The model as a medium for expressing the third dimension in the work of a landscape architect
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 21 (2025)
-
Museums of medicine in Europe - architecture, history, identity
Rafał Strojny7-24
-
The model as a medium for expressing the third dimension in the work of a landscape architect
Patryk Czerwiński, Justyna Kadlec25-34
-
Changes in rural farmstead layouts in the Knyszyn Forest area
Joanna Orłowska-Rogalska, Marta Baum35-41
-
Perception of diversity in urban culture: examining interior architecture students’ views on campus accessibility
Sariye Selhan Yalçın Usal, A. Nilay Evcil42-50
-
Assessment of the technical condition of a historic building using photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning: the case of the Juliusz Osterwa Theatre in Lublin
Michał Wac, Weronika Kendzierawska-Foryś51-63
-
Direct perception and algorithmic data processing: a comparative study of creative processes in an artistic project at the Kłodzko Fortress
Aleksandra Sztorc, Aleksandra Typek64-73
-
Superhospital as a form of centralised medical care – a cure for contemporary problems in the healthcare sector or a utopian dream?
Rafał Strojny74-85
-
Between integration and expression: BIPV façades in Basel – a comparative study
Magdalena Muszyńska-Łanowy86-97
-
Greenery in a modernist area
Patrycja Zawiska98-104
-
Julian Zakharevich’s bookcase: between design and implementation
Nadiia Datsko105-116
-
Ways of implementing green spaces in urban areas based on selected market revitalization projects in Greater Poland
Karol Tomczak117-127
-
Architectural solutions for contemporary aesthetic medicine clinics – a case study
Rafał Strojny, Aleskandra Murawska128-139
-
Architectural solutions for contemporary dental clinics based on scientific research – a case study
Rafał Strojny, Wiktoria Błasiak140-155
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2024-12-27 7
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2024-12-27 7
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2024-12-27 8
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2023-12-29 11
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2023-12-19 13
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-12-27 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-12-27 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-12-27 4
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2021-12-30 11
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2021-12-30 9
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2021-12-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2021-12-30 8
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
The model is one of the tools employed in the work of a landscape architect, enabling a three-dimensional representation of design assumptions. This article analyzes the role of the model as a means of expressing the third dimension, considering its application in design processes, educational contexts, and communication. Based on the conducted studies, it has been demonstrated that transforming flat 2D plans into a 3D spatial representation of a section of an urban residential area facilitates the intuitive understanding of the design by both professionals and laypersons. Particularly valuable is the ability to explore the model haptically, which intensifies the audience’s emotional engagement and enhances their spatial perception. The process of constructing the model requires landscape architects to perform a detailed analysis of the site and to make deliberate design decisions, representing an active form of learning and iterative refinement of solutions. In the context of landscape architecture education, the model enables the visualization and critical evaluation of spatial scenarios, surpassing traditional drawings and digital 3D models in terms of the capacity for physically testing design concepts. Despite its significant advantages, such as affordability and relatively low production costs, constructing a model presents challenges. These include the time-consuming nature of the process, difficulties in accurately representing scaled details, and logistical limitations. Furthermore, the static nature of the model precludes dynamic modifications to the design, and photographic documentation of models does not match the aesthetic quality of digital 3D visualizations. The research findings confirm that the model serves as an effective communication platform between the designer and stakeholders, facilitating an understanding of the spatial context and the integration of artistic vision, scientific analysis, and design practice. The conclusions emphasize the value of models as tools that support multidimensional spatial thinking, making them an indispensable element in the landscape architect’s toolkit.
Keywords:
References
Barełkowska K. Modele architektoniczne a rozumienie struktury przestrzennej budowli historycznych i współczesnych. Przestrzeń i Forma. 2011;16:187−194.
Dupont L, Guidat C, Morel L, Skiba N. The role of mock-ups in the anticipation of the user experience within a living lab: An empirical study. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation / International Technology Management Conference (ICE/ITMC). 2015:1−8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2015.7438669.
Elser O. Makieta w XX wieku [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2025 Feb 5]. Available from: https://architektura.muratorplus.pl/krytyka/makieta-w-xx-wieku-aa-TAxa-52UX-2xkN.html.
Fernberg P, Chamberlain B. Artificial intelligence in landscape architecture: A literature review. Landscape Journal. 2023;42(1):13−35. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.42.1.13.
Głaz J. Debata potrzebna od zaraz. Zawód: Architekt. 2022;(88):46−51.
Gulczyńska A. „Małe rewitalizacje podwórek”. Przykład zastosowania społeczno-pedagogicznej tradycji ożywiania społeczności lokalnych ich siłami w procesach rewitalizacji miast. Praca Socjalna. 2022;37:157−181. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.9036.
Ha J, Alrayyan K, Alam MML. Virtual reality technology for learning detailed design in landscape architecture. Discover Education. 2024;3(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00123-9.
Iwuanyanwu O, Gil-Ozoudeh I, Okwandu AC, Ike CS. Cultural and social dimensions of green architecture: Designing for sustainability and community well-being. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. 2024;6(8):1951−1968. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i8.1477.
Janusz J. Komunikowanie projektu architektonicznego poprzez makietę w rozszerzonej rzeczywistości. Architecturae et Artibus. 2016;8(3):33−42.
Juchacz O, Czerwiński P, Wilkaniec A. Pozawzrokowe postrzeganie krajobrazu przez zróżnicowane grupy użytkowników na przykładzie Bydgoszczy. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna. 2023;(64):117−133. https://doi.org/10.14746/rrpr.2023.64.08.
Lorens P, Martyniuk-Pęczek J. Wprowadzenie do projektowania urbanistycznego. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Akapit-DTP; 2014.
Paszkowski Z. Historia idei miasta: Od Antyku do Renesansu. Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Hogben; 2015.
Raszeja E, Szczepańska M, Gałecka-Drozda A, de Mezer E, Wilkaniec A. Ochrona i kształtowanie krajobrazu kulturowego w zintegrowanym planowaniu rozwoju. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Bogucki; 2020.
Słodczyk J. Historia planowania i budowy miast. Opole: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Opolskiego; 2012.
Swarabowicz R. Przestrzeń zewnętrzna jako tworzywo architektury. Rozprawa doktorska. Gdańsk: Politechnika Gdańska; 2004.
Szczepanowska HB. Miejsce terenów zieleni w strukturze zintegrowanego projektowania, zarządzania i oceny ekologicznej inwestycji miejskich. Człowiek i Środowisko. 2012;36(1−2):25−49.
Urbanik A. Quo vadis?: O partycypacyjnej diagnozie lokalnej. Warszawa: Instytut Socjologii Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego; 2011.
Wolski P. Nauczanie architektów krajobrazu w Polsce. Czasopismo Techniczne. Architektura. 2007;104(5−A):26−30.
Żołnierczuk M. Wizualizacje jako wszechstronne, krajobrazu narzędzie służące ekonomii, edukacji, ochronie i kreowaniu przestrzeni. Prace Komisji Krajobrazu Kulturowego. 2016;(32):125−139.
Article Details
Abstract views: 3

