Performance comparison of automatic tests written in Selenium WebDriver and HP UFT
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Published:
Nov 30, 2018
Issue Vol. 8 (2018)
Articles
-
Object recognition on video from camera to computer
Oleksandr Cherednyk, Elżbieta Miłosz215-219
-
System and hardware security options available for users on devices running Android operating system
Tomasz Borysiewicz220-225
-
Efficiency of creating application’s presentation layer with frameworks AngularJS, Angular2, BackboneJS
Monika Tobiańska, Jakub Smołka226-229
-
User monitoring system using of social networks - structure and analysis of the opportunities
Sofiia Lahoda, Marek Miłosz230-234
-
Comparison of object-relational data mapping technology in Symfony 3 framework
Karol Sawłuk, Marek Miłosz235-240
-
Time analysis of the performance of Windows 10 and Windows 8.1 based on mobile application
Jacek Chmiel, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska241-246
-
Comparison of selected network communication methods on the Android platform
Przemysław Żydek, Jakub Smołka247-251
-
Comparison of tools for automated tests of the graphical user interface using the the Sikuli and AutoIT example
Tomasz Paczuski, Beata Pańczyk252-257
-
Hosting models comparison of ASP.NET Core application
Kamil Zdanikowski, Beata Pańczyk258-262
-
Performance analysis of relational databases Oracle and MS SQL based on desktop application
Grzegorz Dziewit, Jakub Korczyński, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska263-269
-
Verification methods of a programmer’s knowledge and skills
Paweł Hajduk, Norbert Wieruszewski, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska270-276
-
Possibility analysis of environmental threat monitoring with the Arduino platform
Krzysztof Lenart, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik277-281
-
Comparative analysis of mobile applications for IT project management
Ewelina Wlaszczyk, Elżbieta Miłosz282-285
-
Comparing the performance of integration platforms
Bartłomiej Karol Flis, Łukasz Kołyga, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska286-291
-
Analysis of properties of reversible steganography methods
Piotr Zimnicki, Grzegorz Kozieł292-297
-
Performance comparison of automatic tests written in Selenium WebDriver and HP UFT
Krzysztof Drążek, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska298-301
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Krzysztof Drążek
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska
Institute of Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36B, 20-618 Lublin, Poland, Poland
Abstract
Automation tests are used for verification of functionality of developing applications. The performance of automation tests written in HP UFT and Selenium WebDriver was compared. There were created 3 tests for both technologies that were executing the same tasks. According to the obtained results, it was concluded which technology is a better choice if the time efficiency of tests execution is important.
Keywords:
automation tests; testing; Selenium; UFT
References
[1] AUTOMATION TESTING Tutorial: Process, Planning &Tools, http://www.guru99.com/automationtesting.html [11.03.2018]
[2] H. P. Bajaj, Choosing the right automation tool and framework is critical to project success, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/526a/
5b00714e1cad6809234020cd8f81fdfb905a.pdf [11.03.2018]
[3] P. Kunte, Prof. D. Mane, Automation Testing of Web based application with Selenium and HP UFT (QTP), International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 04 Issue: 06 June -2017 https://www.irjet.net/archives//i6/IRJETV4I6500.pdf [11.03.2018]
[4] Y. Kumar, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (IRJET),, 09-2015, Volume 2, Issue 9 Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Selenium, SoapUI, HP Unified Functional Testing and Test Complete, http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1509007.pdf [11.03.2018]
[5] P. Wałachowski, Porównanie narzędzi do automatyzacji crossprzeglądarkowych testów funkcjonalnych aplikacji webowej, https://moodle.cs.pollub.pl/mod/resource/view.php?id=6709 [11.03.2018]
[6] Test Automation Tool Comparison – HP UFT/QTP vs. Selenium, http://www.aspiresys.com/WhitePapers/QTPvs Selenium.pdf [11.03.2018]
[7] Introduction to HP Unified Functional Testing (UFT) - Latest version of Quick Test Professional (QTP), http://www. softwaretestingclass.com/introduction-to-hp-unified-functionaltesting-uft/ [11.03.2018]
[8] HP UFT/QTP vs. Selenium – Automated Test Tool Comparison, http://www.optimusinfo.com/blog/7392 [11.03.2018]
[2] H. P. Bajaj, Choosing the right automation tool and framework is critical to project success, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/526a/
5b00714e1cad6809234020cd8f81fdfb905a.pdf [11.03.2018]
[3] P. Kunte, Prof. D. Mane, Automation Testing of Web based application with Selenium and HP UFT (QTP), International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET), Volume: 04 Issue: 06 June -2017 https://www.irjet.net/archives//i6/IRJETV4I6500.pdf [11.03.2018]
[4] Y. Kumar, Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (IRJET),, 09-2015, Volume 2, Issue 9 Comparative Study of Automated Testing Tools: Selenium, SoapUI, HP Unified Functional Testing and Test Complete, http://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1509007.pdf [11.03.2018]
[5] P. Wałachowski, Porównanie narzędzi do automatyzacji crossprzeglądarkowych testów funkcjonalnych aplikacji webowej, https://moodle.cs.pollub.pl/mod/resource/view.php?id=6709 [11.03.2018]
[6] Test Automation Tool Comparison – HP UFT/QTP vs. Selenium, http://www.aspiresys.com/WhitePapers/QTPvs Selenium.pdf [11.03.2018]
[7] Introduction to HP Unified Functional Testing (UFT) - Latest version of Quick Test Professional (QTP), http://www. softwaretestingclass.com/introduction-to-hp-unified-functionaltesting-uft/ [11.03.2018]
[8] HP UFT/QTP vs. Selenium – Automated Test Tool Comparison, http://www.optimusinfo.com/blog/7392 [11.03.2018]
Article Details
Drążek, K., & Skublewska-Paszkowska, M. (2018). Performance comparison of automatic tests written in Selenium WebDriver and HP UFT. Journal of Computer Sciences Institute, 8, 298–301. https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.700
Abstract views: 360
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
