Hybrid systems to enhance the seismic performance of steel soft-story structures
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 24 No. 4 (2025)
-
Hybrid systems to enhance the seismic performance of steel soft-story structures
Kheira Camellia Nehar, Abdallah Yacine Rahmani, Said Hicham Boukhalkhal, Mohamed Badaoui
-
The Modelling vitality in the intermediate spaces of mid-rise residential complexes: a structural approach with a case study of Tehran
Seyedeh Ashraf Sadat, Mohammad Sadegh Taher Tolou Del, Bahram Saleh Sedghpour
-
Towards an exploratory approach to residential choices and social representations of domestic architecture. Case study: the town of El Eulma (north-central Algeria)
Imane Zaidi, Hassib Rehailia
-
The full-scale test of bearing structures of the shelter to assess the possibility of its further operation
Andrii Kramarchuk, Borys Ilnytskyy, Oksana Lytvyniak
-
Comparative review of liveability indices: trends and insights
Meenakshi Pappu, Nina Lazar
-
Involving children in design processes: a systematic review
Oksana Iurchyshyn
-
Impact of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) waste on the physico-mechanical and durability behavior of lime-stabilized adobe bricks
Hammache Soumia, Izemmouren Ouarda, Guettala Abdelhamid
-
The influence of layer interaction models and horizontal loads on flexible pavement strain responses
Andi Muflih Marsuq Muthaher, Anno Mahfuda, Muh Bahrul Ulum Al Karimi
-
Study of the impact of adhesion promoters on the properties of road bitumens
Yan Pyrig, Serhii Kishchynskyi, Andrii Galkin, Serhii Oksak, Olha Poliak, Iurii Sidun, Volodymyr Gunka
-
Toward autonomous floating architecture
Karolina Życzkowska
-
From neglect to nurture: redefining pocket gardens as community vitality centers – case study of Al-Shorouk City, Egypt
Aya Khashaba, Ghada Farouk Hassan, Noha Gamal Said, Ayat Ismail
-
Urban morphology during the French colonization (19th-20th centuries). Case study of Mostaganem City in north-western Algeria
Said Beldjilali, Sami Zerari, Naima Benkari
-
Numerical analysis of the load-bearing capacity of LVL beams reinforced with steel plates
Kacper Majchrzak, Marcin Chybiński, Łukasz Polus
Archives
-
Vol. 24 No. 4
2025-12-16 13
-
Vol. 24 No. 3
2025-09-30 13
-
Vol. 24 No. 2
2025-06-25 13
-
Vol. 24 No. 1
2025-03-31 12
-
Vol. 23 No. 4
2025-01-02 11
-
Vol. 23 No. 3
2024-10-07 10
-
Vol. 23 No. 2
2024-06-15 8
-
Vol. 23 No. 1
2024-03-29 6
-
Vol. 22 No. 4
2023-12-29 9
-
Vol. 22 No. 3
2023-09-29 5
-
Vol. 22 No. 2
2023-06-30 3
-
Vol. 22 No. 1
2023-03-30 3
-
Vol. 21 No. 4
2022-12-14 8
-
Vol. 21 No. 3
2022-11-02 3
-
Vol. 21 No. 2
2022-08-31 3
-
Vol. 21 No. 1
2022-03-30 3
-
Vol. 20 No. 4
2021-12-29 6
-
Vol. 20 No. 3
2021-10-29 8
-
Vol. 20 No. 2
2021-06-02 8
-
Vol. 20 No. 1
2021-02-09 8
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
abdallahyacine.rahmani@univ-msila.dz
saidhichamboukhalkhal@yahoo.fr
Abstract
Recent global seismic events have shown that most destroyed structures were irregularly designed, especially those with a soft story. A “soft story” refers to a building floor significantly weaker or more flexible than the others, often because of large openings such as windows or parking spaces. This reduction in stiffness creates a vulnerable point where excessive deformation can occur during an earthquake, leading to potential structural failure. This study proposes a practical hybrid connection strategy that combines fully rigid and semi-rigid joints to address this case and mitigate the failure mechanism affecting the overall seismic response of steel structures. The objective is to smooth stiffness discontinuities and improve earthquake performance in a 12-story steel moment-resisting frame with a mid-height soft story. Semi-rigid joints are modeled as zero-length rotational springs with a fixity factor (α), applied above the soft story in two layout configurations. Compared to the fully rigid frame, introducing semi-rigid joints increases the fundamental period (by ≈10% for α = 0.5 and up to ≈60% for α = 0.1 in Case 1; more moderate increases of ≈5% and ≈12% in Case 2), thereby shifting seismic demand toward lower spectral accelerations. Intermediate fixity (α ≈ 0.5–0.75) offers a balanced performance: roof displacements and inter-story drifts remain controlled while the soft-story stiffness criterion is satisfied. Overall, strategically placing semi-rigid connections above the soft story reduces drift concentration, smooths the stiffness profiles, and enhances seismic resilience without compromising global stability. These findings support hybrid connection detailing as a cost-effective and practical strategy for improving the seismic behavior of steel structures.
Keywords:
References
[1] Chen W. F., Lui F. M., Stability design of steel frames, Florida, USA: CRC press, Inc., 1991, 394.
[2] Bento R., Azevedo J., “Behaviour coefficient assessment for soft storey structures”, In Proceedings of the Twelfth World Conference On Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000, no. 0779.
[3] Charleson A., Seismic Design for Architects, Routledge, 2012.
[4] Chopra A. K. (2017). Dynamics of structures theory and applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995
[5] Ebadi P., Maghsoudi A., “Case Study on Seismic Performance of Soft Stories in Short Steel Structures and Replacement of Braces with Equivalent Moment Resisting Frame” Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering 49(2) (2017) 237-250. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2015.408
[6] Chen W. F., Structural Analysis: A Unified Classical and Matrix Approach, McGraw-Hill, 1991.
[7] Indumathi K., Saravanan G., “Comparative Analysis of Soft Storey Mechanism using Different Codal Standards”, International Journal for Scientific Research & Development 4(1) (2016) 2321-0613.
[8] Chen W. F., Practical Analysis For Semi-regid Frame, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2000.
[9] Donduren M. S., Nakipoğlu A., “Comparison of R/C buildings with a soft-storey irregularity with respect to various national building codes”, Materiali in Tehnologije 52(5) (2018) 575-581. https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2018.015
[10] Boukhalkhal S. H., Ihaddoudène A. N. T., Da Costa Neves L. F., Vellasco P. C. G. D. S., Madi W., “Performance assessment of steel structures with semi-rigid joints in seismic areas”, International Journal of Structural Integrity 11(1) (2020) 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSI-02-2019-0007
[11] Razavi M., Abolmaali A., “Earthquake resistance frames with combination of rigid and semi-rigid connections”, Journal of Constructional Steel Research 98 (2014) 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.02.006
[12] Al-Aasam H., Modern Engineering Design: Analytical and numerical modelling of semi-rigid connections. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, United Kingdom, 2013.
[13] Çelik H., Şakar G. Ö. K. H. A. N., “Semi-Rigid connections in steel structures State-of-the-Art report on modelling, analysis and design”, Steel and Composite Structures 45(1) (2022) 1-21. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2022.45.1.001
[14] Daryan A. S., Sadri M., Saberi H., Saberi V., Moghadas A. B., “Behavior of semi‐rigid connections and semi‐rigid frames”, The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 23(3) (2014) 210-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1032
[15] Sharma V., Bhandari M., Shrimali M. K., Datta T. K., “Numerical study of hybrid steel frames under far-field earthquakes”, In ASPS Conference Proceedings 1(3) (2022) 781-787. https://doi.org/10.38208/acp.v1.582
[16] Sharma V., Shrimali M. K., Bharti S. D., Datta T. K., “Behavior of semi-rigid steel frames under near-and far-field earthquakes”, Steel and Composite Structures, an International Journal 34(5) (2020) 625-641. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2020.34.5.625
[17] Amsyar F., Tan C. S., Sulaiman A., Mohammad S., “Semi-rigid Composite Beam-to-column Joints for Cold-formed Steel Frames: Experimental and Numerical Study”, International Journal of Steel Structures 23(4) (2023) 974-992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00744-0
[18] Abidelah A., Analyse numérique du comportement d’assemblages métalliques. Approche numérique et validation expérimentale, Doctoral dissertation, Université Blaise Pascal-Clermont-Ferrand II, 2009.
[19] Chen W. F., Toma S., Advanced analysis of steel frames, Florida, USA: CRC press, Inc., 1994, 398.
[20] Chen W. F., Semi-rigid connections handbook, J. Ross Publishing, 2011, 256.
[21] Eurocode 8 (2004). Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Brussels, Belgium, Ref n° pr EN 1998-1:2004.
[22] DTR, B. Règles Parasismiques Algériennes, RPA. Centre National Recherche Appliquée En Génie Parasismique (CGS), Algérie, 2024.
[23] ASCE/SEI. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (ASCE/SEI 7-22). Reston, VA, 2022.
[24] Teddy, L., Hardiman, G., Nuroji, & Tudjono, S. (2018). The Soft Story Challenge to Architectural Design in Earthquake-Prone Areas. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 30(2), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.17576/jkukm-2018-30(2)
[25] Lestuzzi P., Sellami S., Badoux M., Génie parasismique: Conception et dimensionnement des bâtiments, EPFL Press, 2008.
[26] Halde V. V., Deshmukh A. H., “Soft storey effect on structural response of high rise building”, International Journal of Research in Advent Technology (IJRAT) 4(1) (2016). https://www.ijirset.com/upload/2016/january/52_2_Effect.pdf
[27] Agha Beigi H., Retrofit of soft storey buildings using gapped inclined brace systems, Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, 2014. https://utoronto.scholaris.ca/items/5947b778-f356-4b65-a489-0e9ffa647407
[28] Maaze M. R., Dyavanal S. S., “Seismic Evaluation Of Mutistorey Building With Soft Storey”, In ICRICE Conference, Nov-2013.
[29] Abdesslam I., Analyse pushover des structures en béton armé tridimensionnelle à étage souple, Doctoral dissertation, Universite Mohamed Khider Biskra, 2018.
[30] Kamaris G. S., Vallianatou Y. M., Beskos D. E., “Seismic damage estimation of in-plane regular steel moment resisting and x-braced frames”, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (2012) 1745-1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9387-2
[31] Yahmi D., Branci T., Bouchaïr A., Fournely E., “Evaluating the behaviour factor of medium ductile SMRF structures”, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 62(2) (2018) 373-385. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPci.10419
[32] ETABS, Integrated Software for Structural Analysis and Design. Version 15.0. Berkeley (California – United States): Computers & Structures, Inc, 2007.
[33] American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC 360-22). Chicago, IL, 2022.
Article Details
Abstract views: 15
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Budownictwo i Architektura supports the open science program. The journal enables Open Access to their publications. Everyone can view, download and forward articles, provided that the terms of the license are respected.
Publishing of articles is possible after submitting a signed statement on the transfer of a license to the Journal.
