Wpływ gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym, zielonych finansów i rozwoju technologii ICT na produktywność zasobów ukierunko-waną na ekologiczną zrównoważoność: dowody z krajów OECD stosujących podejście CS-ARDL
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Numer Tom 20 Nr 2 (2025)
-
Spektrum zrównoważoności rozwoju: dlaczego zrównoważoność środowiskowa jest najważniejsza?
Subhasmita Maharana1-10
-
Szacując ryzyka związane z generatywną Sztuczną Inteligencją: analiza porównawcza międzynarodowych podejść regulacyjnych
Huang Xinbo, Liu Guo11-20
-
W kierunku islamskiej ekoteologii: Indonezyjskie organizacje muzułmańskie w wysiłkach na rzecz łagodzenia zmian klimatu i adaptacji
M. Lutfi Mustofa, M. Fauzan Zenrif, Ahmad Barizi21-31
-
Czy prawa społeczno-ekonomiczne kobiet są zagrożone z powodu ekstremalnych warunków pogodowych?
Jia Wei, Xiao-Yang Wang, Hua-Tang Yin, Chun-Ping Chang32-50
-
Klastrowanie krajów europejskich według strategii cyfryzacji ich środowiska biznesowego
Marharyta Chepeliuk, Elena Nirean, Yevheniia Voroniuk51-70
-
Bezpieczeństwo demograficzne i zrównoważony rozwój Ukrainy w warunkach aktywnej migracji ludności
Zinaida Smutchak, Ramin Tsinaridze, Tetiana Burlaienko, Oksana Dubinina71-85
-
Strategie zrównoważonej urbanizacji: łagodzenie miejskich wysp ciepła poprzez synergię między wyborami ekonomicznymi, zużyciem energii odnawialnej i interwencjami w środowisku
Muhammad Khalid Anser, Abdelmohsen A. Nassani, Khalid M. Al-Aiban, Khalid Zaman, Mohamed Haffar86-100
-
Zrównoważony i resilentny międzynarodowy handel produktami rolnymi: globalna niepewność i reakcje regionalne
Yuliia Zavadska, Alla Shlapak, Olha Yatsenko, Oleksandr Iatsenko, Mariia Mykhailova, Oleksandr Dluhopolskyi101-113
-
Od odpadów do bogactwa: wykorzystanie upcyklingu do wspiera-nia zrównoważonego gospodarowania odpadami elektronicznymi
Fatma Ince114-123
-
Dostęp społeczności wiejskich do czystego paliwa do gotowania, energii i technologii: implikacje społeczno-ekonomiczne i postęp w kierunku zrównoważonego rozwoju w Afryce
Haitong Jiang, Kingsley Imandojemu, Mohamad Shaharudin bin Samsurijan, Omowumi Omodunni Idowu, Qinyuan Xu124-140
-
Rola polityki szczytów emisji i neutralności węglowej w transformacji i modernizacji chińskiego sektora produkcyjnego: droga do zielonego, niskoemisyjnego i zrównoważonego rozwoju
Hongbing Shen141-155
-
Carbon Footprints, Social Inclusion, and Inequality: Multidimensional Pathways to Sustainable Development Goals
Haihua Zhao, Chuks Kingsley Okogor, Gabriel Osabohien156-177
-
Badanie czynników determinujących zasoby ekologiczne, ślad węglowy i zasoby naturalne: dowody z krajów azjatyckich
Qiang Wang, Symphorien Zogbassè, Kemi Funlayo Akeju, Oluwayemisi Kajijat Adeleke178-194
-
WThe Impact of Ecological Footprint, Energy Consumption and Economic Stability on Happiness: Evidence from BRICS-T Countries
Seher Suluk, Yusuf Ekrem AKBAŞ195-212
-
Wpływ gospodarki doświadczeń na strategię zrównoważonego rozwoju przedsiębiorstw w Unii Europejskiej i Wielkiej Brytanii
Olesia Iastremska, Maryna Martynenko, Yevgeniy Goryuk, Hanna Demchenko, Mykyta Budreiko213-222
-
Wpływ gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym, zielonych finansów i rozwoju technologii ICT na produktywność zasobów ukierunko-waną na ekologiczną zrównoważoność: dowody z krajów OECD stosujących podejście CS-ARDL
Shaomeng Shi, Asad Nisar223-244
-
Mechanizmy dostosowania zarządzania do Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju w warunkach globalnych zmian
Olha Komelina, Svitlana Korobka, Hanna Kondratieva, Oleh Lazor, Oksana Lazor245-254
-
Przestrzenno-czasowy rozkład czynników wpływających na zrównoważony rozwój rolnictwa w Chinach
Lei Qian, Dehong Sun Sun, Hui Wang Wang254-269
-
Koncepcja ‘Lokasangraha’ (dobrobytu ludzi) Chanakyi w kontekście globalnych Celów zrównoważonego rozwoju
Puja Mishra, Ashutosh Mishra284-293
Archiwum
-
Tom 21 Nr 2
2026-07-01 24
-
Tom 21 Nr 1
2026-01-10 21
-
Tom 20 Nr 2
2025-07-10 19
-
Tom 20 Nr 1
2025-01-10 22
-
Tom 19 Nr 2
2024-07-01 24
-
Tom 19 Nr 1
2024-01-08 27
-
Tom 18 Nr 2
2023-07-10 25
-
Tom 18 Nr 1
2023-01-01 25
-
Tom 16 Nr 2
2021-07-01 26
-
Tom 16 Nr 1
2021-01-04 24
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Authors
Abstrakt
Kraje OECD odnotowały wykładniczy wzrost gospodarczy w ciągu ostatnich dwóch dekad, przyczyniając się obecnie do ponad 60% światowego PKB, jednak wzrost ten wiązał się ze znacznymi kosztami środowiskowymi, wyczerpując zasoby naturalne w alarmującym tempie – zużycie materiałów w tych krajach wzrosło o 70% od 2000 r. – i podnosząc krytyczne pytanie o rolę tych krajów w osiągnięciu SDGs do 2030 r. Aby sprostać krytycznej potrzebie utrzymania ekologicznej zrównoważoności i produktywności zasobów, niniejsze badanie analizuje wzajemne oddziaływanie gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym (CE), zielonych finansów (GF) i rozwoju ICT (ICT) w 27 krajach OECD w latach 2000–2022. Wykorzystujemy ekonometryczne podejście CS-ARDL, aby wyjaśnić krótkoterminowy i długoterminowy wpływ gospodarki o obiegu zamkniętym (CE), zielonych finansów (GF) i rozwoju ICT (ICT) na produktywność zasobów (RP) i ekologiczną zrównoważoność (ES). Wyniki ujawniają podwójny wpływ CE, przy czym początkowe krótkoterminowe wyzwania – wynikające z rozwoju infrastruktury intensywnie wykorzystującej zasoby – przekształcają się w długoterminowe korzyści poprzez redukcję odpadów i poprawę efektywności wykorzystania zasobów. GF wyłania się jako solidny czynnik napędowy, dostosowujący inwestycje do zielonych technologii i praktyk efektywnego wykorzystania zasobów, wspierając zrównoważony rozwój na dużą skalę. Rozwój ICT wykazuje złożoną relację, początkowo obciążając zasoby, ale później znacznie wzmacniając RP i ES poprzez zaawansowaną analitykę, automatyzację i monitorowanie zasobów. Ponadto badanie podkreśla rolę rygorystyczności polityki środowiskowej, pokazując, że CE, GF i ICT są skuteczniejsze w wzmacnianiu RP i ES w ramach rygorystycznej polityki środowiskowej, podczas gdy złagodzona polityka prowadzi do słabszych wyników zrównoważonego rozwoju. Badanie to podkreśla krytyczną rolę CE, GF i ICT w rozwiązywaniu pilnych globalnych wyzwań zrównoważonego rozwoju, oferując praktyczne spostrzeżenia dla decydentów i interesariuszy.
Słowa kluczowe:
Bibliografia
1. ABBAS J., DOGAN E, 2022, The impacts of organizational green culture and corporate social responsibility on employees' responsible behavior towards society, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 29, 60024–60034.
2. AGRAWAL R., AGRAWAL S., SAMADHIYA A., KUMAR A., LUTHRA S., JAIN V, 2024, Adoption of green finance and green innovation for achieving circularity: An exploratory review and future directions, Geoscience frontiers 15(4), 101669.
3. AIZAWA M., YANG C, 2010, Green credit, green stimulus, green revolution? China’s mobilization of banks for envi-ronmental cleanup, The Journal of Environment & Development 19(2), 119-144.
4. AL MAMUN M., BOUBAKER S., NGUYEN D. K., 2022, Green finance and decarbonization: Evidence from around the world, Finance Research Letters 46, 102807.
5. ALOLA A. A., KIRIKKALELI D., 2019, The nexus of environmental quality with renewable consumption, immigration, and healthcare in the US: wavelet and gradual-shift causality approaches, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26(34), 35208-35217.
6. ASKARZAI W., 2011. The Negative Impact of ICT Waste on Environment and Health, Handbook of Research on Green ICT: Technology, Business and Social Perspectives, ed. Unhelkar B., IGI Global, https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61692-834-6.
7. ASONGU S., 2013, Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be wrong in our era. New evidence from Meta-analysis, New Evidence from Meta-Analysis, January 8, African Governance and Development Institute WP/13/009.
8. ASWATHANARAYANA U., DIVI R. S., 2009, Energy portfolios, CRC Press.
9. AWODUMI O. B., ADEWUYI A. O., 2020, The role of non-renewable energy consumption in economic growth and carbon emission: Evidence from oil producing economies in Africa Energy Strategy Reviews 27, 100434.
10. AZHGALIYEVA D., KAPSAPLYAMOVA Z., LOW L, 2018, Implications of fiscal and financial policies for unlocking green finance and green investment, Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI).
11. BAAS L. W., 2005, Cleaner Production and Industrial Ecology: Dynamic Aspects of the Introduction and Dissemination of New Concepts in Industrial Practice, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254804811_Cleaner_Production_and_Industrial_Ecology_Dynamic_Aspects_of_the_Introduction_and_Dissemination_of_New_Concepts_in_Industrial_Practice.
12. BELLOUMI M., ALSHEHRY A, 2020, The impact of international trade on sustainable development in Saudi Arabia, Sustainability 12(13), 5421.
13. BERENSMANN K., LINDENBERG N., 2016, Green finance: actors, challenges and policy recommendations, German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) Briefing Paper, 23.
14. BILAL M. J., SHAHEEN W. A., 2024, Towards sustainable development: Investigating the effect of green financial indicators on renewable energy via the mediating variable, Renewable Energy 221, 119819.
15. BRINGEZU S., SCHÜTZ H., STEGER S., BAUDISCH J., 2004, International comparison of resource use and its rela-tion to economic growth: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR, Ecological economics 51(1-2), 97-124.
16. BROCK W, A., TAYLOR M. S., 2010, The green Solow model, Journal of Economic Growth 15, 127-153.
17. CHEN H., GUO W., FENG X., WEI W., LIU H., FENG, Y., GONG W., 2021, The impact of low-carbon city pilot policy on the total factor productivity of listed enterprises in China, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 169, 105457.
18. CHEN X., CHEN Z., 2021, Can green finance development reduce carbon emissions? Empirical evidence from 30 Chinese provinces, Sustainability 13(21), 12137.
19. CHERTOW M.,, EHRENFELD J., 2012, Organizing self-organizing systems: Toward a theory of industrial symbiosis, Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1), 13–27.
20. CHERTOW M., PARK J., 2016, Scholarship and practice in industrial symbiosis: 1989–2014, Journal of Industrial Ecology 87–116.
21. CHIEN F., CHAU K. Y., ADY S. U., ZHANG Y., TRAN Q. H., ALDEEHANI T. M., 2021, Does the combining effects of energy and consideration of financial development lead to environmental burden: social perspective of energy finance?, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28, 40957-40970.
22. CHOI I., 2001, Unit root tests for panel data, Journal of international money and Finance 20(2), 249-272.
23. CHUDIK A., PESARAN M. H., TOSETTI E., 2011, Weak and strong cross‐section dependence and estimation of large panels, Oxford University Press Oxford, UK.
24. COROAMA V. C., HILTY L. M., BIRTEL M., 2012, Effects of Internet-based multiple-site conferences on greenhouse gas emissions, Telematics and Informatics 29, 362–374.
25. DANISH ZHANG B., WANG B., WANG. Z, 2017, Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan, Journal of Cleaner production 156, 855-864.
26. DAVID D., VENKATACHALAM A., 2018, A comparative study on the role of public-private partnerships and green investment banks in boosting low-carbon investments, Handbook of Green Finance. Sustainable Development, eds. Sachs, J., Woo , W., Yoshino, N., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Springer, Singapore.
27. DEMIREL P.,, KESIDOU E., 2019, Sustainability‐oriented capabilities for eco‐innovation: Meeting the regulatory, tech-nology, and market demands, Business Strategy and the Environment 28(5), 847-857.
28. ECOFYS CIRCLE E., 2016, Implementing Circular Economy Globally Makes Paris Targets Achievable, Cornelis Blok, Netherlands.
29. EEA, 2016, Circular Economy in Europe – Developing the Knowledge Base, EEA Report No 2/2016, European Environ-ment Agency, Copenhagen.
30. ELLEN MACARTHUR F., 2015. Delivering the circular economy: A toolkit for policymakers, Ellen MacArthur Founda-tion.
31. EUROPEAN COMISSION, 2015, Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy, EC, Brussels.
32. EUROSTAT, 2023, Material flow accounts and resource productivity. Material consumption in EU, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Material_flow_accounts_and_resource_productivity.
33. FAN J., LIAO Y., YAO J. 2015, Power enhancement in high‐dimensional cross‐sectional tests, Econometrica 83(4), 1497-1541.
34. FRANCE S. 2016, Economie circulaire: combien d’emplois? [Circular economy: how many jobs?], Note d’analyse n° 46.
35. FRIENDS OF EUROPE, 2014, Circular economy: Scaling up best practices worldwide, Brussels.
36. FU Q., RAHMAN A., JIANG H., ABBAS J., COMITE U., 2022, Sustainable supply chain and business performance: The impact of strategy, network design, information systems, and organizational structure, Sustainability, 14(3), 1080.
37. GILBERT S., ZHOU L., 2017, The knowns and unknowns of China’s green finance, The New Climate Economy 5(860), 7780.
38. GOODWIN D., HOLMAN I., PARDTHAISONG L., VISESSRI S., EKKAWATPANIT C., REY VICARIO D., 2022, What is the evidence linking financial assistance for drought-affected agriculture and resilience in tropical Asia? A systematic review, Regional Environmental Change, 22(1), 12.
39. GOWER R., SCHROEDER P., 2016, Virtuous circle: How the circular economy can save lives and create jobs in low and middle-income countries, Tearfund and Institute of Development Studies, London.
40. GREUNZ L,, 2004, Industrial structure and innovation-evidence from European regions, Journal of evolutionary econom-ics 14, 563-592.
41. GROSSMAN G, M., KRUEGER A. B., 1995, Economic growth and the environment, The quarterly journal of economics 110(2), 353-377.
42. GUO C.-Q., WANG X., CAO D.-D., HOU Y.-G., 2022, The impact of green finance on carbon emission-analysis based on mediation effect and spatial effect, Frontiers in Environmental Science 10, 844988.
43. HAAS W., KRAUSMANN F., WIEDENHOFER D.,, HEINZ M., 2015, How Circular is the global economy? An as-sessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(5), 765–777.
44. HANSEN B. E., 1995, Rethinking the univariate approach to unit root testing: Using covariates to increase power, Econ-ometric Theory 11(5), 1148-1171.
45. HARRIS A., 2013,. Feed the world, Engineering & Technology 8(10), 61-63.
46. HE G., MOL A. P. J., LU Y., ZHANG L., 2010, Environmental performance analysis of China’s public transport sector: insights from the Kaya identity, Journal of environmental Management 91(4), 978–985.
47. HERTWICH E, G., PETERS G. P., 2009, Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis, Environmental science & technology 43(16), 6414-6420.
48. HIGÓN D. A., GHOLAMI R., SHIRAZI F., 2017, ICT and environmental sustainability: A global perspective, Telematics and Informatics 34(4), 85-95.
49. HOFFERT, M. I., CALDEIRA K., BENFORD G., CRISWELL D. R., GREEN C., HERZOG H., JAIN A. K., KHESHGI H. S., LACKNER K. S., LEWIS J. S., 2002, Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet, Science 298, 981-987.
50. HU G., WANG X., WANG Y., 2021, Can the green credit policy stimulate green innovation in heavily polluting enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China, Energy Economics 98, 105134.
51. IEA, 2021, Digitalisation. Decarbonisation Enablers. https://www.iea.org/energy-system/decarbonisation-enablers/digitalisation.
52. IEA, 2022, Net zero by 2050 – analysis, https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050.
53. IM K. S., PESARAN M. H., SHIN Y., 2003, Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels, Journal of econometrics 115(1), 53-74.
54. IPCC, 2022, Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.
55. IQBAL M., ARSHED N., CHAN, L.-F,, 2024,. Exploring the dynamics: biodiversity impacts of natural resource extraction with moderating influence of FinTech for sustainable practices in resource-rich nations, Resources Policy 91, 104933.
56. JACKSON T., WEBSTER R., 2016, Limits revisited: a review of the limits to growth debate, APPG on Limits to Growth, https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21095.91045.
57. JIAKUI C., ABBAS J., NAJAM H., LIU J., ABBAS J., 2023, Green technological innovation, green finance, and financial development and their role in green total factor productivity: Empirical insights from China, Journal of Cleaner production 382, 135131.
58. JORGENSON D. W., STIROH K. J., 1999, Information technology and growth, American Economic Review 89, 109-115.
59. JUODIS A., REESE S., 2022, The incidental parameters problem in testing for remaining cross-section correlation, Jour-nal of Business & Economic Statistics 40(3), 1191-1203.
60. KAO C., 1999, Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data, Journal of econometrics 90(1), 1-44.
61. KHAN A., XIMEI W., 2022, Digital economy and environmental sustainability: Do Information Communication and Technology (ICT) and economic complexity matter? International journal of environmental research and public health 19(19), 12301.
62. KHAN M. A., RIAZ H., AHMED M., SAEED A., 2022, Does green finance really deliver what is expected? An empirical perspective, Borsa Istanbul Review 22(3), 586-593.
63. KHAN N., BALOCH M. A., SAUD S., FATIMA T., 2018, The effect of ICT on CO2 emissions in emerging economies: does the level of income matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25, 22850–22860.
64. KLIMOVA A., RONDEAU E., ERSSON K., PORRAS J., RYBIN A., ZASLAVSKY A., 2016, An international Master’s program in green ICT as a contribution to sustainable development, Journal of Cleaner production 135, 223-239.
65. KOENKER R., BASSETT JR G., 1978, Regression quantiles, Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 33-50.
66. KRAUSMANN F., GINGRICH S., EISENMENGER N., ERB K.-H., HABERL H., FISCHER-KOWALSKI M., 2009, Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century, Ecological economics 68(10), 2696-2705.
67. LACY P., KEEBLE J., MCNAMARA R. J. T. M. A. C. K. P. A. T., RUTQVIST J., HANGLUNG T., CUI M., 2014, Circular advantage: innovative business models and technologies to create value in a world without limits to growth, Ac-centure, Chicago, IL, USA.
68. EE C.-C., WANG C.-W.,, HO S.-J, 2022, Financial aid and financial inclusion: Does risk uncertainty matter? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 71, 101700.
69. LEVIN A., LIN C.-F.,, CHU C.-S, J., 2002, Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties, Journal of econometrics 108(1), 1-24.
70. LIN S., SUN J., MARINOVA D., ZHAO D., 2018,. Evaluation of the green technology innovation efficiency of China’s manufacturing industries: DEA window analysis with ideal window width, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 30, 1166–1181.
71. LINDLEIN P., 2012, Mainstreaming environmental finance into financial markets–relevance, potential and obstacles, Greening the Financial Sector: How to Mainstream Environmental Finance in Developing Countries, ed. Köhn D., Sprin-ger, 1-30.
72. LINDSEY R., DAHLMAN L., 2022, Climate change: global temperature, http://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature.
73. LIU G., WANG B., CHENG Z., ZHANG N., 2020, The drivers of China’s regional green productivity, 1999–2013, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 153, 104561.
74. LOMBARDI D. R., LAYBOURN P., 2012, Redefining industrial symbiosis, Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1), 28–37.
75. LU L., ZHENG H., CHEN M., NAJAM H., 2022, Tackling carbon intensity with green finance in the covid-19-era: recommendations for OECD economies, Climate Change Economics 13(03), 2240014.
76. MACARTHUR E., HEADING H., 2019, How the circular economy tackles climate change, Ellen MacArthur Found 1, 1-71.
77. MAMGHADERI M., MAMKHEZRI J., KHEZRI M., 2023, Assessing the environmental efficiency of OECD countries through the lens of ecological footprint indices, Journal of environmental Management 338, 117796.
78. MIDDLEMIST R. D., HITT M. A., 1981, Technology as a moderator of the relationship between perceived work envi-ronment and subunit effectiveness, Human Relations 34, 517-532.
79. MOHSIN M., KAMRAN H. W., NAWAZ M. A., HUSSAIN M. S., DAHRI A. S., 2021, Assessing the impact of transition from nonrenewable to renewable energy consumption on economic growth-environmental nexus from develop-ing Asian economies, Journal of environmental Management 284, 111999.
80. MORGAN J., MITCHELL P., 2015, Employment and the circular economy: Job creation in a more resource-efficient Britain. WRAP and Green Alliance, London.
81. NAJAM H., MALIK I. R., 2021, Nexus between diversification and banking efficiency in developing economies, Journal of Business & Economics 13(2), 34–49.
82. NASR N., THURSTON M, 2006, Remanufacturing: A key enabler to sustainable product systems, Rochester Institute of Technology.
83. OECD, 2000, Information Technology Outlook 2000, OECD Publishing.
84. OECD, 2015, Material resources, productivity and the environment, OECD Publishing.
85. OECD, 2020, Green Growth and Energy 2019, OECD Publishing.
86. OECD, 2021, Research and Development Statistics (RDS). Science, technology and innovation policy, https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/researchanddevelopmentstatisticsrds.htm.
87. OECD, 2022, OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction – Key Facts and Figures. Environ-mental indicators, modelling and outlooks, https://www.oecd.org/env/indicators-modelling-outlooks/oecdenvironmentaloutlookto2050theconsequencesofinaction-keyfactsandfigures.htm.
88. PAN C., ABBAS J., ÁLVAREZ-OTERO S., KHAN H., CAI C, 2022, Interplay between corporate social responsibility and organizational green culture and their role in employees’ responsible behavior towards the environment and society, Journal of Cleaner production 366, 132878.
89. PARK Y., MENG F., BALOCH M. A., 2018, The effect of ICT, financial development, growth, and trade openness on CO2 emissions: an empirical analysis, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25, 30708–30719.
90. PARRIQUE T., BARTH J., BRIENS F., KUOKKANEN A., SPANGENBERG J. 2019, Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability, European Environmental Bureau.
91. PEDRONI P., 1999, Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics 61(S1), 653-670.
92. PENEDER, M., 2003, Industrial structure and aggregate growth. Structural change and economic dynamics 14(4), 427-448.
93. PESARAN M. H., 2007, A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence, Journal of applied econometrics 22(2), 265-312.
94. PESARAN M. H., 2015, Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels, Econometric reviews 34(6-10), 1089-1117.
95. PESARAN M. H., XIE Y., 2021, A bias-corrected CD test for error cross-sectional dependence in panel data models with latent factors, arXiv preprint, arXiv:2109.00408.
96. PORTER M. E., LINDE C., 1995, Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of economic perspectives 9(4), 97-118.
97. RASKIN P. D., 1995, Methods for estimating the population contribution to environmental change, Ecological economics 15(3), 225-233.
98. REHMAN A., MA H., OZTURK I., 2021, Do industrialization, energy importations, and economic progress influence carbon emission in Pakistan, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28, 45840-45852.
99. RIZVI S. K. A., NAQVI B., MIRZA N., UMAR M., 2022, Safe haven properties of green, Islamic, and crypto assets and investor's proclivity towards treasury and gold, Energy Economics 115, 106396.
100. SCHAFFARTZIK A., MAYER A., GINGRICH S., EISENMENGER N., LOY C., KRAUSMANN F. 2014, The global metabolic transition: Regional patterns and trends of global material flows, 1950–2010, Global Environmental Change 26, 87-97.
101. SCHANDL H., FISCHER‐KOWALSKI M., WEST J., GILJUM S., DITTRICH M., EISENMENGER N., GESCHKE A., LIEBER M., WIELAND H., SCHAFFARTZIK A., 2018, Global material flows and resource productivity: forty years of evidence, Journal of Industrial Ecology 22(4), 827-838.
102. SCHROEDER P., ANGGRAENI K., SARTORI S., WEBER U. (eds.), 2017, Sustainable Asia: Supporting the transi-tion to sustainable consumption and production in Asian developing countries, World Scientific Publishing.
103. SHABANI Z. D., SHAHNAZI R., 2019, Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: a panel causality analysis, Energy 169, 1064–1078.
104. SHAHNAZI R., SHABANI Z. D., 2019, The effects of spatial spillover information and communications technology on carbon dioxide emissions in Iran, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, 24198–24212.
105. SHAO J., HE Z., 2022, How does social media drive corporate carbon disclosure? Evidence from China, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10, 971077.
106. SHARIF A., MEHMOOD U.,, TIWARI S., 2023, A step towards sustainable development: role of green energy and environmental innovation, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–22.
107. SHARIF A., SAQIB N., DONG K.,, KHAN S. A. R., 2022, Nexus between green technology innovation, green financing, and CO2 emissions in the G7 countries: the moderating role of social globalization, Sustainable Development 30(6), 1934-1946.
108. SOHAIL A., DU J., ABBASI B. N., 2023, Exploring the interrelationship among health status, CO2 emissions, and ener-gy use in the top 20 highest emitting economies: based on the CS-DL and CS-ARDL approaches, Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 16(7), 1419-1442.
109. SONG M., PENG L., SHANG Y.,, ZHAO X., 2022, Green technology progress and total factor productivity of resource-based enterprises: A perspective of technical compensation of environmental regulation, Technological forecasting and social change 174, 121276.
110. STEINBERGER J, K., KRAUSMANN F., EISENMENGER N., 2010, Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis, Ecological economics 69(5), 1148-1158.
111. SU C.-W., NAQVI B., SHAO X.-F., LI J.-P., JIAO Z., 2020, Trade and technological innovation: The catalysts for climate change and way forward for COP21, Journal of environmental Management 269, 110774.
112. SU C.-W., UMAR M.,, GAO R., 2022, Save the environment, get financing! How China is protecting the environment with green credit policies? Journal of environmental Management 323, 116178.
113. TISSERANT A., PAULIUK S., MERCIAI S., SCHMIDT J., FRY J., WOOD R., TUKKER A., 2017, Solid waste and the circular economy: a global analysis of waste treatment and waste footprints, Journal of Industrial Ecology 21(3), 628–640.
114. TIWARI S., MOHAMMED K. S., 2024, Unraveling the impacts of linear economy, circular economy, green energy and green patents on environmental sustainability: Empirical evidence from OECD countries, Gondwana Research 135, 75-88.
115. TUKKER A., 2015, Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review, Journal of Cleaner production 97, 76-91.
116. UMAR M., JI X., KIRIKKALELI D., XU Q, 2020, COP21 Roadmap: Do innovation, financial development, and trans-portation infrastructure matter for environmental sustainability in China? Journal of environmental Management 271, 111026.
117. UNDP, 2021, Sustainable development goals, https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals.
118. UNEP, 2019, Global Resources Outlook 2019: Natural Resources for the Future we want – Factsheet. Knowledge Repository, https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/31629.
119. UN, 2015, Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations.
120. WANG K., TSAI S.-B., DU X., BI D., 2019, Internet Finance, Green Finance, and Sustainability, Sustainability 11(14), 3856, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143856.
121. WANG K. H., UMAR M., AKRAM R., CAGLAR E., 2021, Is technological innovation making world ‘Greener’? An evidence from changing growth story of China, Technological forecasting and social change 165, 120516, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120516.
122. WESTERLUND J., 2007, Testing for error correction in panel data, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics 69(6), 709–748.
123. WESTERLUND J., BLOMQUIST J., 2013, A modified LLC panel unit root test of the PPP hypothesis, Empirical eco-nomics 44, 833-860.
124. WIEDMANN T. O., SCHNADL H., LENZEN M., MORAN D., SUH S., WEST J., KANEMOTO K., 2015, The material footprint of nations, Proceedings of the national academy of sciences 112(20), 6271-6276.
125. WIJKMAN A., SKANBERG K., 2015, The Circular Economy and Benefits for Society: Swedish Case Study Shows Jobs and Climate as Clear Winners, The Club of Rome.
126. WU T. P., WU H. C., WU Y. Y., LIU Y. T., WU S. T., 2020, Causality between tourism and economic growth, Journal of China Tourism Research, 1–18.
127. WU Y., SUN C., 2008, A Research on the Green Technology Innovation of the Cemetery Industry, International Journal of Business, 147–150, Wuhan, China.
128. XU X., LI J., 2020, Asymmetric impacts of the policy and development of green credit on the debt financing cost and maturity of different types of enterprises in China, Journal of Cleaner production 264, 121574.
129. YANG L., FAN Y., WEI Y., 2021, Impact of green innovation and economic policies on China's renewable energy market development: evidence from an energy structure perspective, Sustainability 13(1), 482.
130. YANG S., LIU W., ZHANG Z., 2022, The dynamic value of China’s high-tech zones: direct and indirect influence on urban ecological innovation, Land 11(1), 59.
131. YAO S., ZHANG S., ZHANG X., 2019, Renewable energy, carbon emission and economic growth: A revised environmental Kuznets Curve perspective, Journal of Cleaner production 235, 1338-1352.
132. YU S., ABBAS J., ÁLVAREZ-OTERO S., CHERIAN J., 2022, Green knowledge management: Scale development and validation, Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 7(4), 100244.
133. ZHANG C., LIU C., 2015, The impact of ICT industry on CO2 emissions: a regional analysis in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 44, 12–19.
134. ZHANG D., MOHSIN M., TAGHIZADEH-HESARY F., 2022, Does green finance counteract the climate change mitigation: Asymmetric effect of renewable energy investment and R&D, Energy Economics 113, 106183.
135. ZHANG J., WANG B., LATIF Z., 2019, Towards cross-regional sustainable development: the nexus between information and communication technology, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions, Sustainable Development 27, 990–1000.
136. ZHOU X., TANG X.,, ZHANG R., 2020, Impact of green finance on economic development and environmental quality: a study based on provincial panel data from China, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27, 19915-19932.
137. ZHOU X., ZHOU D., WANG Q., SU B., 2019, How information and communication technology drives carbon emis-sions: a sector-level analysis for China, Energy Economics 81, 380–392.
138. ZHOU Z., CHAU K, Y., SIBGHATULLAH A., MOSLEHPOUR M., TIEN N. H., SHUKURULLAEVICH K. N., 2024, The role of green finance, environmental benefits, fintech development, and natural resource management in advancing sustainability, Resources Policy 92, 105013.
139. ZHU R.,, LIN B., 2022, How does the carbon tax influence the energy and carbon performance of China’s mining industry? Sustainability 14(7), 3866.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Abstract views: 836
Downloads: 534

