Eco-feminist Ethics: A Sustainable Approach to the Environmental Crisis
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 21 No. 2 (2026)
-
An Evaluation of the Convergence of Six Different Environmental Sustainable Development Goals in OECD Countries
Idris Yagmur, Sakiru Adebola Solarin , Mustafa Kocaoğlu , Halit Buluthan Çetintaş1-14
-
Empowering Women for Sustainable Economic Recovery: Optimizing Natural Resource Markets for Environmental Efficiency in the USA
Muhammad Khalid Anser, Helmi Ali Mkaouar, Jameel Ahmad Khader, Alaa Shoukry, Wasfi Yengui, Khalid Zaman15-40
-
Knowledge-Based Economic Growth: Strategies for Integrating Digital Transformation in Developing Economies
Xingyuan Sun, Jize Liu41-53
-
Social Capital and its Influence on Community Resilience and Local Governance Capacity
Lin Ji, Xi Cheng, Savetbek Abdrasulov54-62
-
Comparing the Foreign Policy Identities of the United States of America and the European Union in Climate Communications and National Narratives
Olena Shevchenko, Iuliia Tsyrfa, Mykhailo Goncharenko, Svitlana Palii, Dmytro Podolchuk63-77
-
Management of Chinese Energy Sector for the Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy: Legislative Gaps and Emerging Judicial Trends
Naixin Hu, Qian Wu78-92
-
Sustainable Budgeting and Climate Adaptation Finance: Optimizing Public Expenditures Amid Intensifying Climate Crisis
George Abuselidze93-104
-
Eco-feminist Ethics: A Sustainable Approach to the Environmental Crisis
Dipti Khatua, Ajit Kumar Behura, Purnima Lenka105-114
-
Sustainable Energy Transition, Energy Efficiency and Labor Market Dynamics: An Empirical Assessment of SDG 7 and SDG 8
Hongxia Zhang, Chuks Kingsley Okogor, Uche Benson Okogor, Abdifatah Ahmed Ali Afyare115-138
-
Reducing or Reproducing Inequality? A Critical Analysis of the Gender and Sustainability through Problematizing Digital Policies in India
Sanjana Santra, Kishore Kumar, Nilanjan Chattopadhyay139-151
-
Pricing, Green Investment and Job Carbon Quality in Eight Leading Energy-Transitioning Economies: Implications for Employment, Health, and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Hongyun Kuang, Qian Xiao, Ye Wu152-167
-
Green Jobs in the Energy Transition among the Eight Largest Economies: Assessing Employment Quality in Renewable Energy Supply Chains
Jianhua Zheng168-185
-
Exploring Dynamic Pathways of Green Technology Innovation Efficiency in Provincial Regions of China
Juan Tan, Jinyu Wei186-198
-
Green Finance and Human Health Outcomes: The Role of Public Renewable Energy Investment in China, India and Selected Economies
Dechun Wang, Hao Ding199-223
-
Sustainable Development in Climate Change: A Systematic Literatur Review
Dewi Risnawati, Sry Reski Mulka, Dea Rizki Amanda224-238
-
Harmonizing Human Dignity and Economic Progress: The Evolution of Labour Rights in the Global Architecture of Sustainable Development
Yuriy Kyrylov, Nataliia Cherevko239-247
-
Maṣlaḥah Mursalah and Environmental Sustainability: An Islamic Jurisprudential Perspective
Anthony Le Duc248-257
-
Green recovery, Low-Carbon Economy and Sustainable Development in BRICS Economies
Xiaoning Sun, Sha Fu258-283
-
Effective Management of Tourist Destinations to Minimize Negative Impacts on the Environment and Cultural Heritage
Zegeng Сhen, Shimin Fu284-297
-
Coherence between Human and Sustainable Development: a DP2-Based Assessment
Oksana Liashenko, Olena Mykhailovska, Anastasiia Duka, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi298-326
-
Alternative Asset Diversification for ESG Investments: Evidence from G7 Countries Under Economic and Geopolitical Crises
Halilibrahim Gökgöz, Aamir Aijaz Syed, Fadhila Hamza, Ahmed Jeribi
-
Artificial Intelligence in Global Libraries: Pathways and Policies for Sustainable Development
Shuang Zheng, Qianbai Dai , Rabiu Abubakar347-360
-
Financial Inclusion, Energy Access, and Poverty Reduction in BRICS Plus Economies
Xiaowan Xu361-392
-
Resilience as a Key Feature of Smart Cities Supporting Sustainable Urban Development
Magdalena Kisała393-402
Archives
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2026-07-01 24
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2026-01-10 21
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2025-07-10 20
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2022-07-04 26
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2022-01-03 28
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
What if all the plants and plateaus, rocks and mountains, air and water of the planet vanish – except human beings? and what if all human beings vanished, leaving behind everything else on the planet? The first alternative seems unimaginable. However, the second one seems impractical but highly romantic. This, however, shows the significance of two categories at hand, viz. humans on one hand and the rest of the planet on the other. Two categories are not even simple binaries enjoying equal status in the world of values. No one knows how the former assumes the power to dominate the latter. Moreover, it is thoroughly backed by vindication. Domination gets justification, exploitation finds plausibility. The rest of nature thus is vindicated and vanquished in the name of progress and prosperity. In this article, we discuss the current environmental degradation which occurs due to the dualistic mindset of human beings. As we move towards a philosophical analysis, we adopt an eco-feminist approach to coping with the current environmental catastrophe. This paper promote ecofeminist ideology as a viable alternative policy and ethical model for environmental conservation, demonstrating a sustainable approach grounded in ecofeminist philosophy. This paper has a two-fold objective: first to examine the internal connection between women and nature from an eco-feminist perspective; and second, to explore a sustainable approach to meet the environmental crisis. Through this paper, we establish the relationship between ecofeminism and the sustainability approach, integrating philosophical, ecological and social perspectives.
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)
- 3 - Good health and well-being
- 4 - Quality education
- 5 - Gender equality
- 12 - Responsible consumption and production
- 16 - Peace, justice and strong institutions
- 17 - Partnerships for the goals
References
1. BAHUGUNA S., 1987, Chipko: India’s environment-friendly movement, Environmental regeneration in Himalaya: Strategies, concepts, and approaches, ed. Tripathi J.P., The Indian Institute of Public Administration, 31-39.
2. CALLICOTT J.B., 1989, In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy, Suny Press.
3. GAARD G., GRUEN L., 1993, Ecofeminism: Toward global justice and planetary health, Society & Nature, 2(1):1-35.
4. GAARD G., 1993, Ecofeminism: Women, animals, nature, Temple University Press.
5. GILLIGAN, C., 1993, In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development, Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674037618
6. HELD V., 2005, The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195180992.001.0001
7. HOLLAND A., 2000, Ecological integrity and the Darwinian paradigm, Ecological integrity: Integrating environment, conservation, and health, eds. Piementel D., Westra L., Noss R.F., Island Press: 45-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.41003825.6
8.
9. KING R.J., 1991, Caring about nature: Feminist ethics and the environment, Hypatia, 6(1): 75-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00210.x
10. KING Y., 1989, The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology, Healing the wounds: The promise of ecofemi-nism: 18-28, https://files.libcom.org/files/King-%20Ecology%20of%20Feminism.pdf.
11. LAURITZEN P., 1989, A Feminist Ethic and the New Romanticism Mothering as a Model of Moral Rela-tions, Hypatia, 4(2): 29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1989.tb00571.x
12. LENKA P., KHATUA D., 2025, Women's Leadership in Accelerating Sustainable Development: Care Based Approach for Transformative Change, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 20(1): 261-270, https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.6605
13. LENKA P., 2023, Philosophy of sustainable development: understanding the significance of gender equality in business organisations, Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development, 18(2): 121-127, https://doi.org/0.35784/preko.3950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/preko.3950
14. LEOPOLD A., 1989, A Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there, Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/87.6.25
15. MAATHAI W., 2003, The Green Belt Movement: Sharing the approach and the experience, Lantern Books.
16. MELLOR M., 1997, Feminism and ecology: An introduction, NYU Press.
17. MERCHAN C., 1980, The Death of Nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution, Harper & Row.
18. MIE M., SHIVA V., 1993, Ecofeminism, Zed Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350219786
19. NAESS A., 2017, The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement. A summary, The ethics of the environment, Routledge: 115-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315239897-8
20. PATKAR M., 1995, The struggle for participation and justice: A critique of the Narmada project, Development, dis-placement and rehabilitation: Issues for a national debate, eds. Fernandes W., Thukral S., Indian Social Institute: 203-215.
21. PLUMWOOD V., 1993, Feminism and the mastery of nature, Routledge.
22. PURVIS B., MAO Y., ROBINSON D., 2019, Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual ori-gins, Sustainability Science, 14(3): 681-695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
23. ROBINSON F., 1999, Globalizing care: Ethics, feminist theory, and international relations, Westview Press.
24. RUETHER R. R., 1995, New woman, new earth: Sexist ideologies and human liberation, Beacon Press.
25. SALLEH A., 1997, Ecofeminism as politics: Nature, Marx and the postmodern, Zed Books.
26. SALLEH A.K., 1984, Deeper than deep ecology: The eco-feminist connection, Environmental Ethics, 6(4): 339-345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics1984645
27. SCHOTT R. M., 1997, Feminist philosophy and the problem of evil, Indiana University Press.
28. SHIVA V., 1988, Staying Alive: Women, ecology and development, Zed Books.
29. SHIVA V., 1997, Biopiracy: The plunder of nature and knowledge, South End Press.
30. SHIVA V., 2005, Earth democracy: Justice, sustainability, and peace, South End Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350219755
31. TAYLOR P. W., 1986, Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics,. Princeton University Press.
32. THOMPSON C., 2006, Back to nature? Resurrecting ecofeminism after poststructuralist and third-wave femi-nisms, Isis, 97(3): 505-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/508080
33. WARREN K. J., 1990, The power and the promise of ecological feminism, Environmental Ethics, 12(2): 125–146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199012221
34. WARREN K. J., 1995, Feminism and ecology: Making connections. Readings in ecology and feminist theology, Sheed & Ward: 105-123.
35. WARREN K. J., 2000, Ecofeminist philosophy: A western perspective on what it is and why it matters, Rowman & Little-field Publishers.
36. WILSON H. L., 1997, Rethinking Kant from the Perspective of Ecofeminism, Feminist interpretations of Immanuel Kant, ed. Schott R.M., Penn State University Press.
37. WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (WCED), 1987, Our Common Future, Ox-ford University Press.
38. ZIMMERMAN M., 1987. Feminism, Deep Ecology, and Environmental Ethics, Environmental Ethics 9(1): 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19879112
Article Details
Abstract views: 10

