The analysis of the settlement of the various types of geodetic benchmarks
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 16 No. 3 (2017)
-
Experimental modal analysis in research
Mariusz Żółtowski, Krzysztof Napieraj005-012
-
The evaluation of dynamic of designed truss railway bridge in the light of Eurocodes standards
Radosław Oleszek, Mirosław Wyrzykowski, Krzysztof Grej, Jerzy Bąk013-024
-
Evaluation of degradation of bricks using FRF
Mariusz Żółtowski, Krzysztof Napieraj025-036
-
Innovative buildings and structures as a means of humanization of urban space
Maksim Votinov, Olga Smirnova037-043
-
Importing the basic map to the BIM model
Andrzej Szymon Borkowski045-051
-
Mechanical properties of cement and cement-asphalt matrices with rubber powder
Jerzy Kukiełka053-063
-
Visual symbols of new identity in cities of modern Ukraine during the interwar period
Svitlana Linda, Olga Mychajłyszyn065-076
-
The impact of maintenance on wood column capacity of the XVIIIth to XIXth century of arcaded houses from the Żuławy region
Tomasz Zybała077-094
-
Numerical modelling of hydraulically bonded mixture with rubber admixture due to applied mechanical loadings
Daniel Pietras, Tomasz Sadowski095-102
-
A beam or a slab? Classification of structural members according to the theory of solid mechanics and engineering literature
Marcin Samborski, Marta Słowik103-112
-
Summary of laboratory tests of sandstone for pull-out test analysis
Jakub Gontarz, Jerzy Podgórski, Marek Kalita, Michał Siegmund113-123
-
An analysis of the impact surface roughness of concrete substrate as a factor influencing the bond strength in composite concrete elements
Dominika Franczak-Balmas125-134
-
The analysis of the settlement of the various types of geodetic benchmarks
Łukasz Borowski, Agnieszka Lal, Krzysztof Nepelski135-142
-
Lubelszczyzna rocks in the construction and architecture of the region – glaukonityte
Lucjan Gazda143-154
-
Comparison of different strength characteristics of gravel concrete with variable index w/c
Stanisław Fic, Andrzej Szewczak155-166
Archives
-
Vol. 18 No. 4
2020-04-23 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 3
2020-01-24 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 2
2019-11-20 8
-
Vol. 18 No. 1
2019-09-30 8
-
Vol. 17 No. 4
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 3
2019-10-10 15
-
Vol. 17 No. 2
2019-10-10 16
-
Vol. 17 No. 1
2019-10-10 21
-
Vol. 16 No. 4
2019-10-14 14
-
Vol. 16 No. 3
2019-10-14 15
-
Vol. 16 No. 2
2019-10-14 12
-
Vol. 16 No. 1
2019-10-15 20
-
Vol. 15 No. 4
2019-10-17 19
-
Vol. 15 No. 3
2019-10-15 13
-
Vol. 15 No. 2
2019-10-16 14
-
Vol. 15 No. 1
2019-10-09 28
-
Vol. 14 No. 4
2020-04-07 19
-
Vol. 14 No. 3
2020-04-15 25
-
Vol. 14 No. 2
2020-04-20 15
-
Vol. 14 No. 1
2020-04-25 14
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The paper presents the studies of the possible causes of the excessive settlement of geodetic benchmarks. For the purpose of the study, two types of ground benchmarks (type 75a and b) were selected. The computational analysis was carried out on benchmarks situated in different soil conditions and under two variants of load. The parameters were modified in order to reach the interaction between the subsoil and the structure, which is the closest to the actual conditions. Obtained results were compared with the settlement noted in Kętrzyn district, during heights frame transformation from Kronsztadt’60 to Kronsztadt’86. As a result, possible change of heights of geodetic points between land surveying campaigns (circa 20 years) could be estimated.
Keywords:
References
Rada Ministrów, Rozporządzenie z dnia 15 października 2012 r. w sprawie państwowego systemu odniesień przestrzennych, nr 76. Dz.U. 2012 poz. 1247.
GUGiK, Model różnic wysokości pomiędzy układami wysokościowymi PL-EVRF2007-NH i PL-KRON86-NH. Warszawa, 2015.
Walo J., Analiza wybranych algorytmów wyznaczania lokalnego przebiegu geoidy, Politechnika Warszawska, 2000.
Banasik P., Wyznaczenie przebiegu quasi geoidy w rejonie Krakowa na podstawie pomiarów niwelacyjnych i GPS, Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza w Krakowie, 1999.
Borowski Ł., Zastosowanie sieci ASG-EUPOS do modelowania lokalnej quasi-geoidy, AGH, 2015.
Banasik P., Ligas M., Kudrys J., Skorupa B., i Bujakowski K., Transformacja wysokości z układu Kronasztadt’60 do układu Kronsztadt’86 na przykładzie powiatu krakowskiego, Przegląd Geodezyjny 4 (2012) 6–13.
Mnisterstwo Administracji i Cyfryzacji, Rozporządzenie w sprawie osnów geodezyjnych, grawimetrycznych i magnetycznych, nr 248. Dz.U. 2012 poz. 352.
Felczak J., „Wytyczne Techniczne G-1.9 «Katalog znaków geodezyjnych oraz wzory stabilizacji punktów»”, Warszawa, 1984.
PN-EN 1997-1:2008 Eurokod 7. Projektowanie geotechniczne. Część1: Zasady ogólne.
PN-EN 1997-2:2009 Eurokod 7. Projektowanie geotechniczne. Część2: Rozpoznanie i badanie podłoża gruntowego.
PN-81/B-3020 Grunty budowlane. Posadowienie bezpośrednie budowli. Obliczenia statyczne i projektowanie.
Marchetti S. The Flat Dilatometer: Design applications. 3rd International Geotechnical Engineering Conference, Keynote lecture, (pp. 421-448). Cairo University; 1997.
Janbu N., Bjerrum L., Kjaernsli B., Veiledning Ved Løsning Av Fundamenteringsoppgaver. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Report 16, Oslo; 1964.
Netherlandish standard NEN6740, 1991, Geotechniek TGB1990 Basisen en belastingen, Nederlands normalisatie-Institut.
Burland J.B. The yielding and dilatation of clay (correspondence), Géotechnique, 15(2) (1965) 211-214.
Article Details
Abstract views: 381
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
