DEVELOPMENT OF AN ONTOLOGY-BASED ADAPTIVE PERSONALIZED E-LEARNING SYSTEM

Abu-Sayf, F.K. (1979). The Scoring of Multiple-choice Tests: A Closer Look. Educational Technology, 19(6), 5–15.
  Google Scholar

Adewale, O.S. (2006). University Digital libraries: an initiative for teaching, research, and service. Adeyemo Publishing House.
  Google Scholar

Agbonifo, O., & Obolo, O. (2018). Genetic Algorithm-based Curriculum Sequencing Model for Personalized E-Learning System. I.J. Modern Education and Computer Science, 5, 27–35.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2018.05.04   Google Scholar

Baker, F. (2001). The Basics of Item Response Theory. University of Maryland, College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation.
  Google Scholar

Baker, F.B. (1992). Item Response Theory: Parameter estimation techniques. Marcel Dekker.
  Google Scholar

Beulah, C., Latha, C.B., & Kirubakaran, E. (2013). Personalized Learning Path Delivery in Web based Educational Systems using a Graph Theory based Approach. Computer Science, 55428839.
  Google Scholar

Boyinbode, O., & Akintade, F. (2015). A Cloud Based Mobile Learning Interface. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science: Proceedings of The World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (pp. 353–356). San Francisco, USA.
  Google Scholar

Boyinbode, O., & Bagula, A. (2012). An Interactive Mobile Learning System for Enhancing Learning in Higher Education. Proceedings of the IADIS International Mobile Learning Conference Berlin (pp. 331–334). Germany.
  Google Scholar

Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling, and User–Adapted Interaction, 11, 87-110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306   Google Scholar

Chen, C.M., & Chung, C.J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624–647.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.011   Google Scholar

Chi,Y. (2009). Ontology-based Curriculum Content Sequencing System with Semantic Rules. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4), 7838–7847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.048
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.048   Google Scholar

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  Google Scholar

Dag, F., & Gecer, A. (2009). Relations between online learning and learning styles. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 862–871.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.155   Google Scholar

Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H.J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Sage Publications.
  Google Scholar

Hamzeh, M. (2005). Using Distractors in Correcting for Guessing in Multiple-Choice Tests. Educational Sciences, 32(1), 192–197.
  Google Scholar

Kurilovas, E., Zilinskiene, I., & Dagiene, V. (2016). Recommending Suitable Learning Paths According to Learners’ Preferences: Experimental Research Results. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 945–951.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.027   Google Scholar

Uhomoibhi, J.O. (2006). Implementing e-learning in Northern Ireland: prospects and challenges. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 23(1), 4–14.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740610639697   Google Scholar

Yarandi, M., Jahankhani, H., & Tawil., A. (2013). A Personalized Adaptive e-learning approach based on semantic web technology. Computer Science, 6257403.
  Google Scholar