Comparative Performance Analysis of RabbitMQ and Kafka Message Queue Systems in Spring Boot and ASP.NET Environments
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue Vol. 37 (2025)
-
Performance evaluation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning models for 5G resource allocation
Abdullah Havolli, Majlinda Fetaji371-378
-
Analysis of the use of object detection systems in edge computing
Jakub Kozłowski, Marcin Badurowicz379-390
-
Performance analysis of Jetpack Compose components in mobile applications
Adrian Kwiatkowski, Jakub Smołka391-398
-
Methods for comparing three-dimensional motion trajectories
Tomasz Waldemar Samorow, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska399-404
-
Performance and scalability analysis of monolithic and microservice architectures in social networks
Viacheslav Chernohor405-409
-
Comparative analysis of methods for identifying tree structures of coronary vessels
Kacper Liżewski, Małgorzata Charytanowicz410-417
-
Websites accessibility assessment of voivodeship cities in Poland
Kacper Czajka, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska418-425
-
Analysis of ORM framework approaches for Node.js
Serhii Zhadko-Bazilevych426-430
-
Analysis of performance optimization methods for 3D games in the Unity environment
Maciej Potręć, Marcin Badurowicz431-435
-
The impact of AI use on the performance of chess engines
Jakub Król, Jakub Smołka436-442
-
Evaluating the effectiveness of selected tools in recognizing emotions from facial photos
Klaudiusz Wierzbowski443-450
-
Performance analysis of the GraphQL API creation technologies using Spring Boot and NestJS
Jakub Maciej Tkaczyk, Beata Pańczyk451-456
-
Comparative Performance Analysis of RabbitMQ and Kafka Message Queue Systems in Spring Boot and ASP.NET Environments
Filip Kamiński, Radosław Kłonica, Beata Pańczyk457-462
-
Analysis of current threats and security measures used in web applications on the example of Symfony, Express, and Spring Boot
Karol Kurowski, Magdalena Kramek463-469
-
The use of machine learning to classify symbols on cultural monuments to identify their origin and historical period.
Igor Pajura, Sylwester Korga470-475
-
Investigating Machine Learning Algorithms for Stroke Occurrence Prediction
Kazeem B. Adedeji, Titilayo A. Ogunjobi, Thabane H. Shabangu, Joshua A. Omowaye476-483
-
Comparative performance analysis of Spring Boot and Quarkus frameworks in Java applications
Grzegorz Szymanek, Jakub Smołka484-491
-
Influence of activation function in deep learning for cutaneous melanoma identification
Adrian Szymczyk, Maria Skublewska-Paszkowska492-499
-
Analysis of methods for simulating character encounters in a game with RPG elements
Michał Zdybel, Jakub Smołka500-507
-
Analysis of the efficiency of Apex and Java languages and related technologies in performing database operations
Marcin Janczarek, Konrad Lewicki, Jakub Smołka508-514
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
The article analyzes and compares the performance of Kafka 4.0 and RabbitMQ 4.1 in applications built with Spring (Kotlin) and .NET. Given the growing importance of microservices and event-driven architectures, the research examines message throughput, resource consumption, and stability under different loads. Two applications were developed to measure performance in terms of processing speed, CPU, and memory usage. The study also explores architectural considerations and factors affecting performance. The findings offer insights into when each system is most suitable, helping developers make informed decisions based on project requirements. The results show that Kafka performs better in .NET environments with up to 38% higher throughput and 40% lower latency while RabbitMQ is more efficient in Spring Boot setups, using nearly 29% less memory and delivering responses 25% faster.
Keywords:
References
[1] Kafka 4.0 Documentation, https://kafka.apache.org/documentation, [16.05.2025].
[2] RabbitMQ 4.1 Documentation, https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs, [16.05.2025].
[3] Kotlin docs Latest stable version: 2.1.21, https://kotlinlang.org/docs/home.html, [16.05.2025].
[4] .NET documentation, https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/, [16.05.2025].
[5] S. Henning, W. Hasselbring, Benchmarking scalability of stream processing frameworks deployed as microservices in the cloud, Journal of Systems and Software 208 (2023) 111879, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111879.
[6] A. Lercher, J. Glock, C. Macho, M. Pinzger, Microservice API Evolution in Practice: A Study on Strategies and Challenges, Journal of Systems and Software 215 (2024) 112110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112110.
[7] A. Pathak, C. Kalaiarasan, RabbitMQ Queuing Mechanism of Publish Subscribe model for better Throughput and Response, Fourth International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Technologies (2021) 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1109/icecct52121.2021.9616722.
[8] T. P. Raptis, C. Cicconetti, A. Passarella, Efficient topic partitioning of Apache Kafka for high-reliability real-time data streaming applications, Future Generation Computer Systems 154 (2024) 173–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2023.12.028.
[9] S. Dyjach, M. Plechawska-Wójcik, Efficiency comparison of message brokers, J. Comput. Sci. Inst. 31 (2024) 116–123, https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.6084.
[10] Apache JMeter 5.6.3 Documentation, https://jmeter.apache.org/usermanual/index.html, [16.05.2025].
[11] Docker 28.3.3. Documentation, https://docs.docker.com/, [16.05.2025].
[12] S. Ronglong, C. Arpnikanondt, Signal: An open-source cross-platform universal messaging system with feedback support, Journal of Systems and Software 117 (2016) 30–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.02.018.
Article Details
Abstract views: 22

