Twelve Years On: A Key ICOMOS France Event for the Dissemination of the Venice Charter’s Principles
Article Sidebar
Issue Vol. 25 (2026)
-
Twelve Years On: A Key ICOMOS France Event for the Dissemination of the Venice Charter’s Principles
Franca Malservisi1-13
-
A tough interrelation: Architectural conservation theory and electromechanical installations arrangement in late 19th and early 20th century monuments
Dimitrios Zygomalas15-31
-
The function of the inventory of monuments in the heritage protection system – the informative role or the legal form of protection?
Gabriela Gruszczak33-48
-
ICOMOS at 60. Surveying our Philosophical Foundations, and How They Might Be Fixed
Nigel Walter49-65
-
Socialist Realist Heritage in Poland – successes in protection and challenges for the future
Lukasz Mikolaj Sadowski, Aleksandra Sumorok67-83
-
Statement regarding the position of the Association of Art Historians (SHS), submitted to the conference entitled „Principles of the monument protection system – forms of protection, organisation of conservatory services, financing, and the role of stakeholders”, organised by the Polish National Committee of ICOMOS on 1–2 December 2025 in Warsaw
Malgorzata Gwiazdowska85-90
-
Access to cultural heritage and democratic participation
Cecilia Antonini Lanari91-103
-
Ship(s) of Theseus: Authenticiti(es) and Identiti(es) of Biñan's Alberto House(s)
Timothy Augustus Y. Ong, Drew Ashley Paige L. Rabadon105-123
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The meeting organized by ICOMOS France in 1976, in response to a request by ICOMOS International, was an inaugural moment in the acclimatization process of the Venice Charter. The conference proceedings should be placed in the context of the late 1970s to highlight considerations relating to a specific way of dealing with principles and concepts. While the twelve years since the Venice Congress may seem a long time, this lag can be explained by the time taken to establish the French national committee of ICOMOS within a highly structured administrative organization. Surprisingly, despite the active presence of French representatives at international meetings, the charter remained confidential for several years. The papers published in 1977 revealed the emergence of new issues: What attitude should we adopt toward the nineteenth- and twentieth-century heritage? How should we deal with the multiplication of techniques? What lessons should we draw from operational experience in urban fabrics?
The presentation will focus on different attitudes proposed by the contributors, most of whom had connections with the Department of Historic Monuments. François Énaud, a specialist in mural paintings, expresses his agreement with the charter, confirming a shared international culture in this field. The concluding text by the famous historian André Chastel shows a move toward interdisciplinarity. Architects such as Yves-Marie Froidevaux and Jean Sonnier develop formulas that continue to shape the current debate, thus confirming their role as the charter’s primary exegetes. The time lag between the drafting of the charter and its adoption invites us to reconsider temporal aspects to promote consensus building and reduce frictions in today’s changing environment.
Keywords:
References
Babelon, J.-P. (1977). Restaurations et histoire. Monuments historiques, special issue, 20–30.
Bercé, F. (2021). Michel Parent. Monumental: Revue scientifique et technique des monuments historiques, 2, 34.
Boiret, Y. (1977). Restauration et utilisation. Monuments historiques, special issue, 63–71.
Caccia Gherardini, S. (2024). Indagine sulla conferenza di Atene. Milan: Francoangeli.
Chastel, A. (1977). Restauration et avenir du patrimoine. Monuments historiques, special issue,102–108.
Cohen, J.-L., (2015). La coupure entre architectes et intellectuels, ou les enseignements de l’italophilie, Brussels: Mardaga.
Contenay, F., & Mouton, B. (2012). L’École de Chaillot: Une aventure des savoirs et des pratiques; Architecture & patrimoine, Paris: Éditions des Cendres, Cité de l'architecture & du patrimoine.
Dussaule, P. (1977). Aspects administratifs et financiers du problème de la restauration. Monuments historiques, special issue, 39–50.
Énaud, F. (1977). Bilan documentaire critique de restaurations de peinture murales en France. Monuments historiques, special issue, 85–93.
Fosseyeux, J. (1977). La section française de l’ICOMOS. Monuments historiques, special issue, 6–7.
Froidevaux, Y-M. (1977). Problèmes de restauration. Monuments historiques, special issue, 95–100.
Gondran, F. (2015). L’année éuropéenne du patrimoine en France. Monumenta, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.11588/MONU.2015.0.42423.
Guuinic, T. (2021). Jean Sonnier (1913–2004) Un acteur majeur dans l'histoire de la charte de Venise en France. Monumental: Revue scientifique et technique des monuments historiques, 2, 36–39.
Houbart, C. (2017). La charte de Venise en France: Acteurs, réception, interprétations (1957–1976). Apuntes, 30(2), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.apc30-2.cvfa.
Houbart, C. (2021a). La fabrique de la charte de Venise. Monumental: Revue scientifique et technique des monuments historiques, 2, 18–23.
Houbart, C., (2021b). François Sorlin (1911–1995). Monumental: Revue scientifique et technique des monuments historiques, 2, 33.
Houbart, C. & Dawans, S. (2025). The “Open” Venice Charter: Learning from the Multiple Interpretations and Translations of the Charter’s Article 9. Protection of Cultural Heritage, 22, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.6171.
Houlet, J. (1977). Les modalités de la restauration des ensembles anciens. Monuments historiques, special issue, 51–62.
Jacquin, L. (2016). Doctrine et pratique de la restauration française à l’épreuve de la Charte de Venise: Architectures contemporaines dans les monuments historiques, projets et enjeux. PhD diss. supervised by Philippe Garric, defended on December 14, 2016, Université Paris Est.
Jannière, H., (2025). La critique architecturale, un espace disputé. Critiques, architectes et opinion publique France 1953–1977. Rennes: PUR.
Lestienne, C. (2016). Les “Entretiens du patrimoine” (1988–2001) ou la “grand-messe” des professionnels du patrimoine. In Situ: Revue des patrimoines, 30. https://doi.org/10.4000/insitu.13582.
Malservisi, F., & Vitale, M.R. (2013). La costruzione del patrimonio architettonico in Francia e in Italia: Tra tradizioni culturali e pratiche di intervento. In: A. Aveta & M. Di Stefano (eds.), Roberto Di Stefano: Filosofia della conservazione e prassi del restauro. (286–293): Naples: Arte Tipografica Editrice.
Malservisi, F. (2018). Les cartes postales, témoins et vecteurs de l’excroissance des monuments. L’architecture au quotidien : regards sur des représentations ordinaires. Profil, Revue de l’Association des historiens de l’architecture, 1, 59-68.
Malservisi, F., & Vitale, M.R. (2019). Gustavo Giovannoni e Paul Léon: Idée e “dottrine” a confronto nel processo di internazionalizzazione della cultura della tutela e del restauro. In: Gustavo Giovannoni e l’architetto intergrale. Convegno internazionale Roma, Palazzo Carpegna, 25–27 novembre 2015. (55–62): Rome: Accademia Nazionale di San Luca.
Maupeou, de, C.(1977). Compte rendu. Monuments historiques, special issue, 101.
Monnet, B. (1977). Lisibilité des restaurations. Monuments historiques, special issue, 73–76.
Parent, M. (1977). Problèmes de la restauration avec l’environnement sociologique et culturel. Monuments historiques, special issue, 10–19.
Passini, M. (2018). La Conférence d’Athènes sur la conservation des monuments d’art et d’histoire (1931) et l’élaboration croisée de la notion de patrimoine de l’humanité. In: L. Arnoux-Farnoux, P. Kosmadaki, & S. Jollivet (eds.), Le double voyage: Paris-Athènes (1919–1939). (243–252): Athens: École française d’Athènes.
Raymond, J.-F. (2014). La diplomatie culturelle, spécificité française. In: Du Brésil à l’Atlantique. Edited by Laurent Vidal and Didier Poton. (201–212): Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes.
Salusse et al., (1977). Les restaurations françaises et la charte de Venise. Monuments historiques, special issue.
Sonnier, J. (1977a). Conservation des ruines et traitement des vestiges provenant des fouilles. Monuments historiques, special issue, 78–82.
Sonnier, J. (1977b). Preface. Monuments historiques, special issue, 2–3.
Sonnier, J. (1989). Avignon: Façade de l’Ancienne Comédie. In: Entretiens du patrimoine: Ornementation architecturale en pierre dans les monuments historiques. (155–157): Vesoul: Direction du Patrimoine.
Star, S.L. (2010). Ceci n’est pas un objet-frontière! Réflexions sur l’origine d’un concept. SAC Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 4(1), 18–35.
Trompette, P., & Vinck, D. (2009). Revisiting the Notion of Boundary Object. Translated by Neil Draper. Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.3917/rac.006.0003.
Article Details
Abstract views: 7

