Dimensions of Ecological Discourse – Overview of Problems and Selected Literature
Lech W. Zacher
Centrum Badań Ewaluacyjnych i Prognostycznych, Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego, ul. Jagiellońska 59, 03-301 Warszawa (Poland)
Abstract
In the last few decades the ecological (environmental or sustainability) discourse has been advanced and intensified. This discourse takes its place predominantly in highly developed countries and also in forums of international organizations and institutions (e.g. UN, Greenpeace, alter-globalist movements). There is more and more dimensions of research and discussions. New ideas, concepts, theoretical approaches, methodologies, also practical innovations and procedures are emerging. The discourse is to a growing extent multi- and interdisciplinary, not excluding however other perspectives like e.g. technological, economic, political, managerial, ethical. Important areas of studies and debates are such as government policies, business strategies, behavior of citizens, not to mention the global dimension of the problematique.
Keywords:
sustainability, global environmental change, eco-innovation, political ecology, earth system governanceReferences
ADGER W. N. et. al. (red.)., Adapting to Climate Change. Thresholds Values, Governance, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 2009.
Google Scholar
AYRES R. V., SIMONIS V. E., Industrial Metabolism – Restructuring for Sustainable Development, UNU Press, Tokyo 1994.
Google Scholar
BECK V. (red.) et al., Reflexive Modernization. Politics, Tradition and Aestethics in the Modern Social Order, CA, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto 1994.
Google Scholar
BERG VAN DEN J. C. J. M., BRUINSMA F. R. (red.), Managing the Transition to Renewable Energy. Theory and Practice from Local, Regional and Macro Perspectives, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northhamp-ton 2008.
Google Scholar
BROWN L. R., Building a Sustainable Society, Norton, New York, London 1981.
Google Scholar
BROWN L. R., Gospodarka ekologiczna na miarę Ziemi, KiW, Warszawa 2003.
Google Scholar
BROWN L. R., Plan 2.0: Rescuing a Planet under Stress and a Civilization in Trouble, Norton, New York, London 2006.
Google Scholar
BROWN L. R., Plan 3.0: Mobilizing to Save Civilization, Norton, New York, London 2008.
Google Scholar
BULLIETT R. W., Hunters, Herders, and Hamburgers: The Past and Future of Human-Animal Relationship, Columbia University Press, New York 2005.
Google Scholar
CAROLAN M., 2008, Democratizing Knowledge. Sustainable and Conventional Agricultural Field Days as Divergent Democratic Forms, in: Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 33 no 4, s. 508-528.
Google Scholar
CATO SCOTT M., Green Economics – An Introduction to Theory, Policy and Practice, VA, Earthscan London, Sterling 2009.
Google Scholar
Colorado Conference, http://cc2011.earthsystemgovernance.org (1.07.2010).
Google Scholar
COGOY M., K. W. STEININGER (red.), The Economics of Global Environmental Change. International Cooperation for Sustainability, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton 2007.
Google Scholar
DRYZEK J. et al., 2009, Promethean Elites Encounter Precautionary Publics. The Case of GM Foods, in: Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 34 no 3, s. 263-288.
Google Scholar
EDWARDS A. R., The Sustainability Revolution. Portrait of a paradigm shift, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island 2009.
Google Scholar
EKINS P., T. VOITURIEZ (red.), Trade, Globalization and Sustainability Impact Assessment, Earthscan, London, Sterling 2009.
Google Scholar
ENDRES A., 2004, Game theory and global environmental policy, in: Poiesis & Praxis, vol. 3 no 1-2, s. 123-139.
Google Scholar
EPSTEIN M. J., Making Sustainability Work: Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental and Economic Impacts, Berett-Koehler, S. Francisco 2008.
Google Scholar
ESTES J., Smart Green: How to Implement Sustainable Business Practices in Any Industry – and Make Money, Wiley, Hoboken 2009.
Google Scholar
ELLIS R. WATERTON C., 2004, Environmental citizenship in the making: the participation of volunteer naturalists in UK biological recording and biodiversity policy, in: Science and Public Policy, vol. 31 no 2, s. 95-101.
Google Scholar
EVANS J. H., Playing God? Human Genetic Engineering and the Rationalization of Public Bioethical Debate, Chicago University Press, Chicago, London 2002.
Google Scholar
FEILER K. (red.), Sustainability Creates New Prosperity, Peter Lang, Frankfurt, Wien 2004.
Google Scholar
FRICKEL S., D. J. DAVIDSON, 2004, Building Environmental States. Legitimacy and Rationalization in Sustainability Governance, in: International Sociology, vol. 19 no 1, s. 89-101.
Google Scholar
GLASSON J., R. THERIVEL, A. CHADWICK, Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, Natural and Built Environment Series, Routledge, London, New York 2005.
Google Scholar
GUY S., SHOVE E., A Sociology of Energy, Buildings and the Environment. Constructing Knowledge, Designing Practice, Routledge, London, New York 2000.
Google Scholar
HAWKEN P. A. LOVINS, L. HUNTER LOVINS, Natural Capitalism. Creating the Next Industrial Revolution, Little, Brown and Co, New York, Boston, London 2000.
Google Scholar
HEDGECOE A., 2010, Bioethics and the Reinforcement of Social-technical Expectations, in: Social Studies of Science, vol. 40 no 2, s. 163-186.
Google Scholar
HILTY L. M. et al. (red.), Information Systems for Sustainable Development, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, Singapore 2005.
Google Scholar
HOLLAND S. et al. (red.), The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics on Public Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge 2001.
Google Scholar
HOLMES K. J. et al., 2009, Regulatory Models and the Environment. Practice, Pitfalls, and Prospects, in: Risk Analysis, vol. 29 no 2, s. 159-162.
Google Scholar
HORST M., 2007, Public Expectations of Gene Therapy: Scientific Futures and Their Performative Effects on Scientific Citizenship, in: Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 32 no 2, s. 150-171.
Google Scholar
HUBBARD R., The Politics of Women’s Biology, Rutgers Univ. Pr., New Brunswick 1992.
Google Scholar
IRWIN A., Citizen Science. A study of people, expertise and sustainable development, Routledge, London 1995.
Google Scholar
JAMISON A., 2001, Science, Technology and the Quest for Sustainable Development, in: Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, vol. 13 no 1, s. 9-22.
Google Scholar
JAMISON A., P. ØSTBY (red.), Public Participation and Sustainable Development. Comparing European Experiences, in: Pesto Papers 1, Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Aalborg 1997.
Google Scholar
JÄNICKE M., Megatrend-Umweltinnovation. Zur ökologischen Modernisirung von Wirt-schaft und Staat, Oekom-Verlag, Münche2008.
Google Scholar
JONES N. et al., 2009, The Influence of Social Capital on Willingness to Pay for the Environment Among European Citizens, in: European Societies, vol. 11 no 4, s. 511-530.
Google Scholar
KIM T.-S., 2008, Chemical Sunset. Technological Inflexibility and Designing an Intelligent Precautionary „Polluter Pays” Principle, in: Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 33 no 4, s. 459-479.
Google Scholar
LADLE R. J., GILLSON L., 2009, The (im)balance of nature: a public perception time-lag?, in: Public Understanding of Science, vol. 18 no 2, s. 229-242.
Google Scholar
LAFFERTY W. M. (red.), Governance for Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2004.
Google Scholar
LASZLO CH., Sustainable Value: How the World’s Leading Companies Are Doing Well by Doing Good, Stanford Business Books, Stanford 2008.
Google Scholar
LATOUR B., Polityka natury.Nauki wkraczają do demokracji, WKP, Warszawa 2009.
Google Scholar
LAWRENCE D. P., Environmental Impact Assessment: Practical Solutions to Recurrent Problems, Wiley, Hoboken 2003.
Google Scholar
LEVY D. L., NEWELL P. J. (red.), The Business of Global Environmental Governance, MIT Press, Cambridge 2005.
Google Scholar
LINDSKOG R., 2008, Scientised citizens and democratised science. Re-assesing the expert – lay divide, in: Journal of Risk Research, vol. 11 no 1-2, s. 63-76.
Google Scholar
LINDSKOG R., SUNDQVIST G., 2004, From consensus to credibility. New challenges for policy-relevant science, in: Innovation, vol. 17 no 3, s. 205-226.
Google Scholar
MACNAGHTEN P., URRY J., Alternatywne przyrody. Nowe myślenie o przyrodzie i społeczeństwie, Scholar, Warszawa 2005.
Google Scholar
MAKOWER J., Strategies for the Green Economy: Opportunities and Challenges in the New World of Business, McGraw-Hill, New York 2008.
Google Scholar
MALONE E. L., Debating Climate Change. Pathways Through Argument to Agreement, Earthscan, London, Sterling 2009.
Google Scholar
MOL A. P. J., SPAARGAREN G. (red.), The Ecological Modernisation: Environmental Re-form in Theory and Practice, Routledge, London, New York 2009.
Google Scholar
MORDINI E., 2005, Biowarfare as a biopolitical icon, in: Poiesis & Praxis, vol. 3 no 4, s. 242-255.
Google Scholar
MURPHY J. (red.), Governing Technology for Sustainability, Earthscan, London 2007.
Google Scholar
NIU H., Benefits, Risks and Trust in Human Biobanks, in: Yearbook 2008 of the Institute for Advanced Studies on Science, Technology and Society, red. Bammé A. et al., Profil, München-Wien 2009.
Google Scholar
O’RIORDAN T., Globalism, Localism & Identity, Earthscan, London 2001.
Google Scholar
PATTBERG PH. H., Private Institutions and Global Governance. The New Politics of Environmental Sustainability, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2007.
Google Scholar
PAWŁOWSKI A., 2006, Wielowymiarowość rozwoju zrównoważonego, w: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 1 no 1, s. 23-32.
Google Scholar
PAWŁOWSKI L., 2010, Czy rozwój współczesnego świata jest zrównoważony?, w: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 5 no 2, s. 9-12.
Google Scholar
PICOLOTTI R., J. D. TAILLANT (red.), Linking Human Rights and Environment, University of Arizona Press, Tucson 2003.
Google Scholar
POSKROBKO B., 2010, Wpływ trendów cywilizacyjnych na realizację trwałego rozwoju, w: Przyszłość. Świat - Europa - Polska, vol. 1 no 21.
Google Scholar
POSKROBKO B. (red.), Zrównoważony rozwój gospodarki opartej na wiedzy, WSE, Białystok 2009.
Google Scholar
PRETTY J. et al. (red.), The Sage Handbook of Environment and Society, SAGE, Los Angeles, Singapore 2007.
Google Scholar
RAINEY D. L., Sustainable Business Development: Inventing the Future Through Strategy, Innovation, and Leadership, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2006.
Google Scholar
RENN O., Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World, Earthscan, London 2008.
Google Scholar
ROTHSTEIN H., 2007, Talking Shops or Talking Turkey? Institutionalizing Consumer Representation in Risk Regulation, in: Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 32 no 5, s. 582-607.
Google Scholar
SACHS J., Nasze wspólne bogactwo, PWN, Warszawa 2009.
Google Scholar
SALTER B., CH. SALTER, 2007, Bioethics and the Global Moral Economy. The Cultural Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science, in: Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 32 no 5, s. 554-581.
Google Scholar
SHAPIRO A. L., Control Revolution. How the Internet Is Putting Individuals in Charge and Changing the World We Know, Century Foundation, New York 1999.
Google Scholar
SVENDSEN M. N., L. KOCH, 2008, Unpacking the „Spare Embryo”: Facilitating Stem Cell Research in a Moral Landscape, in: Social Studies of Science, vol. 38 no 1, s. 21-45.
Google Scholar
SZTUMSKI W., 2009, Mitologia rozwoju zrównoważonego, w: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 4 no 2, s. 13-23.
Google Scholar
TIMMONS ROBERTS J., PARKS B. C., A Climate of Injustice. Global Inequality, North-South Politics, and Climate Policy, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA-London 2007.
Google Scholar
TOFFLER A. I H., Rewolucyjne bogactwo, Kurpisz, Przeźmierowo 2007.
Google Scholar
TUKKER A. et al. (red.), System innovation for sustainability. Perspectives on Radical Changes to Sustainable Consumption and Production, Greenleaf, Sheffield 2008.
Google Scholar
WEBER E. P., Bringing Society Back In: Grassroots Ecosystem Management Accountability, and Sustainable Communities, MIT Press, Cambridge 2003.
Google Scholar
WEBER M., J. HEMMELSKAMP (red.), Towards Environmental Innovation Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 2005.
Google Scholar
WERBACH A., Strategy for Sustainability: A Business Manifesto, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge 2009.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., (red.), Racjonalność myślenia, decydowania i działania (Problemy stare i nowe), WSPiZ, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., 2004, Rozwój zrównoważony i trwały jako wyzwanie dla biznesu, w: Problemy Ekologii, no 4.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., Rozwój samopodtrzymujący się – orientacje racjonalnościowe, w: Zrównoważony rozwój – od utopii do praw człowieka, red. Papuziński A., Branta, Bydgoszcz 2005a.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., 2005b, Wdrażanie koncepcji zrównoważonego i trwałego rozwoju, w: Master of Business Administration, no 5.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., Bezpieczeństwo ekologiczne i społeczne, w: Europa – kontynent ryzyka?, red. Bożek M., Troszyński M., AON, Warszawa 2007a.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., 2008a, On Crises and Sustainability – Toward Crisisology, in: Transformacje, Special Issue 2005-2007, s. 141-156.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., 2008b, Trwały rozwój – utopia czy realna możliwość?, w: Problemy Ekorozwoju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 3 no 2, s. 63-68.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., Modele, strategie, uwarunkowania i konteksty trwałego rozwoju, w: Zrównoważony rozwój gospodarki opartej na wiedzy, red. Poskrobko B., WSE, Białystok 2009a.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., Gry o przyszłość – wielopodmiotowe i generacyjne, w: Wyzwania ekonomiczne w warunkach kryzysu, red. Lichniak I.. SGH, Warszawa 2009b.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., Biowładza i biopolityka (refleksje, przykłady, predykcje), w: Wiedza – władza, red. Szymczyk J., KUL, Lublin 2009c.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., Bariery racjonalności w decyzjach (refleksje o kontekstach decydowania), w: Człowiek i jego decyzje, red. Kłosiński K. A., Biela A., t. 1, KUL, Lublin 2009d.
Google Scholar
ZACHER L. W., Przyszłość jako obszar zderzenia wiedzy, wyobraźni i interesów, w: Granice poznania przyszłości, red. Zalewska D., Uniwersytet Wrocławski, Wrocław 2009e.
Google Scholar
ZIMMERER K. S., TH. J. BASSET (red.), Political Ecology. An integrative approach to geography and environment-development stu-dies, Gilford Press, New York, London 2003.
Google Scholar
Authors
Lech W. ZacherCentrum Badań Ewaluacyjnych i Prognostycznych, Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego, ul. Jagiellońska 59, 03-301 Warszawa Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 12PDF downloads: 3
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.