Analysis of the capabilities of predictive artificial intelligence models in corporate risk management
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 40 (2026)
-
Analysis of the capabilities of predictive artificial intelligence models in corporate risk management
Kacper Ziemski188-192
-
Usability and availability of selected e-commerce services
Marcin Kozicki, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska193-200
-
Comparison of C++ and Python performance based on selected algorithms
Szymon Bogucki, Kacper Burda201-205
-
Security analysis of selected web applications using vulnerability scanners
Mariusz Choroś, Marta Dziuba-Kozieł206-212
-
Comparison of Java and .NET reflection mechanisms for dynamic module loading: a performance benchmark study
Michał Mazur, Sebastian Maruszak, Marek Miłosz213-217
-
Comparative analysis of network vulnerability detection tools
Mateusz Zdunek218-225
-
Evaluation of mobile applications for personal finance management using the MARS scale
Łukasz Nikiel, Artsiom Patskevich, Marek Miłosz226-231
-
Comparison of the effectiveness of roulette betting strategies using Monte Carlo simulation
Marek Sarnecki232-238
-
Analysis of optimization capabilities of selected database management systems
Paweł Tarkiewicz, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik239-246
-
Comparative analysis of Espresso and Appium frameworks for automated UI testing of Android mobile applications
Jakub Derkacz247-254
-
Comparative analysis of the applicability of artificial intelligence models for code generation
Patryk Warchoł, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik255-262
-
Comparison of the effectiveness of selected tools for detecting texts generated by artificial intelligence
Marcin Brodacki, Małgorzata Plechawska-Wójcik263-269
-
Comparative analysis of selected containerization tools in terms of MCP
Paweł Jan Tłusty, Maciej Pańczyk270-276
-
SpikeCliff effect: empirical analysis of deterministic timing discontinuities in sponge-based XOF functions
Łukasz Wójcik, Stanisław Lota277-282
-
Comparison of AI agents for creating SQL queries
Julia Sierpień, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska283-288
-
Comparative analysis of the performance of PostgreSQL and Neo4j databases in the context of genealogical queries
Michał Muzyka, Mateusz Niedźwiedź, Marek Miłosz289-296
-
Evaluation of the effectiveness of static and dynamic methods in malware analysis
Dominik Tracz, Daniel Sawicki, Konrad Gromaszek297-303
-
Comparison of classical machine learning methods in the task of obesity level classification
Paweł Biesaga, Paweł Powroźnik304-312
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
This study examines the use of predictive artificial intelligence models in corporate risk management. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) architectures are evaluated in forecasting five widely used market risk indicators based on daily financial time series for Apple Inc. Model performance is assessed using a unified experimental framework and out-of-sample data, with accuracy measured by Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Results show that predictive effectiveness varies across risk measures and model types, and no single model consistently outperforms the others. These findings highlight the need to align model choice with the structural properties of the specific market risk indicators being predicted.
Keywords:
Sustainable Development Goal (SDG)
- Decent work and economic growth
References
[1] M. Crouhy, D. Galai, R. Mark, The Essentials of Risk Management, McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 2014.
[2] A. Karasan, Machine Learning for Financial Risk Management with Python, O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, 2021.
[3] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer, New York, 2009.
[4] K. P. Murphy, Machine Learning: A Probabilistic Perspective, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2012.
[5] I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio, A. Courville, Deep Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2016.
[6] E. I. Altman, Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and the Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, J. Finance 23 (4) (1968) 589-609, https://doi.org/10.2307/2978933.
[7] J. A. Ohlson, Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy, Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1) (1980) 109-131, https://doi.org/10.2307/2490395.
[8] S. Selvin, R. Vinayakumar, E. A. Gopalakrishnan, V. K. Menon, K. P. Soman, Stock price prediction using LSTM, RNN and CNN-sliding window model, In 2017 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) (2017) 1643-1647, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCI.2017.8126078.
[9] D. Nurmalitasari, D. Pantagama, D. Pramanaswari, Predicting LQ45 financial sector indices using RNN-LSTM, Journal of Big Data 8 (2021) 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-021-00495-x.
[10] T. Fischer, C. Krauss, Deep Learning with long short-term memory networks for financial market predictions, European Journal of Operational Research 270(2) (2018) 654-669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.11.054.
[11] W. Bao, J. Yue, Y. Rao, A deep learning framework for financial time series using stacked autoencoders and long short-term memory, PLoS ONE 12(7) (2017) e0180944, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180944.
[12] K. Xu, Y. Cheng, S. Long, J. Guo, J. Xiao, M. Sun, Advancing Financial Risk Prediction through Optimized LSTM Model Performance and Comparative Analysis, In 2024 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Sensors, Electronics and Computer Engineering (ICSECE) (2024) 1264-1270, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSECE61636.2024.10729338.
[13] Y. Gao, Stock Prediction Based on Optimized LSTM and GRU Models, Scientific Programming 2021 (2021) 4055281, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4055281.
[14] G. R. Naufal, A. Wibowo, Time Series Forecasting Based on Deep Learning CNN-LSTM-GRU Model on Stock Prices, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology 71(6) (2023) 126-133, https://doi.org/10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V71I6P215.
[15] C. Zhang, N. N. A. Sjarif, R. Ibrahim., Deep learning models for price forecasting of financial time series: A review of recent advancements: 2020-2022, WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 13(1) (2023) e1519, https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1519.
[16] E. Tölö, Predicting systemic financial crises with recurrent neural networks, Journal of Financial Stability 49 (2020) 100746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100746.
[17] Z. Xu, J. Pan, S. Han, H. Ouyang, Y. Chen, M. Jiang, Predicting Liquidity Coverage Ratio with Gated Recurrent Units: A Deep Learning Model for Risk Management, In 2024 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computer Application (ICMLCA) (2024) 108-112, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLCA63499.2024.10753702.
[18] P. Chen, M. Ji, Deep learning-based financial risk early warning model for listed companies: A multi-dimensional analysis approach, Expert Systems with Applications 283 (2025) 127746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.127746.
[19] W. Sun, Z. Xu, W. Zhang, K. Ma, Y. Wu, M. Sun, Advanced Risk Prediction and Stability Assessment of Banks Using Time Series Transformer Models, Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Conference on Big Data Economy and Information Management (BDIEM) (2024) 657-661, https://doi.org/10.1145/3724154.3724264.
[20] E. Ramos-Pérez, P. J. Alonso-González, J. J. Núñez-Velázquez, Forecasting volatility with a stacked model based on a hybridized Artificial Neural Network, Expert Systems with Applications 129 (2020) 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.046.

