Analysis of usability and accessibility of Polish web services for English language testing
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 39 (2026)
-
Comparative analysis of user interface quality of mobile operator applications
Darya Benedziktovich, Oleksii Davydok102-107
-
Comparative analysis of non-relational databases on the example of Amazon DynamoDB and MongoDB
Michał Sagan, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik108-114
-
Generative adversarial networks in sound synthesis: analysis of sound modeling capabilities using GANs.
Michał Galant, Paweł Powroźnik115-122
-
Analysis of LEAPET: a new energy-aware routing protocol for Internet of Things-based Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Network
Kazeem B. Adedeji123-131
-
Comparative analysis of query optimization techniques in modern relational database systems
Volodymyr Solohub, Volodymyr Pashkevych132-137
-
Statistical analysis of the results of real dice rolls using the object detection model in the context of the Central Limit Theorem
Kacper Gębusia, Edyta Łukasik138-145
-
Analysis of usability and accessibility of Polish web services for English language testing
Michał Billewicz, Natalia Bogusz, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska146-153
-
Comparative analysis of reactive programming and Java virtual threads
Daniel Charlak, Jakub Brzeziński, Grzegorz Kozieł154-160
-
Comparative analysis of the security of instant messaging apps
Natalia Pioterczak, Maksymilian Potocki, Piotr Kopniak161-166
-
Comparative analysis of chosen programming languages
Jakub Machnowski, Marta Dziuba-Koziel167-175
-
Comparative performance analysis of Express.js and Spring Boot in CRUD-oriented web applications
Wojciech Wnuk, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik176-182
-
Comparative performance analysis of Spring Boot and Ktor for a ticket reservation REST API on the JVM
Miłosz Serej, Kamil Kopciński, Jakub Smołka183-187
Main Article Content
Authors
michal.billewicz@pollub.edu.pl
Abstract
Digital accessibility is crucial for inclusive education, yet many language learning platforms remain inaccessible. This study evaluated five Polish web services for English language testing, focusing on universal design principles and using a mixed-methods approach (eye-tracking, SUS survey, WAVE). Results show that adherence to the Simple and Intuitive Use principle was the strongest predictor of user satisfaction. While a baseline of technical accessibility is important, intuitive layout and clear information hierarchy were more decisive. Crucially, the study highlights that different methods measure distinct aspects of usability. Automated compliance failed to correlate with user satisfaction and visual search efficiency did not predict interactive task performance.
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
- 4 - Quality education
- 9 - Industry, Innovation, Technology and Infrastructure
References
[1] B. A. Shawar, Evaluating Web Accessibility of Educa-tional Websites, International Journal of Emerging Tech-nologies in Learning 10(4) (2015) 4-10, https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i4.4518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i4.4518
[2] U. Singh, J. D. Venkatesh, A. Muraleedharan, K. S. Salu-ja, J. H. Anamika, P. Biswas, Accessibility Analysis of Educational Websites Using WCAG 2.0, Digital Gov-ernment: Research and Practice 5(3) (2024) 1-28, https://doi.org/10.1145/3696318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3696318
[3] H. Y. Abuaddous, M. Z. Jali, N. Basir, Web Accessibility Challenges, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 7(10) (2016), https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.071023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.071023
[4] A. Alsaeedi, Comparing Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools and Evaluating the Accessibility of Webpages: Proposed Frameworks, Information 11(1) (2020) Article 40, https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010040. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info11010040
[5] W. Stasiak, M. Dzieńkowski, Accessibility assessment of selected university websites, J. Comput. Sci. Inst. 19 (2021) 81-88, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.2462
[6] S. Harper, A. Q. Chen, Web accessibility guidelines: A lesson from the evolving Web, World Wide Web 15(1) (2012) 61-88, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-011-0130-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-011-0130-8
[7] N. Iannuzzi, M. Manca, F. Paternò, C. Santoro, Usability and transparency in the design of a tool for automatic support for web accessibility validation, Universal Access in the Information Society 23(1) (2024) 435-454, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00948-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00948-x
[8] P. Parvin, V. Palumbo, M. Manca, F. Paternò, The Transparency of Automatic Accessibility Evaluation Tools, Proceedings of the 18th Web for All Conference (W4A '21) (2021) 1-5, https://doi.org/10.1145/3430263.3452436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3430263.3452436
[9] S. G. Abduganiev, Towards Automated Web Accessibility Evaluation: A Comparative Study, International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science 9(9) (2017) 18-44, https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2017.09.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2017.09.03
[10] K. Tzafilkou, N. Protogeros, Diagnosing user perception and acceptance using eye tracking in web-based end-user development, Computers in Human Behavior 72 (2017) 23-37, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.035. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.035
[11] L. Rello, M. C. Marcos, An Eye Tracking Study on Text Customization for User Performance and Preference, In 2012 Eighth Latin American Web Congress (2012) 64-70, https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-WEB.2012.13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-WEB.2012.13
[12] P. Weichbroth, K. Redlarski, I. Garnik, Eye-tracking Web Usability Research, In Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (2016) 1681-1684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15439/2016F127
[13] H. Tuzun, A. Akinci, M. Kurtoglu, D. Atal, F. K. Pala, A study on the usability of a university registrar's office website through the methods of authentic tasks and eye-tracking, Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technol-ogy 12(2) (2013) 26-38, https://www.tojet.net/articles/v12i2/1223.pdf.
[14] K. Kurek, M. Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. Dzieńkowski, P. Powroźnik, The impact of applying universal design principles on the usability of online accommodation booking websites, Applied Computer Science 20(1) (2024) 56–71, https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2024-04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2024-04
[15] B. Badzio, A. Bodziak, B. Brodawka, K. Buchajczuk, M. Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. Dzieńkowski, P. Pow-roźnik, Analysis of the usability and accessibility of web-sites in view of their universal design principles, Applied Computer Science 18(3) (2022) 63–85, https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2022-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/acs-2022-22
[16] S. Schmutz, A. Sonderegger, J. Sauer, Easy-to-read lan-guage in disability-friendly web sites: Effects on non-disabled users, Applied Ergonomics 74 (2019) 97-106, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.013
[17] S. Ntoa, Usability and User Experience Evaluation in In-telligent Environments: A Review and Reappraisal, In-ternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 41(5) (2025) 2829-2858, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2394724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2394724
[18] C. Ş. Kölemen, E. Akgün, Designing, Development, Im-plementation and Assessment of the Accessible Mass Open Learning Platforms for the Visually Impaired Indi-viduals, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 21(3) (2022) 15-32.
[19] J. Brooke, SUS: A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale, Usa-bility Evaluation in Industry, CRC Press 189(194) 1996 4-7, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35
[20] M. F. Story, J. L. Mueller, R. L. Mace, The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abili-ties. Revised Edition, The Center for Universal Design, NC State University (1998).
[21] A. Duchowski, Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed., Springer, London, 2007.
[22] K. Holmqvist, M. Nyström, R. Andersson, R. Dewhurst, H. Jarodzka, J. van de Weijer, Eye Tracking: A Compre-hensive Guide to Methods and Measures, Oxford Univer-sity Press, Oxford, 2011.
[23] J. Sauro, J. R. Lewis, Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research, Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802308-2.00002-3
Article Details
Abstract views: 31

