CLASSIFICATION OF EEG SIGNAL BY METHODS OF MACHINE LEARNING
Amina ALYAMANI
amina.alyamani@yahoo.comOmar Al-Mukhtar University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Science, West Shiha, Dernah (Libya)
Oleh YASNIY
* Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Faculty of Computer Information Systems and Software Engineering, Department of Mathematical Methods in Engineering, Ruska 56, 46001, Ternopil (Ukraine)
Abstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG) signal of two healthy subjects that was available from literature, was studied using the methods of machine learning, namely, decision trees (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), K-nearest neighbours (kNN), and support vector machines (SVM). Since the data were imbalanced, the appropriate balancing was performed by Kmeans clustering algorithm. The original and balanced data were classified by means of the mentioned above 4 methods. It was found, that SVM showed the best result for the both datasets in terms of accuracy. MLP and kNN produce the comparable results which are almost the same. DT accuracies are the lowest for the given dataset, with 83.82% for the original data and 61.48% for the balanced data.
Keywords:
machine learning, EEG signal, classification, data balancing, feature extractionReferences
Altman, N. S. (1992). An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician, 46(3), 175–185.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879
Google Scholar
Amin, H. U., Mumtaz, W., Subhani, A. R., Saad, M. N. M., & Malik, A. S. (2017). Classification of EEG Signals Based on Pattern Recognition Approach. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 11(103), 1–12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2017.00103
Google Scholar
Bryant, R. A., & Sindicich, N. (2007). Hypnosis and Thought Suppression – More Data: A Brief Communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 56(1), 37–46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207140701672995
Google Scholar
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. N. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20(3), 273–297.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018
Google Scholar
Dvey-Aharon, Z., Fogelson, N., Peled, A, & Intrator, N. (2015). Schizophrenia Detection and Classification by Advanced Analysis of EEG Recordings Using a Single Electrode Approach. PLoS ONE, 10(4), 1–12.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123033
Google Scholar
Haykin, S. (Ed.). (2009). Neural Networks and Learning Machines (3rd Edition). New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006). Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 313(5786), 504–507.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127647
Google Scholar
Lawhern, V., Hairston, W. D., McDowell, K., Westerfield, M., & Robbins, K. (2012). Detection and classification of subject-generated artifacts in EEG signals using autoregressive models. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 208(2), 181–189.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.05.017
Google Scholar
Li, J., Struzik, Z., Zhang, L., & Cichocki, A. (2015). Feature learning from incomplete EEG with denoising autoencoder. Neurocomputing, 165, 23–31.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.08.092
Google Scholar
MacQueen, J. B. (1967). Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability – Volume 1: Statistics, 281–297.
Google Scholar
Parvinnia, E., Sabeti, M., Zolghadri Jahromi, M., & Boostani, R. (2014). Classification of EEG Signals using Adaptive Weighted Distance Nearest Neighbor Algorithm. Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 1–6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2013.01.001
Google Scholar
Podgorelec, V. (2012). Analyzing EEG signals with machine learning for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease. Elektronika i Elektrotechnika, 18(8), 61–64.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.18.8.2627
Google Scholar
Provençal, S. C., Bond, S., Rizkallah, E., & El-Baalbaki, G. (2018). Hypnosis for burn wound care pain and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Burns, 44(8), 1870–1881.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.04.017
Google Scholar
Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1, 81–106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116251
Google Scholar
Real, R. G. L., & Kübler, A. (2014). Auditory oddball paradigm during hypnosis. Institute of Psychology, University of Würzburg.
Google Scholar
Sanei, S., & Chambers, J. A. (Eds.). (2007). EEG Signal processing. Great Britain, Chippenham, John Wiley & Sons.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470511923
Google Scholar
Satapathy, S. K., Jagadev, A. K., & Dehuri, S. (2017). Weighted majority voting based ensemble of classifiers using different machine learning techniques for classification of EEG signal to detect epileptic seizure. Informatica, 41(1), 99–110.
Google Scholar
Sun, L., Jin, B., Yang, B., Tong, J., Liu, C., & Xiong, H. (2019). Unsupervised EEG Feature Extraction Based on Echo State Network. Information Sciences, 475, 1–17.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.09.057
Google Scholar
Terhune, D. B., Cleeremans, A., Raz, A., & Lynn, S. J. (2017). Hypnosis and top-down regulation of consciousness. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 81(A), 59–74.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.002
Google Scholar
Thilakvathi, B., Shenbaga, Devi, S., Bhanu, K., & Malaippan, M. (2017). EEG signal complexity analysis for schizophrenia during rest and mental activity. Biomedical Research, 28(1): 1–9.
Google Scholar
Wood, C., & Bioy, A. (2008). Hypnosis and Pain in Children. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 35(4), 437–446.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.009
Google Scholar
Authors
Amina ALYAMANIamina.alyamani@yahoo.com
Omar Al-Mukhtar University, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Computer Science, West Shiha, Dernah Libya
Authors
Oleh YASNIY* Ternopil Ivan Pul’uj National Technical University, Faculty of Computer Information Systems and Software Engineering, Department of Mathematical Methods in Engineering, Ruska 56, 46001, Ternopil Ukraine
Statistics
Abstract views: 244PDF downloads: 30
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Applied Computer Science are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Nataliya SHABLIY, Serhii LUPENKO, Nadiia LUTSYK, Oleh YASNIY, Olha MALYSHEVSKA, KEYSTROKE DYNAMICS ANALYSIS USING MACHINE LEARNING METHODS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 4 (2021)
Similar Articles
- Jarosław ZUBRZYCKI, Antoni ŚWIĆ, Łukasz SOBASZEK, Juraj KOVAC, Ruzena KRALIKOVA, Robert JENCIK, Natalia SMIDOVA, Polyxeni ARAPI, Peter DULENCIN, Jozef HOMZA, CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGIES AS A KEY FACTOR IN THE PROCESS OF INDUSTRY 4.0 AND SMART MANUFACTURING DEVELOPMENT , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 4 (2021)
- Saleh ALBAHLI, A DEEP ENSEMBLE LEARNING METHOD FOR EFFORT-AWARE JUST-IN-TIME DEFECT PREDICTION , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 16 No. 3 (2020)
- Eduardo Sánchez-García, Javier Martínez-Falcó, Bartolomé Marco-Lajara, Jolanta Słoniec, ANALYZING THE ROLE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE IN SHAPING MODERN ECONOMIC AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024)
- Michał TOMCZYK, Anna PLICHTA, Mariusz MIKULSKI, APPLICATION OF WAVELET – NEURAL METHOD TO DETECT BACKLASH ZONE IN ELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS GENERATING NOISES , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 15 No. 4 (2019)
- Elizabeth Perez, Juan A. Araiza, Dreysy Pozos, Edmundo Bonilla, Jose C. Hernandez, Jesus A. Cortes, APPLICATION FOR FUNCTIONALITY AND REGISTRATION IN THE CLOUD OF A MICROCONTROLLER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR IOT IN AWS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021)
- Mazen GHAREB, Hawraman KARIM, Shvan SALIH, Hiwa HASSAN, SOCIAL MEDIA AND SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS: A CASE STUDY IN KURDISTAN SOCIETY , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 14 No. 3 (2018)
- Wojciech DANILCZUK, THE USE OF SIMULATION ENVIRONMENT FOR SOLVING THE ASSEMBLY LINE BALANCING PROBLEM , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 14 No. 1 (2018)
- Jarosław WIKAREK, Paweł SITEK, Mieczysław JAGODZIŃSKI, A DECLARATIVE APPROACH TO SHOP ORDERS OPTIMIZATION , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 15 No. 4 (2019)
- Marcin Badurowicz, Sebastian Łagowski, USAGE OF IOT EDGE APPROACH FOR ROAD QUALITY ANALYSIS , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 19 No. 1 (2023)
- Przemysław KRAKOWSKI, Józef JONAK, Robert KARPIŃSKI, Łukasz JAWORSKI, USEFULNESS OF RAPID PROTOTYPING IN PLANNING COMPLEX TRAUMA SURGERIES , Applied Computer Science: Vol. 15 No. 3 (2019)
<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >>
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.