The Idea of Philosophy vs. Eco-Philosophy

Andrzej Papuziński


Kazimierz Wielki University of Bydgoszcz, Poland (Poland)


Abstract

This article on environmental philosophy was inspired by a discussion on the latter’s compatibility with the standards in place in academic philosophy. It seeks to consider how environmental philosophy relates to the idea of philosophy as such, electing to do so by reference to one of the best-known systems of environmental philosophy: the concept Henryk Skolimowski dubbed ecophilosophy (eko-filozofia). It is the author’s contention that the latter is a contemporary philosophy in which the core idea of philosophy is being renewed.

This main thesis is developed in the article’s three parts, of which the first deals with the ongoing relationship between the idea and subject of philosophy. Here it is noted that the critical attitude is the one constant element underpinning the idea of philosophy. This attitude entails reservations as to – or simply a lack of full confidence in – the certainties and truths deemed to make up each and every one of history’s concrete forms of rationality. The lack of confidence manifests itself in a refusal to engage in a priori acceptance of any cultural tradition as exhausting the layers of human rationality (in terms of values, cognitive stereotypes or standards determining actions).

The second part of the article addresses with the crisis in contemporary philosophy taken to reflect the marginalization of philosophical thought in today’s Euro-Atlantic culture. A theory as to why this is now being noted is presented and developed, the assertion – in brief – being that such a state of affairs has arisen because the main currents in contemporary philosophy have separated from the idea of philosophy, the currents in question tending to seek philosophy’s conversion into yet another scientific discipline.

The third part of the article then focuses on ecophilosophy as a system aiming to re-supply philosophy with the idea of philosophy it has otherwise contrived to lose. Two issues  raised here are thus the characterisation of the remaining currents to contemporary philosophy – as a voice of protest against the main direction philosophy adopted in the 19th and 20th centuries, as well as the characterisation of ecophilosophy as heir to that other style of philosophical reflection wherein the aforementioned criticism remains a powerful feature, at least in relation to today’s most troublesome civilisational and social problems.

The methodological background to the article comprises a popular typology of contemporary philosophy identifying the scientistic, the anti-scientistic and the ideological as the three fundamental groups of theories present; as well as a detailing of the sources of philosophical issues that points to those spheres of public life in which universally-accepted solutions are ceasing to be self-evident.


Keywords:

environmental philosophy, contemporary philosophy, ecophilosophy, Skolimowski, idea of philosophy, rationality, cultural rationality

GELLNER E., Oświecenie – tak czy nie? w: przekład i opracowanie J. Niżnik, Habermas, Rorthy, Kołakowski: stan filozofii współczesnej, Wyd. IFiS PAN, Warszawa 1996. [Gellner E., The Enlightenment – pro or contra? in:
  Google Scholar

translated and drawn up by Niżnik J., Habermas, Rorty, Kołakowski: the condition of the contemporary philosophy, published by IFiS PAN, Warszawa 1996.]
  Google Scholar

HUSSERL E., Kryzys europejskiego człowieczeństwa a filozofia, Biblioteka Aletheia, Warszawa 1993. [Husserl E., The crises of European humanity vs. philosophy, Biblioteka Aletheia, Warszawa 1993.]
  Google Scholar

JOHN PAUL II, Fides et ratio, Vatican, 1998.
  Google Scholar

KMITA J., Przedmowa do wydania polskiego, w: red. Martens E., Schnädelbach H., Filozofia. Podstawowe pytania, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995 [Kmita J., Introduction to the Polish edition, in: ed. Martens E., Schnädelbach H., Philosophy. Basic questions, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995.]
  Google Scholar

KOT W., Współczesne orientacje filozoficzne, PWN, Warszawa 1989. [Kot W., Contemporary philosophical orientations, PWN, Warszawa 1989.]
  Google Scholar

MARTENS E., SCHNÄDELBACH H., O aktualnej sytuacji filozofii, w: red. Martens E., Schnädelbach H., Filozofia. Podstawowe pytania, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995. [Martens E, Schnädelbach H., The current
  Google Scholar

state of philosophy, in: ed. by Martens E., Schnädelbach H., Philosophy. Basic questions, Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1995.]
  Google Scholar

PAPUZIŃSKI A., Życie – Nauka – Ekologia. Prolegomena do kulturalistycznej filozofii ekologii, Wydawnictwo Uczelniane WSP w Bydgoszczy, Bydgoszcz 1998 [Papuziński A., Life - Science – Ecology. Prolegomena to the culturalistic philosophy of ecology, Wydawnictwo Uczelniane WSP in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz 1998.]
  Google Scholar

PAPUZIŃSKI A., 1999, Nauki szczegółowe a filozofia współczesna, w: Humanistyka i Przyrodoznawstwo, no 5.[Papuziński A., Detailed sciences vs. contemporary philosophy, in: Humanistyka i Przyrodoznawstwo 1999, no. 5.]
  Google Scholar

PICHT G., Odwaga utopii, PIW, Warszawa 1981. [Picht G., The courage of utopia, PIW, Warszawa 1981.]
  Google Scholar

SKOLIMOWSKI H., Filozofia żyjąca. Ekofilozofia jako drzewo życia, Wyd. Pusty Obłok, Warszawa 1993. [Skolimowski H.: Living philosophy. Eco-philosophy as a Tree of Life, Pusty Obłok Publishing, Warszawa 1993.]
  Google Scholar

TULIBACKI W., Etyka i naturalizm. Problem naukowego kontekstu etyki, Wyd. ART, Olsztyn 1998. [Tulibacki W., Naturalism and ethics. The problem of a scienitfic context of ethics, ART., Olsztyn 1998.]
  Google Scholar

WALOSZCZYK K., Kryzys ekologiczny w świetle ekofilozofii, Wyd. Politechniki Łódzkiej, Łódź 1996. [Waloszczyk K., Ecological crises in the light of eco-philosophy, Politechnika Łódzka Publishing, Łódź 1996.]
  Google Scholar

WELSCH W., Rozum i przejścia. O rozumie transwersalnym, w: red. Buksiński T., , Rozumność i racjonalność, Wyd. Naukowe Instytut Filozofii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza, Poznań 1997. [Welsch W.: The reason
  Google Scholar

and passages. Of transversal reason, in: ed. Buksiński T., Sensibility and Rationality, The Institute of Philosophy Academic Publishing, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań 1997.]
  Google Scholar

Download


Published
2009-01-05

Cited by

Papuziński, A. (2009). The Idea of Philosophy vs. Eco-Philosophy. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 4(1), 51–59. Retrieved from https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/preko/article/view/4710

Authors

Andrzej Papuziński 

Kazimierz Wielki University of Bydgoszcz, Poland Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 26
PDF downloads: 7