„Seal in the building” – the integration element
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 16 No. 1 (2017)
-
Synergy in non-ideal „ideal city” – the attempts to integrate Zamość
Jan Wrana5-17
-
Synergy as a criterion for evaluation of projects revitalization of city centers
Adam Derlatka019-028
-
Recovering visual contacts in the historic cityscape
Yuliia Frolova29-35
-
The use of public utility facility entered into the register of monuments to fulfill the contemporary occupancy function
Mieczysław Brzozowski, Katarzyna Święcicka-Brzozowska037-058
-
Variable theater space and synergy
Piotr Obracaj059-068
-
Sacrum versus Synergy
Jurij Kryworuczko, Bogusław Podhalański069-080
-
„Seal in the building” – the integration element
Piotr Gleń, Bartosz Szostak081-088
-
Transformation of old-town’s districts after 1989/1990 in Poland and Germany
Piotr Fiuk099-108
-
Śródka District in Poznan – physical and mental borders within the city
Teresa Bardzińska-Bonenberg089-098
-
Synergy of contemporary architecture and materials science
Petro Rychkov, Nataliya Lushnikova109-118
-
From the ground floor of the city
Wacław Seruga119-138
-
Light in architecture and urban planning – the underestimated element bonding the city
Małgorzata Bartnicka139-152
-
Space Syntax in communication structure of Lublin’s district – Kośminek
Wojciech Kocki, Bartłomiej Kwiatkowski153-164
-
City as a human-friendly organism
Aleksandra Prokopska, Anna Martyka165-174
-
The importance of the space in the process of merging the city
Aleksandra Hereć, Michał Pieczka, Olga Skoczylas175-182
-
On the synergy of urban plan
Zbigniew Zuziak183-198
-
Synergy in architectural design and urban planning
Krzysztof Lenartowicz199-212
-
Synergy in economics, as an element of urban creation in China
Dariusz Gaweł213-222
-
Synergistic completeness of contemporary villa architecture in urban space
Monika Gała-Walczowska223-232
-
Synergy in the seaside resort architecture – Sopot case study
Krystyna Pokrzywnicka233-244
Archives
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2020-04-23 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2020-01-24 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2019-11-20 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2019-09-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2019-10-10 15
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2019-10-10 21
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2019-10-14 14
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2019-10-14 15
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2019-10-14 12
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2019-10-15 20
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2019-10-17 19
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2019-10-15 13
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2019-10-16 14
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2019-10-09 28
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2020-04-07 19
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2020-04-15 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2020-04-20 15
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2020-04-25 14
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Following article relates to issue of ‘synergy in architecture’ and it brings up problematic aspect of urban area, namely the urban infill. Urban infill is no doubt bonding element in narrow downtown’s development. Architects while projecting buildings in such localizations they have to face characteristic issues that is space limitations. Another problem is referring new designed building to existing spatial context in historical. At the end construction solution applied during connecting new building to existing ones is a problem that needs to be tackled on. Text talks about urban infill as a positive part of a building completing frontage in a city. It introduces urban infill as a synergistic element which means added, increasing value of a place where it is built. Through the positive aspects of urban infill’s examples there are effects shown which can be elected by this architectural form. In downtowns development necessity of filling ‘gaps’ in frontage is something effortless and common. It is important to mold this type of building in the correct way. Both choosing correct form and function might be crucial. Article in its predominant part is based on examples of this type of objects in limits of Lublin city. In a past few years there have been lots of new buildings arisen to infill downtowns development. Comparing this objects and analysis of its form and function is a base to worded conclusions.
Keywords:
References
[2] Kapela M. Problemy konstrukcyjne wykonywania budynków „plombowych”. Rozbiórki i wyburzenia budynków w zabudowie pierzowej. Budownictwo na obszarach zurbanizowanych nauka, praktyka, perspektywy (2014) 17-26.
[3] Runkiewicz L. Wzamcnianie i zabezpieczanie istniejących obiektów w sąsiedztwie realizowanych budynków plombowych. Przegląd Budowlany 4 (2008) 28-38.
[4] Puła O., Puła W. Realizacja nowych obiektów usytuowanych w zwartej zabudowie miejskiej i ich wpływ na otoczenie - Construction of new buildings in vicinity of old structures and their impact on the surrounding, Wiadomości Konserwatorskie – Conservation News 26 (2009) 492-498.
[5] Baryska H. Wybrane metody i zalecenia dotyczące poprawy wizualnej plomb w krajobrazie śródmiejskim. Problemy Rozwoju Miast 3 (2010) 22-31.
[6] Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, Warszawa, dnia 18 września 2015r., Obwieszczenie Ministra Infrastruktury i Rozwoju z dnia 17 lipca 2015 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu rozporządzenia ministra infrastruktury w sprawie warunków technicznych, jakim powinny odpowiadać budynki i ich usytuowanie.
[7] Nadolny A. Zabudowa uzupełniająca jako element kompozycji miejskiego środowiska zamieszkania w planach urbanistycznych Poznania w drugiej połowie XX wieku. Czasopismo Techniczne – Architektura 3-A (2010) 91-98.
[8] Wrana J. Rola i znaczenie architektury w procesie scalania struktury przestrzennej miasta na przykładzie Lublina (2014) 39-40.
Article Details
Abstract views: 281
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
