pl/jpro/article/narzedzia-businessintelligence-dla-managera-qlikview-i-qlik-sense [5.06.2017]
[9] Baker P., Tableau Desktop, http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2491943,00.asp, [6.06.2017]
[10] Strona producenta Tableau, https://www.tableau.com, [04.06.2017]
[11] Prichard J., What's the difference between Qlik Sense and Qlik View?, http://optimalbi.com/blog/2016/01/18/whats-thedifference-between-qlik-sense-and-qlik-view/ [3.06.2017]
[12] Strona producenta Qlik, http://www.qlik.com/pl-pl/ [04.06.2017]
[13] Ris O., Microsoft Power BI, PCMag, http://uk.pcmag.com/microsoft-powerbi/74174/review/microsoft-power-bi [26.05.2017]
[14] Strona producenta Microsoft Power BI, https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/ [04.06.2017]
[15] Rui R., Use Power BI Desktop as an ETL Tool, https://ruiromanoblog.wordpress.com/2016/04/21/use-powerbi-desktop-as-an-etl-tool/ [30.05.2017]
[16] Chadran S., Is Microsoft Power BI a data warehouse also?, Olympic Software, https://www.olympic.co.nz/is-microsoftpower-bi-a-data-warehouse-also/ [28.05.2017]
[17] Iseminger D., Measuers in Power BI Desktop, https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/powerbidesktop-measures/ [01.06.2017]
[18] Deng S., Saxton A.,.Schiavon A., Wprowadzenie do usługi Microsoft Power BI Embedded, https://docs.microsoft.com/plpl/azure/power-bi-embedded/power-bi-embedded-get-started [29.05.2017]
[2] Howson C., Idoine C., Oestreich T., Richardson J., Sallam R., Tapadinhas J., Magic Quadrant for Business Intelligence and Analytics Platforms, Gartner, htps://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?id=1-3TYE0CD&ct=170221&st=sb., [02.06.2017]
[3] Rangarajan S., Data Warehouse Design – Inmon versus Kimball, http://tdan.com/data-warehouse-design-inmon-versuskimball/20300 [03.06.2017]
[4] Mudrakola S., Manage your data with these 3 open source etl tools, http://techgenix.com/open-source-etl-tools/ [04.06.2017]
[5] Strona firmy Hortonworks, wykorzystującej Apache Hadoop https://hortonworks.com/products/data-center/hdp/ [21.05.2017]
[6] Siudziński M., Hadoop, czyli przetwarzanie rozproszone w open source, http://itwiz.pl/hadoop-czyli-przetwarzanie-rozproszoneopen-source/ [20.05.2017]
[7] Czajkowski L., A Comparison of SQL and NoSQL to Simplify Your Database Decision, https://blog.couchbase.com/comparison-sql-nosql-simplifydatabase-decision/ [11.06.2017]
[8] Harazin J., Narzędzia Business Intelligence dla managera: QlikView i Qlik Sense, http://www.jcommerce.pl/jpro/article/narzedzia-businessintelligence-dla-managera-qlikview-i-qlik-sense [5.06.2017]
[9] Baker P., Tableau Desktop, http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2491943,00.asp, [6.06.2017]
[10] Strona producenta Tableau, https://www.tableau.com, [04.06.2017]
[11] Prichard J., What's the difference between Qlik Sense and Qlik View?, http://optimalbi.com/blog/2016/01/18/whats-thedifference-between-qlik-sense-and-qlik-view/ [3.06.2017]
[12] Strona producenta Qlik, http://www.qlik.com/pl-pl/ [04.06.2017]
[13] Ris O., Microsoft Power BI, PCMag, http://uk.pcmag.com/microsoft-powerbi/74174/review/microsoft-power-bi [26.05.2017]
[14] Strona producenta Microsoft Power BI, https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/ [04.06.2017]
[15] Rui R., Use Power BI Desktop as an ETL Tool, https://ruiromanoblog.wordpress.com/2016/04/21/use-powerbi-desktop-as-an-etl-tool/ [30.05.2017]
[16] Chadran S., Is Microsoft Power BI a data warehouse also?, Olympic Software, https://www.olympic.co.nz/is-microsoftpower-bi-a-data-warehouse-also/ [28.05.2017]
[17] Iseminger D., Measuers in Power BI Desktop, https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/powerbidesktop-measures/ [01.06.2017]
[18] Deng S., Saxton A.,.Schiavon A., Wprowadzenie do usługi Microsoft Power BI Embedded, https://docs.microsoft.com/plpl/azure/power-bi-embedded/power-bi-embedded-get-started [29.05.2017]
Article Details
Abstract views: 815
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
