DEVELOPMENT OF AN ONTOLOGY-BASED ADAPTIVE PERSONALIZED E-LEARNING SYSTEM
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 16 No. 4 (2020)
-
GRAPH-BASED FOG COMPUTING NETWORK MODEL
Ihor PYSMENNYI, Anatolii PETRENKO, Roman KYSLYI5-20
-
JOINT EFFECT OF FORECASTING AND LOT-SIZING METHOD ON COST MINIMIZATION OBJECTIVE OF A MANUFACTURER: A CASE STUDY
Jack OLESEN, Carl-Emil Houmøller PEDERSEN, Markus Germann KNUDSEN, Sandra TOFT, Vladimir NEDBAILO, Johan PRISAK, Izabela Ewa NIELSEN, Subrata SAHA21-36
-
ELECTROCARDIOGRAM GENERATION SOFTWARE FOR TESTING OF PARAMETER EXTRACTION ALGORITHMS
Marcin MACIEJEWSKI, Barbara MACIEJEWSKA, Robert KARPIŃSKI, Przemysław KRAKOWSKI37-47
-
ARCHITECTURAL PARADIGM OF THE INTERACTIVE INTERFACE MODULE IN THE CLOUD TECHNOLOGY MODEL
Denis RATOV48-55
-
CLASSIFICATION OF EEG SIGNAL BY METHODS OF MACHINE LEARNING
Amina ALYAMANI, Oleh YASNIY56-63
-
DEVELOPMENT OF AN ONTOLOGY-BASED ADAPTIVE PERSONALIZED E-LEARNING SYSTEM
Olutayo BOYINBODE, Paul OLOTU, Kolawole AKINTOLA64-84
-
COMPUTER VISION BASED ON RASPBERRY PI SYSTEM
Mohanad ABDULHAMID, Otieno ODONDI, Muaayed AL-RAWI85-102
-
ORDER VIOLATION IN MULTITHREADED APPLICATIONS AND ITS DETECTION IN STATIC CODE ANALYSIS PROCESS
Damian GIEBAS, Rafał WOJSZCZYK103-117
Archives
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2022-12-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2022-09-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2022-06-30 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2022-03-30 7
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2021-12-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2021-09-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2021-06-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2021-03-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2020-12-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2020-09-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2020-06-30 8
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2020-03-30 8
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2019-12-30 8
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2019-09-30 8
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2019-06-30 8
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2019-03-30 8
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2018-12-30 8
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2018-09-30 8
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2018-06-30 8
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2018-03-30 7
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
E-learning has fast become an active field of research with a lot of investments towards web-based delivery of personalized learning contents to learners. Some issues of e-learning arise from the heterogeneity and interoperability of learning content adapting to learner's styles and preferences. This has brought about the development of an ontology-based personalized learning system to solve this problem. This research developed an ontology-based personalized e-learning system that presents suitable learning contents to learners based on their learning style, preferences, background knowledge, and personal profile.
Keywords:
References
Abu-Sayf, F.K. (1979). The Scoring of Multiple-choice Tests: A Closer Look. Educational Technology, 19(6), 5–15.
Adewale, O.S. (2006). University Digital libraries: an initiative for teaching, research, and service. Adeyemo Publishing House.
Agbonifo, O., & Obolo, O. (2018). Genetic Algorithm-based Curriculum Sequencing Model for Personalized E-Learning System. I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science, 5, 27–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2018.05.04
Baker, F. (2001). The Basics of Item Response Theory. University of Maryland, College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
Baker, F.B. (1992). Item Response Theory: Parameter estimation techniques. Marcel Dekker.
Beulah, C., Latha, C.B., & Kirubakaran, E. (2013). Personalized Learning Path Delivery in Web based Educational Systems using a Graph Theory based Approach. Computer Science, 55428839.
Boyinbode, O., & Akintade, F. (2015). A Cloud Based Mobile Learning Interface. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of The World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (pp. 353–356). San Francisco, USA.
Boyinbode, O., & Bagula, A. (2012). An Interactive Mobile Learning System for Enhancing Learning in Higher Education. Proceedings of the IADIS International Mobile Learning Conference Berlin (pp. 331–334). Germany.
Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling, and User–Adapted Interaction, 11, 87-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306
Chen, C.M., & Chung, C.J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.011
Chi,Y. (2009). Ontology-based Curriculum Content Sequencing System with Semantic Rules. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7838–7847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.048
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Dag, F., & Gecer, A. (2009). Relations between online learning and learning styles. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 862–871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.155
Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Sage Publications.
Hamzeh, M. (2005). Using Distractors in Correcting for Guessing in Multiple-Choice Tests. Educational Sciences, 32(1), 192–197.
Kurilovas, E., Zilinskiene, I., & Dagiene, V. (2016). Recommending Suitable Learning Paths According to Learners’ Preferences: Experimental Research Results. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 945–951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.027
Uhomoibhi, J.O. (2006). Implementing e-learning in Northern Ireland: prospects and challenges. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 23(1), 4–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740610639697
Yarandi, M., Jahankhani, H., & Tawil., A. (2013). A Personalized Adaptive e-learning approach based on semantic web technology. Computer Science, 6257403.
Article Details
Abstract views: 400
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in Applied Computer Science are open-access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
