Performance comparison of automatic tests written in Selenium WebDriver and HP UFT
Krzysztof Drążek
krzydrazek@gmail.comInstitute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)
Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland (Poland)
Abstract
Automation tests are used for verification of functionality of developing applications. The performance of automation tests written in HP UFT and Selenium WebDriver was compared. There were created 3 tests for both technologies that were executing the same tasks. According to the obtained results, it was concluded which technology is a better choice if the time efficiency of tests execution is important.
Keywords:
automation tests; testing; Selenium; UFTReferences
[1] AUTOMATION TESTING Tutorial: Process, Planning &Tools, http://www.guru99.com/automationtesting.html [11.03.2018]
[2] H. P. Bajaj, Choosing the right automation tool and framework is critical to project success, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/526a/
5b00714e1cad6809234020cd8f81fdfb905a.pdf [11.03.2018]
[3] P. Kunte, Prof. D. Mane, Automation Testing of Web based application with Selenium and HP UFT (QTP), International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 04 Issue: 06 June -2017 https://www.irjet.net/archives//i6/IRJETV4I6500.pdf [11.03.2018]
[4] Y. Kumar, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (IRJET),, 09-2015, Volume 2, Issue 9 Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Selenium, SoapUI, HP Unified Functional Testing and Test Complete, http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1509007.pdf [11.03.2018]
[5] P. Wałachowski, Porównanie narzędzi do automatyzacji crossprzeglądarkowych testów funkcjonalnych aplikacji webowej, https://moodle.cs.pollub.pl/mod/resource/view.php?id=6709 [11.03.2018]
[6] Test Automation Tool Comparison – HP UFT/QTP vs. Selenium, http://www.aspiresys.com/WhitePapers/QTPvs Selenium.pdf [11.03.2018]
[7] Introduction to HP Unified Functional Testing (UFT) - Latest version of Quick Test Professional (QTP), http://www. softwaretestingclass.com/introduction-to-hp-unified-functionaltesting-uft/ [11.03.2018]
[8] HP UFT/QTP vs. Selenium – Automated Test Tool Comparison, http://www.optimusinfo.com/blog/7392 [11.03.2018]
[2] H. P. Bajaj, Choosing the right automation tool and framework is critical to project success, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/526a/
5b00714e1cad6809234020cd8f81fdfb905a.pdf [11.03.2018]
[3] P. Kunte, Prof. D. Mane, Automation Testing of Web based application with Selenium and HP UFT (QTP), International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 04 Issue: 06 June -2017 https://www.irjet.net/archives//i6/IRJETV4I6500.pdf [11.03.2018]
[4] Y. Kumar, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (IRJET),, 09-2015, Volume 2, Issue 9 Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Selenium, SoapUI, HP Unified Functional Testing and Test Complete, http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1509007.pdf [11.03.2018]
[5] P. Wałachowski, Porównanie narzędzi do automatyzacji crossprzeglądarkowych testów funkcjonalnych aplikacji webowej, https://moodle.cs.pollub.pl/mod/resource/view.php?id=6709 [11.03.2018]
[6] Test Automation Tool Comparison – HP UFT/QTP vs. Selenium, http://www.aspiresys.com/WhitePapers/QTPvs Selenium.pdf [11.03.2018]
[7] Introduction to HP Unified Functional Testing (UFT) - Latest version of Quick Test Professional (QTP), http://www. softwaretestingclass.com/introduction-to-hp-unified-functionaltesting-uft/ [11.03.2018]
[8] HP UFT/QTP vs. Selenium – Automated Test Tool Comparison, http://www.optimusinfo.com/blog/7392 [11.03.2018]
Drążek, K., & Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. (2018). Performance comparison of automatic tests written in Selenium WebDriver and HP UFT. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 8, 298–301. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.700
Authors
Krzysztof Drążekkrzydrazek@gmail.com
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland
Authors
Maria Skublewska-PaszkowskaInstitute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 289PDF downloads: 353
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
