The basis of the theory of conservation as a prerequisite for its application On the question of empirical knowledge of the practice of conservation
Article Sidebar
Open full text
Issue No. 23 (2025)
-
Alternative Views of Authenticity
The Case of Park Hill, SheffieldNigel Walter1-19 -
Understanding Heritage Conservation Challenges in Taiwan: Traditional Chinese Thinking Through Classical Texts
Chih-Wen Lan21-32
-
Evaluating Authenticity in Heritage: A Quantitative Framework
Ayesha Agha Shah, Chandrasekara, Anila Naeem33-60
-
Authenticity between pure theory and practical application – the barrier of words
Adrian Crăciunescu61-82
-
In support of joint action: Methods for the effective cooperation of public authorities and non-conservation experts in the protection of the “modern” monuments of Thessaloniki
Dimitrios Zygomalas83-98
-
Regeneration of urban cultural landscapes
Monisha Jain, Prafulla Parlewar99-119
-
Authentic or not? Art historian's reflections on castle reconstructions in contemporary Poland
Lukasz Mikolaj Sadowski121-130
-
Authenticity in S, M, L, XL scale of Thessaloniki
Sotiria Alexiadou131-144
-
The basis of the theory of conservation as a prerequisite for its application
On the question of empirical knowledge of the practice of conservationVít Jesenský145-156 -
Changes in the status of authenticity in the analysis of the valuation of historical monuments
Karolina Zimna-Kawecka157-177
Main Article Content
DOI
Authors
Abstract
An integral part of theory, a prerequisite for its predictive and explanatory function, is its empirical layer - the generalization, sorting and explanation of empirical findings. The latter are also a guarantee of objective confrontability with the addressed area of reality and, consequently, of the theory's plausibility and applicability. The article deals with the fact that in the theory of conservation the sources of knowledge of the phenomena addressed (the state of conservation) are insufficiently provided and mediated. The analysis of the field practice is unsatisfactory. This is done in a number of forms, but especially by interpreting only subjective experience and also by theoretical research of a qualitative nature. What is absent, however, is empirical research that is quantitative or quantitative-qualitative, ideally on a regional or national scale.
By analysing a range of theoretical writings, both international and domestic (doctrinal documents, articles, concepts and strategies), the causes and consequences of the existing situation are outlined. As a solution, the author proposes the development of broader empirical research in 3 main research areas: analysis of the state and quality (effectiveness) of conservation practice, economic analysis, analysis of the relationship of society to heritage sites. The context of practice research for the needs of field theory are discussed, and the subject of the essay is effectively field metatheory.
Keywords:
References
Bold J., Pickard R. (Eds.).(2018). An integrated approach to cultural heritage – The Council of Europe’s Technical Co-operation and Consultancy Programme.
Clark K. (2019). Playing wit the Past. Exploring Values in The Heritage Practice (p.xvii,xviii). Berghahn.
Council of Europe (2005). Council of Europe Framework Convention on the Value of Cultural Heritage for Society. https://rm.coe.int/1680083746.
The Florence Declaration on Heritage and Landscape as Human Values (2014). https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Secretariat/2015/GA_2014_results/GA2014_Symposium_FlorenceDeclaration_EN_final_20150318.pdf.
Giddens A. (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology (pp. 20-21). John Wiley & Sons.
Harrison R. (2015). Beyond „Natural“ and „Cultural“ Heritage: Toward an Ontological Politics of Heritage in the Age of Anthropocene. Heritage & Society, 8(1), (pp- 24-42).
Hendl J. (2008). Kvalitativní výzkum (2nd, rev. ed.). Praha: Portál.
Heritage A., Golfomitsou S. (Eds.) (2015). ICCROM FORUM on Conservation Science – Position Papers 2015. ICCROM. https://www.iccrom.org/publication/conservation-science.
Heritage A., Iwasaki A., Wollentz G. (2021). Anticipating Futures for Heritage. Anticipating Futures for Heritage. ICCROM. https://www.iccrom.org/sites/default/files/publications/2023-11/anticipating_futures_web_pdf.pdf.
ICOMOS. Charters and other doctrinal texts. https://www.icomos.org/en/resources/charters-and-texts.
Jesenský V. (2017). Co je teorie památkové péče. Zprávy památkové péče, 77(6), (p. 627).
Jesenský V. (2017). Mezinárodní anketa k aktuálním úkolům teorie památkové péče. Zprávy památkové péče 77 (6), (pp. 697-704).
Jesenský V. (2020). How do we know the state of heritage conservation? On the issues of analysis and self-reflection of conservation field. https://www.academia.edu/44790391/How_do_we_know_the_state_of_heritage_conservation_On_the_issues_of_analysis_and_self_reflection_of_conservation_field_prezentace_na_konferenci_ACHS_2020.
Jesenský V. (2021). Co může památková péče získat z critical heritage studies? Zprávy památkové péče (81/3), (pp. 372-380).
Jesenský V. (2023). Vzpomínka na Jukku Jokilehta, Zprávy památkové péče 83 (4), (pp. 372-374).
Jesenský V. (2004). Operativní průzkum a dokumentace nemovitých památek. Doctoral thesis. FA ČVUT, Prague.
Metodické materiály NHI. https://www.npu.cz/cs/pamatkova-pece/o-pamatkove-peci/metodicke-materialy.
Muños Viñas S. (2005). Contemporary Theory of Conservation (p.xii). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
NPÚ (2023). Dlouhodobá koncepce rozvoje výzkumné organizace Národní památkový ústav na léta 2024–2028. https://www.npu.cz/portal/o-nas/veda-a-vyzkum/koncepce-dkrvo/koncepce-vo-npu-2024_2028.pdf.
Popper K. R. (1997). Logika vědeckého bádání (Fiala, J. Trans.). Praha: OIKOYMENH. (Original work published 1934).
Šola T. (2005). What theory? What heritage?. Nordisk Museologi 2005 (2), (p. 7). https://journals.uio.no/museolog/article/view/3311/2873.
Walker M., Marquis-Kyle P. (2004). The illustrated Burra Charter: good practice for heritage places. Burwood: Australia ICOMOS.
Walter N. (2020). Narrative Theory in Conservation. Change and Living Buildings (pp. 130-140 ). Routledge.
Article Details
Abstract views: 134

