Alternative Asset Diversification for ESG Investments: Evidence from G7 Countries Under Economic and Geopolitical Crises
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026)
-
An Evaluation of the Convergence of Six Different Environmental Sustainable Development Goals in OECD Countries
Idris Yagmur, Sakiru Adebola Solarin , Mustafa Kocaoğlu , Halit Buluthan Çetintaş1-14
-
Empowering Women for Sustainable Economic Recovery: Optimizing Natural Resource Markets for Environmental Efficiency in the USA
Muhammad Khalid Anser, Helmi Ali Mkaouar, Jameel Ahmad Khader, Alaa Shoukry, Wasfi Yengui, Khalid Zaman15-40
-
Knowledge-Based Economic Growth: Strategies for Integrating Digital Transformation in Developing Economies
Xingyuan Sun, Jize Liu41-53
-
Social Capital and its Influence on Community Resilience and Local Governance Capacity
Lin Ji, Xi Cheng, Savetbek Abdrasulov54-62
-
Comparing the Foreign Policy Identities of the United States of America and the European Union in Climate Communications and National Narratives
Olena Shevchenko, Iuliia Tsyrfa, Mykhailo Goncharenko, Svitlana Palii, Dmytro Podolchuk63-77
-
Management of Chinese Energy Sector for the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy: Legislative Gaps and Emerging Judicial Trends
Naixin Hu, Qian Wu78-92
-
Sustainable Budgeting and Climate Adaptation Finance: Optimizing Public Expenditures Amid Intensifying Climate Crisis
George Abuselidze93-104
-
Eco-feminist Ethics: A Sustainable Approach to the Environmental Crisis
Dipti Khatua, Ajit Kumar Behura, Purnima Lenka105-114
-
Sustainable Energy Transition, Energy Efficiency and Labor Market Dynamics: An Empirical Assessment of SDG 7 and SDG 8
Hongxia Zhang, Chuks Kingsley Okogor, Uche Benson Okogor, Abdifatah Ahmed Ali Afyare115-138
-
Reducing or Reproducing Inequality? A Critical Analysis of the Gender and Sustainability through Problematizing Digital Policies in India
Sanjana Santra, Kishore Kumar, Nilanjan Chattopadhyay139-151
-
Pricing, Green Investment and Job Carbon Quality in Eight Leading Energy-Transitioning Economies: Implications for Employment, Health, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Hongyun Kuang, Qian Xiao, Ye Wu152-167
-
Green Jobs in the Energy Transition among the Eight Largest Economies: Assessing Employment Quality in Renewable Energy Supply Chains
Jianhua Zheng168-185
-
Exploring Dynamic Pathways of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in Provincial Regions of China
Juan Tan, Jinyu Wei186-198
-
Green Finance and Human Health Outcomes: The Role of Public Renewable Energy Investment in China, India and Selected Economies
Dechun Wang, Hao Ding199-223
-
Sustainable Development in Climate Change: A Systematic Literatur Review
Dewi Risnawati, Sry Reski Mulka, Dea Rizki Amanda224-238
-
Harmonizing Human Dignity and Economic Progress: The Evolution of Labour Rights in the Global Architecture of Sustainable Development
Yuriy Kyrylov, Nataliia Cherevko239-247
-
Maṣlaḥah Mursalah and Environmental Sustainability: An Islamic Jurisprudential Perspective
Anthony Le Duc248-257
-
Green recovery, Low-Carbon Economy and Sustainable Development in BRICS Economies
Xiaoning Sun, Sha Fu258-283
-
Effective Management of Tourist Destinations to Minimize Negative Impacts on the Environment and Cultural Heritage
Zegeng Сhen, Shimin Fu284-297
-
Coherence between Human and Sustainable Development: a DP2-Based Assessment
Oksana Liashenko, Olena Mykhailovska, Anastasiia Duka, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi298-326
-
Alternative Asset Diversification for ESG Investments: Evidence from G7 Countries Under Economic and Geopolitical Crises
Halilibrahim Gökgöz, Aamir Aijaz Syed, Fadhila Hamza, Ahmed Jeribi
-
Artificial Intelligence in Global Libraries: Pathways and Policies for Sustainable Development
Shuang Zheng, Qianbai Dai , Rabiu Abubakar347-360
-
Financial Inclusion, Energy Access, and Poverty Reduction in BRICS Plus Economies
Xiaowan Xu361-392
-
Resilience as a Key Feature of Smart Cities Supporting Sustainable Urban Development
Magdalena Kisała393-402
Archives
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2026-07-01 24
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2026-01-10 21
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-07-10 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
In recent years, environmental, social, and governance (ESG)-oriented investments have emerged as a key pillar of sustainable finance. This study analyses the resilience of the ESG Leaders indices of G7 countries to global economic and geopolitical shocks, as well as their dynamic relationships with alternative assets such as Bitcoin, gold, the Japanese yen, and the Swiss franc. Covering the period from January 2019 to May 2025, the analysis incorporates major global developments, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia–Ukraine war, the collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank, the Israel–Palestine conflict, and U.S. tariff policies targeting China. The empirical findings reveal that ESG indices are significantly affected by such shocks and emphasize the necessity for investors to adapt their portfolio diversification strategies to evolving market conditions. The results show that the Japanese yen (excluding Japan) consistently exhibits the lowest correlation with the G7 ESG indices and provides considerable cost efficiency. While gold and the Swiss franc also serve as effective diversifiers under high uncertainty, Bitcoin generally offers a cost-effective diversification option.
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
- 8 - Decent work and economic growth
- 9 - Industry, Innovation, Technology and Infrastructure
- 13 - Climate action
References
1. ALHAMIS I., 2025, The Resurgence of Trumponomics: Implications for the Future of ESG Investments in a Changing Political Landscape, arXiv, preprint arXiv:2502.02627.
2. ALHARBI S.S., NAVEED M., ALI S., MOUSSA F., 2025, Sailing towards sustainability: Connected-ness between ESG stocks and green cryptocurrencies, International Review of Economics & Finance, (98): 103848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103848
3. ALMANSOUR B.Y., ALSHATER M.M., MARASHDEH H., DHIAF M., ATAYAH O.F., 2023, The re-turn volatility and shock transmission patterns of chosen S&P and Dow Jones sustainability indices and their conventional counterpart, Competitiveness Review, 33(1): 107-119, https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2021-0188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2021-0188
4. BAUR D.G., LUCEY B.M., 2010, Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold, Financial Review, 45(2): 217-229, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.952289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6288.2010.00244.x
5. BAUR D.G., HONG K., LEE A.D., 2018, Bitcoin: Medium of Exchange or Speculative Assets?, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, (54): 177-189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.12.004
6. BOURI E., MOLNAR P., AZZI G., ROUBAUD D., HAGFORS L., 2017, On the Hedge and Safe Haven Properties of Bitcoin: Is it Really more than a Diversifier?, Finance Research Letters, (20): 192-198, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.09.025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.09.025
7. CHOI S., SHIN J., 2022, Bitcoin: An Inflation Hedge but not a Safe Haven, Finance Research Letters, (46): 102379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102379
8. DE BOYRIE M.E., PAVLOVA I., 2024, Connectedness with commodities in emerging markets: ESG leaders vs. conventional indexes, Research in International Business and Finance, 71: 102456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102456
9. ELSAYED A.H., GOZGOR G., LAU C.K.M., 2022, Risk transmissions between bitcoin and traditional financial assets during the COVID-19 era: The role of global uncertainties, International Review of Fi-nancial Analysis, 81: 102069, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102069
10. GÖKGÖZ H., AFJAL M., BEJAOUI A., JERIBI A., 2024, Comparative Analysis of Gold, Bitcoin and Gold-backed Cryptocurrencies as Safe Havens During Global Crises: A Focus on G7 Stock Market and Banking Sector Indices, Global Business Review: 1-23, https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241251547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509241251547
11. GÖKGÖZ H., ARİFOĞLU A., KANDEMIR T., 2024, Stochastic and Dynamic Interaction between Is-lamic Volatility Index and Volatility Indices, Turkish Journal of Islamic Economics, 11(2): 59-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.26414/A4106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26414/A4106
12. JAWADI F., JAWADI N., CHEFFOU A.I., 2019, A statistical analysis of uncertainty for conventional and ethical stock indexes, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 74: 9-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.03.002
13. JIN Y., LIU Q., TSE Y., ZHENG K., 2023, Hedging Covid-19 risk with ESG disclosure, International Review of Economics & Finance, 88: 27-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.002
14. KANDEMIR T., GÖKGÖZ H., 2022, Is Bitcoin more than A Diversifier for Commodities? Range-Based Analysis via cDCC-GARCH, Research of Financial Economic and Social Studies, 7(2): 227-240, https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1092764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1092764
15. KRONER K.F., NG V.K., 1998, Modeling asymmetric comovements of asset returns, Review of Finan-cial Studies, 11(4): 817-844, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/11.4.817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/11.4.817
16. KRONER K.F., SULTAN J., 1993, Time-varying distributions and dynamic hedging with foreign cur-rency futures, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 28(4): 535-551, https://doi.org/10.2307/2331164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2331164
17. KUMAMOTO M., ZHUO J., 2021, Global Risk and Safe Haven Currency: Copula-DCC Approach, Working Paper No. G-1-26, Hitotsubashi University Center for Financial Research, https://hermes-ir.lib.hit-u.ac.jp/hermes/ir/re/71905/070hcfrWP_1_026.pdf.
18. LEAN H.H., PIZZUTILO F., 2020, Performances and risk of socially responsible investments across re-gions during crisis, International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1975
19. LONG S., PEI H., TIAN H., LANG K., 2021, Can both Bitcoin and Gold Serve As Safe-Haven Assets? — A Comparative Analysis based on the NARDL Model, International Review of Financial Analysis (78): 101914, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101914
20. NOFSINGER J., VARMA A., 2014, Socially responsible funds and market crises, Journal of Banking & Finance, 48: 180-193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016
21. PEDINI L., SEVERINI S., 2022, Exploring the hedge, diversifier and safe haven properties of ESG in-vestments: A cross-quantilogram analysis, MPRA Paper No. 112339, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112339/1/MPRA_paper_112339.pdf.
22. PISERÀ S., CHIAPPINI H., 2024, Are ESG indexes a safe-haven or hedging asset? Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in China, International Journal of Emerging Markets, 19(1): 56-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-07-2021-1018
23. REHMAN R.U., ABIDIN M.Z.U., ALI R., NOR S.M., NASEEM M.A., HASAN M., AHMAD M.I., 2021, The integration of conventional equity indices with environmental, social, and governance indices: evidence from emerging economies, Sustainability, 13(2): 676.
24. RUBBANIY G., KHALID A.A., RIZWAN M.F., ALI S., 2022, Are ESG stocks safe-haven during COVID-19?, Studies in Economics and Finance, 39(2): 239-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-08-2021-0320
25. SADORSKY P., 2014, Modeling volatility and conditional correlations between socially responsible investments, gold and oil, Economic Modelling, 38: 609-618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.013
26. SHARMA G.D., SARKER T., RAO A., TALAN G., JAIN M., 2022, Revisiting conventional and green finance spillover in post-COVID world: Evidence from robust econometric models, Global Finance Journal, 51: 100691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2021.100691
27. USTAOĞLU E., 2023, Diversification, hedge, and safe-haven properties of gold and bitcoin with port-folio implications during the Russia–Ukraine war, Resources Policy, 84: 103791, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103791
28. VAN DER WEIDE R., 2002, GO-GARCH: a Multivariate Generalized Orthogonal GARCH Model, Journal of Applied Econometrics, (17): 549-564, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.688
29. WANG G., TANG Y., XIE C., CHEN S., 2019, Is Bitcoin a Safe Haven or a Hedging Asset? Evidence from China, Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 4: 173-188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2019.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmse.2019.09.001
30. WANG Y., ALI S., AYAZ M., 2024, Equity markets and ESG dynamics: Assessing spillovers and port-folio strategies through time-varying parameters, Energy Economics 134: 107548. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107548
Article Details
Abstract views: 13

