The analysis of the settlement of the various types of geodetic benchmarks

Łukasz Borowski

l.borowski@pollub.pl
Department of Geotechnical Engineering; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology; (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-5377

Agnieszka Lal


Department of geotechnics; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology; (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-6064

Krzysztof Nepelski


Department of Geotechnical Engineering; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology; (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9495-6457

Abstract

The paper presents the studies of the possible causes of the excessive settlement of geodetic benchmarks. For the purpose of the study, two types of ground benchmarks (type 75a and b) were selected. The computational analysis was carried out on benchmarks situated in different soil conditions and under two variants of load. The parameters were modified in order to reach the interaction between the subsoil and the structure, which is the closest to the actual conditions. Obtained results were compared with the settlement noted in Kętrzyn district, during heights frame transformation from Kronsztadt’60 to Kronsztadt’86. As a result, possible change of heights of geodetic points between land surveying campaigns (circa 20 years) could be estimated. 


Keywords:

height transformation, geodetic benchmark, geodetic network, ground settlement

Rada Ministrów, Rozporządzenie z dnia 15 października 2012 r. w sprawie państwowego systemu odniesień przestrzennych, nr 76. Dz.U. 2012 poz. 1247.
  Google Scholar

GUGiK, Model różnic wysokości pomiędzy układami wysokościowymi PL-EVRF2007-NH i PL-KRON86-NH. Warszawa, 2015.
  Google Scholar

Walo J., Analiza wybranych algorytmów wyznaczania lokalnego przebiegu geoidy, Politechnika Warszawska, 2000.
  Google Scholar

Banasik P., Wyznaczenie przebiegu quasi geoidy w rejonie Krakowa na podstawie pomiarów niwelacyjnych i GPS, Akademia Górniczo-Hutnicza w Krakowie, 1999.
  Google Scholar

Borowski Ł., Zastosowanie sieci ASG-EUPOS do modelowania lokalnej quasi-geoidy, AGH, 2015.
  Google Scholar

Banasik P., Ligas M., Kudrys J., Skorupa B., i Bujakowski K., Transformacja wysokości z układu Kronasztadt’60 do układu Kronsztadt’86 na przykładzie powiatu krakowskiego, Przegląd Geodezyjny 4 (2012) 6–13.
  Google Scholar

Mnisterstwo Administracji i Cyfryzacji, Rozporządzenie w sprawie osnów geodezyjnych, grawimetrycznych i magnetycznych, nr 248. Dz.U. 2012 poz. 352.
  Google Scholar

Felczak J., „Wytyczne Techniczne G-1.9 «Katalog znaków geodezyjnych oraz wzory stabilizacji punktów»”, Warszawa, 1984.
  Google Scholar

PN-EN 1997-1:2008 Eurokod 7. Projektowanie geotechniczne. Część1: Zasady ogólne.
  Google Scholar

PN-EN 1997-2:2009 Eurokod 7. Projektowanie geotechniczne. Część2: Rozpoznanie i badanie podłoża gruntowego.
  Google Scholar

PN-81/B-3020 Grunty budowlane. Posadowienie bezpośrednie budowli. Obliczenia statyczne i projektowanie.
  Google Scholar

Marchetti S. The Flat Dilatometer: Design applications. 3rd International Geotechnical Engineering Conference, Keynote lecture, (pp. 421-448). Cairo University; 1997.
  Google Scholar

Janbu N., Bjerrum L., Kjaernsli B., Veiledning Ved Løsning Av Fundamenteringsoppgaver. Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Report 16, Oslo; 1964.
  Google Scholar

Netherlandish standard NEN6740, 1991, Geotechniek TGB1990 Basisen en belastingen, Nederlands normalisatie-Institut.
  Google Scholar

Burland J.B. The yielding and dilatation of clay (correspondence), Géotechnique, 15(2) (1965) 211-214.
  Google Scholar


Published
2017-12-03

Cited by

Borowski, Łukasz ., Lal, A. and Nepelski, K. (2017) “The analysis of the settlement of the various types of geodetic benchmarks”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 16(3), pp. 135–142. doi: 10.24358/Bud-Arch_17_163_13.

Authors

Łukasz Borowski 
l.borowski@pollub.pl
Department of Geotechnical Engineering; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology; Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7356-5377

Authors

Agnieszka Lal 

Department of geotechnics; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology; Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3557-6064

Authors

Krzysztof Nepelski 

Department of Geotechnical Engineering; Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture; Lublin University of Technology; Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9495-6457

Statistics

Abstract views: 281
PDF downloads: 144


License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.

Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.