Access to cultural heritage and democratic participation
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 25 (2026)
-
Twelve Years On: A Key ICOMOS France Event for the Dissemination of the Venice Charter’s Principles
1-13
-
A tough interrelation: Architectural conservation theory and electromechanical installations arrangement in late 19th and early 20th century monuments
15-31
-
The function of the inventory of monuments in the heritage protection system – the informative role or the legal form of protection?
33-48
-
ICOMOS at 60. Surveying our Philosophical Foundations, and How They Might Be Fixed
49-65
-
Socialist Realist Heritage in Poland – successes in protection and challenges for the future
67-83
-
Statement regarding the position of the Association of Art Historians (SHS), submitted to the conference entitled „Principles of the monument protection system – forms of protection, organisation of conservatory services, financing, and the role of stakeholders”, organised by the Polish National Committee of ICOMOS on 1–2 December 2025 in Warsaw
85-90
-
Access to cultural heritage and democratic participation
91-103
-
Ship(s) of Theseus: Authenticiti(es) and Identiti(es) of Biñan's Alberto House(s)
105-123
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
About the Faro Convention, we agree what says in the article 12, a, b: “Access to cultural heritage and democratic participation”, but we must clarify somethings in points c and d in particular about the “voluntary organisations”. What organizations we are talking about? When should they act? We must recognize which are the heritage communities, organizations and other people who can be part of the protection system. And then when must give its opinion. An example of partecipation is that of the “Servei” of monuments in Barcellona, Spain. In the method (that we will explain) is included in one part to have the opinion of different statements when the works of restoration are advanced. A not good example is the work in the Leon Cathedral by “Amigos de la Catedral”.
