Perception of diversity in urban culture: examining interior architecture students’ views on campus accessibility
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 21 (2025)
-
Museums of medicine in Europe - architecture, history, identity
Rafał Strojny7-24
-
The model as a medium for expressing the third dimension in the work of a landscape architect
Patryk Czerwiński, Justyna Kadlec25-34
-
Changes in rural farmstead layouts in the Knyszyn Forest area
Joanna Orłowska-Rogalska, Marta Baum35-41
-
Perception of diversity in urban culture: examining interior architecture students’ views on campus accessibility
Sariye Selhan Yalçın Usal, A. Nilay Evcil42-50
-
Assessment of the technical condition of a historic building using photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning: the case of the Juliusz Osterwa Theatre in Lublin
Michał Wac, Weronika Kendzierawska-Foryś51-63
-
Direct perception and algorithmic data processing: a comparative study of creative processes in an artistic project at the Kłodzko Fortress
Aleksandra Sztorc, Aleksandra Typek64-73
-
Superhospital as a form of centralised medical care – a cure for contemporary problems in the healthcare sector or a utopian dream?
Rafał Strojny74-85
-
Between integration and expression: BIPV façades in Basel – a comparative study
Magdalena Muszyńska-Łanowy86-97
-
Greenery in a modernist area
Patrycja Zawiska98-104
-
Julian Zakharevich’s bookcase: between design and implementation
Nadiia Datsko105-116
-
Ways of implementing green spaces in urban areas based on selected market revitalization projects in Greater Poland
Karol Tomczak117-127
-
Architectural solutions for contemporary aesthetic medicine clinics – a case study
Rafał Strojny, Aleskandra Murawska128-139
-
Architectural solutions for contemporary dental clinics based on scientific research – a case study
Rafał Strojny, Wiktoria Błasiak140-155
Archives
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2024-12-27 7
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2024-12-27 7
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2024-12-27 8
-
Vol. 19 No. 2
2023-12-29 11
-
Vol. 19 No. 1
2023-12-19 13
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-12-27 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-12-27 5
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-12-27 4
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2021-12-30 11
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2021-12-30 9
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2021-12-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2021-12-30 8
Main Article Content
Authors
Abstract
Understanding diversity-related needs and developing the capacity to create inclusive designs are among the goals of Interior Architecture education. This study investigates how Interior Architecture students perceive accessibility in buildings, open areas and premises on and off campus in their daily lives and how interior design education affects their perceptions of accessibility. A 5-point Likert-type scale survey was administered to Interior Architecture students, both those who had taken and those who had not taken an accessibility and universal design course. Factor analysis and t-test were used to evaluate the survey results. It was observed that the students’ perceptions of accessibility were largely guided by the spatial requirements of people with physical disabilities and visual impairments. Moreover, there was no difference in accessibility perception based on whether the students had or had not taken an accessibility course. From the results of the study, it can be recommended that design, interior architecture and architecture curricula should include universal design content with empathetic practices that focus on diversity in urban culture.
Keywords:
References
Ertas S, Tas A. Studio courses (project design) of interior architecture education: analysis of sustainable culture tourism: sample of Sille. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;182:289−294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.768.
Webber SB. Emotional intelligence in the interior design context. Journal of Interior Design. 2017;42(4):29−44. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12103
Evcil AN. Türkiye’de mimarlık eğitiminde herkes için tasarım (Design for all in the architecture education in Turkey). Mimar.ist. 2012;45:108−111 [cited 2020 Mar 19]. Retrieved from http://www.mimarist.org/mimar-ist-sayi-45-guz-2012/.
Usal YS, Evcil AN. How do we perceive the concept of ‘difference’ in universal design? Example of interior architecture students. In: Yılmaz P, ed. 1st International Symposium Education in Interior Architecture in the Year of German-Turkish Research, Education and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing; 2016:64−75.
Altay B, Demirkan H. Inclusive design: developing students’ knowledge and attitude through empathic modelling. International Journal of Inclusive Education. 2014;18(2):196−217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.764933
Gleń P, Riekste A. Theory and practice in teaching universal design. Teka Komisji Architektury, Urbanistyki i Studiów Krajobrazowych. 2023;19(1):87−96. https://doi.org/10.35784/teka.3600
Null R. Commentary on universal design. Housing and Society. 2003;30(2):109−118. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2003.11430487
Li F, Zhang Z, Xu L, Yin J. The effects of professional design training on urban public space perception: a virtual reality study with physiological and psychological measurements. Cities. 2025;158:105654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105654
Mace RL, Hardie GJ, Place JP. Accessible environments: towards universal design. Raleigh (NC): Center for Accessible Housing, North Carolina State University; 1996.
Story MF. Maximizing usability: the principles of universal design. Assistive Technology. 1998;10:4−12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.1998.10131955
Demirkan H. Mekânlarda erişilebilirlik, kullanılabilirlik i yaşanabilirlik (Accessibility, usability and liveability in spaces). In: Demirkan H, ed. Dosya 36: Mekânlarda Erişilebilirlik, Kullanılabilirlik i Yaşanabilirlik. Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası; 2015:1−5.
Tromp N, Hekkert P, Verbeek PP. Design for socially responsible behaviour: a classification of influence based on intended user experience [cited 2020 Jan 03]. Design Issues. 2011;27(3):3−19. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41261940.
Imrie R, Luck R. Designing inclusive environments: rehabilitating the body and the relevance of universal design. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2014;36(16):1315−1319. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.936191.
Wijk M. The Dutch struggle for accessibility awareness. In: Preiser WFE, Ostroff E, eds. Universal Design Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001:28.1−28.17.
Rimmer J, Riley B, Wang E, Rauworth A, Jurkowski J. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004;26(5):419−425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.02.002.
Simonson S, Glick S, Nobe MEC. Accessibility at a public university: students’ perceptions. Journal of Facilities Management. 2013;11(3):198−209. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-06-2012-0025.
Kuran E. Z bir kuşağı anlamak (Z Understanding a Generation). Istanbul: Mundi Kitap, Can Sanat Yayınları; 2019.
Mackintosh L. Just doing it: the role of experiential learning and integrated curricula in architectural education. The International Journal of Pedagogy and Curriculum. 2014;20(3):67−78 [cited 2020 May 31]. Retrieved from https://espace.curtin.edu.au/handle/20.500.11937/13590.
Gomez-Lanier L. The role of empathy in experiential learning: a case of empathy as an interior design learning tool. International Journal of Social Sciences Studies. 2018;6(4):20−29. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v6i4.3054
Büyüköztürk Ş. Faktör analizi: temel kavramlar i ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı (Factor analysis: basic concepts and using to development scale). Kuram i Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi (Educational Administration in Theory and Practice). 2002;37:470−483.
Yaşlıoğlu MM. Sosyal bilimlerde faktör analizi i geçerlilik: keşfedici i doğrulayıcı faktör analizlerinin kullanılması (Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: Application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses). Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business. 2017;46(Special Issue):74−85 [cited 2021 Feb 05]. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/iuisletme.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. Needham Heights (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2001.
Kane JL. The college experience for students with physical disabilities [dissertation]. Buffalo (NY): State University of New York at Buffalo; 2009 [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/305087086? parentSessionId=KBXF8CzyP20nPR8uqIZ4LHKPxoFdz5jmZygbq07MboU%3D.
Gray D, Gould M, Bickenbach J. Environmental barriers and disability. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. 2003;20(1):29−37 [cited 2018 Aug 07]. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43030640.
Hall P, Imrie R. Architectural practices and disabling design in the built environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1998;26:409−425. https://doi.org/10.1068/b260409.
Afacan Y. Teaching universal design: an empirical research in interior architecture. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011;15:3185−3192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.269.
Larkin H, Dell K, Hitch D. Students’ attitudes to universal design in architecture education. Journal of Social Inclusion. 2016;7(2).
Strickfaden M, Devlieger P. Empathy through accumulating techne: designing an accessible metro. The Design Journal. 2011;14(2):207−230. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630611X12984592780041.
Article Details
Abstract views: 7
Sariye Selhan Yalçın Usal, Department of Interior Architecture, Maltepe University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Received her Ph.D in Interior Architecture from Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul in 2005. Currently Professor at Maltepe University. Her research interests include consuming design and space, universal design and also interior design education.
A. Nilay Evcil, Department of Architecture, Istanbul Beykent University, Istanbul, Türkiye
Received her Ph.D degree from Istanbul Technical University Department of City & Regional Planning in 2001. Currently Professor at Istanbul Beykent University. She has extensive research on universal design, housing and quality of life.

