The Idea of Philosophy vs. Eco-Philosophy
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2009)
-
From the Polish Minister of Environment
Maciej Nowicki9-10
-
About the State Environmental Council of Poland (PROS) and the Future of “Problemy Ekorozwoju/ Problems of Sustainable Development”
Tomasz Winnicki11-13
-
Sustainable Activism, The Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, and Experimental Learning
Paul T. Durbin15-32
-
Sustainable Development (1987-2005) – an Oxymoron Comes of Age
Michael R. Redclift33-50
-
The Idea of Philosophy vs. Eco-Philosophy
Andrzej Papuziński51-59
-
Convincing Industry that there is Value In Environmentally Supply Chains
Joseph Sarkis61-64
-
The Sustainable Development Revolution
Artur Pawłowski65-76
-
Sustainable Development Versus Political Aspect of Defining the Nature
Jacek Leszek Łapiński77-81
-
Sustainable Development in the Discourse over the Polish Wildlife Conservation Concept after 1989
Czesław Wodzikowski83-92
-
Subsidiarity in EU Environmental Policy
Barbara Hartman93-98
-
Market Mechanisms in Environment Protection as Sustainable Development Factor
Andrzej Graczyk99-108
-
The Premises of Renewable Energy Sources Market Development in Poland in the Light of Sustainable Development Idea
Alicja Pultowicz109-115
-
Biofuels – a Step Towards Sustainable Development
Sabina Dołęgowska117-121
-
Problems of Sustainable Use of Mineral Resources
Agnieszka Gałuszka, Zdzisław Migaszewski123-130
-
Development in Postmodern Time
Jerzy Janikowski131-134
-
Letter to the Editorial Office: Work on Sustainability
John Ikerd161-162
-
Letter to the Editorial Office: Global Ballistic Missile Defense and Strategy of Zero Growth vs. Necessity of Global Cooperation for Sustainable Development
Lesław Michnowski161-165
-
Communiques on Activities of the State Environmental Council of Poland
Tomasz Winnicki135-153
-
EEAC, the Way Ahead in the Light of the Last Five Years
Frans Evers141-142
-
On the Politics of Sustainability a Long Way Ahead EEAC, the Way Ahead in the Light of the Last Five Years
Tim O’Riordan155-159
-
Work on Sustainability
John Ikerd161-162
-
Global Ballistic Missile Defense and Strategy of Zero Growth vs. Necessity of Global Cooperation for Sustainable Development
Lesław Michnowski163-165
Archives
-
Vol. 6 No. 2
2011-07-01 19
-
Vol. 6 No. 1
2011-01-03 18
-
Vol. 5 No. 2
2010-07-01 21
-
Vol. 5 No. 1
2010-01-04 16
-
Vol. 4 No. 2
2009-07-01 19
-
Vol. 4 No. 1
2009-01-05 22
-
Vol. 3 No. 2
2008-07-01 19
-
Vol. 3 No. 1
2008-01-02 12
-
Vol. 2 No. 2
2007-07-02 13
-
Vol. 2 No. 1
2007-01-02 11
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
This article on environmental philosophy was inspired by a discussion on the latter’s compatibility with the standards in place in academic philosophy. It seeks to consider how environmental philosophy relates to the idea of philosophy as such, electing to do so by reference to one of the best-known systems of environmental philosophy: the concept Henryk Skolimowski dubbed ecophilosophy (eko-filozofia). It is the author’s contention that the latter is a contemporary philosophy in which the core idea of philosophy is being renewed.
This main thesis is developed in the article’s three parts, of which the first deals with the ongoing relationship between the idea and subject of philosophy. Here it is noted that the critical attitude is the one constant element underpinning the idea of philosophy. This attitude entails reservations as to – or simply a lack of full confidence in – the certainties and truths deemed to make up each and every one of history’s concrete forms of rationality. The lack of confidence manifests itself in a refusal to engage in a priori acceptance of any cultural tradition as exhausting the layers of human rationality (in terms of values, cognitive stereotypes or standards determining actions).
The second part of the article addresses with the crisis in contemporary philosophy taken to reflect the marginalization of philosophical thought in today’s Euro-Atlantic culture. A theory as to why this is now being noted is presented and developed, the assertion – in brief – being that such a state of affairs has arisen because the main currents in contemporary philosophy have separated from the idea of philosophy, the currents in question tending to seek philosophy’s conversion into yet another scientific discipline.
The third part of the article then focuses on ecophilosophy as a system aiming to re-supply philosophy with the idea of philosophy it has otherwise contrived to lose. Two issues raised here are thus the characterisation of the remaining currents to contemporary philosophy – as a voice of protest against the main direction philosophy adopted in the 19th and 20th centuries, as well as the characterisation of ecophilosophy as heir to that other style of philosophical reflection wherein the aforementioned criticism remains a powerful feature, at least in relation to today’s most troublesome civilisational and social problems.
The methodological background to the article comprises a popular typology of contemporary philosophy identifying the scientistic, the anti-scientistic and the ideological as the three fundamental groups of theories present; as well as a detailing of the sources of philosophical issues that points to those spheres of public life in which universally-accepted solutions are ceasing to be self-evident.
Keywords:
References
GELLNER E., Oświecenie – tak czy nie? w: przekład i opracowanie J. Niżnik, Habermas, Rorthy, Kołakowski: stan filozofii współczesnej, Wyd. IFiS PAN, Warszawa 1996. [Gellner E., The Enlightenment – pro or contra? in:
translated and drawn up by Niżnik J., Habermas, Rorty, Kołakowski: the condition of the contemporary philosophy, published by IFiS PAN, Warszawa 1996.]
HUSSERL E., Kryzys europejskiego człowieczeństwa a filozofia, Biblioteka Aletheia, Warszawa 1993. [Husserl E., The crises of European humanity vs. philosophy, Biblioteka Aletheia, Warszawa 1993.]
JOHN PAUL II, Fides et ratio, Vatican, 1998.
KMITA J., Przedmowa do wydania polskiego, w: red. Martens E., Schnädelbach H., Filozofia. Podstawowe pytania, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995 [Kmita J., Introduction to the Polish edition, in: ed. Martens E., Schnädelbach H., Philosophy. Basic questions, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995.]
KOT W., Współczesne orientacje filozoficzne, PWN, Warszawa 1989. [Kot W., Contemporary philosophical orientations, PWN, Warszawa 1989.]
MARTENS E., SCHNÄDELBACH H., O aktualnej sytuacji filozofii, w: red. Martens E., Schnädelbach H., Filozofia. Podstawowe pytania, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995. [Martens E, Schnädelbach H., The current
state of philosophy, in: ed. by Martens E., Schnädelbach H., Philosophy. Basic questions, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995.]
PAPUZIŃSKI A., Życie – Nauka – Ekologia. Prolegomena do kulturalistycznej filozofii ekologii, Wydawnictwo Uczelniane WSP w Bydgoszczy, Bydgoszcz 1998 [Papuziński A., Life - Science – Ecology. Prolegomena to the culturalistic philosophy of ecology, Wydawnictwo Uczelniane WSP in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz 1998.]
PAPUZIŃSKI A., 1999, Nauki szczegółowe a filozofia współczesna, w: Humanistyka i Przyrodoznawstwo, no 5.[Papuziński A., Detailed sciences vs. contemporary philosophy, in: Humanistyka i Przyrodoznawstwo 1999, no. 5.]
PICHT G., Odwaga utopii, PIW, Warszawa 1981. [Picht G., The courage of utopia, PIW, Warszawa 1981.]
SKOLIMOWSKI H., Filozofia żyjąca. Ekofilozofia jako drzewo życia, Wyd. Pusty Obłok, Warszawa 1993. [Skolimowski H.: Living philosophy. Eco-philosophy as a Tree of Life, Pusty Obłok Publishing, Warszawa 1993.]
TULIBACKI W., Etyka i naturalizm. Problem naukowego kontekstu etyki, Wyd. ART, Olsztyn 1998. [Tulibacki W., Naturalism and ethics. The problem of a scienitfic context of ethics, ART., Olsztyn 1998.]
WALOSZCZYK K., Kryzys ekologiczny w świetle ekofilozofii, Wyd. Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź 1996. [Waloszczyk K., Ecological crises in the light of eco-philosophy, Politechnika Łódzka Publishing, Łódź 1996.]
WELSCH W., Rozum i przejścia. O rozumie transwersalnym, w: red. Buksiński T., , Rozumność i racjonalność, Wyd. Naukowe Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań 1997. [Welsch W.: The reason
and passages. Of transversal reason, in: ed. Buksiński T., Sensibility and Rationality, The Institute of Philosophy Academic Publishing, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań 1997.]
Article Details
Abstract views: 107
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
