Simulation-based performance evaluation of kinetic Mashrabiya for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in arid climates: A case study in Biskra, Algeria

Cherif Ben Bacha; Fatiha Bourbia

doi:10.35784/bud-arch.7102

Open full text

PDF

Published: Sep 30, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.7102

Issue Vol. 24 No. 3 (2025)

Articles

Geodetic monitoring of the subsidence of a multi-storey building foundation
Oksana Gera, Roksolana Oleskiv, Liubov Dorosh, Mykola Hrynishak, Volodymyr Mykhailyshyn

005-014
Natural and hybrid lighting effects on architecture students' creativity: a case study in Mostaganem
Zineb Derouiche, Malika Kacemi, Okba Benameur

015-030
Smart transformation of cities: the case of the EMU Campus, North Cyprus
Islam Alshafei

031--46
Behaviour of eco-friendly mortar containing recycled concrete sand in fresh and hardened states
Imen Bouldoum, Toufik Boubekeur, Karim Ezziane, Tien-Tung Ngo, EL Hadj Kadri, Jean-Christophe Lacouture

047-062
Fire safety in historic buildings: A case study using the qualitative risk analysis method
Muammer Yaman, Cüneyt Kurtay

063-078
Enhancing the mechanical and durability properties of bio self-compacting sand concrete containing granite industrial waste as a fine aggregate: an experimental study
Mohamed Guendouz, Moussa Hadjadj, Djamila Boukhelkhal

079-099
Reconnecting with nature: reflections of the concepts of biophilia and biomimicry in interior design
Dürdane Aksoy Dolu, Emine Banu Burkut

101-120
Morphological mutations of patios, from traditional to contemporary housing in Tadjmout city (Algeria): implications and considerations
Ali Chellali, Latifa Khettabi

121-144
Analytical modeling of the dynamic thermal behavior of stabilized compacted earth blocks walls for bioclimatic constructions
M’hamed Mahdad, Aghiles Hammas, Said Abboudi

145-170
Simulation-based performance evaluation of kinetic Mashrabiya for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in arid climates: A case study in Biskra, Algeria
Cherif Ben Bacha, Fatiha Bourbia

171-193
Assessing the impact of degraded urban green infrastructure on disaster risk resilience: A case study of Amman city centre, Jordan
Islam Alshafei, Safa' Al-Kfouf, Pinar Ulucay Righelato

195-212
Façade lighting designs in historical buildings: The case of Mersin Kızkalesi
Gizem Nur Özcan, Tuba Akar

213-234
Strength and rheology of cement mortars incorporating quarry and commercial limestone filler
Salim Safiddine, Hamza Soualhi, El-Hadj Kadri

235-253

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35784/bud-arch.7102

Authors

Cherif Ben Bacha

cherif.benbacha@univ-constantine3.dz

Bioclimatic Architecture and Environment Laboratory ABE; University of Constantine 3;, Algeria

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8741-8500

Fatiha Bourbia

fatiha.meghezzi@univ-constantine3.dz

Bioclimatic Architecture and Environment Laboratory ABE; University of Constantine 3;, Algeria

Abstract

In the hot, dry climate regions of Algeria, traditional buildings are constructed with cooling strategies to cope with harsh climatic conditions. The dominance of direct solar irradiance in these regions requires that building facades be well shaded, allowing for controlled solar transmittance to reduce cooling loads and minimise energy consumption. The Mashrabiya was one of the traditional shading strategies, controlling excess solar radiation and improving interior thermal comfort. Numerous studies have demonstrated that static shading can allow direct radiation to penetrate the building during overheated periods. Shading design must prevent this; however, during colder periods of the year, it is preferable to allow solar radiation to enter the building. This response can be achieved through dynamic shading systems with automated control. This research aims to evaluate the effect and performance of adaptive Mashrabiya as a kinetic sunscreen through parametric simulation, to improve indoor thermal comfort and energy efficiency. These objectives are achieved by integrating solar control with parametric Mashrabiya design to regulate solar radiation intensity and minimise cooling demand. The simulation findings, using parametric tools (Geco and Honeybee plugins for Grasshopper), showed that direct radiation was reduced by 17.9%, resulting in a 43% reduction in energy consumption, accompanied by a corresponding decrease in indoor air temperature of between 4.0°C and 4.8°C. These simulation-based results suggest promising potential for improving building performance and provide valuable insights for early-stage design.

Keywords:

Mashrabiya, adaptive facades, thermal comfort, dynamic shading, solar, Grasshopper

References

[1] M. Santamouris and K. Vasilakopoulou, “Present and future energy consumption of buildings: challenges and opportunities towards decarbonisation”, e-Prime – Advances in Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Energy, 1, (2021), 100002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2021.100002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2021.100002

[2] W. Ahmed, A. Alazazmeh, and M. Asif, “Energy and water saving potential in commercial buildings: a retrofit case study”, Sustainability, 15(1), (2022), 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010518 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010518

[3] M. Salihi et al., “Evaluation of global energy performance of building walls integrating PCM: Numerical study in semi-arid climate in Morocco”, Case Studies in Construction Materials, 16, (2022), e00979, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e00979

[4] B. Abboushi, I. Elzeyadi, K. Van Den Wymelenberg, R. Taylor, M. Sereno, and G. Jacobsen, “Assessing the visual comfort, visual interest of sunlight patterns, and view quality under different window conditions in an open-plan office”, LEUKOS, 17(4), (2021), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1785309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15502724.2020.1785309

[5] I. Konstantzos, S. A. Sadeghi, M. Kim, J. Xiong, and A. Tzempelikos, “The effect of lighting environment on task performance in buildings – A review”, Energy and Buildings, 226, (2020), 110394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110394 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110394

[6] Y. Zhu et al., “Effects of illuminance and correlated color temperature on daytime cognitive performance, subjective mood, and alertness in healthy adults”, Environment and Behavior, 51(2), (2019), 199–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517738077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517738077

[7] A. Nabil and J. Mardaljevic, “Useful daylight illuminances: A replacement for daylight factors”, Energy and Buildings, 38(7), (2006), 905–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.013

[8] R. C. G. M. Loonen, M. Trčka, D. Cóstola, and J. L. M. Hensen, “Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, (2013), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016

[9] S. Attia, S. Bilir, T. Safy, C. Struck, R. Loonen, and F. Goia, “Current trends and future challenges in the performance assessment of adaptive façade systems”, Energy and Buildings, 179, (2018), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.09.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.09.017

[10] A. Tabadkani, A. Roetzel, H. X. Li, and A. Tsangrassoulis, “Design approaches and typologies of adaptive facades: A review”, Automation in Construction, 121, (2021), 103450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103450 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103450

[11] Y. Wang, Y. Han, Y. Wu, E. Korkina, Z. Zhou, and V. Gagarin, “An occupant-centric adaptive façade based on real-time and contactless glare and thermal discomfort estimation using deep learning algorithm”, Building and Environment, 214, (2022), 108907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108907

[12] S. M. Al-Masrani and K. M. Al-Obaidi, “Dynamic shading systems: A review of design parameters, platforms and evaluation strategies”, Automation in Construction, 102, (2019), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.014

[13] A. Kuru, P. Oldfield, S. Bonser, and F. Fiorito, “Biomimetic adaptive building skins: Energy and environmental regulation in buildings”, Energy and Buildings, 205, (2019), 109544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109544

[14] C. M. Harris, Dictionary of architecture & construction, Fourth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006. Accessed: Jul. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ia804602.us.archive.org/5/items/DACPdfbooksfree.pk/DAC_Pdfbooksfree.pk.pdf

[15] H. Fathy, Natural Energy and Vernacular Architecture Principles and Examples with Reference to Hot Arid Climate. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1986. [Online]. Available: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6094230

[16] N. Almerbati, Ford, A. Taki, and L.-O. Dean, “From vernacular to personalised and sustainable”, in Architectural research through to practice: 48th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association (ANZAScA), F. Madeo and M. A. Schnabel, Eds., Sydney: Architectural Science Association, 2014, 479–490.

[17] B. A. Jetto and S. G. Yıldırım, “Revitalizing a vernacular architectural element through sustainability: contemporary applications of mashrabiya”, ART/icle: Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 5(1), (2025), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.56590/stdarticle.1517273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56590/stdarticle.1517273

[18] J. Mohamed, “The traditional arts and crafts of turnery or mashrabiya”, Thesis, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 2015. https://doi.org/10.7282/T37S7QK5

[19] Y. M. El Semary, H. Attalla, and I. Gawad, “Modern mashrabiyas with high-tech daylight responsive systems”, The Academic Research Community publication, 1(1), (2017), 11. https://doi.org/10.21625/archive.v1i1.113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21625/archive.v1i1.113

[20] A. F. Ashour, “Islamic architectural heritage: mashrabiya”, in WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, WITPress, 2018, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.2495/IHA180211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/IHA180211

[21] N. Almurbati, D. Headley, Ford, and A. Taki, “From manual to hybrid, parametric mashrabiya: digital workflow for the re-envisioning and conservation of eastern architectural screens and the engagement of digital tectonics”, The International Journal of Architectonic, Spatial, and Environmental Design, 10(2), (2016), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1662/CGP/v10i02/29-39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1662/CGP/v10i02/29-39

[22] A. A. Bagasi, “Investigation of the ventilation and thermal performance of Mashrabiya for residential buildings in the hot-humid climate of Saudi Arabia”, Thesis, University of Nottingham., 2022.

[23] A. Ö. Akçay and H. Alotman, “A theoretical framework for the evaluation from the traditional mashrabiya to modern mashrabiya”, Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(3), (2017), 107. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i3.962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i3.962

[24] M. Shahda and S. Noseir, “Traditional environmental treatments in arab architecture: as a guide to contemporary architecture”, Port-Said Engineering Research Journal, 25(2), (2021), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.21608/pserj.2021.72763.1106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/pserj.2021.72763.1106

[25] A. Sherif, A. El-Zafarany, and R. Arafa, “External perforated window Solar Screens: The effect of screen depth and perforation ratio on energy performance in extreme desert environments”, Energy and Buildings, 52, (2012) 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.05.025

[26] A. Sherif, H. Sabry, and T. Rakha, “External perforated Solar Screens for daylighting in residential desert buildings: Identification of minimum perforation percentages”, Solar Energy, 86(6), (2012), 1929–1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.029

[27] N. S. Naik, I. Elzeyadi, C. T. Minson, and J.-H. Lee, “Significance of dynamic over static solar screens on thermal perception in perimeter offices under different sky conditions”, Building and Environment, 234, (2023),110153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110153 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110153

[28] M. V. Nielsen, S. Svendsen, and L. B. Jensen, “Quantifying the potential of automated dynamic solar shading in office buildings through integrated simulations of energy and daylight”, Solar Energy, 85(5), (2011), 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.01.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2011.01.010

[29] S. M. Al-Masrani and K. M. Al-Obaidi, “Dynamic shading systems: A review of design parameters, platforms and evaluation strategies”, Automation in Construction, 102, (2019), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.01.014

[30] N. S. Naik, I. Elzeyadi, and V. Cartwright, “Dynamic solar screens for high-performance buildings – a critical review of perforated external shading systems”, Architectural Science Review, 65(3), (2022), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2022.2063248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2022.2063248

[31] A. A. Bagasi and J. K. Calautit, “Experimental field study of the integration of passive and evaporative cooling techniques with Mashrabiya in hot climates”, Energy and Buildings, 225, (2020), 110325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110325

[32] A. Taki and H. Kumari, “Examining mashrabiya’s impact on energy efficiency and cultural aspects in Saudi Arabia”, Sustainability, 15(13), (2023), 10131. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310131

[33] L. Giovannini, V. R. M. Lo Verso, B. Karamata, and M. Andersen, “Lighting and Energy Performance of an Adaptive Shading and Daylighting System for Arid Climates”, Energy Procedia, 78, (2015), 370–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.675 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.675

[34] J. Erickson, H. Bryan, M. Addison, M. Kroelinger, and A. Reddy, “Envelope as Climate Negotiator: Evaluating adaptive building envelope’s capacity to moderate indoor climate and energy”, Thesis, Arizona State University, 2013.

[35] H. Bahi and M. El Azhari, “Sustainable facades for the future”, Al Akhawayn University, 2022.

[36] D. A. Chi, D. Moreno, and J. Navarro, “Design optimisation of perforated solar façades in order to balance daylighting with thermal performance”, Building and Environment, 125, (2017), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.09.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.09.007

[37] G. Jamilu, A. Abdou, and M. Asif, “Dynamic facades for sustainable buildings: A review of classification, applications, prospects and challenges”, Energy Reports, 11, (2024), 5999–6014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.05.047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.05.047

[38] R. Nady, “Dynamic facades: environmental control systems for sustainable design”, Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development, 3(1), (2017), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.21622/resd.2017.03.1.118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21622/resd.2017.03.1.118

[39] A. Luna-Navarro, G. R. Hunt, and M. Overend, “Dynamic façades – An exploratory campaign to assess occupant multi-domain environmental satisfaction and façade interaction”, Building and Environment, 211, (2022), 108703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108703

[40] I. Konstantzos, A. Tzempelikos, and Y.-C. Chan, “Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare probability in offices with dynamic window shades”, Building and Environment, 87, (2015), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.007

[41] Y. J. Grobman, I. G. Capeluto, and G. Austern, “External shading in buildings: comparative analysis of daylighting performance in static and kinetic operation scenarios”, Architectural Science Review, 60(2), (2017), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1266991 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2016.1266991

[42] S. M. Hosseini, M. Mohammadi, A. Rosemann, T. Schröder, and J. Lichtenberg, “A morphological approach for kinetic façade design process to improve visual and thermal comfort: Review”, Building and Environment, 153, (2019), 186–204 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.040 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.02.040

[43] A. H. A. Mahmoud and Y. Elghazi, “Parametric-based designs for kinetic facades to optimize daylight performance: Comparing rotation and translation kinetic motion for hexagonal facade patterns”, Solar Energy, 126, (2016), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.039

[44] I. Elzeyadi, “The impacts of dynamic façade shading typologies on building energy performance and occupant’s multi-comfort”, Architectural Science Review, 60(4), (2017), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2017.1337558 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00038628.2017.1337558

[45] S. Mazzetto, “Dynamic integration of shading and ventilation: novel quantitative insights into building performance optimization”, buildings, 15(7), (2025), 1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071123

[46] Y. Ajaji and André, “Thermal comfort and visual comfort in an office building equipped with smart electrochromic glazing: an experimental study”, Energy Procedia, 78, (2015), 2464–2469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.230

[47] H. Djamila, “Indoor thermal comfort predictions: Selected issues and trends”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, (2017), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.076 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.076

[48] I. Oropeza-Perez, A. H. Petzold-Rodriguez, and C. Bonilla-Lopez, “Adaptive thermal comfort in the main Mexican climate conditions with and without passive cooling”, Energy and Buildings, 145, (2017), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.031

[49] A. Tzempelikos, “Advances on daylighting and visual comfort research”, Building and Environment, 113, (2017), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.12.002

[50] A. H. A. Mahmoud and Y. Elghazi, “Parametric-based designs for kinetic facades to optimize daylight performance: Comparing rotation and translation kinetic motion for hexagonal facade patterns”, Solar Energy, 126, (2016), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.039

[51] M. Krarti, “A comparative energy analysis of dynamic external shadings for office buildings”, ASME Journal of Engineering for Sustainable Buildings and Cities, 3(2), (2022), 021001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054775 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054775

[52] A. Batool and I. M. K. Elzeyadi, “From romance to performance: assessing the impacts of jali screens on energy savings and daylighting quality of office buildings in Lahore, Pakistan”, in The 30th International PLEA Conference, Sustainable Habitat for developing societies – choosing the way forward, 2014.

[53] A. Shafaghat and A. Keyvanfar, “Dynamic façades design typologies, technologies, measurement techniques, and physical performances across thermal, optical, ventilation, and electricity generation outlooks”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 167, (2022), 112647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112647 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112647

[54] A. Sherif, H. Sabry, A. El-zafarany, R. Arafa, T. Rakha, and M. Anees, “Balancing the energy savings and daylighting performance of external perforated solar screens: Evaluation of screen opening proportions”, in Proceeding of the 27th International Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture - PLEA, Louvain- La- Neuve, 2011, 807–812.

[55] A. Omidfar, “Design optimization of a contemporary high performance shading screen-integration of ‘form’ and simulation tools”, in 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, 2011, 2491–2498.

[56] E. S. Lee et al., “High Performance Building Facade Solutions: PIER Final Project Report”, Dec. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2172/1016580

[57] F. Hammad and B. Abu-Hijleh, “The energy savings potential of using dynamic external louvers in an office building”, Energy and Buildings, 42(10), (2010), 1888–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2010.05.024

[58] A. I. Palmero-Marrero and A. C. Oliveira, “Effect of louver shading devices on building energy requirements”, Applied Energy, 87(6), (2010), 2040–2049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.11.020

[59] J. Wang, L. O. Beltrá, and J. Kim, “From static to kinetic: a review of acclimated kinetic building envelopes”, in World Renewable Energy Forum, WREF 2012, Including World Renewable Energy Congress XII and Colorado Renewable Energy Society (CRES) Annual Conference, 2012, 4022–4029.

[60] C. Ben Bacha, “Les façades dynamiques; moyen de contrôle solaire pour accroitre l’efficacité énergétique des équipements administratifs en climat aride - Biskra”, Master’s Thesis, University of Constantine 3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.18817.56163/1

[61] Meteotest, “Meteonorme”, 2013, Meteotest: v 7.0.22.8.

[62] Solargis, “Solar resource maps of Algeria”, https://solargis.com/resources/free-maps-and-gis-data?locality=algeria.

[63] R. McNeel, “Rhinoceros: Nurbs Modeling for Rhino”, 2015, Robert McNeel and Associates: Version 5.0 SR 9.

[64] H. Marroquin, M. Thitisawat, and E. Vermisso, “Performative Parametric Design of Radiation Responsive Screens”, in ARCC Conference Repository, 2014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17831/rep:arcc%25y221

[65] M. Taleghani, M. Tenpierik, S. Kurvers, and A. van den Dobbelsteen, “A review into thermal comfort in buildings”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 26, (2013), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.050

[66] Oborn, E. Heathcote, E. Denison, and E. L. (Eric L. Ormsby, Al Bahr towers : the Abu Dhabi investment council headquarters. 2014. Accessed: Jul. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Al_Bahr_Towers.html?id=QXm8BQAAQBAJ

[67] G. J. Ward, “Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection”, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 26(2), (1992), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1145/142920.134078 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/142920.134078

[68] A. Nabil and J. Mardaljevic, “Useful daylight illuminance: a new paradigm for assessing daylight in buildings”, Lighting Research & Technology, 37(1), (2005), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782805li128oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1365782805li128oa

[69] M. Boubekri and J. Lee, “A comparison of four daylighting metrics in assessing the daylighting performance of three shading systems”, Journal of Green Building, 12(3), (2017), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.12.3.39 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.12.3.39

[70] J. Wienold and J. Christoffersen, “Evaluation methods and development of a new glare prediction model for daylight environments with the use of CCD cameras”, Energy and Buildings, 38(7), (2006), 743–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.03.017

[71] C. F. Reinhart and J. Wienold, “The daylighting dashboard – A simulation-based design analysis for daylit spaces”, Building and Environment, 46(2), (2011), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.08.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.08.001

[72] A. Figliola and M. Rossi, “Parametric design for technological and ‘smart’ system. Adaptive and optimized skin”, in 30th International Plea Conference, 2014, 1–8.

[73] S. Hoffmann, C. Jedek, and E. Arens, “Assessing thermal comfort near glass facades with new tools”, in BEST 3 Building Enclosure Science and Technology Conference, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://escholarshiorg/uc/item/0t68701n

[74] A. A. Bagasi, J. K. Calautit, and A. S. Karban, “Evaluation of the integration of the traditional architectural element mashrabiya into the ventilation strategy for buildings in hot climates”, Energies (Basel), 14(3), (2021), 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030530

[75] M. Brzezicki, “Enhancing daylight comfort with climate-responsive kinetic shading: a simulation and experimental study of a horizontal fin system”, Sustainability, 16(18), (2024), 8156. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16188156

Ben Bacha, C. and Bourbia , F. (2025) “Simulation-based performance evaluation of kinetic Mashrabiya for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in arid climates: A case study in Biskra, Algeria”, Budownictwo i Architektura, 24(3), pp. 171–193. doi: 10.35784/bud-arch.7102.

Author Biography

Fatiha Bourbia , Bioclimatic Architecture and Environment Laboratory ABE; University of Constantine 3;

Prof. Fatiha Bourbia

University of Constantine 3 Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism Bioclimatic Architecture and Environment Laboratory ABE

Simulation-based performance evaluation of kinetic Mashrabiya for thermal comfort and energy efficiency in arid climates: A case study in Biskra, Algeria

Issue Vol. 24 No. 3 (2025)

Archives

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

License

Fatiha Bourbia , Bioclimatic Architecture and Environment Laboratory ABE; University of Constantine 3;

Article Sidebar

Issue Vol. 24 No. 3 (2025)

Archives

Main Article Content

DOI

Authors

Abstract

Keywords:

References

Article Details

License

Fatiha Bourbia , Bioclimatic Architecture and Environment Laboratory ABE; University of Constantine 3;