Alternative Views of Authenticity The Case of Park Hill, Sheffield
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 23 (2025)
-
Alternative Views of Authenticity
The Case of Park Hill, SheffieldNigel Walter1-19 -
Understanding Heritage Conservation Challenges in Taiwan: Traditional Chinese Thinking Through Classical Texts
Chih-Wen Lan21-32
-
Evaluating Authenticity in Heritage: A Quantitative Framework
Ayesha Agha Shah, Chandrasekara, Anila Naeem33-60
-
Authenticity between pure theory and practical application – the barrier of words
Adrian Crăciunescu61-82
-
In support of joint action: Methods for the effective cooperation of public authorities and non-conservation experts in the protection of the “modern” monuments of Thessaloniki
Dimitrios Zygomalas83-98
-
Regeneration of urban cultural landscapes
Monisha Jain, Prafulla Parlewar99-119
-
Authentic or not? Art historian's reflections on castle reconstructions in contemporary Poland
Lukasz Mikolaj Sadowski121-130
-
Authenticity in S, M, L, XL scale of Thessaloniki
Sotiria Alexiadou131-144
-
The basis of the theory of conservation as a prerequisite for its application
On the question of empirical knowledge of the practice of conservationVít Jesenský145-156 -
Changes in the status of authenticity in the analysis of the valuation of historical monuments
Karolina Zimna-Kawecka157-177
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
Park Hill is the largest listed building in Europe. Opened in 1961, its design is an innovation on Le Corbusier’s Unité d’Habitation, with horizontal ‘streets in the sky’ at every third level, with duplex apartments extending above and below each access level. It was Britain's first completed scheme of post-war slum clearance and the most ambitious inner-city development of its time.
However, while the development was conceived and opened with great optimism, by the time it was listed in 1998 it was in serious decline, both socially and physically. Unable to finance its refurbishment, Sheffield City Council sold Park Hill to developers for £1 in 2004. With the extensive involvement of Historic England, the subsequent refurbishment has upgraded the buildings and gentrified them, with only a small minority of units being available for affordable housing. The form and much of the physical fabric of the development has been preserved, but its original social significance has arguably been lost.
This paper examines Park Hill in the context of the development of the notion of authenticity from the Venice Charter (1964) through to the Nara Document (1994). The paper concludes that the listing and protection of a building such as Park Hill would not have been possible without the development of the multivalent approach to authenticity in the Nara Document, which forms an essential aspect of the broadened understanding of what constitutes cultural heritage.
Keywords:
References
Australia ICOMOS. (1979). The Australia ICOMOS charter for places of cultural significance (‘Burra Charter’). Australia ICOMOS. https://australia.icomos.org/wp-content/uploads/Burra-Charter_1979.pdf
Banham, R. (1961). Park Hill Housing, Sheffield. Architectural Review, 130(778), 403–410.
Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. Viking.
Falser, M. S. (2010). From Venice 1964 to Nara 1994—Changing concepts of authenticity? In M. S. Falser, W. Lipp, & A. Tomaszewski (Eds.), Conservation and preservation: Interactions between theory and practice: In memoriam Alois Riegl (1858-1905) (pp. 115–132). Edizioni Polistampa.
Founded. (n.d.). Park Hill Type. Retrieved 7 January 2025, from https://www.parkhilltype.com
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.; 2nd, rev. ed.). Sheed and Ward. (Original work published 1960)
Harwood, E. (with English Heritage). (2003). England: A guide to post-war listed buildings (Rev.). Batsford.
Historic England. (2008a). Conservation principles: Policies and guidance for the sustainable management of the historic environment. English Heritage. https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/conservation-principles-sustainable-management-historic-environment/
Historic England. (2008b). Constructive Conservation in Practice. Historic England. https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/constructive-conservation-in-practice/ccdpsweb/
Historic England. (2024a, May 20). Enhanced Advisory Services. https://historicengland.org.uk/services-skills/our-planning-services/enhanced-advisory-services/
Historic England. (2024b, May 20). Park Hill, Sheffield, South Yorkshire | Historic England. https://historicengland.org.uk/services-skills/our-planning-services/enhanced-advisory-services/case-study-park-hill/
Historic England. (2024c, July 10). What are Listed Buildings? How England’s historic buildings are protected | Historic England. https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/what-is-designation/listed-buildings/
ICOMOS. (1964). International charter on the conservation and restoration of monuments and sites. ICOMOS.
ICOMOS. (1994). The Nara document on authenticity. ICOMOS. https://www.icomos.org/charters/nara-e.pdf
Jokilehto, J. (1998). The context of the Venice Charter (1964). Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 2(4), 229–233. https://doi.org/10.1179/135050398793138762 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/135050398793138762
Lewis, D. (1961). Criticism. Architectural Design, 397–398.
National Theatre. (2024). Standing at the Sky’s Edge. https://www.nationaltheatre.org.uk/productions/standing-at-the-skys-edge/
Smith, H. (2023). Demythologising Park Hill, Sheffield: The Hawksmoor Prize Essay 2022. Architectural History, 66, 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/arh.2023.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/arh.2023.11
Smith, I. (2008, April 20). Park Hill, 1908–2008 [Lecture]. https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/us-website-content/Downloads/park-hill/080424_Ivor_lecture.pdf
Smith, I. (2014). Architecture: An inspiration. Matador.
UNESCO. (1977). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO World Heritage Centre. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/opguide77b.pdf
Walter, N. (2024a). Narrative and the legitimacy of change to historic buildings. In Z. Somhegyi & L. Giombini (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Architectural Reconstruction (pp. 107–122). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003334200-11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003334200-11
Walter, N. (2024b). Venice at 60: Article 5 and the Acceptable Limits of Use. Protection of Cultural Heritage, 20, 0–19. https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.6225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.6225
Article Details
Abstract views: 220

