Exploring Dynamic Pathways of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in Provincial Regions of China
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026)
-
An Evaluation of the Convergence of Six Different Environmental Sustainable Development Goals in OECD Countries
Idris Yagmur, Sakiru Adebola Solarin , Mustafa Kocaoğlu , Halit Buluthan Çetintaş1-14
-
Empowering Women for Sustainable Economic Recovery: Optimizing Natural Resource Markets for Environmental Efficiency in the USA
Muhammad Khalid Anser, Helmi Ali Mkaouar, Jameel Ahmad Khader, Alaa Shoukry, Wasfi Yengui, Khalid Zaman15-40
-
Knowledge-Based Economic Growth: Strategies for Integrating Digital Transformation in Developing Economies
Xingyuan Sun, Jize Liu41-53
-
Social Capital and its Influence on Community Resilience and Local Governance Capacity
Lin Ji, Xi Cheng, Savetbek Abdrasulov54-62
-
Comparing the Foreign Policy Identities of the United States of America and the European Union in Climate Communications and National Narratives
Olena Shevchenko, Iuliia Tsyrfa, Mykhailo Goncharenko, Svitlana Palii, Dmytro Podolchuk63-77
-
Management of Chinese Energy Sector for the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy: Legislative Gaps and Emerging Judicial Trends
Naixin Hu, Qian Wu78-92
-
Sustainable Budgeting and Climate Adaptation Finance: Optimizing Public Expenditures Amid Intensifying Climate Crisis
George Abuselidze93-104
-
Eco-feminist Ethics: A Sustainable Approach to the Environmental Crisis
Dipti Khatua, Ajit Kumar Behura, Purnima Lenka105-114
-
Sustainable Energy Transition, Energy Efficiency and Labor Market Dynamics: An Empirical Assessment of SDG 7 and SDG 8
Hongxia Zhang, Chuks Kingsley Okogor, Uche Benson Okogor, Abdifatah Ahmed Ali Afyare115-138
-
Reducing or Reproducing Inequality? A Critical Analysis of the Gender and Sustainability through Problematizing Digital Policies in India
Sanjana Santra, Kishore Kumar, Nilanjan Chattopadhyay139-151
-
Pricing, Green Investment and Job Carbon Quality in Eight Leading Energy-Transitioning Economies: Implications for Employment, Health, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Hongyun Kuang, Qian Xiao, Ye Wu152-167
-
Green Jobs in the Energy Transition among the Eight Largest Economies: Assessing Employment Quality in Renewable Energy Supply Chains
Jianhua Zheng168-185
-
Exploring Dynamic Pathways of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in Provincial Regions of China
Juan Tan, Jinyu Wei186-198
-
Green Finance and Human Health Outcomes: The Role of Public Renewable Energy Investment in China, India and Selected Economies
Dechun Wang, Hao Ding199-223
-
Sustainable Development in Climate Change: A Systematic Literatur Review
Dewi Risnawati, Sry Reski Mulka, Dea Rizki Amanda224-238
-
Harmonizing Human Dignity and Economic Progress: The Evolution of Labour Rights in the Global Architecture of Sustainable Development
Yuriy Kyrylov, Nataliia Cherevko239-247
-
Maṣlaḥah Mursalah and Environmental Sustainability: An Islamic Jurisprudential Perspective
Anthony Le Duc248-257
-
Green recovery, Low-Carbon Economy and Sustainable Development in BRICS Economies
Xiaoning Sun, Sha Fu258-283
-
Effective Management of Tourist Destinations to Minimize Negative Impacts on the Environment and Cultural Heritage
Zegeng Сhen, Shimin Fu284-297
-
Coherence between Human and Sustainable Development: a DP2-Based Assessment
Oksana Liashenko, Olena Mykhailovska, Anastasiia Duka, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi298-326
-
Alternative Asset Diversification for ESG Investments: Evidence from G7 Countries Under Economic and Geopolitical Crises
Halilibrahim Gökgöz, Aamir Aijaz Syed, Fadhila Hamza, Ahmed Jeribi
-
Artificial Intelligence in Global Libraries: Pathways and Policies for Sustainable Development
Shuang Zheng, Qianbai Dai , Rabiu Abubakar347-360
-
Financial Inclusion, Energy Access, and Poverty Reduction in BRICS Plus Economies
Xiaowan Xu361-392
-
Resilience as a Key Feature of Smart Cities Supporting Sustainable Urban Development
Magdalena Kisała393-402
Archives
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2026-07-01 24
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2026-01-10 21
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-07-10 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The efficiency of green technology innovation functions as a fundamental catalyst for realizing the synergy between innovation-driven development and ecological transformation, which is essential for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure), SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), and SDG 13 (Climate Action). This study assesses green technology innovation efficiency across 30 Chinese provinces from 2013 to 2024 using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. It constructs an analytical framework that integrates institutional settings, industrial structure, and market environment, and applies dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to examine the configurational effects of these factors on green technology innovation efficiency. Additionally, the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test is employed to investigate spatial disparities in the configurational coverage at the provincial level. To address the temporal heterogeneity arising from events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, this study employs a dynamic QCA approach that captures both between-group and within-group variations across different time periods. The results indicate that no single factor constitutes a necessary condition for high green technology innovation efficiency; instead, three distinct pathways are identified as equally effective. Moreover, significant regional differences are observed in the configurational distribution of green technology innovation efficiency across the eastern, central, and western regions of China. These findings provide practical implications for policymakers seeking to advance China's sustainable development agenda through differentiated regional innovation strategies. This paper presents a multidimensional analytical framework and utilizes dynamic QCA to offer a comprehensive examination of complex causal relationships.
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
- 9 - Industry, Innovation, Technology and Infrastructure
References
1. ABBASI R.S., SARA A., ASGHAR A.F., 2022, Evaluating the efficiency of decision making units in fuzzy two-stage DEA models, Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 14(3): 291-313, https://doi.org/10.1080/16168658.2022.2152921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16168658.2022.2152921
2. AYLA D., CIHAN A.K., 2025, Spatial dynamics in low carbon technologies exports: Institutional, political and economic determinants, Journal of Cleaner Production, 532: 146972, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2025.146972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146972
3. BATTESE G.E., COELLI T.J., 1995, A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data, Empirical Economics, 20(2): 325-332, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01205442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205442
4. BIAN Z., LUO M., 2025, Impact of climate policy uncertainty on enterprises’ green technology innovation: Based on growth option theory, Sustainable Futures, 10: 101305, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SFTR.2025.101305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101305
5. CHANG J., 2025, Digital technology, innovation resource misallocation, and green technology innovation effi-ciency: evidence from China, Environment, Development, and Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06576-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06576-8
6. CHENG M.L., WANG J.B., YANG S.L., et al., 2024, The driving effect of technological innovation on green development: From the perspective of efficiency, Energy Policy, 188(5): 114089, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114089
7. DU K., CHENG Y., YAO X., 2021, Environmental regulation, green technology innovation, and industrial struc-ture upgrading: The road to the green transformation of Chinese cities, Energy Economics, 98(6): 105247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105247
8. DU Y., JIA L., 2017, Configuration perspective and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): A new way of man-agement research, Management World, 6: 155-167.
9. FANG Z., BAI H., BILAN Y., 2019, Evaluation research of green innovation efficiency in China’s heavy polluting industries, Sustainability, 12(1): 146, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010146
10. FISS P. C., 2011, Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research, Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 393-420, https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120
11. GARCIA-CASTRO R., ARIÑO M.A., 2016, A general approach to panel data set-theoretic research, Journal of Advances in Management Sciences and Information System, 2(9): 63-76. https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1647.2016.02.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1647.2016.02.06
12. GUEDES M.J., DA CONCEIÇÃO GONÇALVES V., SOARES N., et al., 2016, UK evidence for the determinants of R&D intensity from a panel fsQCA, Journal of Business Research, 69(11): 5431-5436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.150
13. GUO M., WANG H., KUAI Y., 2023, Environmental regulation and green innovation: Evidence from heavily polluting firms in China, Finance Research Letters, 53(5): 103624, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103624
14. HORBACH J., RAMMER C., RENNINGS K., 2012, Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact-The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull, Ecological Economics, 78(6): 112-122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
15. JIANG Y., WU Q., BRENYA R., et al., 2022, Environmental decentralization, environmental regulation, and green technology innovation: Evidence based on China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(10): 28305-28320, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23935-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23935-4
16. JIN X., ZHANG M., SUN G., et al., 2021, The impact of COVID-19 on firm innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies, Finance Research Letters, 30: 102133, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2021.102133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102133
17. LANDMARKS H., 1989, The sociological study of time, Current Sociology, 37(3): 4-18, https://doi.org/10.1177/001139289037003003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001139289037003003
18. LI F., LI J., WANG D., 2024, Policy instruments and green innovation: Evidence and implications for corporate performance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 471: 143443, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2024.143443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143443
19. LIAO T., YAN J., ZHANG Q., 2024, The impact of green technology innovation on carbon emission efficiency: The intermediary role of intellectual capital, International Review of Economics and Finance, 92(4): 520-532, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.02.016
20. LIANG T., ZHANG L., FABUŠ M., et al., 2025, The impact of technology finance on corporategreen innovation, Finance Research Letters, 86: 108553, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2025.108553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108553
21. LIN B.C., 2024, The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Institutional Change, Journal of Economic Issues, 58(2): 511-516, https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2024.2344427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2024.2344427
22. LUO Y., SALMAN M., LU Z., 2021, Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulations and foreign direct in-vestment on green innovation across different regions in China, Science of the Total Environment, 759(8): 143744, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143744
23. MA T., CAO X., 2022, Spatial econometric study on the impact of industrial upgrading on green total factor productivity, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022(9): 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1133340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1133340
24. MIAO C., CHEN Z., ZHANG A., 2024, Green technology innovation and carbon emission efficiency: The moder-ating role of environmental uncertainty, The Science of the Total Environment, 938(8): 173551-173551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173551
25. MU D., YANG D., 2023, How does financial decentralization synergies carbon reduction and pollution control in China? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(48): 106408-106420, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29600-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29600-8
26. OECD, 2011, Towards Green Growth: Monitoring Progress: OECD Indicators. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264111356-EN. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264111356-en
27. PHILIPP B., 2016, The allocation and effectiveness of China's R&D subsidies - Evidence from listed firms, Re-search Policy, 45(9): 1774-1789, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.007
28. RAGIN C.C., 2008, Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226702797.001.0001
29. RENNINGS K., 2000, Redefining innovation-eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological eco-nomics, Ecological Economics, 32(2): 319-332, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00112-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00112-3
30. RIHOUX B., RAGIN C.C., 2009, Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569
31. SACHS J.D., SCHMIDT-TRAUB G., MAZZUCATO M., et al., 2019, Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals, Nature Sustainability, 2, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0352-9
32. SCHNEIDER C.Q., WAGEMANN C., 2013, Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
33. SCHNEIDER M.R., SCHULZE-BENTROP C., PAUNESCU M., 2009, Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: A fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance, Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 246-266, https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.36
34. SHEN F., LIU B., LUO F., et al., 2021, The effect of economic growth target constraints on green technology innovation, Journal of Environmental Management, 292(15): 112765, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112765
35. SONG A., RASOOL Z., NAZAR R., et al., 2024, Towards a greener future: How green technology innovation and energy efficiency are transforming sustainability, Energy, 290(3): 129891, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129891. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.129891
36. SUN F., GUO J., HUANG X., et al., 2024, Spatio-temporal characteristics and coupling coordination relationship between industrial green water efficiency and science and technology innovation: A case study in China, Ecologi-cal Indicators, 159: 111651, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2024.111651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111651
37. TONE K., TSUTSUI M., 2009, Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach, European Journal of Operation-al Research, 197(1): 243-252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.027. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.027
38. WANG F., RANI T., RAZZAQ A., 2022, Environmental impact of fiscal decentralization, green technology inno-vation and institution’s efficiency in developed countries using advance panel modelling, Energy and Environ-ment, 34(4): 1006-1030, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x221074727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X221074727
39. WANG F., SUN Z., 2022, Does the environmental regulation intensity and ESG performance have a substitution effect on the impact of enterprise green innovation: Evidence from China, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14): 8558, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148558
40. WANG L., WANG Z., MA Y., 2021a, Heterogeneous environmental regulation and industrial structure upgrading: Evidence from China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16591-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16591-7
41. WANG Y., WU D., LI H., 2021b, Efficiency measurement and productivity progress of regional green technology innovation in China: A comprehensive analytical framework, Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 34(12): 1432-1448, https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1963427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1963427
42. XIE R., YUAN Y., HUANG J., 2017, Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on ‘Green’ productivity: Evidence from China, Ecological Economics, 132(2): 104-112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.10.019
43. YUAN H., LUAN H., WANG X., 2024, The Impact of ESG rating events on corporate green technology innova-tion under sustainable development: Perspectives based on informal environmental regulation of social systems, Sustainability, 16(19): 8308, https://doi.org/10.3390/SU16198308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198308
44. ZENG S., LI G., WU S., et al., 2022, The impact of green technology innovation on carbon emissions in the con-text of carbon neutrality in China: Evidence from spatial spillover and nonlinear effect analysis, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(2): 730, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020730
45. ZHANG J., OUYANG Y., BALLESTEROS-PÉREZ P., et al., 2021, Understanding the impact of environmental regulations on green technology innovation efficiency in the construction industry, Sustainable Cities and Society, 65(2): 102647, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102647
46. ZHANG X., HU X., WU F., 2022, Fiscal decentralization, taxation efforts and corporate green technology innova-tion in China based on moderating and heterogeneity effects, Sustainability, 14(22): 15372-15372, https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215372
47. ZHOU H., WANG R., 2022, Exploring the impact of energy factor prices and environmental regulation on China’s green innovation efficiency, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(52): 78973-78988, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21371-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21371-y
48. ZHOU Y.C., HUO W.D., BO L., et al., 2023, Impact and mechanism analysis of ESG ratings on the efficiency of green technology innovation, Finance Research Letters, 58: 104591, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104591
Article Details
Abstract views: 11

