Empowering Women for Sustainable Economic Recovery: Optimizing Natural Resource Markets for Environmental Efficiency in the USA
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026)
-
An Evaluation of the Convergence of Six Different Environmental Sustainable Development Goals in OECD Countries
Idris Yagmur, Sakiru Adebola Solarin , Mustafa Kocaoğlu , Halit Buluthan Çetintaş1-14
-
Empowering Women for Sustainable Economic Recovery: Optimizing Natural Resource Markets for Environmental Efficiency in the USA
Muhammad Khalid Anser, Helmi Ali Mkaouar, Jameel Ahmad Khader, Alaa Shoukry, Wasfi Yengui, Khalid Zaman15-40
-
Knowledge-Based Economic Growth: Strategies for Integrating Digital Transformation in Developing Economies
Xingyuan Sun, Jize Liu41-53
-
Social Capital and its Influence on Community Resilience and Local Governance Capacity
Lin Ji, Xi Cheng, Savetbek Abdrasulov54-62
-
Comparing the Foreign Policy Identities of the United States of America and the European Union in Climate Communications and National Narratives
Olena Shevchenko, Iuliia Tsyrfa, Mykhailo Goncharenko, Svitlana Palii, Dmytro Podolchuk63-77
-
Management of Chinese Energy Sector for the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy: Legislative Gaps and Emerging Judicial Trends
Naixin Hu, Qian Wu78-92
-
Sustainable Budgeting and Climate Adaptation Finance: Optimizing Public Expenditures Amid Intensifying Climate Crisis
George Abuselidze93-104
-
Eco-feminist Ethics: A Sustainable Approach to the Environmental Crisis
Dipti Khatua, Ajit Kumar Behura, Purnima Lenka105-114
-
Sustainable Energy Transition, Energy Efficiency and Labor Market Dynamics: An Empirical Assessment of SDG 7 and SDG 8
Hongxia Zhang, Chuks Kingsley Okogor, Uche Benson Okogor, Abdifatah Ahmed Ali Afyare115-138
-
Reducing or Reproducing Inequality? A Critical Analysis of the Gender and Sustainability through Problematizing Digital Policies in India
Sanjana Santra, Kishore Kumar, Nilanjan Chattopadhyay139-151
-
Pricing, Green Investment and Job Carbon Quality in Eight Leading Energy-Transitioning Economies: Implications for Employment, Health, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Hongyun Kuang, Qian Xiao, Ye Wu152-167
-
Green Jobs in the Energy Transition among the Eight Largest Economies: Assessing Employment Quality in Renewable Energy Supply Chains
Jianhua Zheng168-185
-
Exploring Dynamic Pathways of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in Provincial Regions of China
Juan Tan, Jinyu Wei186-198
-
Green Finance and Human Health Outcomes: The Role of Public Renewable Energy Investment in China, India and Selected Economies
Dechun Wang, Hao Ding199-223
-
Sustainable Development in Climate Change: A Systematic Literatur Review
Dewi Risnawati, Sry Reski Mulka, Dea Rizki Amanda224-238
-
Harmonizing Human Dignity and Economic Progress: The Evolution of Labour Rights in the Global Architecture of Sustainable Development
Yuriy Kyrylov, Nataliia Cherevko239-247
-
Maṣlaḥah Mursalah and Environmental Sustainability: An Islamic Jurisprudential Perspective
Anthony Le Duc248-257
-
Green recovery, Low-Carbon Economy and Sustainable Development in BRICS Economies
Xiaoning Sun, Sha Fu258-283
-
Effective Management of Tourist Destinations to Minimize Negative Impacts on the Environment and Cultural Heritage
Zegeng Сhen, Shimin Fu284-297
-
Coherence between Human and Sustainable Development: a DP2-Based Assessment
Oksana Liashenko, Olena Mykhailovska, Anastasiia Duka, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi298-326
-
Alternative Asset Diversification for ESG Investments: Evidence from G7 Countries Under Economic and Geopolitical Crises
Halilibrahim Gökgöz, Aamir Aijaz Syed, Fadhila Hamza, Ahmed Jeribi
-
Artificial Intelligence in Global Libraries: Pathways and Policies for Sustainable Development
Shuang Zheng, Qianbai Dai , Rabiu Abubakar347-360
-
Financial Inclusion, Energy Access, and Poverty Reduction in BRICS Plus Economies
Xiaowan Xu361-392
-
Resilience as a Key Feature of Smart Cities Supporting Sustainable Urban Development
Magdalena Kisała393-402
Archives
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2026-07-01 24
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2026-01-10 21
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-07-10 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The UN SDG 5 promotes gender equality and the empowerment of women and girls. Despite its focus on SDG 5 (Gender Equality), the study recognizes that empowering women supports numerous other SDGs. Gender equality's promotion of inclusive p boosts SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic Growth) through increased productivity and innovation, SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) through increased female representation in science and technology, SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) through more sustainable behavioral choices, and SDG 13 (Climate Action) through environmental awareness and policy advocacy. Empowering women is a systemic driver for social, economic, and environmental sustainability. The lack of gender parity in governance is counterproductive to long-term goals. Based on the key facts, the study filled a research gap by including various predictors of women's autonomy that aid in managing a country's environmental and natural resources in the United States by using a period of 1975–2023. The asymmetric relationship between women's autonomy factors, ecological footprints, and ores and metal exports was discovered using the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model. Further, Granger causality test is used for causal inferences between the variables. The NARDL estimates show that increasing the women's sovereignty index is beneficial in the short and long run for reducing ecological footprints and conserving ores and metal exports. Furthermore, advanced female education's positive and negative shocks reduce environmental footprints through political wisdom. The Granger causality estimates show that ecological footprints cause of to increase advanced female education, whereas negative shocks of advanced female education cause women's sovereignty. The findings confirmed the viability of asymmetric causation between the variables mentioned during the specified period. The country needs to include women in its main policy plans to protect the environment and natural resources for green and clean development.
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
- 5 - Gender equality
- 12 - Responsible consumption and production
- 13 - Climate action
References
1. ADENDORFF C.M., KEOWN H., AMANSURE R., 2020, The development of a socio-economic model to promote women's empowerment initiatives in the renewable energy sector of South Africa, Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 31(2): 34–47.
2. AGARWAL S., LENKA U., SINGH K., AGRAWAL V., AGRAWAL A.M., 2020, A qualitative approach towards crucial factors for sustainable development of women social entrepreneurship: Indian cases, Journal of Cleaner Production, 274: 123135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123135
3. AHMAD N., ULLAH Z., ARSHAD M.Z., KAMRAN H., SCHOLZ M., HAN H., 2021a, Relationship between cor-porate social responsibility at the micro-level and environmental performance: The mediating role of employee pro-environmental behavior and the moderating role of gender, Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27: 1138–1148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.034
4. AHMAD N., ULLAH Z., MAHMOOD A., ARIZA-MONTES A., VEGA-MUÑOZ A., HAN H., SCHOLZ M., 2021b, Corporate social responsibility at the micro-level as a ‘new organizational value’ for sustainability: are fe-males more aligned towards it?, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4): 2165, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18042165
5. AHMED Z., AHMAD M., RJIOUB H., KALUGINA O.A., HUSSAIN N., 2022, Economic growth, renewable ener-gy consumption, and ecological footprint: Exploring the role of environmental regulations and democracy in sus-tainable development, Sustainable Development, 30(4): 595–605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2251
6. AKINSEMOLU A.A., OLUKOYA O.A., 2020, The vulnerability of women to climate change in coastal regions of Nigeria: A case of the Ilaje community in Ondo State, Journal of Cleaner Production, 246: 119015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119015
7. ANANTHA K.H., GARG K.K., MOSES D.S., PATIL M.D., SAWARGAONKAR G.L., KAMDI P.J., WANI S.P., 2021, Impact of natural resource management interventions on water resources and environmental services in dif-ferent agroecological regions of India, Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 13: 100574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2021.100574
8. ARTHUR-HOLMES F., BUSIA K.A., 2020, Household dynamics and the bargaining power of women in artisanal and small-scale mining in sub-Saharan Africa: A Ghanaian case study, Resources Policy, 69: 101884.
9. ATAHAU A.D.R., SAKTI I.M., HURUTA A.D., KIM M.S., 2021, Gender and renewable energy integration: The mediating role of green-microfinance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 318: 128536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128536
10. BEGAM A., MUJAHID N., 2019, The nexus between economic globalization and female labor force participation, Pakistan Journal of Gender Studies, 19: 19–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46568/pjgs.v19i1.73
11. BELL S.E., DAGGETT C., LABUSKI C., 2020, Toward feminist energy systems: Why adding women and solar panels is not enough, Energy Research & Social Science, 68: 101557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101557
12. BERNIELL I., GASPARINI L., MARCHIONNI M., VIOLLAZ M., 2023, Lucky women in unlucky cohorts: Gender differences in the effects of initial labor market conditions in Latin America, Journal of Development Economics, 161: 103042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.103042
13. BHALOTRA S., VENKATARAMANI A., WALTHER S., 2023, Women’s fertility and labor market responses to a health innovation, Journal of the European Economic Association, 35(2): 461–479.
14. BILGILI F., KHAN M., AWAN A., 2023b, Is there a gender dimension of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evi-dence from Asian countries, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(3): 2387–2418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02139-3
15. BILGILI F., SOYKAN E., DUMRUL C., AWAN A., ÖNDEROL S., KHAN K., 2023a, Disaggregating the impact of natural resource rents on environmental sustainability in the MENA region: A quantile regression analysis, Re-sources Policy, 85: 103825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103825
16. BORMANN K.C., BACKS S., HOON C., 2021, What makes nonfamily employees act as good stewards? Emotions and the moderating roles of stewardship culture and gender roles in family firms, Family Business Review, 34(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520968826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486520968826
17. BROWN-GROSSMAN F., NAVA-BOLAÑOS I., 2023, Do male and female labor market transition patterns differ in Mexico?, The Economics of Women and Work in the Global Economy, Routledge: 191–222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198314-11
18. BUCKINGHAM S., PERELLO M., LÓPEZ-MURCIA J., 2021, Gender mainstreaming urban waste reduction in European cities, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(4): 671–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1781601
19. BURKHARDT K., NGUYEN P., POINCELOT E., 2020, Agents of change: Women in top management and corpo-rate environmental performance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4): 1591–1604.
20. CAMERON E.C., CUNNINGHAM F.J., HEMINGWAY S.L., TSCHIDA S.L., JACQUIN K.M., 2020, Indicators of gender inequality and violence against women predict number of reported human trafficking legal cases across countries, Journal of Human Trafficking, https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2020.1852000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2020.1852000
21. CAMPBELL S.J., MEDIANTI E., ADE YULIANI R.J., SETIAWAN H., DE LA ROSA E., SUHERFIAN W., 2021, Gender-inclusive financial literacy strategies: Unlocking the value of small-scale fishing communities, SPC Women in Fisheries Information Bulletin, 33: 37–47.
22. CHAN E.S., 2021, Influencing stakeholders to reduce carbon footprints: Hotel managers’ perspective, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94: 102807.
23. CHANG C.C., LIAO Y.T., CHANG Y.W., 2019, Life cycle assessment of carbon footprint in public transporta-tion—a case study of bus route no. 2 in Tainan city, Taiwan, Procedia Manufacturing, 30: 388–395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.054
24. CHÁVEZ A., RODRÍGUEZ-PUELLO G., 2022, Commodity price shocks and the gender wage gap: Evidence from the metal mining prices super-cycle in Chile, Resources Policy, 76: 102497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102497
25. COE I.R., WILEY R., BEKKER L.G., 2019, Organisational best practices towards gender equality in science and medicine, The Lancet, 393(10171), 587–593. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33188-X
26. CRONKLETON P., EVANS K., ADDAOH T., SMITH DUMONT E., ZIDA M., DJOUDI H., 2021, Using participa-tory approaches to enhance women’s engagement in natural resource management in northern Ghana, Sustainabil-ity, 13(13): 7072, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137072
27. DOĞAN N., KIRIKKALELI D., 2021, Does gender equality in education matter for environmental sustainability in sub-Saharan Africa?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28: 39853–39865. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13452-1
28. DU C., ANSER M.K., PENG M.Y.P., ASKAR S.E., NASSANI A.A., ZAMAN K., ABRO M.M.Q., 2021, Women’s autonomy and its impact on environmental sustainability agenda, Journal of Environmental Planning and Man-agement, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1952168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1952168
29. DURÁN-DÍAZ P., ARMENTA-RAMÍREZ A., KURJENOJA A.K., SCHUMACHER M., 2020, Community devel-opment through the empowerment of indigenous women in Cuetzalan del Progreso, Mexico, Land, 9(5): 163, https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9050163
30. ELSHEIKH T., ALMAQTARI F.A., AL-HATTAMI H.M., AL-BUKHRANI M.A., ETTISH A.A., 2024, The moder-ating effect of women in boardrooms on the relationship between control of corruption and corporate sustainability performance, Discover Sustainability, 5(1): 502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00490-1
31. ERGAS C., GREINER P.T., MCGEE J.A., CLEMENT M.T., 2021, Does gender climate influence climate change? The multidimensionality of gender equality and its countervailing effects on the carbon intensity of well-being, Sus-tainability, 13(7), 3956, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073956. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073956
32. ESHUN M.E., 2020, Women, artisanal mining and peacebuilding in Africa, Women and Peacebuilding in Africa, Routledge: 158–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003026044-11
33. FAN P., QIAN X., WANG J., 2023, Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 77: 101931. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101931
34. FRIMAN H., BANNER I., SITBON Y., SAHAR-INBAR L., SHAKED N., 2024, Nurturing eco-literate minds: Un-veiling the pathways to minimize ecological footprint in early childhood education, Social Sciences, 13(4): 187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13040187
35. FRISCHTAK C.R., 2019, The protection of intellectual property rights and industrial technology development in Brazil, Intellectual Property Rights in Science, Technology, and Economic Performance, Routledge: 61–98.
36. GANDA F., 2019, The environmental impacts of financial development in OECD countries: a panel GMM ap-proach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(7): 6758–6772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04143-z
37. GATTO A., DRAGO C., 2021, When renewable energy, empowerment, and entrepreneurship connect: Measuring energy policy effectiveness in 230 countries, Energy Research & Social Science, 78: 101977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.101977
38. GAYATHRI R., VIJAYABANU C., 2021, Upshot of gender inequalities towards labor markets: A macro level perspective, Women Empowerment and Well-Being for Inclusive Economic Growth, IGI Global: 73–88.
39. GLAZEBROOK T., NOLL S., OPOKU E., 2020, Gender matters: Climate change, gender bias, and women’s farm-ing in the global South and North, Agriculture, 10(7): 267, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10070267
40. GOEL M., RAVISHANKAR N., 2021, Impact of public policy and legislation on autonomy and empowerment of women in India, Gender Issues, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09282-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09282-7
41. GRAAFLAND J., 2020, Women in management and sustainable development of SMEs: Do relational environmen-tal management instruments matter?, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5): 2320–2328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1966
42. HOMEWOOD K., NIELSEN M.R., KEANE A., 2020, Women, wellbeing and wildlife management areas in Tanza-nia, The Journal of Peasant Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1726323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1726323
43. HOSIO Y.F., AQUARISTA A., 2023, Ecological impact of mangrove forest damage on women's economic re-sources based on ecofeminism theory in Youtefa Bay, Jayapura City, JAMBU AIR Journal of Accounting Manage-ment Business and International Research, 1(2): 86–97.
44. HOU X., HU Q., LIANG X., XU J., 2023, How do low-carbon city pilots affect carbon emissions? Staggered differ-ence-in-difference evidence from Chinese firms, Economic Analysis and Policy, 79: 664–686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.030
45. HUANG C., LIU W., IQBAL W., SHAH S.A.R., 2024, Does digital governance matter for environmental sustaina-bility? The key challenges and opportunities under the prism of natural resource management, Resources Policy, 91: 104812. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.104812
46. IBRAHIEM D.M., HANAFY S.A., 2020, Dynamic linkages amongst ecological footprints, fossil fuel energy con-sumption and globalization: an empirical analysis, Management of Environmental Quality: An International Jour-nal, 31(6): 1549–1568.
47. IPCC, 2014, IPCC Fifth Assessment Report, https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar5/ (22.02.2023).
48. JAISWAL N., GUPTA A.K., SINGH S., SRIVASTAVA R., 2023, Women as an edifice of nation-building: A futur-istic approach, Biodiversity, CRC Press: 447–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003220398-31
49. JAYACHANDRAN S., 2021, Social norms as a barrier to women’s employment in developing countries, IMF Eco-nomic Review, 69(3): 576–595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-021-00140-w
50. JEONG B.G., COMPION S., 2021, Characteristics of women’s leadership in African social enterprises: The Heart-felt Project, Bright Kids Uganda and Chikumbuso, Emerald Emerging Markets Case Studies, 11(2), https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS-11-2019-0305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EEMCS-11-2019-0305
51. KAGGWA M., 2020, Interventions to promote gender equality in the mining sector of South Africa, The Extractive Industries and Society, 7(2): 398–404.
52. KAKADE K.S., KULKARNI A.M., NAIK K.R., 2024, The role of women leadership in environmental manage-ment, Opportunities and Challenges for Women Leaders in Environmental Management, EDS. Aquino P. Jr., Jala-gat R. Jr., Justin M., IGI Global: 31–49, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5986-7.ch003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5986-7.ch003
53. KANSAKE B.A., SAKYI-ADDO G.B., DUMAKOR-DUPEY N.K., 2021, Creating a gender-inclusive mining in-dustry: Uncovering the challenges of female mining stakeholders, Resources Policy, 70: 101962.
54. KHURSHEED A., KHAN A.A., MUSTAFA F., 2021, Women’s social empowerment and microfinance: a brief review of literature, Journal of International Women’s Studies, 22(5): 249–265.
55. KUŞKAYA S., BILGILI F., MUĞALOĞLU E., KHAN K., HOQUE M.E., TOGUÇ N., 2023, The role of solar ener-gy usage in environmental sustainability: Fresh evidence through time-frequency analyses, Renewable Energy, 206: 858–871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.02.063
56. LI T.M., 2007, The will to improve: Governmentality, development, and the practice of politics, Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822389781
57. LIU Y., ANSER M.K., ZAMAN K., 2021, Ecofeminism and natural resource management: Justice delayed, justice denied, Sustainability, 13(13): 7319, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137319
58. LÖW C., 2020, Gender and indigenous concepts of climate protection: A critical revision of REDD+ projects, Cur-rent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 43: 91–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2020.03.002
59. MA H., NING W., WANG J., WANG S., 2024, The impact of environmental pollution liability insurance on firms’ green innovations: evidence from China, Applied Economics Letters, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2331658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2331658
60. MAJA M.M., AYANO S.F., 2021, The impact of population growth on natural resources and farmers’ capacity to adapt to climate change in low-income countries, Earth Systems and Environment, 5: 271–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-021-00209-6
61. MALEKNIA R., SALEHI T., 2024, Exploring the drivers behind women’s intentions towards climate change miti-gation through urban forest conservation, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 97: 128395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2024.128395
62. MALEKNIA R., ENESCU E.R., SALEHI T., 2025, Climate change and urban forests: generational differences in women’s perceptions and willingness to participate in conservation efforts, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 7: 1450098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1450098
63. MANGAROO-PILLAY S., BOTHA D., 2020, An exploration of women's workplace experiences in the South Afri-can mining industry, Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 120(8): 475–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/1099/2020
64. MANG-BENZA C., JODOIN L., DOUBOGAN Y.O., GAYE I., KOLA E., 2023, Making energy justice work for women in rural sub-Saharan Africa: A qualitative diagnostic from Benin, Senegal, and Togo, Energy Policy, 173, 113345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113345
65. MEAGHER K., SINGH N.S., PATEL P., 2020, The role of gender inclusive leadership during the COVID-19 pan-demic to support vulnerable populations in conflict settings, BMJ Global Health, 5(9): e003760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003760
66. MITRA A., BARUA P., 2022, Coping practices of women fisherfolk in responses to climate change at UNESCO declared world heritage site of Sundarbans, Ecological Footprints of Climate Change, eds. Chatterjee U., Akanwa A.O., Kumar S., Singh S.K., Dutta Roy A., Springer Climate, Springer, Cham: 191–222, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15501-7_28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15501-7_28
67. MUJEED S., LI S., JABEEN M., NASSANI A.A., ASKAR S.E., ZAMAN K., JAMBARI H., 2021, Technowomen: Women’s autonomy and its impact on environmental quality, Sustainability, 13(4): 1611, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041611
68. MUNGALL-BALDWIN C., 2022, Women’s participation in the prevention and control of dengue using environ-mental methods in the global south: a qualitative meta-synthesis, International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1): 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01726-0
69. MURTAZA S.A., MAHMOOD A., SALEEM S., AHMAD N., SHARIF M.S., MOLNÁR E., 2021, Proposing stew-ardship theory as an alternate to explain the relationship between CSR and employees’ pro-environmental behavior, Sustainability, 13(15): 8558, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158558
70. NASSANI A.A., ALDAKHIL A.M., ZAMAN K., 2021, Ecological footprints jeopardy for mineral resource extrac-tion: efficient use of energy, financial development and insurance services to conserve natural resources, Resources Policy, 74: 102271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102271
71. NASSANI A.A., ALDAKHIL A.M., ABRO M.M.Q., ISLAM T., ZAMAN K., 2019, The impact of tourism and finance on women empowerment, Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(2): 234–254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2018.12.001
72. NHAMO G., MUKONZA C., 2020, Opportunities for women in the green economy and environmental sectors, Sustainable Development, 28(4): 823–832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2033
73. NYAHUNDA L., 2021, Social work empowerment model for mainstreaming the participation of rural women in the climate change discourse, Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 6: 120–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-020-00148-8
74. ODERA J.A., MULUSA J., 2020, SDGs, gender equality and women’s empowerment: what prospects for delivery, in Sustainable Development Goals and Human Rights: 95–106, https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/22942/1007219.pdf .
75. ODO D.B., YANG I.A., GREEN D., KNIBBS L.D., 2021, Women’s empowerment and household fuel use in 31 African countries: a cross-sectional analysis, Environmental Research Letters, 16(2): 025012.
76. OKERE K.I., DIMNWOI S.K., EKESIOBI C., ONUOHA F.C., 2024, Pollution, governance, and women's work: examining African female labour force participation in environmental pollution and governance quality puzzles, Women’s Studies International Forum: 102, 102851. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102851
77. OLUJOBI O.J., UFUA D.E., OKORIE U.E., OGBARI M.E., 2022, Carbon emission, solid waste management, and electricity generation: A legal and empirical perspective for renewable energy in Nigeria, International Environmen-tal Agreements, 22(3): 599–619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09558-z
78. ORATUNGYE K.E., RUBYOGO J.C., ONYANGO P., 2021, Improving food security, nutrition, incomes, natural resource base and gender equity for better livelihoods of smallholder households in sub-Saharan Africa, https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/113988.
79. OYAWOLE F.P., SHITTU A., KEHINDE M., OGUNNAIKE G., AKINJOBI L.T., 2020, Women empowerment and adoption of climate-smart agricultural practices in Nigeria, African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 12(1): 105–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-04-2020-0137
80. PAN Y., ZHANG C., LEE C., LV S., 2024, Environmental performance evaluation of electric enterprises during a power crisis: Evidence from DEA methods and AI prediction algorithms, Energy Economics, 130: 107285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107285
81. PANDEY D., AGRAWAL M., PANDEY J.S., 2011, Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation, Environmen-tal Monitoring and Assessment, 178: 135–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1678-y
82. PATA U.K., 2021, Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break, Environmental Science and Pol-lution Research, 28: 846–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10446-3
83. PESARAN M.H., SHIN Y., SMITH R.J., 2001, Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3): 289–326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
84. PETTORELLI N., GRAHAM N.A., SEDDON N., BUSTAMANTE M.M., LOWTON M.J., SUTHERLAND W.J., BARLOW J., 2021, Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science-policy agendas, Journal of Applied Ecology, 58(11): 2384–2393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13985
85. PIENAACH C.K., BARUAH B., KANSANGA M., LUGINA AH I., 2024, The impact of community-led conserva-tion models on women's nature-based livelihood outcomes in semi-arid Northern Ghana, Discover Environment, 2(1): 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00073-x
86. POTLURI S., PHANI B.V., 2020, Women and green entrepreneurship: a literature-based study of India, Interna-tional Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 20(3): 409–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICBM.2020.107675
87. RAIHAN A., TUSPEKOVA A., 2022, Dynamic impacts of economic growth, renewable energy use, urbanization, industrialization, tourism, agriculture, and forests on carbon emissions in Turkey, Carbon Research, 1(1): 20, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-022-00019-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-022-00019-z
88. ROBA R., KIKWATHA R.W., 2021, Influence of women participation on sustainability of community conservation project implemented by Jaldesa Community Conservancy in Marsabit County, Kenya, European Journal of Busi-ness and Management Research, 6(3), 188–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.3.898
89. ROTHERMEL A.K., 2020, Gender in the United Nations’ agenda on preventing and countering violent extremism, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 22(5): 720–741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2020.1827967
90. RUI G.U., NIE F.Y., 2021, Does empowering women benefit poverty reduction? Evidence from a multi-component program in Inner Mongolia, Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 20(4): 1092–1106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63436-0
91. SADIQ M., WEN F., 2022, Environmental footprint impacts of nuclear energy consumption, Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 54(10): 3672–3681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.05.016
92. SAIT S., 2021, The land rights, climate justice and gender equality conundrum, African Journal on Land Policy and Geospatial Sciences, 4(2): 267–291.
93. SALAMON H., 2023, The effect of women's parliamentary participation on renewable energy policy outcomes, European Journal of Political Research, 62(1): 174–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12539
94. SEN A., 1999, Development as Freedom, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
95. SEN A., 2001, Gender equity and the population problem, International Journal of Health Services, 31(3): 469–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/9EPF-CWCM-DHE5-KA68
96. SEN G., 2019, Gender equality and women's empowerment: feminist mobilization for the SDGs, Global Policy, 10: 28–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12593
97. SHAHZAD U., FERRAZ D., NGUYEN H.H., CUI L., 2022, Spillovers between financial globalization, high-tech industries and environmental footprints, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174: 121205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121205
98. SHIN Y., YU B., GREENWOOD-NIMMO M., 2014, Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework, Festscrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, Springer,:281–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
99. SHRESTHA B., TIWARI S., BAJRACHARYA S., 2021, Role of gender participation in urban household energy technology, Discover Sustainability, 2(1): 1–18.
100. SHRESTHA G., PAKHTIGIAN E.L., JEULAND M., 2023, Women who do not migrate: intersectionality and social relations in Western Nepal, World Development, 161: 106109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106109
101. SINGH N.C., 2022, Sustainable natural resource management through traditional ecological knowledge, Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Resource Management in Asia, Springer: 223–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16840-6_14
102. SINGH P., TABE T., MARTIN T., 2022, The role of women in community resilience to climate change, Women’s Studies International Forum, 90: 102550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102550
103. SITHOLE M., PHIRI K., MASABO T., 2021, Gendered spaces in natural resource utilisation, Cogent Social Scienc-es, 7(1): 1909792.
104. SSERWANJA Q., NABBUYE R., KAWUKI J., 2022, Women empowerment and antenatal care in Uganda, Interna-tional Journal of Health Planning and Management, 37(3): 1736–1753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3439
105. STOJANOVSKA-STEFANOVA A., MAGDINCEVA-SOPOVA M., RUNCHEVA-TASEV H., 2020, Empowerment of women: challenges and opportunities, International Scientific Conference Proceedings: 119–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46763/YFNTS2031119ss
106. THOMSON L., KAMALALDIN A., SJÖDIN D., PARIDA V., 2021, Maturity framework for autonomous solutions in manufacturing firms, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00717-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00717-3
107. UNITED NATIONS, 2021, Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production, https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals.
108. USMAN M., MAKHDUM M.S.A., KOUSAR R., 2021, Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy affect ecological footprint?, Sustainable Cities and Society, 65: 102590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102590
109. WANG Q., WANG J., GAO F., 2021, Economic and environmental factors and health insurance purchase, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 58: 101479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2021.101479
110. WIECZOREK-SZYMAŃSKA A., 2020, Gender diversity in academic sector, Administrative Sciences, 10(3): 41, https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030041. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10030041
111. WORLD BANK, 2023, World Development Indicators, World Bank, Washington D.C.
112. WU A., 2024, Do female political leaders make the environment greener? Evidence from the United States, Kyber-netes, https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2023-1932. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2023-1932
113. WU Q., LI Y., WU Y., LI F., ZHONG S., 2022, Spatial spillover effect of environmental regulation on total factor productivity, Scientific Reports, 12: 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15614-8
114. YANG X., GAO C., 2021, Missing women in STEM in China, Research in Science Education, 51: 1705–1723.
115. YORO K.O., DARAMOLA M.O., 2020, CO2 emission sources and global warming effect, in Advances in Carbon Capture, Woodhead Publishing, 3–28.
116. YURUI L., XUANCHANG Z., ZHI C., ZHENGJIA L., ZHI L., YANSUI L., 2021, Ecological restoration and eco-nomic development in China’s Loess Plateau, Science of the Total Environment, 756: 143676.
117. ZIERSCH A., MILLER E., WALSH M., DUE C., CALLAGHAN P., HOWE J., GREEN E., 2023, Health impacts of employment experiences for women refugees in Australia, SSM – Qualitative Research in Health, 3: 100209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100209
Article Details
Abstract views: 7

