Analysis of LEAPET: a new energy-aware routing protocol for Internet of Things-based Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 39 (2026)
-
Comparative analysis of user interface quality of mobile operator applications
Darya Benedziktovich, Oleksii Davydok102-107
-
Comparative analysis of non-relational databases on the example of Amazon DynamoDB and MongoDB
Michał Sagan, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik108-114
-
Generative adversarial networks in sound synthesis: analysis of sound modeling capabilities using GANs.
Michał Galant, Paweł Powroźnik115-122
-
Analysis of LEAPET: a new energy-aware routing protocol for Internet of Things-based Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network
Kazeem B. Adedeji123-131
-
Comparative analysis of query optimization techniques in modern relational database systems
Volodymyr Solohub, Volodymyr Pashkevych132-137
-
Statistical analysis of the results of real dice rolls using the object detection model in the context of the Central Limit Theorem
Kacper Gębusia, Edyta Łukasik138-145
-
Analysis of usability and accessibility of Polish web services for English language testing
Michał Billewicz, Natalia Bogusz, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska146-153
-
Comparative analysis of reactive programming and Java virtual threads
Daniel Charlak, Jakub Brzeziński, Grzegorz Kozieł154-160
-
Comparative analysis of the security of instant messaging apps
Natalia Pioterczak, Maksymilian Potocki, Piotr Kopniak161-166
-
Comparative analysis of chosen programming languages
Jakub Machnowski, Marta Dziuba-Koziel167-175
-
Comparative performance analysis of Express.js and Spring Boot in CRUD-oriented web applications
Wojciech Wnuk, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik176-182
-
Comparative performance analysis of Spring Boot and Ktor for a ticket reservation REST API on the JVM
Miłosz Serej, Kamil Kopciński, Jakub Smołka183-187
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
Routing protocol is required for wireless sensor network (WSN) to transmit data to a base station. Because of the resource constraint internet of thing (IoT) sensors, it is vital to have an energy efficient routing protocol for the IoT-based Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks (IoT-HWSN). This study developed a new energy-efficient routing protocol for HWSN. The routing protocol combines the functionalities LEACH, PEGASIS, and Adaptive Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) to improve energy efficiency and data transmission. In this study, 100 heterogeneous sensor nodes with an initial energy of 0.5 J were modelled and simulated in a 100 m by 100 m square area. The performance of the developed routing protocol was compared to other existing routing protocol like LEACH, A-LEACH, PEGASIS, MC-PEGASIS, EERP and A&F. The results obtained show that the LEAPET routing protocol has the superior performance while MC-PEGASIS has the second best performance. In comparison to this, LEAPET achieves an improvement in a network lifetime of more than 14.3% over MC-PEGASIS. In terms of the packet delivery ratio, the LEAPET achieved up to 98.8% and 95.6% of packet delivery ratio with 10 and 100 nodes respectively. Furthermore, the proposed routing protocol (LEAPET) yields a good result with relatively minimum delay when compared with existing routing protocols
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
- 9 - Industry, Innovation, Technology and Infrastructure
References
[1] A. A. M. Faudzi, Y. Sabzehmeidani, K. Suzumori, Application of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) as sensors: A review, Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 32(2) (2020) 281–288, https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2020.p0281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2020.p0281
[2] M. A. Fraga, R. S. Pessoa, The role of semiconductor thin films in advancing MEMS sensor technology, IEEE Sensors Reviews 2 (2025) 112–121, https://doi.org/10.1109/SR.2025.3564231 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SR.2025.3564231
[3] E. Taparci, K. Olcay, M. O. Akmandor, B. Kabakulak, B. Sarioglu, Y. D. Gokdel, A mathematical programming approach for IoT-enabled, energy-efficient heterogeneous wireless sensor network design and implementation, Sensors 24(5) (2024) 1457, https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s24051457
[4] S. I. Hamim, A. B. A. Rahman, Optimizing wireless sensor networks: a survey of clustering strategies and algorithms, International Journal of Computer Networks and Applications 11(5) (2024) 673–689, https://doi.org/10.22247/ijcna/2024/42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22247/ijcna/2024/42
[5] D. W. Wajgi, J. V. Tembhurne, Localization in wireless sensor networks and wireless multimedia sensor networks using clustering techniques, Multimedia Tools and Applications 83(3) (2024) 6829–6879, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15956-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-15956-z
[6] M. Trigka, E. Dritsas, Wireless sensor networks: From fundamentals and applications to innovations and future trends, IEEE Access 13 (2025) 96365–96399, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3572328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3572328
[7] C. C. Chang, W. Y. Hsueh, T. F. Cheng, A dynamic user authentication and key agreement scheme for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, Wireless Personal Communications 89(2) (2016) 447–465, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3281-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3281-1
[8] Z. Mohammadian, S. H. Hosseini Nejad, A. Charmin, S. Barghandan, M. Ebadpour, A routing method for extending network lifetime in wireless sensor networks using improved PSO, Applied Sciences 15(18) (2025) 10236, https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810236
[9] O. Moh’d Alia, Dynamic relocation of a mobile base station in wireless sensor networks using a cluster-based harmony search algorithm, Information Sciences 385 (2017) 76–95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.12.046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.12.046
[10] R. Vankdothu, M. A. Hameed, H. Fatima, A. Subbarao, Multicast scaling in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks for security and time efficiency, Wireless Personal Communications 145 (2025) 699–715, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11696-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-024-11696-x
[11] N. A. Pantazis, S. A. Nikolidakis, D. D. Vergados, Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 15(2) (2012) 551–591, https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.062612.00084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.062612.00084
[12] W. Abushiba, P. Johnson, S. Alharthi, C. Wright, An energy-efficient and adaptive clustering for wireless sensor network (CH-LEACH) using leach protocol, In 2017 13th International Computer Engineering Conference (2017) 50–54, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENCO.2017.8289762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICENCO.2017.8289762
[13] S. Dutt, S. Agrawal, R. Vig, Cluster-head restricted energy efficient protocol (CREEP) for routing in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, Wireless Personal Communications 100(4) (2018) 1477–1497, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5649-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5649-x
[14] K. Guleria, A. K. Verma, Comprehensive review for energy efficient hierarchical routing protocols on wireless sensor networks, Wireless Networks 25(3) (2019) 1159–1183, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1696-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-018-1696-1
[15] B. Senthilkumar, P. Bachanna, S. Chandragandhi, U. B. Nisha, M. Sravani, S. Swathi, P. P. Prasanth, R. Y. Abdullah, An exploration of edge-based energy harvesting and routing strategies to enhance communication efficiency in IoT networks, International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing 16(5-6) (2025) 505–526, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGUC.2025.148545 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGUC.2025.148545
[16] P. Rawat, G. S. Rawat, H. Rawat, S. Chauhan, Energy-efficient cluster-based routing protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor network, Annals of Telecommunications 80(1) (2025) 109–122, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-024-01015-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-024-01015-7
[17] Y. Liu, Q. Wu, T. Zhao, Y. Tie, F. Bai, M. Jin, An improved energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks, Sensors 19(20) (2019) 4579, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19204579
[18] S. Singh, A. Malik, R. Kumar, Energy efficient heterogeneous DEEC protocol for enhancing lifetime in WSNs, Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal 20(1) (2017) 345–353, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.08.009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2016.08.009
[19] A. Alromih, H. Kurdi, An energy-efficient gossiping protocol for wireless sensor networks using Chebyshev distance, Procedia Computer Science 151 (2019) 1066–1071, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.04.151
[20] J. Cheng, Y. Gao, N. Zhang, H. Yang, An energy-efficient two-stage cooperative routing scheme in wireless multi-hop networks, Sensors 19(5) (2019) 1002, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s19051002
[21] L. Dung, B. An, A stability-aware cooperative routing scheme in multi-rate mobile ad-hoc wireless networks. In: Pathan, M., Wei, G., Fortino, G. (eds) Internet and distributed computing systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8223 (2013) Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41428-2_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41428-2_4
[22] A. Jamalipour, Y. Ma, Intermittently connected mobile Ad hoc networks: From routing to content distribution, New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1572-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1572-5
[23] P. Bosch, T. De Schepper, E. Zeljković, J. Famaey, S. Latré, Orchestration of heterogeneous wireless networks: State of the art and remaining challenges, Computer Communications 149 (2020) 62–77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.008
[24] T. Khalifa, A. Abdrabou, K. Shaban, A. Gaouda, Heterogeneous wireless networks for smart grid distribution systems: Advantages and limitations, Sensors 18(5) (2018) 1517, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s18051517
[25] Z. Ying and J. Changgang, A kind of routing algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks based on affinity propagation, In 2014 26th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (2014) 2481–2485, https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2014.6852590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2014.6852590
[26] G. T. Singh, F. M. Al-Turjman, Cognitive routing for information-centric sensor networks in smart cities, In IEEE International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (2014) 1124–1129, https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2014.6906512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2014.6906512
[27] T. Sharma, B. Kumar, K. Berry, A. Dhawan, R. S. Rathore, V. Gupta, Ant based cluster head election algorithm in wireless sensor network to avoid redundancy, In 2014 4th International Conference on Communication Systems and Network (2014) 83–88, https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT.2014.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CSNT.2014.25
[28] S. Guo, C. Wang, Y. Yang, Mobile data gathering with wireless energy replenishment in rechargeable sensor networks, In IEEE INFOCOM (2013) 1932–1940, https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2013.6566993 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/INFCOM.2013.6566993
[29] M. R. El Ouadi, A. Hasbi, Comparison of LEACH and PEGASIS hierarchical routing protocols in WSN, iJOE, 16(9) (2020) 159–172, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i09.14691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v16i09.14691
[30] S. Randhawa, A. K. Verma, Comparative analysis of flat routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: Which one is better?, In IEEE 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control (2017) 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/I2C2.2017.8321945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/I2C2.2017.8321945
[31] C. Nakas D. Kandris, G. Visvardis, Review energy efficient routing in wireless sensor networks: A comprehensive survey, Algorithms 13(3) (2020) 72, https://doi.org/10.3390/a13030072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/a13030072
[32] S. Jyothirmaye, A. R. L. Padmaja, G. Nagalakshumma, R. Kumar, Enhanced network lifetime and efficiency in wireless sensor networks through modified multi-chain PEGASIS with mobile sink mobility, In IEEE International Conference on Emerging Research in Computational Science (2023) 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-023-10419-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICERCS57948.2023.10434260
[33] C. Parvathi, S. Talanki, Energy saving hierarchical routing protocol in WSN. In: S. Yellampalli, S. (Ed.). Wireless Sensor Networks-Design, Deployment and Applications, IntechOpen, United Kingdom (2021), https://doi: 10.5772/intechopen.77917. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.93595
[34] J. Vellaichamy, S. Basheer, P. S. M. Bai, M. Khan, S. Kumar Mathivanan, P. Jayagopal, J. C. Babu, Wireless sensor networks based on multi-criteria clustering and optimal bio-inspired algorithm for energy-efficient routing, Applied Sciences 13(5) (2023) 2801, https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052801
[35] E. Alnawafa, I. Marghescu, New energy efficient multi-hop routing techniques for wireless sensor networks: Static and dynamic techniques, Sensors 18(6) (2018), 1863, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061863
[36] M.S.. Ali, T. Dey, R. Biswas, ALEACH: Advanced LEACH routing protocol for wireless microsensor networks, In IEEE International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (2008) 909–914, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECE.2008.4769341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECE.2008.4769341
[37] R.K. Yadav, A. Singh, Comparative study of PEGASIS based protocols in wireless sensor netwroks, In 1st India International Conference on Information Processing (2016) 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/IICIP.2016.7975320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/IICIP.2016.7975320
[38] .S. Sreedharan, D.J. Pete, A fuzzy multicriteria decision‐making‐based CH selection and hybrid routing protocol for WSN, International Journal of Communication Systems 33(15) (2020) e4536, https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4536 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/dac.4536
[39] S. Chelbi, H. Dhahri, M. Abdouli, C. Duvallet, R. Bouaziz, A new hybrid routing protocol for wireless sensor networks, International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing 28(4) (2018) 247–257, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAHUC.2018.093330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAHUC.2018.093330
Article Details
Abstract views: 35

